Topics The Cart The Horse Answers to previously asked questions and comments on the comments to said questions Dan Obrecht – University of Missouri.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Measuring Water Pollution
Advertisements

Factors that influence primary producers –biomass, productivity, diversity Light Temperature Flow of water Consumers Scouring action of floods Toxic substances.
Presented to: Reitz Lake Open House July 12, 2005 Randy Anhorn Principle Environmental Scientist Metropolitan Council Environmental Services
EPA’s Guidance on Nutrient Criteria Development
Definition of Eutrophication Developed by Richard Sandford with contributions from Martin Bloxham and Paul Worsfold, Eutrophication in the Sea of Azov.
PowerPoint Development Tool For the Cooperative Lakes Monitoring Program Enabling YOU to make your own presentations.
RICE CREEK CHAIN OF LAKES TMDL. PELTIER LAKE TOTAL PHOSPHORUS MONITORING DATA.
The Lake Allegan/Kalamazoo River Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Plan Implementation by Jeff Spoelstra, Coordinator, Kalamazoo River Watershed Council.
Lakes of Missouri Volunteer Program University of Missouri-Columbia The Missouri’s Lakes and Reservoirs The Missouri Department of Natural Resources Region.
Prioritization Workgroup Summary. Workgroup Topics Nutrient results What is a watershed? What is a TMDL? Prioritization methods Basin framework and management.
Predicting Taste and Odor Events: Is it Possible? Andrew R. Dzialowski Department of Zoology Oklahoma State University Donald Huggins Central Plains Center.
Factors that Affect Productivity in Wintering Lakes: An Analysis of Lake Zones and Snow Depth Kristen Kernan Winter Ecology- Spring 2012.
Limnology 101 Dan Obrecht MU Limnology
Evaluation of Volunteer Data – The Lakes of Missouri Volunteer Program Review Daniel V. Obrecht Anthony P. Thorpe John R. Jones Department of Fisheries.
09/17/02City of Aurora Treatability Index Provides Operational Guidelines By Pam Benskin & Kevin Linder City of Aurora, CO.
©2010 Elsevier, Inc. Chapter 18 Trophic State and Eutrophication Dodds & Whiles.
Physicochemical indicators of water in Durowskie Lake.
James River Chlorophyll Study Status Update: January 2015 House Agriculture, Chesapeake and Natural Resources Committee David K. Paylor, DEQ Director.
Looking Inland: Ohio Reservoir Water Quality Joe Conroy Fisheries Biologist Inland Fisheries Research Unit.
Trophic Classification of Lakes Created by Diane Gravel.
Purposes and Ideas Behind the Project Esau – I have a interest in a career that involves natural resources. Austin – I am a new student at Wildlands this.
Developing Nutrient Criteria – Divide and Conquer! Dan Obrecht, MU Limnology.
Nutrient Standards – Where will they lead? OWEA / WEF Webinar February 24, 2011 Dan Dudley, Ohio EPA Division of Surface Water.
Phytoplankton Translates from Greek “free-floating plants”
Missouri Nutrient Criteria Plan Mark Osborn October 20, 2005.
GG313 Lecture 8 9/15/05 Parametric Tests. Cruise Meeting 1:30 PM tomorrow, POST 703 Surf’s Up “Peak Oil and the Future of Civilization” 12:30 PM tomorrow.
Analyzing Stream Condition Using EMAP Algae Data By Nick Paretti ARIZONA PHYCOLOGY ECOL 475.
The Supplies The Product eutrophication: nutrient-driven stimulation of plant growth; contrast natural and cultural eutrophication; phosphorus is most.
Effects of Drought on Lake Almanor Water Quality
Pomme de Terre Lake Water Quality Summary Pomme de Terre Lake Water Quality Summary US Army Corps of Engineers Environmental Resources Section.
Lake user surveys in West Virginia Evan Hansen West Virginia Rivers Coalition November 3, 2004.
PowerPoint Development Tool For the Cooperative Lakes Monitoring Program Enabling YOU to make your own presentations.
