Meeting Data Needs of CWA NPDES Program Through a Modernized PCS Michael Stahl, Director Office of Compliance Office of Enforcement and Compliance Assurance.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

NetDMR Electronic DMR Reporting

Advertisements

Rhode Island DEM’s Workplan Reporting Project EPA Innovations Conference Denver, Colorado January 2006 Thomas D. Getz -Presenter Kien Harris – IT Project.

Utah Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (UPDES) Utah Sewer Management Program (USMP)

0 1 Environmental Management Systems (EMS) Overview and Status of EMS Projects Road Ecology Meeting February 26, 2009.

EPA Plans for Moving Forward with Electronic Reporting David Hindin, US EPA May 31, 2012 General Session for the Exchange Network National Meeting Philadelphia,

What is it and what can it do for me?

Webinar: EPA’s Environmental Enforcement Data August 10, 2011.

Electronic Reporting: ICIS Data Publishing Presented by: Alison Kittle, U.S. EPA Elisa Willard, Colorado Department of Public Health & Environment Roy.

National STORET Users Conference Environmental Information Exchange Network Andrew T. Battin, Director Information Exchange & Services Division Office.

Energy & Materials Flow & Cost Tracker (EMFACT) Terri Goldberg, NEWMOA.

NPDES Electronic Reporting: Notices of Intent and Discharge Monitoring Reports Moderator: Andy Battin, U.S. EPA Presented by: John Dombrowski, U.S. EPA.

Financials – Phase II Kick-Off Meeting September 11, 2008 Brenda Bolander, State Comptroller Michael Grisser, Project Manager.

NAPHSIS Making EVVE a Reality by Garland Land NAPHSIS Executive Director.

Developing Final Phase II WIPs and Milestones Katherine Antos Chesapeake Bay Program Office Jenny Molloy Water Protection Division DC Draft Phase II WIP.

Objectives: 1) Participants will become familiar with General Supervision Monitoring Plan Section of the Kansas Infant Toddler Services Procedural Manual.

Certification & Training Assessment Group History & Current Activity North Central Region Pesticide Education & Certification Workshop June 2002.

Regulations that Protect Clean Water Jocelyn Mullen, P.E. PART 2 OF PRESENTATION Presented at The Water Course January 27, 2010 Mesa County Water Association.

Water Supply Planning Initiative State Water Commission November 22, 2004.

Introduction to the Exchange Network January 9 th, 2012.

1 The Exchange Network: A Tool for Better Environmental Management Doreen Sterling, Director Information Exchange & Services Division Office of Environmental.

1 Environmental Information Exchange Network - Principles and Components Molly O’Neill, State Director, Network Steering Board Pat Garvey, EPA Director,

STATUS OF ECOLOGY’S DRAFT FLOW BLENDING POLICY WATER QUALITY PARTNERSHIP MEETING January 20, 2005.

WQ Partnership September 5 th,  26 grant and loan programs  1,138 active agreements totaling $954M as of June 2012  450 new grant and loans totaling.

Phase II WIP Background & Development Process Tri-County Council – Eastern Shore June 2,

Electronic Reporting: Notices of Intent and Discharge Monitoring Reports Moderator: Andy Battin, U.S. EPA Presented by: John Dombrowski, U.S. EPA Alison.

Connecting Stovepipes: The Toxics Release Inventory (TRI) Experience February 13, 2008 Larry Reisman For Conference Purposes Only.

NetDMR Greg Nudd, P.E. Texas Commission On Environmental Quality April 18, 2006.

COMPLIANCE MONITORING and INSPECTIONS Or, how to run an effective program through an adequate field presence.

RCRAInfo May 6, RCRAInfo: What is it? The national (mission critical) information system that supports the RCRA Subtitle C program. A national.

EPA Plans for Moving Forward with Electronic Reporting David Hindin, US EPA May 31, 2012 General Session for the Exchange Network National Meeting May.

CIWQS Review Phase II: Evaluation and Final Recommendations March 14, 2008.

ICIS Hardware/Software Environments – Discussion January 22, 2015.

THE HOW’S AND WHY’S BEHIND THE WPLCS REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT Turning WPLCS into PARIS.

