C&I 212 Dr. Brown. Federal Role in Education  Bill of Rights (10th Amendment)  Morrill Acts  Smith-Hughes Act (1917), George-Barden Act (1946)  GI.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Newport News Public Schools Information on Title I Funding
Advertisements

No Child Left Behind The reauthorization of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA), also known as the “No Child Left Behind Act,” will have.
Race to the Top Discussion Points to determine LUSD’s interest in participating in the State program January 7, 2010.
1 Overview: What is “No Child Left Behind”?. 2 Reauthorization of Elementary and Secondary Education Act (“ESEA”) of ’65 Money to states for specific.
No Child Left Behind Act © No Child Left Behind Act ©Kristina Krampe, 2005 EDS 513: Legal Issues in Special Education.
No Child Left Behind Act January 2002 Revision of Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA) Education is a state and local responsibility Insure.
Before IDEA One in five children with disabilities was educated. One in five children with disabilities was educated. More than 1 million children with.
ESEA FLEXIBILITY WAIVER Overview of Federal Requirements August 2, 2012 Alaska Department of Education & Early Development.
EDU 221.  Group Presentation Reflections due for 7 & 8  Quiz #2 (Tuesday, Nov. 16 th ) – Problem- based ◦ What makes an outstanding response? Referring.
2011 Bridge to Excellence Master Plan Annual Update Review Division of Student, Family, and School Support Office of Finance Division of Academic Reform.
ESEA FLEXIBILITY WAIVER RENEWAL Overview of Proposed Renewal March 6, 2015 Alaska Department of Education & Early Development.
“Political Education: National Policy Comes of Age” Christopher T. Cross Chairman, Cross & Joftus, LLC.
Nebraska Department of Education Focus on Effective Instruction and Student Learning Revised Standards and NeSA Nebraska’s P-16 Effort Federal Agenda Fiscal.
Module 4 TED 356 Curriculum in Sec. Ed.. Module 4 Explain the current official federal and state standards, including professional and accrediting groups.
SAVING AND CREATING JOBS AND REFORMING EDUCATION U.S. Department of Education June 12, 2009.
Elementary and Secondary Education (ESEA) Law NO CHILD LEFT BEHIND.
No Child Left Behind and Students with Disabilities Presentation for OSEP Staff March 20, 2003 Stephanie Lee Director, Office of Special Education Programs.
Subtitle 1003(g) School Improvement Grants April 2, 2012.
Federal Program Monitoring and Support Division Charlotte Hughes, Director Donna Brown, Section Chief.
DECEMBER 10, 2014 MARK SASS EDUCATION REFORM. GOALS FOR TODAY Overview of three main pieces of legislation that impact our practice NCLB RTT SB 191 Philosophical.
Springfield Public Schools Adequate Yearly Progress 2010 Overview.
MEASURES OF COLLEGE AND CAREER READINESS AND SUCCESS July 16, 2013.
Florida’s Implementation of NCLB John L. Winn Deputy Commissioner Florida Department of Education.
FY RACE TO THE TOP
Standards The Achievement Gap The Debate Continues.
Title I Parent Information Session Applegate School Laura Donovan School.
U.S. Department of Education Reform Agenda Overview April 2010.
Title I 2010 Spring Admin. Meeting Spring Title I Administrative Meeting Maryland State Department of Education April 13-14, 2010 Presented by: Maria E.
CHANGES IN FEDERAL ACCOUNTABILITY FOR SCHOOLS BEGINNING IN
Pennsylvania’s ESEA Flexibility Proposal PAFPC Conference Summary of comments made by Amy Morton, Executive Deputy Secretary Pennsylvania Department of.
March 12, Common Core Standards  K-12  Feedback by April 2, 2010, and finalized early spring.  Professional.
Title I and Families. Purpose of Meeting According to the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, schools are required to host an Annual Meeting to explain.
ESEA Flexibility: Overview Maryland Accountability Program Presentation 1 of 8.
5/13/10 National Expectations for Learning in Arts Education A brief look at what has come before and how educational context shapes the work ahead.
1 No Child Left Behind for Indian Groups 2004 Eva M. Kubinski Comprehensive Center – Region VI January 29, 2004 Home/School Coordinators’ Conference UW-Stout.
Pennsylvania’s ESEA Flexibility Proposal May 23, >
School Accountability in Delaware for the School Year August 3, 2005.
Annual Student Performance Report September
No Child Left Behind Education Week
No Child Left Behind. HISTORY President Lyndon B. Johnson signs Elementary and Secondary Education Act, 1965 Title I and ESEA coordinated through Improving.
No Child Left Behind No Child Left Behind  NCLB Overview  Assessment and Accountability Requirements  Educator Quality.
August 1, 2007 DELAWARE’S GROWTH MODEL FOR AYP DETERMINATIONS.
Title I What Parents Need to Know!. What is Title I? Title I is a program that provides funds from the federal government to improve student learning.
Race to the Top Application State Board of Education Meeting January 6, 2010 January 6, 2010.
From the Board Room To the Classroom PDK Panel Discussion September 19, 2002.
ESEA Federal Accountability System Overview 1. Federal Accountability System Adequate Yearly Progress – AYP defined by the Elementary and Secondary Education.
Wyoming Valley West Technology Evaluation John Sharkus Ed. 585.
An Affiliate of the U.S. Chamber of Commerce Primer on NCLB Reauthorization Implications from Federal Stimulus Programs September 20, 2010.
NCLB. Introduction Increased federal mandates and requirements on states Increased federal funding to states by almost 25% from the previous year Movement.
Springs 2006 and 2007 Adequate Yearly Progress Results Potential Challenges with 2008 Annual Measurable Objectives & District Corrective Action.
Neo-Conservative Ideas Berliner and Biddle ( ) Neo-conservative “centrist” thought won out in school reform. Main approaches to school reform: Get.
Coordinator’s Academy Local District 6 Program Improvement Thursday October 27, 2005.
Presented by: Frank Ciloski, Sherry Hutchins, Barb Light, Val Masuga, Amy Metz, Michelle Ribant, Kevin Richard, Kristina Rider, and Helena Shepard.
1 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) U.S. Department of Education Adapted by TEA May 2003 Modified by Dr. Teresa Cortez for Riverside Feeder Data Days February.
US Government Mrs. Lacks ON THE ISSUES: EDUCATION.
The Every Student Succeeds Act Highlights of Key Changes for States, Districts, and Schools.
Overview: Every Student Succeeds Act April ESEA in Ohio In 2012, our state applied for and received a waiver from provisions of No Child Left Behind.
The Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA): A Briefing for Alaska Lee Posey State-Federal Relations Division National Conference of State Legislatures.
Presented By: Kealee Paulsen, Chelsea Varney, Zoë Brown, McKenna Marshall.
Aim: Does the US need to reform the educational system? Do Now: Make a list of the best aspects of the education you receive and make a list of the worst.
ICN, December 18, 2009 Agenda  DE Updates  January Workshops  AEA Snapshots  Sustaining and Increasing Capacity  Next Steps.
CHANGES IN FEDERAL ACCOUNTABILITY FOR SCHOOLS BEGINNING IN Central Susquehanna Intermediate Unit.
Kansas Association of School Boards ESEA Flexibility Waiver KASB Briefing August 10, 2012.
Types of Statewide Assessments Currently Used in Grades 3-8.
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP)
No Child Left Behind.
Analysis of No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB)
RACE TO THE TOP: An Overview
NSTA Summer Congress July, 2002
EDN Fall 2002.
Presentation transcript:

C&I 212 Dr. Brown

Federal Role in Education  Bill of Rights (10th Amendment)  Morrill Acts  Smith-Hughes Act (1917), George-Barden Act (1946)  GI Bill (1944)  National Defense Act (1958)  Anti-discrimination acts (1964, 1972, 1973)  ESEA – Title I (1965, IASA 1994, NCLB 2001)

NCLB Rationale  Close achievement gaps between students of different economic, racial, ethnic backgrounds  Students should learn from highly qualified teachers  All students should graduate from high school and achieve high standards  Schools should be safe and drug free

NCLB Principles  Accountability Measure yearly progress of all students State-created standards Adequate yearly progress (AYP) Highly Qualified Teachers  Research-based instruction “scientifically-based” research  Local control and flexibility Can use 50% of fed $ to other programs  Parental options Parents may transfer students to other schools

AYP Basics  Criteria: Math and reading assessment, test participation rate and other (attendance/graduation rate)  Baseline was set by each state in 2001, with 12 years to achieve goal Test Scores: 40% (2003) – 100% (2014) Participation: 95% Graduation Rate: 65% (2003) – 85% (2014)  All subgroups (larger that 45 students) must meet AYP or a subgroup may increase by 10% (Safe Harbor)  Example; Illinois AYP Information; AYP Awards ExampleIllinois AYP InformationAYP Awards

AYP Success and Failure  Success is “rewarded”  Failure: Published Improvement plan Professional development  2 years of failure: (Academic Early Warning) All of the above Students can transfer within the district  3 years of failure: (Academic Early Warning 1) All of the above Supplemental education  4 years or more: (Academic Watch 1, 2, 3+) Restructuring, replace staff, turn over operation to the state (5 years)

Race to the Top - Overview  Newest Federal Education initiative  Competitive grants to states  $20 - $700 Million (depending on state)  Phase 1: Tennessee and Delaware ($820 million total)  Phase 2: 10 states awarded ($3.4 billion)  Illinois was a finalist in both phases  “Phase 3”: 7 state were awarded funds Illinois will receive $43 million.

Race to the Top – Reform Areas  Adopting standards and assessments that prepare students to succeed in college and the workplace and to compete in the global economy;  Building data systems that measure student growth and success, and inform teachers and principals about how they can improve instruction;  Recruiting, developing, rewarding, and retaining effective teachers and principals, especially where they are needed most; and  Turning around our lowest-achieving schools.