NECAP Presentation for School Year 2012-2013 March 26, 2014 1.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Data Warehouse What is a Data Warehouse? MAISA Definition Michigan Association of Intermediate School Administrators (supported by MSBO-Michigan School.
Advertisements

Dudley-Charlton Regional School District 2009 MCAS Information October 2009.
Narragansett Elementary School Report Night Gail Dandurand, Principal Lisa Monahan, Assistant Principal.
What Parents Need to Know  TABS (Texas Assessment of Basic Skills)  TEAMS (Texas Educational Assessment of Minimum Skills)  TAAS (Texas Assessment.
Tewksbury Township Schools “ Measuring Our 2012 Results ” District Testing Report NJ PASS Grades 1 and 2 NJ ASK Grades 3-8 Prepared for the Tewksbury.
School Improvement Plan Results & Next Steps December, 2009 Central Elementary School Home of the Eagles.
A Presentation of the New Hampshire State Task Force on Mathematics Instruction Report to the State Board of Education, March 2012 Patty Ewen (603)
 Here’s What... › The State Board of Education has adopted the Common Core State Standards (July 2010)  So what... › Implications and Impact in NH ›
Valentine Elementary School San Marino Unified School District Standardized Testing and Reporting (STAR) Spring 2009 California Standards Test.
Report to the Board of Education October 15, 2007.
MELROSE PUBLIC SCHOOLS MELROSE VETERANS MEMORIAL MIDDLE SCHOOL OCTOBER 2013 MCAS Spring 2013 Results.
Data for Student Success Regional Data Initiative Presentation November 20, 2009.
Arshall Public Schools Walking the Talk: The Role of Leadership in Implementing an RtI Framework Presented By: Barb Sramek, District Administrator Barb.
Instruction, Assessment & Student Achievement Presented: September 23, 2013 Bessie Weller Elementary School.
MT. VIEW ELEMENTARY SCHOOL SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT PLAN ADJUSTMENTS
Mathematics Indicators and Goals. Math Tier II Indicator Indicator 1.8: All junior high students will meet or exceed standards and be identified as proficient.
September 11,  Measurements of Student Progress (MSP) ◦ Reading and math were tested every year in grades 3 through 8. ◦ Writing was tested in.
Connecticut Mastery Test (CMT) and the Connecticut Academic Achievement Test (CAPT) Spring 2011 Presented to the Guilford Board of Education September.
Student Achievement Data Data by School Board of Education Presentation October 14,
Proficiency Delivery Plan Strategies Curriculum, Assessment & Alignment Continuous Instructional Improvement System ( CIITS) New Accountability Model KY.
Graduating Chariho High School How Do We Get There?
Evaluating the Vermont Mathematics Initiative (VMI) in a Value Added Context H. ‘Bud’ Meyers, Ph.D. College of Education and Social Services University.
Restructuring Plan Overview. Process Advisory Committee – teacher representatives, administrators Advisory Committee – teacher representatives, administrators.
RESULTS FOR ELEMENTARY AND MIDDLE SCHOOLS 2013 Statewide Test Data.
Lincoln Public Schools Testing Year Scores New England Common Assessment Program Grades 3-8 and 11 Reading Math Writing.
Elementary Progress Report Proposal May Process 18 months of committee work. 3 representatives from each elementary school (at the start at least).
WELCOME TO PARK VIEW MIDDLE SCHOOL NECAP REPORT NIGHT.
U-32 Spring 2013 NECAP Presentation March 27,
Created by NWRESD Data Quality Project CCSS Stewardship Committee 2013 Created by NWRESD Data Quality Project EQuIP Network Common Core Stewardship Committee.
Berlin Elementary School Spring 2014 Assessments and Initiatives March 26, 2014.
OASD Annual Report October 14, 2013 Maximizing Opportunities For Success.
DeAnn Huinker, UW-Milwaukee MMP Principal Investigator 26 August 2008 This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under.
Understanding the Common Core Kansas Development of Common Core Standards.