1 US EPA Straw Proposals for Modifying the 12/2005 draft Policy Statement Jim Hanlon, Director Office of Wastewater Management, OW Expanded Steering Committee.

ASTRA Update Sunflower Project Statewide Management, Accounting and Reporting Tool (SMART) February 12, 2009.

1 The Resource Workgroup’s RIDE Data Entry Estimate Model Expanded Steering Committee Meeting December 11-12, 2006 Betsy Smidinger US EPA/OECA.

1 What Program Requirements Drive Data Needs James Hanlon, Director Office of Wastewater Management Office of Water US EPA Expanded Steering Committee.

1 Overview of EPA Straw Proposals to Reduce State Burden and EPA’s Reactions to States’ Alternative Approaches David Hindin, Director Enforcement Targeting.

Compliance Monitoring and the Integrated Compliance Information System Getting the most out of ICIS 2/2007 NPDES Inspector Workshop.

1 Electronic DMRs: Key to Burden Reduction and Improved NPDES Program Management David Hindin, Director, Enforcement Targeting and Data Division Office.

1 Quick Update for NOB On ICIS-NPDES and Possible NOB Role NOB Conference Call September 13, 2006 David Hindin Office of Compliance, OECA.

1 ICIS 2.0 Status and FY2007 Plan Senior Enforcement Managers Meeting Denver October 11, 2006 David Hindin Michael Stahl Office of Compliance, OECA.

Electronic Reporting: ICIS Data Publishing Presented by: Alison Kittle, U.S. EPA Elisa Willard, Colorado Department of Public Health & Environment Roy.

1 Quick Update on ICIS-NPDES (PCS Modernization) David Hindin, U.S. EPA Director, Enforcement Targeting and Data Division August 30/31, 2005 State EPA.

AFS Overview, the Universal Interface, and AFS Modernization Plans Network Operations Board (NOB) Meeting October 25, 2006 David Hindin, Director Enforcement.

1 The Changing NPDES Enforcement and Compliance Program The Program The Policies ICIS-NPDES David Hindin, U.S. EPA Director, Enforcement Targeting Data.

Integrated Compliance Information System (ICIS) and the Exchange Network David A. Hindin, Director Enforcement Targeting and Data Division Office of Compliance.

ICIS-NPDES: PCS Modernization Background Briefing for Catherine McCabe, OECA’s Deputy Assistant Administrator December 29, 2005 Attendees: DH, MS, CM and.

1 Brief Update on ICIS-NPDES (PCS Modernization) David Hindin, U.S. EPA Director, Enforcement Targeting and Data Division October 26, 2005 SHORTER VERSION.

ICIS-NPDES: PCS Modernization Background Briefing for Granta Nakayama October 7, 2005.

1 EPA RIDE Review Expanded Steering Committee Meeting December 11-12, 2006 Betsy Smidinger USEPA/OECA R equired I CIS-NPDES D ata E lements.

1 Indiana Department of Environmental Management Budget Presentation FY

STREAMLINING STORM WATER PERMIT IMPLEMENTATION THROUGH USE OF AN INFORMATION MANAGEMENT SYSTEM April 8, 2004 Presented by John W. Hart 30 th Environmental.

DRAFT USEPA Office of Compliance Update: 90 CWA Action Plan, State Review Framework, & OECA National Priority Selection Presentation to NACAA Chris Knopes.

1 Understanding the ICIS-NPDES Policy Statement Betsy Smidinger, Deputy Director Enforcement Targeting and Data Division Office of Compliance Office of.

Question to Answer? What is eDMR Why eDMR? Who can use eDMR? What are advantages of eDMR? How does eDMR work? How can facilities sign up?

Sustain Noblesville Committee September 19, 2011 Thomas W. Easterly, P.E., DEE, QEP Commissioner, Indiana Department of Environmental Management.

Clean Water Act Significant Noncompliance De-Mystified Presentation for Federal Facilities Managers by Michael Barrette Enforcement Targeting and Public.

THE NEW CLEAN WATER ACT E-REPORTING RULE: WHAT ELECTRONIC DATA REPORTING AND SHARING MEAN FOR YOUR OPERATIONS By: Damien M. Schiff Principal Attorney Pacific.

