Tiered Lessons Project Aspire 2004 – 2005 Broadcasts Sara Delano Moore.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Author: Brenda Stephenson The University of Tennessee Date submitted to deafed.net – Date submitted to deafed.net – March 6, 2006 March 6, 2006 To contact.
Advertisements

Understanding by Design Stage 3
Job Embedded Training March 28, 2012 Carol Muzny, Instructional Coach.
Modifications for All Learners
Specific Learning Disabilities LD—Learns Differently! Dickey LaMoure Special Education Unit.
Author: Brenda Stephenson The University of Tennessee  Date submitted to deafed.net – March 6, 2006 March 6, 2006  To contact the author for permission.
What is Differentiation?
Differentiated Instruction
Differentiation: What It Is/What It Isn’t
CURRICULUM COMPACTING
Understanding by Design Planning Instruction Stage Three Prepared for Mercer University EDUC621 by Sherah B. Carr, Ph.D Information adapted from training.
Introduction to Tiered Lessons Project Aspire Session 6 Broadcast Sara Delano Moore, Ph.D.
Acceleration An RUSD GATE Best Practices Tune-Up.
Dare to Differentiate Deborah Espitia Coordinator of World Languages & ESOL Leslie Grahn World Language Resource Teacher Howard County Public Schools,
When a child enters your classroom / school at the start of the school year...
Balanced Literacy J McIntyre Belize.
WARNING: Making, carrying, or using overhead transparencies for every item in this training packet poses a significant physical and mental health hazard.
Unit 16 Learner Differences and Learner Training.
© 2012 Common Core, Inc. All rights reserved. commoncore.org NYS COMMON CORE MATHEMATICS CURRICULUM A Story of Units Module Focus Grade 2- Module 4.
What is Flexible Grouping?
Acceleration Bakersfield City School District Bakersfield City School District Extended Programs Department GATE Program February, 2010 PowerPoint adapted.
One Size Does Not Fit All: An Introduction to Differentiated Instruction Facilitated By Sara Fridley Region 3 Education Service Agency
Effective Pedagogical Practices for Fragile Learners California Educational Research Association December 2011 Alicia Henderson, Ph.D. Franklin-McKinley.
Interstate New Teacher Assessment and Support Consortium (INTASC)
Why take the leap … …to Differentiated Instruction? Why take the leap … …to Differentiated Instruction?
FULFILLING THE PROMISE OF DIFFERENTIATION: RESPONDING TO THE NEEDS OF ALL LEARNERS.
Do Now…on the index card  Rank these 7 Effective Instructional Strategies in order from LEAST Effective to MOST Effective. 1. Practice by Doing 2. Teach.
1 Differentiating Instruction. 2 K-W-L This is what I know about Differentiating Instruction (DI) This is what I want to know about DI This is what I.
The Framework for Teaching Domain 1 Planning and Preparation.
Student centered learning The shift from teachers teaching to students learning: more than semantics.
Tiered Lessons – Process Project Aspire Broadcast 7 Sara Delano Moore, Ph.D.
 Participants will teach Mathematics II or are responsible for the delivery of Mathematics II instruction  Participants attended Days 1, 2, and 3 of.
Grade 6 Math Cohort January 14, How Have You Been? Insights, Hindsights, Oversights since we met last.
COMPONENT #6 PracticeandApplication SIOP. Review Homework 1. Share with the people at your table your plans for_______________. 2. The person staying.

Teaching through Problem Solving
Meeting the Needs of “Talented” and “Gifted” Learners in the Regular Education Classroom Kristina M. Gartrell K -6 Gifted Education Teacher Central York.
A Quick Quiz What is your DI IQ? Discuss with peers… What do you know about differentiation? What concerns or fears do you have regarding differentiation?
Advancing Exploration
Meeting the needs of diverse learners k-6. Carol Ann Tomilson  Its not a strategy but a total way of thinking about learners, teaching and learning.
ABC’S OF DIFFERENTIATION By Taylor Queen. A IS FOR Anchor activities can be completed independently by students when they finish an assignment before.
Tiered Lessons – Content by Readiness Project Aspire Broadcast 8 Sara Delano Moore, Ph.D.
Team Husky 6 th Grade Language Arts Mrs. Raub “Differentiation in the Curriculum”
Marjorie Hall Haley, PhD - GMU1 Differentiating Instruction Marjorie Hall Haley, Ph.D. George Mason University.
Cubing Rae Pitchford Spring, Differentiated Instruction “Differentiation is simply attending to the learning needs of a particular student or small.
 Together, my Co-Teaching partner and I have 32 first grade students. All of the students listed below are either 6 or 7 years old.  One child has.
 In your school, what data have you been exposed to about students that enables you to make decisions about your instruction? Is it enough?  Why/why.
Overview of Differentiating Instruction Fdlrs-South Cynthia Magnus.
TEACHING WITH A FOCUS ON LEARNERS One model of Differentiation: Sousa and Tomlinson (2011) Differentiation and The Brain. Purpose: Understanding Text Complexity.
Learning Logs and Journals Burke, Chapters 6, 7, 8.
What is Differentiated Instruction? Differentiated instruction is the theory that allows teachers to face this challenge by taking diverse student factors.
Responding to the Needs of All Learners Katina Alexander Foundation of Education ED 500 Dr. Gloria Crawford.
INCLUSION Universal Design & Differentiated Instruction.
EL Program in a Nutshell EL Program Flow Chart.
Differentiated Instruction Beth Ackerman, Ed.D.
Tiered Lessons – Content by Readiness Project Aspire Broadcast 9 – Focus on Assessing Concepts Sara Delano Moore, Ph.D.
Differentiated Instruction and UDL. Exercise Think of a lesson plan you would like to (or have) used in a classroom Identify the grade you are hoping.
ASSESSMENT What is assessment? What types of assessment are there? What types of assessment do we implement at St. John Eudes? Why do we implement various.
UDL & DIFFERENTIATION (DI) Melody Murphy Week 4 Discussion.
The Basic Steps Towards Differentiating. Differentiating instruction is doing what is fair for students. It means creating multiple paths so that students.
Conceptual Change Theory
Differentiation and Inclusion
97.
Differentiated Instruction Reaching to all our students
Differentiate by CONTENT Differentiate Content by... READINESS
WELCOME   Background information on me PHYSICS Room 65.
Echo Wu, Ph.D. Murray State University KAGE, February 24, 2015
Differentiation from Planning to Practice
DIFFERENTIATED INSTRUCTION USING ASSESSMENT EFFECTIVELY.
Presentation transcript:

Tiered Lessons Project Aspire 2004 – 2005 Broadcasts Sara Delano Moore

What are tiered lessons? Tiered lessons are an organizational structure for meeting a variety of learning needs in a single classroom. Tiered lessons are built on the premise of “variations on a theme” where teachers create thoughtful variations of lessons they already teach in order to meet the needs of a wider range of learners.

On what basis are lessons tiered? ContentProcessProduct Interest X Learning Style X Readiness X

Agenda for these broadcasts November – focus on tiering product by interest December – focus on tiering process by learning style January – March – focus on tiering content by readiness – grant focus

Tiering Product by Interest Easy way to start – doesn’t change daily instruction Teachers develop alternative products they think will be of interest to students for the end of the unit. These can be in addition to or instead of a unit test on the content.

Making this work It is most helpful to develop a standard set of products you will allow in your classroom, with rubrics for each. Product Guides (Jim Curry and John Samara) are a good resource here. Rubrics are essential to the success of this strategy – students have to know what quality work looks like!

Sample Product Set Physical model (3D) or demonstration Visual representation (2D) Oral presentation (live or taped) Written report These products respond to a variety of student interests and learning styles These products accommodate a wide range of content.

What about the rubrics? Rubrics here have two parts – content and product The content rubric is the same no matter which product is selected – students are still demonstrating the same knowledge. The product rubric stays the same from unit to unit – a good written report, for example, is always nicely structured and mechanically accurate.

Implementation Work with your vertical team to develop a set of common products and rubrics. Identify a unit where 2 – 4 of these common products might be appropriate. Develop a content rubric for the unit topic. After reviewing all the product options & rubrics, allow students to choose which one they will use to share their learning.

Things to Remember This can be in addition to a unit test everyone takes or instead of a test. Spending time with the product rubrics is key to not being overwhelmed with questions about the various products. Emphasize that with a common content rubric, everyone is demonstrating the same learning, just using various strategies.

Tiering Process by Learning Style In this context, learning styles means being responsive to the fact that students learn content in various ways and bring different cognitive and intellectual strengths to our classrooms. Potential learning style models you might know: –Multiple intelligences –Visual/auditory/kinesthetic –Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI)

Making this Work This is a more teacher-directed approach to tiered lessons than allowing students to choose products based on interest. There are two basic approaches –Students rotate through a set of tasks so everyone has done all tasks at the end –Students do a subset of the available tasks based on teacher assignment and/or student choice

Sample set of tasks Students read from the text and answer questions (visual, verbal-linguistic, intrapersonal) Students conduct a simulation (kinesthetic, visual-spatial, interpersonal) Students interview a community member or expert about a topic (auditory, interpersonal)

How to Manage These Option 1 –Everyone does the simulation in class during the week and has two homework assignments, the interview and the text reading/questions Option 2 –Students spend a day in class reviewing the options and hearing the big ideas from the teacher –Students then choose how to spend their time the rest of the week based on the fact that they have to complete two of the three assignments, one selected by the teacher and one selected by the student.

Tiering Content by Readiness In this scenario, we are adjusting the content students study (what they are learning) based on their level of prerequisite knowledge/skill. It is assumed that working at grade level means they are meeting the state standards for the course Typically think of three groups – below level, at level, and above level.

Pretesting We discussed pretesting in the May broadcast Pretesting is one way to determine a student’s readiness level Teachers can be as general or as specific as they like in determining readiness level. Three groups is generally a manageable number.

Adjusting for Skills Teachers form three groups based on student skill level. Activities are often hierarchical and students simply enter the sequence at different points and progress to different levels. Example – solving systems of equations

Adjusting for Conceptual Knowledge More difficult to pretest for this Focus here is on big ideas and depth of understanding more than discrete skills Groups might be formed like this –Has no knowledge of the concept –Has some surface knowledge of the concept –Has solid understanding of the concept Again, teachers create a sequence of activities, scaffolding from one to the next

Questions for facilitators How much work do we need on rubrics? How much work do we need on scaffolding? What are good examples of content where teachers are likely to see varying preparation levels? Examples from your own practice?