Using the 2007 NECAP Reports February, 2008 New England Common Assessment Program.
Spring 2012 Testing Results. GRANT API HISTORY
February 2005Introduction to the GLEs & NECAP1 Grade Level Expectations (K-8) Grade Span Expectations (9-12) New England Common Assessment Program.
WASC/CDE Visiting Committee Final Presentation ___________________ Dublin High School ___________________ March 9-11, 2009.
Horizonte Instruction and Training Center Salt Lake City School District School Community Council Meeting November 14, 2012.
Professional Development is aligned to your district’s initiatives and tailored to your districts current needs. Our modules are designed to  Deepen.
Georgia’s Changing Assessment Landscape Melissa Fincher, Ph.D. Associate Superintendent for Assessment and Accountability Georgia Department for Education.
Governor Thomas Johnson High School Analysis of 2008 AYP Scores.
Lansing Central School District District Assessment Results Presentation May 14, 2012 Dr. Stephen L. Grimm, Superintendent District Leadership Team 1.
1 New Hampshire – Addenda Ppt Slides State Level Results (slides 2-7) 2Enrollment - Grades 3-8 for 2005 and Reading NECAP 4Mathematics
Rochester Area Math Science Partnership Our Mission: To support high student achievement through world class standards in math and science Continuous.
Future Ready Schools National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) in North Carolina Wednesday, February 13, 2008 Auditorium III 8:30 – 9:30 a.m.
MCAS 2007 October 24, 2007 A Report to the Sharon School Committee and Dr. Barbara J. Dunham Superintendent of Schools Dr. George S. Anthony Director of.
1 Oregon Content Standards and Assessment System Evaluation Prepared for the Oregon Department of Education by WestEd Dr. Stanley Rabinowitz Dr. Edynn.
Common Core State Standards An overview for Professional Development Leads March 8, 2010 Mary Russell, Region 3 Joyce Gardner, Region 8.
DVAS Training Find out how Battelle for Kids can help Presentation Outcomes Learn rationale for value-added progress measures Receive conceptual.
Using Data to Develop Your School’s Single Plan Parent Institute December 7, 2005 Presenter: Reyna Corral, Categorical Coordinator.
PSSC Meeting – December 4 th  School Review Results  Assessment results  The Field (the discussion was sparked from the School Review)  Miscellaneous.
Student Data Review Title VII Indian Education Parent Meeting March 4, 2013.
Report to Board of Education April 12, 2010 Trenton Public Schools.
“ Let us not be content to wait and see what will happen, but give us the determination to make the right things happen”- Horace Mann 2014 MCAS Overview.
East Longmeadow Public Schools SMART Goals Presented by ELPS Leadership Team.
KHS PARCC/SCIENCE RESULTS Using the results to improve achievement Families can use the results to engage their child in conversations about.
Data Overview Faculty Meeting-October 14,2014 Mission Possible: MOTIVATE, EDUCATE, GRADUATE!!!
GRADE 10 CAPT ACT ADVANCED PLACEMENT SAT 2009 High School Testing Report.
Connecticut Mastery Test Fourth Generation Grades 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8 Connecticut Academic Performance Test Third Generation Grade 10 Presented to the.
North Kingstown School Committee Feb. 29, 2012 MH 2/23/2012.
Granby Public Schools Annual Continuous Progress Review Presented by Diane Dugas Director of Curriculum September CMT Review.
Vision 2020 Quality Schools in Every Neighborhood: Report on Closing the Achievement Gap (LCAP Goal 1) FOCUSING ON READING AND READERS April 12, 2016.
STEM Connect A STEM Initiative funded by Golden Leaf.
Phyllis Lynch, PhD Director, Instruction, Assessment and Curriculum
WELCOME.
2015 PARCC Results for R.I: Work to do, focus on teaching and learning
NECAP PRESENTATION.
Muncy School District November 9, 2015
Title I Annual Parent Meeting
Presentation transcript:

NECAP Presentation for School Year March 26,

Introduction: What is NECAP?  The New England Common Assessment Program is the result of a collaboration among New Hampshire, Rhode Island, Vermont and Maine to build a set of assessments for grades 3-8 and 11 in order to meet the requirements of No Child Left Behind. NECAP assesses reading and math in grades 3-8 and 11, writing in grades 5, 8, and 11, and science in grades 4, 8 & 11. 2

What does NECAP measure? Math (grades 3-8 & 11) – Number and Operations – Geometry and Measurement – Functions and Algebra – Data, Statistics and Probability Writing (grades 5, 8, & 11) – Structure of Language and Writing Conventions – Short Responses – Extended Response Reading (grades 3-8 & 11) - Word ID/Vocabulary - Level of Reading Comprehension: Initial Understanding and Analysis and Interpretation - Type of text: Literary and Informational Science (grades 4, 8 & 11) - Physical Science - Earth Space Science - Life Science - Inquiry NECAP test items are aligned to the Vermont Grade Expectations and are designed to measure student performance in the following ‘strands.’ 3

A Focus on Patterns and Trends Essential Questions:  How do our scores compare to the state?  How do our scores compare to our own history?  How did the various sub-groups perform? 4

Percent of 8 th grade students proficient or better in all content areas? (science scores - last year’s 8 th grade class) 5

Percent of 11 th grade students proficient or better in all content areas? (science scores - last year’s 11 th grade class) 6

How do our 8 th grade reading scores compare over time? 7

How do our 8th grade math scores compare over time? 8

How do our 8 th grade writing scores compare over time? (no 2009 scores) 9

How do our 8 th grade science scores compare over time? 10

How do our 11 th grade reading scores compare over time? 11

How do our 11 th grade math scores compare over time? 12

How do our 11 th grade writing scores compare over time? 13

How do our 11 th grade science scores compare over time? 14

Are there differences in 8 th grade reading achievement related to family income over time? 15

Are there differences in 8 th grade math achievement related to family income over time? 16

Are there differences in 8 th grade writing achievement related to family income over time? 17

Are there differences in 8 th grade science achievement related to family income over time? 18

Are there differences in 11 th grade reading achievement related to family income over time? 19

Are there differences in 11 th grade math achievement related to family income over time? 20

Are there differences in 11 th grade writing achievement related to family income over time? 21

Are there differences in 11 th grade science achievement related to family income over time? 22

Are there differences in 8 th grade reading achievement related to gender over time? 23

Are there differences in 8 th grade math achievement related to gender over time? 24

Are there differences in 8 th writing achievement related to gender over time? 25

Are there differences in 8 th grade science achievement related to gender over time? 26

Are there differences in 11 th grade reading achievement related to gender over time? 27

Are there differences in 11 th grade math achievement related to gender over time? 28

Are there differences in 11 th grade writing achievement related to gender over time? 29

Are there differences in 11 th grade science achievement related to gender over time? 30

Comparison of current 11 th grade cohort data in Reading and Math 31

Focus on NEASC Two-Year Plan Consistent Curriculum Pre-K-12: vertical alignment and non- negotiables at each grade level -Steering committees: Curriculum Council, Math, Literacy, Social, Social Studies, Science -WCSU In-service time for teachers to meet pk-12 -Extensive work w/ Math consultant to develop non- negotiables U-32 Horizontal alignment: consistency across sections and courses, common assessments 32

Focus on NEASC Two-Year Plan Collaborative Professional Development Common planning time for all common courses In-Service Days Faculty CIA time: 2 meetings a month after school Focus on differentiated instruction, formative assessments, and unit planning (UbD) Department Heads as Curriculum Leaders 33

Focus on NEASC Two-Year Plan Data Collection and Application – Move beyond the current annual comprehensive assessment – District goal: develop comprehensive data collection system (diagnostic tools, formative and common assessments at the local level) Assessments are being developed or have been piloted. Training on developing assessments – Interventions systems based on data – revamp MTSS/EST Staffings based on academic performance New schedule with dedicated daily time for intervention, extension across the school 34