MICE LH2 Absorber Safety Mary Anne Cummings Edgar Black (IIT) Abingdon, UK Oct. 30, 2003.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

1 AFSWG Mtg 15 Aug 2003 Elwyn Baynham RAL Safety Overview Work done by RAL Group Contributors Elwyn Baynham Tom Bradshaw Iouri Ivaniouchenkov.

Advertisements

MICE RF and Coupling Coil Module Outstanding Issues Steve Virostek Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory MICE Collaboration Meeting October 26, 2004.

Feb. 9, 2002 Mucool FNAL LH2 Absorber R & D Mary Anne Cummings NIU Illinois Consortium for Accelerator Research (IIT, NIU, UC, UIUC), U Miss Oxford U.

MICE OsC – 22 nd June 2010 Liquid-hydrogen system and absorber M Hills T Bradshaw M Courthold S Ishimoto W Lau I Mullacrane P Warburton.

1 MICE Hydrogen System Elwyn Baynham, Tom Bradshaw, Iouri Ivaniouchenkov RAL MICE / RAL Safety RAL, 30 October 2003.

Vacuum Vessel Production Readiness Review

1 Cooling the Hydrogen (Helium) Absorbers with Small Coolers Michael A. Green University of Oxford Department of Physics Oxford OX1 3RH, UK MICE Video.

Magnet Cooldown Scheme 17 th February 2012 Roy Preece (STFC RAL)

Magnet quench during a training run Magnet electrical circuit schematic PROGRESS ON THE MODELING AND MODIFICATION OF THE MICE SUPERCONDUCTING SPECTROMETER.

Hydrogen Hazard Summary and Preliminary FMECA and HAZOP Yury Ivanyushenkov Elwyn Baynham Tom Bradshaw.

LH2 Absorber Design Mary Anne Cummings MICE Safety Review LBL Dec 9, 2003.

Progress on the MICE Cooling Channel Solenoid Magnet System

The issue: A non-standard thin window design  No closed form expression for maximum stress vs. volume pressure  FEA (finite element analysis): geometry.

MICE LH2 Operating Parameters Mary Anne Cummings MICE October ‘02 LBL Oct. 24, 2002.

1 Update on Focus Coil Design and Configuration M. A. Green, G. Barr, W. Lau, R. S. Senanayake, and S. Q. Yang University of Oxford Department of Physics.

MICE RF Module Safety Steve Virostek Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory MICE Collaboration Meeting February 12, 2005.

The structural and Fluid flow analyses of the Hydrogen Absorber Window for the Muon Cooling collaboration project Presented at the MICE meeting at IIT.

MICE Engineering Integration Update August 13, 2003 Edgar L. Black IIT.

1 MICE Absorber working group Columbia, 13 June 2003 MICE Hydrogen System. Preliminary HAZOP. Elwyn Baynham, Tom Bradshaw and Iouri Ivaniouchenkov,

MICE Safety System DE Baynham TW Bradshaw MJD Courthold Y Ivanyushenkov.

MICE AFCSWG Safety Review Summary Mary Anne Cummings Dec. 17, 2003 MICE Video Conference.

Absorber/vacuum windows and absorber assembly 1.Window Requirements 2.MICE experimental constraints 3.Welded vs. non-welded windows 4.Installation 5.Testing.

Flammable Gas Electrical Safety Concerns for detectors: Power per channel Feedthroughs Seals.

MTA Cryostat & cooling loop design Christine Darve Fermilab/Beams Division/ Cryogenic Department/ Engineering and Design Group Preparation of the Mucool/MICE.

Safety Review: RF Issues Derun Li Absorber Safety Review December 9-10, 2003 Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Berkeley, CA

LH2 Absorber Heat Load and Homeostasis. What has happened before… 1.Huge LH2 volumes, low heat deposition: Bubble chambers 2.Small LH2 volumes, low heat.

11/26/2002Edgar L Black IIT MICE Video Conference November 27, 2002 Summary of safety implementation for proposal.

Talk outline 1 st talk: –Magnetic forces –Quench in the absorber cryostat 2 nd talk: –Shielding of magnetic fringe fields.

LH2 Absorber Design Mary Anne Cummings MICE Safety Review LBL Dec 9, 2003.

1 Superconducting Magnets for the MICE Channel Michael A. Green Oxford University Physics Department Oxford OX1-3RH, UK.

MICE Hydrogen System Implementation Tom Bradshaw Elwyn Baynham Iouri Ivaniouchenkov Jim Rochford.