NPDES Electronic Reporting Rule

Compliance Monitoring Activities State Inspections

Building a Phase III WIP for Wastewater, Stormwater & Septic Systems

Single Event Violations

Redefinition of Scope Presenter: Darrin Polhemus

Transitioning into Prime Pilot Phase & Implementation Phase

ICIS-NPDES Expanded Steering Committee Meeting EPA Opening Remarks

Understanding EPA’s FY National Compliance Initiative: Reducing Significant Noncompliance with CWA-NPDES Permits U.S. Environmental Protection.

Energy & Materials Flow & Cost Tracker (EMFACT)

Presentation transcript:

Meeting Data Needs of CWA NPDES Program Through a Modernized PCS Michael Stahl, Director Office of Compliance Office of Enforcement and Compliance Assurance U.S. EPA February 13, 2006

2 Purpose of Presentation Provide a common level of understanding about status and challenges of PCS modernization

3 Integrated Compliance Information System: Phases and Delivery Time Frames Integrated Compliance Information System: Phases and Delivery Time Frames Air Facility System (AFS) Interface with Facility Registry System (FRS) Federal Enforcement Docket System Phase I Phase II Phase III / Regional Tracking Systems Modernized Permit Compliance System (PCS) Completed and Launched June 2002 Interface with Data Integration Tools (e.g., IDEA)

4 Legacy PCS Today One of the Agency’s largest and most complex systems  In continuous operation, maintenance and enhancement mode since 1975  Contains over 30 million records, 6 to 7 million transactions/year  Supports second largest data collection effort in the Federal government -- Discharge Monitoring Reports (DMRs)  Contains data for approximately 715,000 NPDES permitted parameters  Large and diverse universe of EPA and state users (over 1,000)  Used by 20+ states as primary system to manage their NPDES programs, plus additional states use system to assist in management of the program  Data publicly available through Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requests and EPA websites

5 Supports EPA and state management of the NPDES Program:  Permit Tracking: Tracking of inventory, permit events, permit issuance and re-issuance  DMR Non-Receipt Tracking: Automatic determination of non-receipt and completeness of Discharge Monitoring Reporting data  Violation Detection: Automatic determination and resolution of violations and manual detection of Single Event Violations per regulations Quarterly Noncompliance Report (CWA 40 CFR )  Loadings: Determining the waste load on a stream from a discharger and any additional load over their permit limit  Compliance Monitoring and Enforcement Actions: Tracking of the types and numbers of inspections (scheduled and actual) and enforcement actions taken Legacy PCS Today: Key Functionality

6 ICIS-NPDES (PCS Modernization): The Need to Modernize  Legacy PCS has been FMFIA Agency Level Weakness since 1999 Modernizing PCS is key component of remedying this weakness  Legacy PCS does not support several NPDES program areas ICIS-NPDES will support the collection, and use of, data to help EPA and states manage new and evolving program areas:  Storm Water  Combined Sewer Overflows (CSO)  Sanitary Sewer Overflows (SSO)  Concentrated Animal Feeding Operations (CAFOs)  Biosolids  Pretreatment  Effluent Trading Policy  Legacy PCS uses old technology and is not user-friendly  ICIS-NDPES will provide secure, easier access via web-based desktop tools

7 Decommission & Re-engineer 3. Detailed Design (System Specifications) 4. System Development (Technical Specifications and Programming) 6. Operations & Maintenance (Admin. & Enhance) System Life Cycle 5. System Implementation (System Test, Install & Accept) 1. Concept Definition (Reconnaissance) 2. General Design (Requirements Analysis) ICIS-NPDES (PCS Modernization): Where We Are...

