Review of NEPA Documents (A.K.A. - EPA's 309 Review Process)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA).
Advertisements

SAFETEA-LU Efficient Environmental Review Process (Section 6002) Kelly Dunlap.
Managing Development in the Coastal Zone: Federal Policy Session Name: Managing Development in the Coastal Zone: Federal Policy Coastal Hazards Management.
Introduction to EIS/EA Managing the Environmental & Project Development Process Presented by the Ohio Dept. of Transportation.
Federal Environmental Policy: A Summary Overview
NEPA Environmental Procedure Pam Truitt, Grants Management Consultant  September 4, 2014.
40 CFR REGULATIONS FOR IMPLEMENTING PROCEDURAL PROVISIONS OF NEPA Legislative vs. Discretionary Timelines - Agency Requirements for Implementing.
Presented to: 2010 Airports Conference By: Sue McDonald With slides by Tom Klin, CH2M HILL Date: March 3, 2010 Federal Aviation Administration Cumulative.
The Role of State, Local and Tribal Governments in the Federal NEPA Process Presented by Susan E. Bromm Director, Office of Federal Activities United States.
FOIA and NEPA Federal Highway Administration Environmental Conference June 2006.
Conference on Environmental Assessments in Federations A Montana Perspective September 14, 2009 Tom Livers, Deputy Director Montana Department of Environmental.
Historical Background to NEPA Early 60’s – Congress starts to consider growing pollution problem Early 60’s – Congress starts to consider growing pollution.
Dod deputy general counsel Environment, energy and installations
Chapter 8: Landscape Evaluation and Land Use Earth scientists as part of evaluation team provide info on: F site history (previous use) F physical and.
Negotiating the NEPA Maze: It Really Is Rocket Science Start.
Chapter 24.  Federal and state governments have enacted environmental protection laws  To contain the levels of pollution  To clean up hazardous waste.
Connecticut Department of Transportation Bureau of Policy & Planning.
L O N G B E A C H, C A. Ryk Dunkelberg Barnard Dunkelberg & Company Roles Of Sponsor, Consultant and FAA During NEPA Process L O N G B E.
Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement Experimental Permits COMSTAC Stacey M. Zee October 25, 2006 Federal Aviation Administration.
The National Environmental Policy Act
Page CDBG Recipients' Workshop Community Finance Division NEPA Environmental Procedures.
EPA!!!!.  One of the first laws ever created to protect the environment  Came into effect due to public concern about the deteriorating human environment.
© 2004 West Legal Studies in Business, a Division of Thomson Learning 24.1 Chapter 24 Environmental Law.
Chapter 25 Environmental Protection and Global Warming.
Is NEPA Preventing Energy Development? Bryan Hannegan, Ph.D. Associate Director – Energy and Transportation White House Council on Environmental Quality.
Carrin Williams.  Purity of Waters Act  To assure supplies of clean drinking water  Clean Streams Law  To protect the streams from pollution.
Chapter 45 Environmental Protection and Global Warming.
What does an Environmental Professional Do?
I Larry Heil, FHWA October 15, 2003 Environmental Streamlining.
1 Overview of National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA)  Objective: Clarify the roles of NEPA and Negotiated Rulemaking Clarify the roles of NEPA and Negotiated.
The National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), Clean Water Act, and Clean Air Act Presented by Scott Weir, Air Quality Coordinator Kickapoo Tribe in Kansas.
L O N G B E A C H, C A. Dean McMath Regional Environmental Programs Manager FAA – Southwest Region NEPA Essentials Selected Special.
NEPA Public Review and EPA’s Mandate from Section 309 CAA
CHAPTER 3 SCOPING AND AGENCY COORDINATION. Scoping - the procedure for determining the appropriate level of study of a proposed project/activity - process.
CHAPTER 1 FOUNDATION. 1.1 National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) “An act to establish a national policy for the environment, to provide for the establishment.
NPS Energy Summit January 21-23, 2002 EPA Presentation Cindy Cody Director, NEPA Program EPA Region 8 (303)
SAFETEA-LU Section 6002 “ Efficient Environmental Reviews for Project Decisionmaking”
Integrating Other Laws into BLM Planning. Objectives Integrate legal requirements into the planning process. Discuss laws with review and consultation.
U N I T E D S T A T E S D E P A R T M E N T O F C O M M E R C E N A T I O N A L O C E A N I C A N D A T M O S P H E R I C A D M I N I S T R A T I O N State.
NEPA Environmental Procedure Pam Truitt, Grants Specialist  September 10, 2015.
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Decision Authority l All permit decisions, scope of analysis, 404(b)(1), mitigation, alternatives, jurisdiction -- Corps.
1 Concerned Citizens of Mason County OVERVIEW of ADAGE SEPA PROCESS State Environmental Policy Act Lead Agency - Mason County Department of Community Development.
The National Environmental Policy Act and Oil and Gas Development in Region 8 WESTAR Oil and Gas Conference October 22, 2008.
© 2004 West Legal Studies in Business A Division of Thomson Learning 1 Chapter 24 Environmental Law.
1 NEPA Public Review and EPA’s Mandate from Section 309 CAA Chapter 2 Module 4 HO # 4 & 5.
1 CDBG and Environmental Review For Local Officials.
© 2009 Barnes & Thornburg LLP. All Rights Reserved. This page, and all information on it, is the property of Barnes & Thornburg LLP which may not be reproduced,
Chapter 39 Environmental Law. 2  Under what common law theories may polluters be held liable?  What is an environmental impact statement? What is the.
Effects Analysis and Comparison. Objectives Accurately determine which impacts need to be evaluated in the land use plan. Develop a matrix comparing the.
NRC Environmental Reviews for Uranium Recovery Applicants and Licensees James Park (301)
Margaret Byrne, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
Prentice Hall © PowerPoint Slides to accompany The Legal Environment of Business and Online Commerce 5E, by Henry R. Cheeseman Chapter 25 Environmental.
Managing the Environmental & Project Development Process Presented by the Ohio Department of Transportation NEPA&CEQ.
United States Department of Interior Bureau of Land Management Winnemucca District Draft Resource Management Plan and Draft Environmental Impact Statement.
U.S. Section International Boundary and Water Commission Rio Grande and Tijuana River Flood Control Projects Programmatic EIS.
Executive Order Environmental Stewardship and Transportation Infrastructure Project Reviews Priority Issues.
National Environmental Policy Act An established US national policy Draft Year: 1969 Amendment Years: Section amended May 27, 1986 “Environmental.
Business Law and the Regulation of Business Chapter 46: Environmental Law By Richard A. Mann & Barry S. Roberts.
Essentials of the legal environment today, 5e
National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA)
National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA)
National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA)
Unit 6 NEPA.
Consultation (C) After approval of the EIS, FONSI, or CE designation, the applicant shall consult with the Administration prior to requesting any major.
National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA)
National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA)
National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) Ryo Ishikawa
Clean Air Act of 1963 By: Brian Bae Period 4.
Federal EIS Air Quality Analysis
Chapter 45 Environmental Protection and Global Warming
Presentation transcript:

Review of NEPA Documents (A.K.A. - EPA's 309 Review Process)

EIS Review Process Section 102 of NEPA: All federal agencies can review EISs Section 309 of the Clean Air Act: EPA must review all EISs, and publish findings in the Federal Register Public input/review is a vital component of the EIS process

Important EPA Review Concerns Water quality Air quality Ground water/sole source aquifers Wetlands Hazardous waste issues Environmental Justice Cumulative impacts

EPA's EIS Rating System Project: LO = Lack of Objections EC = Environmental Concerns EO = Environmental Objections EU = Environmentally Unacceptable Document: 1 = Adequate EIS 2 = Insufficient Information 3 = Inadequate EIS Adverse ratings (EU & 3) require Headquarters approval

Recent EPA Adverse Ratings

Referrals to CEQ Action, at Final EIS, is environmentally unacceptable because of: ► possible violations; ► severity, duration, or geographical scope of impacts; ► availability of environmentally preferable alternative(s); or ► importance as a precedent Section 309 of the Clean Air Act expands EPA's referral authority to any matter

Referrals by Agency 27 Referrals since 1970

Referrals to CEQ Possible CEQ Actions Conclude the matter has been resolved Send matter back for further coordination Publish findings/recommendations Submit matter to the President for resolution Project cannot proceed until referral is resolved