1 CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION AN OVERVIEW OF SECURITY HOUSING UNITS MATTHEW CATE, SECRETARY.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Walter A. McNeil, Secretary Florida Department of Corrections Public Safety and Domestic Security Policy Committee Policy Committee October 6, 2009.
Advertisements

Issues Faced by Juveniles Leaving Custody: Breaking Down the Barriers University of Oregon April 6, 2007 Pat Arthur, National Center for Youth Law.
Washtenaw County Office of The Sheriff Preliminary Proposal Jail Space Expansion.
Issues Facing the Criminal Justice System
1 CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION 2012 National Association of Sentencing Commissions Terri McDonald, Undersecretary, Operations.
 – view prison as brief, inevitable break in one’s criminal career  – take advantage of prison programs to improve future prospects  – withdraw from.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION ASSEMBLY BILL 109 AND HOW IT IMPACTS COUNTIES.
Criminal Justice Process: Sentencing and Corrections 1. Sentencing Options 2. Purposes of Punishment 3. Parole 4. Capital Punishment 5. Corrections.
State of the State (Procurement) – Issues at the State Level Affecting Local Agencies Jim Butler Chief Procurement Officer Department of General Services.
Drug Offender Sentencing Alternative (DOSA): Treatment and Supervision
Objective Point Base Classification Carol Mici Acting Deputy Commissioner Massachusetts Department of Correction.
Public Safety Realignment Local custody for non-violent, non- serious, non-sex offenders Changes to State Parole Local Post-release Supervision Local.
Offender Re-Entry: One Jail’s Perspective Montgomery County Department of Correction and Rehabilitation Wendy Miller-Cochran, LCSW-C Re-Entry Unit Social.
THE IMPACT OF AB 109 ON LAPD. Overview AB 109 impact on the LAPD Statistical information AB 109 impact on LAPD jail facilities Securing the safety of.
Michelle Denton Manager: Forensic MHS Southern and Central Qld PhD Candidate Uni of Qld Andrew Hockey Project Officer “Back on Track”: Transition from.
California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation RELEASE PLANNING CONTINUITY OF MENTAL HEALTH AND AND MEDICAL CARE.
Clear & Cole, American Corrections, 8 th Chapter 10 Incarceration.
Current Issues in Correctional Psychiatry or (if you want to be cynical) …so what else is new? Jeffrey L. Metzner, M.D. Clinical Professor of Psychiatry.
September 20, 2011 Criminal Justice Realignment OCTOBER 1, 2011.
1 Division of Adult Parole Operations MARGARITA PEREZ Deputy Director Enhancing Public Safety through the Successful Reintegration of Offenders.
Probation Operations Department of Corrections GEORGIA House Bill 1176 Implementation Presented by: Jay Sanders Special Assistant to the Director of Probation.
CJPAC Cross-Training August 2010 State of Connecticut Department of Correction.
SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY 2011 PUBLIC SAFETY REALIGNMENT PLAN AUGUST 30, 2011.
Special Prison Populations
The Rhode Island Experience Ellen Evans Alexander Assistant Director RI Department of Corrections.
New York City Jails and Restrictive Housing New York City Jails and Restrictive Housing ASCA/CCHA Training September 11, 2014 Phoenix, AZ Commissioner.
Housing Ex-Offenders: Identifying Barriers and Proposing Solutions Angela Lee ODRC Reentry and Family Program Administrator.
Clear & Cole, American Corrections, 8 th Chapter 6 The Correctional Client.
Snohomish County Sheriff’s Office Special Investigations Unit n 98% of our investigations involve crimes where the victim has been assaulted by someone.
1 All Directors Training All Directors Training Security Threat Group & Administrative Segregation.
Prison Rape Elimination Act PREA A Brief Overview.
Click Here to Add Text This could be a call out area. Bullet Points to emphasize Association for Criminal Justice Research (California) 76th Semi-Annual.
Friends Outside Visitor Center Program. The California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation is legally mandated to contract with a non-profit.
Washtenaw County Office of The Sheriff Preliminary Proposal Jail Space Expansion.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION ASSEMBLY BILL 109 AND HOW IT IMPACTS COUNTIES.
Purpose of Punishment Corrections. Retribution – An eye for an eye; a tooth for a tooth. – Society, through the criminal justice system, taking on the.
Prisons in America Practical Citizenship Unit 5. Security Levels  Three major levels of prison security: –Maximum –Medium –Minimum.
Presentation of Sentence Credits for Persons Convicted of Certain B Felonies Materials to Advisory Commission on the Administration of Justice (NRS )
Sentencing and Corrections. Once Found Guilty, a defendant will be sentenced by a jury or judge.
Type II Workplace Violence in the Federal Bureau of Prisons Jennifer L. Edens, Ph.D. Chief, Behavioral Sciences Programs Department of Justice Federal.
C ORRECTIONS. A. P ROBATION 1. Someone found guilty of a crime remains free under supervision. 2. There are over 3.8 million people on probation. 3.
HB 3194 CRAIG PRINS3/5/14 OREGON CRIMINAL JUSTICE COMMISSION NEVADA ADVISORY COMMISSION ON THE ADMINISTRATION OF JUSTICE.
Violent Crime and Socioeconomic Stressors Virginia Department of Criminal Justice Services 1.
Strategies for Special Populations Ray Roberts, Secretary Kansas Department of Corrections.
Public Safety and Offender Rehabilitation Services Act of 2007 (AB 900) Implementation and Impact on County Mental Health Robin Dezember Chief Deputy Secretary.
PRISON SYSTEM. Are responsible for:  Offenders with sentences of less than 2 years  Incarcerating all offenders  Processing parole applications  Supervising.
California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation Office of Research 1.
OBJECTIVE CLASSIFICATION AR’s 503, 521 & 523. Learning Objectives What is objective classification? What is objective classification? What is the purpose.
Improving Access to Mental Health Services: A Community Systems Approach Leslie Mahlmeister, MBA PhD Student Department of Political Science Wayne State.
© 2015 Cengage Learning Chapter 12 Behind Bars: The Life of an Inmate.
Department of Corrections Joint Judiciary Hearing July 25, 2013.
Youth First Initiative National Survey Results and Analysis.
CLASSIFICATION & RECEIVING OF OFFENDERS CLASSIFICATION DEFINED.
EARLY IDENTIFICATION OF MENTAL ILLNESS IN COUNTY JAILS/DENTENTION CENTERS.
Jessica Neal, Intern Wilmington University.  Protect the public by supervising adult offenders through safe and humane services, programs and facilities.
When Discrimination is Legal: The Social Costs of Felony Convictions
International Legislators Forum: Minnesota Criminal Justice Issues
Running head: Life of prisoners
Graduate School of Social Work
Sing, Sing Correctional Facility, Professor Christine Stymus
CPSS 300 Competitive Success/snaptutorial.com
CPSS 300 Education for Service/tutorialrank.com
Correctional Ministry Matters
24-hours a day 7-days a week 365 days per year
Criminal Justice Process: Sentencing & Corrections
How Unmet Health Needs Affect Reentry of Returning Prisoners and Success in Reintegrating Back into Communities Lois Davis, Ph.D. November 9, 2010.
Canada’s Legal System Grade 9 Social Studies.
California department of corrections
Adult Facilities Minimum Security (Level 1)
Purpose & effectiveness
Presentation transcript:

1 CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION AN OVERVIEW OF SECURITY HOUSING UNITS MATTHEW CATE, SECRETARY

2 SECURITY HOUSING UNITS Security Housing Units (SHU) and Psychiatric Services Units (PSU) are special housing units designated for extending term programming of inmates not suited for general population. –PSU provides secure housing and care for inmates with diagnosed psychiatric disorders not requiring inpatient hospital care with a SHU term –SHU houses inmates whose conduct endangers the safety of others or the security of the institution

3 SECURITY HOUSING UNITS Length of SHU Confinement: –Determinate SHU segregation A determinate period of confinement in SHU is established for an inmate found guilty of a serious offense –Ranges from as low as 2 months for assaulting another inmate to 60 months for a murder of a non-inmate –Indeterminate SHU segregation A validated prison gang member or associate is deemed to be a severe threat to the safety of others or the security of the institution

4 SECURITY HOUSING UNITS There are 3,738 male offenders housed in SHU –1,227 at California Correctional Institution in Tehachapi –1,318 at California State Prison, Corcoran –1,101 at Pelican Bay State Prison in Crescent City –92 at California State Prison, Sacramento County There are 55 female offenders housed in SHU at Valley State Prison for Women 2.5% of the inmate population is housed in SHU

5 SECURITY HOUSING UNITS Of the 3,793 inmates in SHU; 2,239 are gang members or associates PRISON GANGS - SHU BEDS CCICORSACPBSPVSPWTOTAL AB BGF EME ,450 NF NLR NS TS0 TOTALS ,057 2,239

6 GANG MEMBERS IN SHU Current policy is any validated gang member or associate will be housed in SHU In the SHU there are 2,239 gang members and associates –459 members –1,780 associates 59% of the offenders in SHU are there because of their gang affiliation

7 HUNGER STRIKES There has been two hunger strikes in the last six months where inmates in SHU are protesting the conditions of confinement –First hunger strike began on July 1, 2011 Lasting three weeks –Second hunger strike began September 26 Lasting less than three weeks

8 NEW POLICY Transition from gang members and associates to Security Threat Groups (STG) Validation requires (3) source items totaling (10) points –A weighted system where each source has a different point value

9 NEW POLICY Only STG members will be housed in SHU –Members will go through a (4) phase step down program completed within (48) months STG associates will not be housed in SHU unless they have committed a serious violation with a clear nexus to gang behavior

10 RELEASING ASSOCIATES FROM SHU Of the 1,780 associates housed in SHU –509 have not received a serious rule violation in the last 5 years Potentially eligible for review for SHU release –459 have only received (1) serious rule violation in the last 5 years But 169 did not rise to the level of a reportable incident CDCR will review the 1,294 associates that have received a serious violation but if the violation does not have a clear nexus to gang behavior they will be reviewed for potential release from SHU

11 REPURPOSING OF SECURITY HOUSING UNITS Releasing the gang associates from SHU will free up SHU capacity to ensure inmates committing serious violations can now be housed in SHU rather than in ASU Inmates housed in SHU will become behavior based with an ability to transition from the SHU with positive behavior