March 14, 2003 MICE Absorber/Coil Integration MICE LH2 Absorber 1.Assembly 2.Safety 3.Staging 4.Instrumentation.

AFC Module Meeting Friday - May 21, 2004 Report on the Window burst test Edgar Black IIT.

1 Infrastructure at RAL Iouri Ivaniouchenkov, RAL MICE Collaboration CERN, 29 March 2003.

LH2 Absorber Design Mary Anne Cummings MICE Safety Review LBL Dec 9, 2003.

Mucool LH2 Absorber Progress and Pauses Mary Anne Cummings FNAL August 12, 2002.

Hydrogen R&D system HAZOP and failure analysis Yury Ivanyushenkov, Elwyn Baynham, Tom Bradshaw, Mike Courthold, Matthew Hills and Tony Jones.

12 March 2006NFMCC Meeting, IIT, Chicago1 Progress on the MICE Cooling Channel and Tracker Magnets Michael A. Green Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory.

1 Progress on the MICE Cooling Channel Magnets Michael A. Green Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory 28 June 2005.

Overview of Experiment and Parameter Choices presented by Giles Barr.

MICE Hydrogen System Design Tom Bradshaw Iouri Ivaniouchenkov Elwyn Baynham Columbia Meeting June 2003.

Absorber Design Details Mary Anne Cummings MICE MEETING Columbia June 13, 2003.

MICE Hydrogen System MICE Collaboration Meeting, CERN, 29 March-2 April 2004 Elwyn Baynham, Tom Bradshaw, Yury Ivanyushenkov Applied Science Division,

MICE hydrogen review Summary of system hardware. System function To provide 22 litres of liquid hydrogen for use as a muon absorber within a superconducting.

Progress on the MuCool and MICE Coupling Coils * L. Wang a, X. K Liu a, F. Y. Xu a, A. B. Chen a, H. Pan a, H. Wu a, X. L. Guo a, S. X Zheng a, D. Summers.

MICE CM February 08Jean-Sébastien GraulichSlide 1 Detector DAQ Hardware Status o Introduction o Preliminary list o Plan for action o Summary Jean-Sebastien.

Edgar L. Black MUCOOL ADVANCED M.T.F. & M.I.C.E. LAYOUTS August 12-13, 2002 Edgar L. Black IIT.

M. A. C. C. NFMCC UCLA Jan 31, 2007 LH2 Absorber Status Mary Anne Cummings NFMCC UCLA January 31, 2007 Muons, Inc.

Hydrogen system R&D. R&D programme – general points Hydrogen absorber system incorporates 2 novel aspects Hydrogen storage using a hydride bed Hydrogen.

Conceptual Design Review of the NPDGamma Experiment in Beam Line 13 Seppo Penttila NPDGamma project manager September 25, 2007 at SNS.

LH2 Absorber Review 1.R&D Motivation 2.Windows (absorber and vacuum) 3.Absorber manifold designs and flow tests 4.System integration 5.Near term plans.

LH2 Absorber Program and Plans Mary Anne Cummings MUTAC Review FNAL Jan 14, 2003.

Spectrometer Solenoid Fabrication Status and Schedule Steve Virostek Lawrence Berkeley National Lab MICE RAL October 20, 2008.

Issues with variable thickness absorbers Iouri Ivaniouchenkov, RAL MICE Video Conference, 22 Jan

MCTF 8/17/06 A. Bross MTA Activities and Plans MCTF August 17, 2006 A. Bross.

Magnet vacuum vessel w/radiation shield and cold mass in place Magnet leads (left) and the three cryocoolers on the top of the spectrometer solenoid service.

MICE: The International Muon Ionisation Cooling Experiment MOPLT106 Abstract The provision of intense stored muon beams would allow the properties of neutrinos.

LH2 Safety Issues for MICE 1.O2/LH2 separation 2.No Ignition sources near LH2 3.Adequate ventilation 4.Affects: Windows: absorbers and vacuum Primary and.

56 MHz SRF Cavity Thermal Analysis and Vacuum Chamber Strength C. Pai

CM27 – 8 th July 2010 LH2 System Progress and Future Plans M Hills T Bradshaw M Courthold I Mullacrane P Warburton.

Apr MUTAC 2005 LH2 Absorber Window R & D Program Mary Anne Cummings MUTAC Review LBL April 26, 2005.

Spectrometer Solenoid Fabrication Update Steve Virostek Lawrence Berkeley National Lab NFMCC at LBNL January 25, 2009.

1 Small Coolers for MICE Michael A. Green University of Oxford Department of Physics Oxford OX1 3RH, UK MICE Collaboration Meeting RAL.