The Utility of Spatially Explicit Parameters in Phosphorus Water Quality Monitoring Graduate Student: Mark Breunig Graduate Advisor: Dr. Paul McGinley.
Concerns about the Current Approach to Nutrient Criteria.
Nicole Reid, Jane Herbert, and Dean Baas MSU Extension Land & Water Program W. K. Kellogg Biological Station Transparency tube as a surrogate for turbidity,
Nutrient Criteria for the plains regions of Missouri.
LAKE ECOLOGY Unit 1: Module 2/3 Part 1- Introduction January 2004.
Use of remote sensing in monitoring algal blooms in inland water bodies Anabel A. Lamaro Fortaleza 1-
Water Quality Short Course April 11, 2007 Lake and Reservoir Dynamics Dan Obrecht – UMC
Ecosystems. Ecosystem Ecology Ecosystem ecology is the study of how energy and materials are used in natural systems.
Bear Lake Association. Agenda Quality of Bear Lake – Sam Lake survey results Treatment plans Zebra mussels update Lake water levels Lake quality readings.
Reservoir and Lake Nutrient Criteria A Different Approach D.V. Obrecht, J.R. Jones & M.K. Knowlton – MU Limnology.
Adem.alabama.gov ADEM’s Monitoring Summary Reports Alabama – Tombigbee CWP Stakeholders Meeting Montgomery, Alabama 3 February 2010 Lisa Huff – ADEM Field.
Lake Independence Phosphorus TMDL Critique Stephanie Koerner & Zach Tauer BBE 4535 Fall 2011.
Steps for the Development of a Model: The case of the Historical Phosphorus Loading Model By Helen Carr.
CIV 913 Environmental Assessment and Sustainability
Planning to use Volunteer Data: Have we put the cart before the horse? Bev Clark Ontario Ministry of the Environment Dorset Environmental Science Centre.
Nutrient Criteria Development for Lakes: Minnesota’s Approach & Timeline Steve Heiskary, Research Scientist III Minnesota Pollution Control Agency Environmental.
Phosphorus Stressor in Lake Champlain Basin Alison Nord, Anna Speed, Ashley Murphy.
Abstract Man-made dams influence more than just the flow of water in a river. The build up of sediments and organic matter, increased residence times,
WATERSHEDS Concepts and Curriculum Review LAKE MONITORING AND ANALYSIS Tony Thorpe and Dan Obrecht Lakes of Missouri Volunteer Program – Univ. of Missouri.
High Rock Lake Nutrient Modeling Update Pam Behm - NC Division of Water Resources Environmental Management Commission Water Quality Committee Information.
Aquatic Ecosystem Overview: We need to understand the physical (e.g. hydrodynamics) and chemical environment that ultimately control the productivity,
Follow Up from the last Nutrient Criteria Meeting Dan Obrecht – UMC Limnology.
Monitoring Land Change is the South John Coulston Team Leader: Methods & Techniques Research USDA Forest Service, Southern Research Station, Forest Inventory.
Landscape exports of phosphorus and their effects on aquatic ecosystems Val H. Smith Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology University of Kansas.
To be responsible protectors of the environment Falling Creek Reservoir Volunteer Monitoring Data Summary 2003 Falling Creek Reservoir Preservation Society.
Nutrient Criteria for Reservoirs – A Review of Missouri’s Proposed Approach Daniel V. Obrecht Dept. of Fisheries and Wildlife Sciences University of Missouri.
Lake Restoration Using Aeration and Alum: When Watershed Management is Not Enough Patrick Goodwin Research Biologist M.S. Lake Management Candidate.
Lakes Where are the world’s largest lakes?.
Aquatic Ecosystem Overview:
Classification of Lakes
Water Chemistry of Local Lakes
Public Meeting February 19, 2009
Classification of Lakes
Lakes of Missouri Volunteer Program
Missouri Nutrient Criteria Development
Evaluation of Proposed Controls Over Baseflow Phosphorus Concentrations in Wadeable Streams in Wisconsin Graduate Student: Mark Breunig Graduate Advisor:
The Impact of Water Clarity on Home prices in Manitowoc County
Lake Water Quality PLA Meeting August 17, 2019.
Presentation transcript:

Topics The Cart The Horse Answers to previously asked questions and comments on the comments to said questions Dan Obrecht – University of Missouri

The Cart Carlson’s TSI =

Carlson’s Trophic State Index TSI Secchi (m) TP (ug/L) CHL (ug/L)

“My purpose here is to present a new approach to the trophic classification of lakes.” “It should be emphasized that the number generated is only an index of the trophic status of a lake and does not define the trophic status.”

The Current Ozark Criteria AdvisoryActionTSI value Oligotrophic Mesotrophic Eutrophic 60 65

The Current Ozark Criteria AdvisoryActionTP level Oligotrophic Mesotrophic Eutrophic

O-M M-E / E-H Comments and Reference World-wideVollenweider (1968) World-wideWetzel (1975) North AmericaCarlson (1977 and per com) North AmericaReckhow and Chapra (1983) South OntarioDillion and Rigler (1975) USAPorcella et al. (1980) MO ReservoirJones and Knowlton (1993) Sweden Forsberg and Ryding (1980) Green Bay of Lake Michigan Auer et al. (1986) Current Ozark Criteria Trophic Cut-Points based on Total Phosphorus from Nurnberg (1996)

Number of Ozark Reservoirs in each Trophic Category TSI Cut-PointsMO Reservoir Cut-Points Oligotrophic1310 Mesotrophic1823 Eutrophic2220 Includes all Ozark Reservoir.

Which criteria is the most appropriate? Which criteria is the easiest to incorporate into the rationale?

An oligotrophic reservoir is defined as having 12 micrograms per liter or less total phosphorus, which correlates to a Carlson Trophic State Index value of 40, as calculated using the following formula: TSI = * ln(TP) A TSI value of 40 is generally accepted as the cut-point between oligotrophic and mesotrophic classifications in systems where phosphorus is the nutrient limiting algal biomass and algal biomass is the dominant factor influencing water clarity. The TSI was developed using data from an assortment of lakes including Lake Superior and Crater Lake.

An oligotrophic reservoir is defined as having 10 micrograms per liter or less total phosphorus based on criteria developed for Missouri reservoirs with data from Missouri reservoirs.

Discuss, Debate & Decide?

The Horse

Is the proposed approach legitimate?

Answers & Comments on Comments

What is the minimum number of samples needed?

Answer 3 or 4 samples during the summer does a fairly decent job of estimating the mean phosphorus level (± 15%). You would have to increase the sample size to ≥6 to improve precision to ± 10%. Extending monitoring beyond the summer would require a greater sampling effort.

Comments on Comments Spatial variability on the horizontal axis Spatial variability on the vertical axis Sampling of outflow TP

What statistical tests will be used?

This question can be expanded into three different questions. 1) How will the criteria be generated? 2) How will the TP values that are compared to the criteria be generated? and 3) How will we compare the two numbers? 1)We are still figuring out how to generate the criteria. 2)Geometric mean of 4 summer samples. 3)I’m not sure, but we will have to take year-to- year variability into account when making the comparisons.

How will algal blooms be determined as excessive in relation to aquatic life?

Answer I don’t know. This is part of the problem with defining impairment – it is at best difficult to do.

Comment of Comments According to Downing et al. (2001) 10 ug/L chlorophyll is the point where the risk of having blue-green algae dominate the algal population starts to increase in natural lakes. If chlorophyll >10 ug/L it does not mean blue-green algae will be dominant, and it certainly does not mean that you will have taste and odor problems.

How to separate the influence of inorganic suspended solids from that of chlorophyll when Secchi transparency is the response variable?

Answer You can’t

Smithville -1996

Comment of Comments As pointed out in Tony’s response – diatoms are algae.

Will Reference Lakes be used?

Answer We don’t have reference lakes, we have reservoirs.

Theory behind Reference Lakes You have a lake that was once oligotrophic but isn’t anymore. You sample a reference lake that hasn’t been impacted to see what water quality is like. You try get water quality in impacted lake to resemble water quality in the un- impacted reference lake.

Why doesn’t it work in Missouri? Most reservoirs were built into landscapes that had already been altered. Most reservoirs have probably not seen a dramatic change in water quality – they were eutrophic when they were created. Reservoirs were built knowing that they will “age” faster than natural lakes and have a life span that may not be more than 100 years.

Forest 9420 acres 67% 3% 12,400 acre/feet 0.4 times/year 23 ug/L Watershed area Forest land cover Ag land cover Volume Flushing Index Total Phosphorus

Forest 9420 acres 67% 3% 12,400 acre/ft 0.4 times/yr 23 ug/L Watershed area Forest land cover Ag land cover Volume Flushing Index Total Phosphorus Grindstone* 13,400 acres 5% 55% 3,270 acre/ft 1.9 times/yr 147 ug/L * Dam completed in 1990

DISSCUSSION