How offensive can you be? PROF. MR YBO BURUMA SUPREME COURT; FACULTY OF LAW, RADBOUD UNIVERSITYNOVEMBER, 6TH 2015.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
 Dr. Peter Smuk associate professor Széchenyi István University Department of Constitutional Law and Political Science Winter Seminar Law, Politics, Economy.
Advertisements

Freedom of Speech.
Challenges of freedom of speech online Andrej Petrovski, SHARE Defence BalCCon 2k14.
DEFAMATION Torts protecting the reputation. Traditional role of the courts Protection of individuals from the damage that can be caused to the reputation.
DEFAMATION LAW IN IRELAND Augustine O Connell MSc (Comp Sc) MBCS.
Marko Milanovic, University of Cambridge ATHA Training, June 2010.
Denmark and Cartoons of the Prophet Mohammed: Freedom of speech or hate speech? Mandana Zarrehparvar Senior Advisor Danish Institute for Human Rights
Human Rights in Europe - Freedom of expression Human rights - There is no speech nor language, where their voice is not heard: Freedom of expression Pavel.
Motherhood and Apple Pie? Questioning Ethical Regulation in the Social Sciences and Humanities Robert Dingwall, Institute for Science and Society University.
Alison Riley Liceo G.Galilei di Dolo May 12th 2011.
Freedom of expression and freedom of the media
FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION Salanieta Tamanikaiwaimaro (Sala T) - FIJI Controversy Conflict Who determines the balance??? Ethics.
1 st Amendment Freedom of Religion, Speech, Press, Assembly, and Petition.
Chapter 4 section 1 The First Amendment. The First Amendment “ Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the.
1 WHY IS WHISTLEBLOWING IMPORTANT AND ON WHAT PRINCIPLES SHOULD PROTECTIVE LEGISLATION BE BASED? David Lewis, Professor of Employment Law, MiddlesexUniversity,
Current challenges: Ukrainian experience by Olha HERASYMIUK First Deputy Chairman Vilnius
What are the limits? Freedom of Speech is NOT paramount if it impinges upon the freedoms/rights of others.
Vienna Vienna Case study on freedom of expression vs. right to equality Romania.
© PCaW PCaW is an independent charity, founded in We provide: free confidential advice to people concerned about wrongdoing.
Session 3 – Conflicts between the right to equality and the freedom of expression Anne Weber, Dr. iur. International standards of limiting the freedom.
 A. The Indian Act  B. The parliamentary press gallery  C. The values and attitudes of Canadians  D. The rights and freedoms that Canadians believe.
Freedom of Expression. 2 Overview n Definition n Restrictions n Enforcement n Intellectual Property.
1 November 2007Maria Lundberg, NCHR1 HUMR 5503: Human Rights and Counter- Terrorism Limitations National security and Public order.
“Freedom of Media and Data Protection” Workshop within Twinning Project “Implementation of Personal Data Protection Strategy” in Montenegro Hotel Podgorica,
IER How Relevant is European Law to Collective Rights.
Freedom of speech. Freedom of speech is the freedom to speak freely without censorship. The term freedom of expression is sometimes used synonymously,
Access to Public Information in Slovenia Nataša Pirc Musar, LL.B. Commissioner for Access to Public Information The Hague – 24 th -25 th November, 2004.
CHAPTER 4: THE BILL OF RIGHTS Integrated Government.
CENSORSHIP. ICCPR Art. 19 Everyone shall have the right to hold opinions without interference. Everyone shall have the right to freedom of expression,
Freedom of speech Freedom of speech is the freedom to speak freely without censorship. The term freedom of expression is sometimes used synonymously, but.
{ The First Amendment. Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the.
Copyright and Commercial Speech: An Uncharted Relationship UNIVERSITAT POMPEU FABRA Facultat de Dret Ramon Trias Fargas, Barcelona European.
內文 資料來源 FREEDOM OF SPEECH. From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Jump to: navigation, searchnavigationsearch For free Speech in specific jurisdictions,
Freedom of Speech Computers in the World.
International Human Rights Defense Institute of International Legal Studies 1.
Civil Liberties and Civil Rights. Civil Liberties Freedoms upon which the government may not infringe. The Bill of Rights guarantees the rights of individuals.
A QUESTION OF FAITH: RELIGION AND BELIEF IN EUROPE Equinet LWG 2011 Jayne Hardwick Moderator Equinet – Legal Working Group.
EU measures combating hate speech ERIO Conference on combating hate speech against Roma and the role of Equality bodies Brussels 16/10/2015 DG JUSTICE.
Chapter 4.1 The First Amendment. First Amendment Freedoms  The Bill of Rights, added in 1791, protects our civil liberties – the freedoms we have to.
Freedom of expression: underlying principles and sources
Freedom of Expression. Universal Declaration of Human Rights Adopted by the United Nations General Assembly on 10 December 1948 at Paris. The Declaration.
DIVISION OF POWERS UNDER THE CONSTITUTION AND THE FIRST AMENDMENT.
Group C: Banter, jokes, freedom of speech and defamation By: Lendina Hykaj Aliyu Aliyu Zia Ahmed Baran Sezgin Timur Aliev Panashe Makanza.
The Role of Media in a Democracy Dr Greg Simons Department of Eurasian Studies Uppsala University.
Task Two – Suggested Structure By Catherine McSherry.
Gail Davidson. Approved unanimously by the UN General Assembly on December 10,  Article 19 Everyone has the right to freedom of opinion and expression;
Essential Questions: How have courts defined (protected/denied) individual rights over time?
Human Rights Population. Population: Human Rights WHAT ARE HUMAN RIGHTS? Fundamental rights that belong to every person, simply by being a human being.
The First Amendment ESSENTIAL QUESTION How do societies balance individual and community rights?
European Court of Human Rights
Human rights and national security
Ioannis Iglezakis, Associate Professor, Aristotle University
Freedom of Speech.
Treatment of Foreigners under International Law
FREE SPEECH LIMITS.
Freedom of Speech.
Bill of Rights- First Amendment Notes
PRINCIPLES OF DEMOCRACY
MT. 3, LT. 1 – Supreme Court Interpretations of the Bill of Rights
Article 10 – Freedom of expression
Freedom of Religion, Speech, Press, Assembly, and Petition
Proportionality.
Main topic of the mobility: The right to Freedom of Expression
Main topic of the mobility: The right to Freedom of Expression
Freedom of Religion, Speech, Press, Assembly, and Petition
Freedom of Religion, Speech, Press, Assembly, and Petition
Regulation in the Contsitution of the Republic of Poland
Freedom of Speech.
The First Amendment and Protecting the Rights of the Accused
Presentation transcript:

How offensive can you be? PROF. MR YBO BURUMA SUPREME COURT; FACULTY OF LAW, RADBOUD UNIVERSITYNOVEMBER, 6TH 2015

The Supreme Court of the Netherlands

Uncivilized manners A long tradition of uncivilized (rude) behaviour The influx of refugees: harsh and offensive words v. fear of other behaviour Freedom of expression – European Convention of Human Rights Crimes: Offensive, threatening or discriminating speech

Article 10 European Convention Human Rights 1.Everyone has the right to freedom of expression. This right shall include freedom to hold opinions and to receive and impart information and ideas without interference by public authority and regardless of frontiers. (…) 2.The exercise of these freedoms, since it carries with it duties and responsibilities, may be subject to such formalities, conditions, restrictions or penalties as are prescribed by law and are necessary in a democratic society, in the interests of national security, territorial integrity or public safety, for the prevention of disorder or crime, for the protection of health or morals, for the protection of the reputation or rights of others, for preventing the disclosure of information received in confidence, or for maintaining the authority and impartiality of the judiciary.

Freedom of expression … also applicable for words “that offend, shock or disturb the State or any sector of the population”. (ECrtHR Handyside) Limitations are permitted – by law – and might be justified – if necessary. difficult balance between rights and interests of each individual honor, fear, anger about unequal treatment pressing social need: encouraging violence

Criminal law Offensive speech: simple insult, slander, libel (including pictures), false accusations Insulting the King; foreign heads of state; insulting officials (police) Insulting groups (race, religion, sexual preference, physical or mental handicaps) Threats: Simple threats regarding individuals, blackmail, stalking Inciting hatred or discrimination of groups Inciting violence against the authorities Blasphemy: no longer punishable Hindering or disturbing a religious meeting

Political cases An old issue Between : 19 prosecutions for lese majesty Freedom of expression versus criminality Opinion Leaders: the Wilders case and inciting jihad Clear political expressions ‘Stop Islam’ case versus Auschwitzcartoon case Insulting officials: no ‘right to indignation’

Ordinary citizens Harm done Reputation, cyberbullying No harm done An abusive tradion Emotive speech: is it ‘freedom of expression’? Rational beings; usefulness; the political importance of emotion Moral emotions Harm/care & fairness/cheating but also loyalty, authority, sanctity/purity Could and should offensive speech be punished? “Hey baby”