Calibration 5
OV 7fdd07a4-4a27-40c3-af92-a0074e6391f5
OV Chr and total CN distributionSNVs in highly amplified region
CITUP-single OV 7fdd07a4-4a27-40c3-af92-a0074e6391f5 Purity is predicted to be low Not many mutations in copy neutral regions Likely clonal, although not enough power to call subclones due to low purity and few mutations CITUP predictions on this sample differs when using Sanger-pipeline CNV calls, which indicates subclonal copy change
OV 7fdd07a4-4a27-40c3-af92-a0074e6391f5
OV 7fdd07a4-4a27-40c3-af92-a0074e6391f5: Summary PhyloWGSPhyloSub
OV 7fdd07a4-4a27-40c3-af92-a0074e6391f5: Cellular prevalence First cancerous population Second cancerous population Third cancerous population PhyloWGSPhyloSub
OV 7fdd07a4-4a27-40c3-af92-a0074e6391f5: SSM distribution First cancerous population Second cancerous population Third cancerous population PhyloWGSPhyloSub
OV 7fdd07a4-4a27-40c3-af92-a0074e6391f5: PhyloWGS tree
OV 7fdd07a4-4a27-40c3-af92-a0074e6391f5: PhyloSub tree
OV– 7fdd07a4 Purity used: 0.46 (from ASCAT) CCFNumber of SVs
OV 7fdd07a4-4a27-40c3-af92-a0074e6391f5
PACA 65d2dbc3-a b246-47a430e66572
CITUP-single PACA 65d2dbc3-a b246-47a430e66572 Purity is predicted to be very high There seems to be at least 1 subclone, possibly more Distribution of mutations to chromosomes seem homogeneous across the sucblones
PACA 65d2dbc3-a b246-47a430e66572
PACA – refit 65d2dbc3-a b246-47a430e66572
PACA 65d2dbc3-a b246-47a430e66572: Summary PhyloWGSPhyloSub
PACA 65d2dbc3-a b246-47a430e66572: Cellular prevalence First cancerous population Second cancerous population Third cancerous population PhyloWGSPhyloSub
PACA 65d2dbc3-a b246-47a430e66572: SSM distribution First cancerous population Second cancerous population Third cancerous population PhyloWGSPhyloSub
PACA 65d2dbc3-a b246-47a430e66572: PhyloWGS tree
PACA 65d2dbc3-a b246-47a430e66572: PhyloSub tree
PACA 65d2dbc3-a b246-47a430e66572 VAF
PBCA edc070db-b f-ae75-4c4012bdc3fe
CITUP-single PBCA edc070db-b f-ae75-4c4012bdc3fe Tumor purity is predicted to be high Not much going on in copy number profile (according to both BB and Sanger) except for a few chromosomes, i.e. the “high purity” is not likely to be explained by missing deletions A cross-check of dbSNP variants (v. June 2015) resulted in 127 matches, but only 43 of them are actually assigned to the clonal population
PBCA edc070db-b f-ae75-4c4012bdc3fe
PBCA edc070db-b f-ae75-4c4012bdc3fe: Summary PhyloWGSPhyloSub
PBCA edc070db-b f-ae75-4c4012bdc3fe: Cellular prevalence First cancerous population Second cancerous population Third cancerous population PhyloWGSPhyloSub
PBCA edc070db-b f-ae75-4c4012bdc3fe: SSM distribution First cancerous population Second cancerous population Third cancerous population PhyloWGSPhyloSub
PBCA edc070db-b f-ae75-4c4012bdc3fe: PhyloWGS tree
PBCA edc070db-b f-ae75-4c4012bdc3fe: PhyloSub tree
PBCA– edc070db Purity used: 0.97 (from ASCAT) CCFNumber of SVs
PBCA edc070db-b f-ae75-4c4012bdc3fe
CITUP-single Combined vs Sanger only Combined Sanger Only