8 ICIS-NPDES (PCS Modernization): States’ Role and Participation Gathering Requirements from Users  PCS Modernization Concept Workshops  24 state participants representing 18 states  Regional and HQ participants  General Design Requirements Gathering Workshops (1998-Apr 2000)  42 state participants representing 26 states  Participants from all 10 regions and HQ (OW, OECA)

9  Six NPDES Data Requirements Workgroups ( Oct 2001-May 2002)  36 state participants representing 21 states  Participants from 10 regions and HQ (OW, OECA, OEI) Core NPDES ProgramBiosolids CAFOsPretreatment CSO/SSOStormwater  Five NPDES Design Workgroups (Oct 2002-Sept 2003)  27 state participants representing 14 States  37 regional and HQ (OW, OEI, OECA) participants Background ProcessingReports Business RulesScreens Data Flows ICIS-NPDES (PCS Modernization): States’ Role and Participation

10 NPDES Data Requirements completed September 2002  Developed with input from data requirements workgroups  Draft sent out to all states, ECOS and ASIWPCA for review in May Detailed Design (1,600 page document) completed September 2003  Based on input from Design Workgroups  Over 888 comments received and addressed from 21 states, 7 regions and EPA HQ (OW, OECA, OEI) document review Software Technical Specifications (16,000 pages) completed September 2004 Software Development completed September 2005 ICIS-NPDES (PCS Modernization): Progress to Date

11 Schedule for Direct Users January – February 2006  User Acceptance Testing February – March 2006  Training March 31, 2006  Wave 1 : Live operations for 7 Direct User NPDES states and all federal Enforcement and Compliance users  Region 1 (New Hampshire, Massachusetts, Rhode Island), Region 2 (New York), Region 3 (Maryland, DC), Region 5 (Indiana)

12 June 2006  Wave 2: Live operations for the remaining 7 Direct User states  Region 2 (Puerto Rico, Virgin Islands), Region 6 (New Mexico), Region 8 (Utah), Region 9 (Hawaii), Region 10 (Alaska, Idaho) August 2006  Wave 3: Live operations for all remaining Direct User NPDES states to include territories and tribes Schedule for Direct Users

13 Schedule for Indirect Users (Batch) July 2005  ICIS-NPDES Schemas have been reviewed and approved for posting on Exchange Network website Spring 2006  NPDES Batch Transmission Independent Review to evaluate applicability of lessons learned from the IDEF, PCS flat files, and network flows to the ICIS-NPDES Batch functionality Summer 2006  Develop a detailed plan for the ICIS-NPDES Batch release (funding dependent)

14 EPA has taken and is taking many actions to reduce the burden associated with the expanded data elements, including:  Designing a new system that makes manual data entry much easier  Working to make sure that states can easily flow data to the new system using the National Environmental Information Exchange Network  Supporting creation of electronic DMRs  Draft ICIS-NPDES Policy Statement provides 3 years for states to meet new data entry requirements What is EPA doing to help states get ready?

15  Using OEI and OECA grant programs to help states prepare for ICIS-NPDES  FY OECA grants were awarded, totaling $1.87 million 6 OEI Exchange Network grants included ICIS-NPDES activities (totaling $1.65 million)  FY OECA grants, totaling $1.7 million 7 OEI Exchange Network grants included ICIS-NPDES activities, totaling $2.83 million eDMR multi-state grant awarded ($750K)  FY2006 Anticipate continued support in both grant programs What is EPA doing to help the states get ready?

16 What is the ICIS-NPDES Policy Statement? Existing PCS Policy Statement was issued in 1985 The ICIS-NPDES Policy Statement:  Establishes ICIS-NPDES as the national database of record for the CWA NPDES program  Sets forth the data entry needs associated with ICIS-NPDES

17 Why Do We Need the ICIS-NPDES Policy Statement? ICIS-NPDES, the modernized system, will change many of the current data management practices for PCS  The NPDES Program has new data needs  Web interface system allows for more decentralized data entry  Ability to track and report on the entire NPDES universe  Desktop access

18 What Is the Role of the Expanded Steering Committee? Many of the items raised by ECOS in summer 2005 are under the ICIS-NPDES Policy Statement:  DMR reporting  Reporting burden  Electronic data exchange to ICIS-NPDES Continuing and preserving the work done to date by the PCS Steering Committee while adding the ECOS and ASIWPCA perspectives The Expanded Steering Committee has to address the difficult issue of resources in moving forward with the CWA NPDES program

19 What Do We Need to Accomplish in 2 Days? Enhance open lines of communication between all parties involved Identify issues that need continued discussion to determine options for resolution Determine a specific path/process for moving forward on those issues Long-term… Finalize the ICIS-NPDES Policy Statement by September 2006