EAC Voting System Certification Process (Test Plan) - 3/21/05

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Standards Development and Approval Process Steve Rueckert Director of Standards Joint Guidance Committee WECC Leadership Annual Training Session Salt Lake.
Advertisements

The Allegation An allegation may be submitted by : Any Person. An allegation may be filed with the PLSB through: The Department of Education A Public.
4/25/20151 The Code-Making Process National Electrical Contractors Association.
THE STANDARDS DEVELOPMENT PROCESS STEP 1 PUBLIC AND COMMITTEE PROPOSAL STAGE PUBLIC AND COMMITTEE PROPOSAL CLOSING DATE FIRST TECHNICAL COMMITTEE MEETING.
[INSERT APPLICABLE REGIONAL ENTITY NAME/LOGO] [ENTITY NAME] [FUNCTION CERTIFYING] Certification [LOCATION] – [DATES OF ON-SITE VISIT] [Presenter Name,
Maine Board of Tax Appeals 1. What we are: An independent Board of three individuals appointed by the Governor to resolve controversies between Taxpayers.
Mitigation and Extenuating Circumstances
Utilization Review Update Durham Center Access February 23, 2011.
Procurement.
Systems Training for HQMC Installations and Logistics Department, Contracts Division (LB) October 24, 2013 Warrant Application System.
Section 29 Education Act, 1998 Appeal Process. Grounds for Appeal Exclude a pupil permanently Suspension of 20 days in any one school year Refusal to.
The Shifting Sands of TPD Carl Casey-Nelnet Ron Stroud-TG Barbara Wilhelm-USA Funds.
Subrecipient Monitoring. A formal binding legal agreement between your institution and another legal entity A portion of your sponsored project's.
SER Organisation and Governance Dr Sue Doran Company Secretary and Head of Certification.
Voting System Qualification How it happens and why.
LAFCO Procedures: There’s a Lot Going On Behind the Scenes Roseanne Chamberlain Executive Officer Amador LAFCO Staff Workshop April 3, 2008.
TAC July 2, 2003 Market Design Implementation Process Recommendation.
Prepared by Raúl Z. Moreno 4290 E. Ashlan Ave Fresno, CA Phone (559) Website.
State of Georgia Sole Source Webinar January 22, 2009.
Secretary of State Voting System Security Standards Juanita Woods Secretary of State Elections Division HAVA Information Security.
Laboratory Accreditation as a Component of the Help America Vote Act Mary H. Saunders Chief, Standards Services Division.
ASME C&S Training Module B7 MODULE B - PROCESS SUBMODULES B1. Organizational Structure B2. Standards Development: Roles and Responsibilities B3. Conformity.
Prepared by Raúl Z. Moreno 4290 E. Ashlan Ave Fresno, CA Phone (559) Website.
MARCH 9, 2006 Boating Safety and Enforcement Grant Program Regulations Stakeholder Workshop Proposed Conceptual Regulations Department of Boating and Waterways.
Campaign Plan Assignment One: District Research GOVT Spring 2015.
The TNI National Environmental Laboratory Accreditation Board Update Daniel Hickman, NELAP Board Chair.
Test Plans, Test Cases, and Test Reports
Making every vote count. United States Election Assistance Commission EAC Voting System Certification TGDC Meeting December 9-10, 2009.
TREE REMOVAL POSTING PROCESS On-site posting on site (yellow sign) and website 5 Working Days Building Permit Application and Tree Removal Plans (sent.
MOA-Track Updates Certified Professional Training October 27, 2015.
Decision Making Process Program Planning and Control Deana Hackfeld Management Systems Office November 17, 2006.
County LOGIN to DLGF Apps County IT Session June 30, : :00 a.m. IGC Auditorium 302 W. Washington St. Indianapolis, IN
31 2. Form 470: Starting the Application Process.
Page  ASME 2013 Standards and Certification Training Module B – Process B7. The Appeals Process.
Certification and Validation Process NPIVP Workshop - March 03, 2006.
COMET Working Group Progress Report. Contents of Report Provide COMET Recommendations, with May 6 revisions (Vote) –Competitive Meter Approval Process.
1 User Pays Non-Code Services – Contract Change Process Summary A Contract Change Proposal (CCP) is submitted. The Contract Change Register (CCR) is updated.
1 Addendum FALL 2004 RFP Detailed Instructions for Bidder Registration and Proposal Submission ENTERGY SERVICES, INC. November 2004.
Equal Employment Opportunity (EEO) Division of Immigration Health Services FY 2010.
Board of Education Public Charter School Application Review Process Virginia Board of Education April 21, 2010.
ISO 9001:2015/14001:2015 Certification Transition Process
I.C. § LIBRARY EXPANSION September Two Options (I.C. § ) Expansion of Library District May Occur by: Legislative Body Passing Resolution.
TEXAS NODAL (ERCOT REVISIONS)
COCE Institutional Review Board Academic Spotlight
Regional Skills Forum 2016:
Current Stakeholder Timelines for Issues Needing a Rapid Response
End User Process Help - (Canada)
End User Process Help - (Canada)
FLOWSHEET FOR APPEALS Application for appeal received
Implementation Strategy July 2002
Overview of the FEPAC Accreditation Process
Standards and Certification Training
IBC Review Pathway Approximate Timeline Online status Online“Sub”State
GMAS Preproposal Entry
INCUBATION PROCESS AT SIIF
[INSERT APPLICABLE REGIONAL ENTITY NAME/LOGO]
ASSISTANCE DOGS INTERNATIONAL ACCREDITATION PROCEDURES 2018
Standards and Certification Training
MODULE B - PROCESS SUBMODULES B1. Organizational Structure
Proposal Phase Draft & Review Phase Approval Phase
Colorado state university-pueblo policy and administration (PA)
MODULE B - PROCESS SUBMODULES B1. Organizational Structure
How did we do it? Case examples from AIC
DRAFT - FOR REVIEW PURPOSES ONLY
Vince May Atlanta, Georgia July , 2010
Standards Development Process
I’m doing a project; how do I know if I need to go through the IRB?
The Code-Making Process
Charter School Legislation HB 1390 and SB 737.
Step 3. Initiate Proposal
Presentation transcript:

EAC Voting System Certification Process (Test Plan) - 3/21/05 VSTL EAC PRB/PRP TDP from vendor Accepts TDP Application to EAC Application processed & number issued Application number and acknowledgement from EAC Draft Develop Test Plan Lead Reviewer est.. review time & recommends reviewers Process to PRB Test Plan Est. date for completion of Test Plan review. Assignment of Peer Review Panel (PRP) Acknowledgement & review time. PRP Review Test Plan Disapprove System Testing, notification of est. test time to EAC Approve Approve//Disapprove Test Plan Notification

EAC Voting System Certification Process (Test Report) - 3/21/05 VSTL EAC PRB/PRP System Testing Lead Reviewer est. review time & recommends reviewers Process to PRB Test Report Assignment of Peer Review Panel (PRP) Acknowledgement w. est. date for completion of Test Report review. VSTL Draft PRP Review of Test Report.. (10 business days) Disapprove Approve/Disapprove Test Report VSTL action Disapproved with reason Approve Disapprove Submit Report with Recommendation Preparation of Tally Vote VSTL action Approve VSTL action? NO Tally Vote Yes VSTL receipt Certification and System Number Final Test Report to Vendor

Draft EAC Voting System Request for Interpretation Process - 3/21/05 PRB Stakeholder EAC Need for clarification of Voting Systems Guidelines Receipt and acknowledgement of request. Assessment of response time Acknowledge request, issue tracking number Request for interpretation Tracking number Accept/Deny request for interpretation Draft DENY Notification of rejection ACCEPT Stakeholder action Review request, expert analysis as necessary PRB interpretation , documentation & recommendation Notification of “No” vote on Interpretation NO Tally vote YES Documented interpretation for public record Clarification of Voting Systems Guidelines

Vendor/VSTL/Stakeholder EAC Voting System Appeal Process - 3/21/05 Vendor/VSTL/Stakeholder EAC PRB NO Certification Interpretation Appeal of EAC decision Appeal letter w. application number, etc. Acknowledgement w. est. date for completion of appeal. Draft Appeal review by full PRB Acknowledgement Decision on appeal No certification/clarification NO Change Tally Vote Recommendation on appeal YES Certification and system number, revised guidance/interpretation EAC Certified voting system Guidance Interpretation

EAC Peer Review Board/Peer Review Panel – 3/21/05 Peer Review Board (PRB): Serving EAC under contract 12- 15 members Lead reviewer 5-6 reviewers experienced in computer technology and the election process. 6-9 subject matter experts. (Security, Cryptography, Accessibility, Usability etc.) Serves as review body for Appeals Process. Draft Peer Review Panel (PRP): Subset of PRB selected by Lead Reviewer for each certification application. 1-2 reviewers and subject matter experts as necessary. Estimates review times for all Test Plans and Test Reports prior to review. Document results of all reviews and actions. All members subject to performance review by EAC.

Draft EAC ITA Accreditation Process – 3/23/05 ITAs EAC Prepare Letter of Intent, provide NASED Accreditation letter, notice of material changes, etc. Acknowledge Letter of Intent Receive acknowledgement Review ITA Documentation Draft Resolve Issues Resolve Issues Recommend approval Prepare Tally Vote package including certificate for signature Tally Vote & certificate signing Receive Certificate of Accreditation List ITA on EAC Register & post to website