Date 2007/Sept./12-14 EDR kick-off-meeting Global Design Effort 1 Cryomodule Interface definition N. Ohuchi.

Working group meeting 07/05/15. Agenda Overview of review and current action list Relief system – Summary of problem – Details of analysis, testing and.

NPDG Liquid Hydrogen Target: Design and Safety Features

FIRST VIDEO CONFERENCE JANUARY 7, 2004 Edgar L. Black IIT

Small Coolers for MICE MICE Collaboration Meeting RAL Michael A. Green

Linac Test Area Instrumentation

Linac Test Area Instrumentation

Presentation transcript:

MICE LH2 Absorber Safety Mary Anne Cummings Edgar Black (IIT) Abingdon, UK Oct. 30, 2003

Design considerations Emittance eqn: coolingheating So, minimizing beam heating term by minimizing and maximizing L R.  The design features of a cooling channel: 1)Hydrogen (lowest Z, highest L R ) for the cooling medium. 2)Thin windows for the hydrogen absorbers. 3)LH2 absorbers placed in large magnetic fields. additionally… 4) RF between LH2 absorbers to restore forward momentum : Muons through matter can actually focus!  xx zz P1P1 P2P2    absorber accelerator absorber P1P1  Multiple scattering RF cavity

Liquid Hydrogen Safety For safe operation, have designed with the redundant requirements: 1)LH2 and O2 separation 2)The avoidance of any possible ignition sources in the vicinity of the hydrogen. The four key features of the design with respect to safety are: 1)The window thicknesses specified based on safety factors of 4.0 for the absorber window and 2.5 for the vacuum window at maximum allowable working pressure (MAWP). 2)An argon-gas-filled jacket surrounding the vacuum chambers of the RF/coupling magnet modules and the hydrogen absorber/focusing magnet modules to minimize the possibility of oxygen leaking in and freezing on the absorber-system windows. 3)Separate vacuum volumes provided for the RF cavities, magnets, and LH 2 absorbers. 4)Hydrogen evacuation systems using valved vents into external buffer tanks.

MICE Cooling Channel Design Other safety concerns: 1)Magnet quenching, LH2 absorber stability 2)Any instrumentation must be “instrinsically safe” 3)Sufficient shielding from detectors/RF 4)Robust, simple failsafe systems Compact environment

Absorber/Coil Assembly Sufficient venting into evacuation tank Secure plumbing attachments Stable and repeatable placement of LH2 absorber inside magnet bore

Experiment Installation Accessibility in a compact, sealed environment Certification of Windows-Absorber-Coil Assembly Accurate component placement LH2 absorber Coil Hydrogen storage ISSUES:

Photogrammetry: Non-contact measurement of strain by calculating displacement Photogrammetry ~1000 points Strain gages ~ 20 “points” Shape measurement at FNALPressure tests at NIU LH2 Window R & D

Absorber window test results Discrepancies between photogrammetry and FEA predictions are < 5% Performance measurement (photogrammetry) 1. Room temp test: pressurize to burst ~ 4 X MAWP (25 psi) 2. Cryo test: a) pressure to below elastic limit to confirm consistency with FEA results b) pressure to burst (LN2 temp) ~ 5 X MAWP from ASME:UG 101 II.C.3.b.(i) Window # Test temp. FEA resultsTest results Minimum window thickness (mm) Rupture pressure (psi) Window thickness from CMM (mm) Measured rupture pressure (psi) 1293K K K K * Cryo test 4 burst tests:

Certification procedures Windows to be tested/certified independently: both vacuum and absorber Pressure tests of assembled absorber manifold Assembly inside vacuum containment vessel or magnet bore Survey of absorber position inside magnet Cryo pressure test after absorber installation Pressure test of vacuum vessel after installation Nitrogen/argon purge of absorber and vacuum before LH2 fill and vacuum area evacuation. Safety valve tests

Vacuum Windows FNAL Requirements: 1.Burst test 5 vacuum windows at room temp. to demonstrate a burst pressure of at least 75 psid (~5 bars) for all samples. (pressure exerted on interior side of vacuum volume). 2.Non-destructive tests at room temperature: a.External pressure to 25 psid (~1.7 bars) to demonstrate no failures: no creeping, yielding, elastic collapse/buckling or rupture b.Other absorber vacuum jacket testing to ensure its integrity Internal pressure: burst at 83 psi No buckling at 1 st yield (34 psi) Vacuum “bellows” window (34 cm diam):