Session 2: Background FHWA Transportation Conformity and CMAQ Workshop Summer 2004.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
SIP Development Process Overview For the Great Smoky Mountain National Park Transportation Partners Requirements, Scenarios and Timelines Laura Boothe,
Advertisements

State Implementation Plan (SIP) Development Process Presentation to: Centralina Nonattainment Area Elected Officials and City and County Managers and Planners.
State Implementation Plan (SIP) Development Process Presentation to: Triangle Area Mayors and County Commission Board Chairs Donnie Redmond April 7, 2005.
SIP Development Process Overview For Rocky Mount Transportation Partners Requirements, Scenarios and Timelines Laura Boothe, NCDAQ Mike Abraczinskas, NCDAQ.
Isolated Rural Areas US EPA Conformity Training Summer 2004 Eddie Dancausse FHWA NC Division x112
Transportation Conformity Basics. What is Transportation Conformity? Transportation conformity (conformity) is a way to ensure that Federal funding and.
Transportation Conformity Basics Eddie Dancausse FHWA NC Division x112
State of North Carolina v. EPA. Introduction The Clean Air Act gives the States the primary responsibility for air quality within their borders and requires.
1 SAFETEA-LU Changes to the Transportation Conformity Rule February 21, 2008.
Session 6: What do I include in my PM 2.5 conformity analysis? FHWA Transportation Conformity and CMAQ Workshop Summer 2004.
Air Quality-Related Features of SAFETEA-LU Review by Michael Brady, Caltrans Air Quality/Conformity Coordinator (916)
“Cleaner Air Sooner” South Carolina Department of Health and Environmental Control Bureau of Air Quality.
Front Range Ozone Early Action Compact Presentation to WESTAR Regional Ozone Conference Steven Arnold Air Pollution Control Division March 9th, 2004.
Session 7: Other Conformity Rule Changes FHWA Transportation Conformity and CMAQ Workshop Summer 2004.
Transportation Conformity and Development of Emission Budgets.
Ozone, PM2.5 and Regional Haze Timeline Dan Johnson Western States Air Resources Council.
Clark County Air Quality Status Department of Air Quality and Environmental Management August 10, 2004.
Transportation Conformity Rule Amendments Net Conference June 23, 2004 Hosted by the Federal Highway Administration Office of Natural and Human Environment.
How Ozone is Regulated under the Clean Air Act Darcy J. Anderson AZ Dept. of Environmental Quality.
Air Quality 101: Clean Air Act Overview/ Update. 2 Origins of the Clean Air Act Historic air pollution Donora, Pennsylvania, – PSD, tribes.
Proposed Revisions to Colorado Air Quality Control Commission Regulation No. 7 Garry Kaufman Air Pollution Control Division Air Pollution Control Division.
Department of the Environment The State Implementation Plan Process – Our Next Steps Brian Hug Division Chief, Air Quality Planning and Policy Division.
Air Pollution Control Board October 1, 2008 Thomas W. Easterly, P.E., DEE, QEP Commissioner, Indiana Department of Environmental Management We Protect.
Air Quality Beyond Ozone and PM2.5 Sheila Holman North Carolina Division of Air Quality 6 th Annual Unifour Air Quality Conference June 15, 2012.
Transportation & Air Quality Planning AMPO MPO Educational Series November 8,
UNLOCK THE MYSTERIES TO AIR QUALITY Bernadette Dupont, FHWA-KY June 2007.
A&WMA Georgia Regulatory Update Conference Current State of the Air in GA Jac Capp, GA EPD, Branch Chief, Air Protection Branch April 16, 2013.
Minnesota Air Quality and Attainment Status Frank Kohlasch Kari Palmer Statewide Travel Demand Coordinating Committee Meeting October 14, 2010.
2015 FTIP/FSTIP Workshop Transportation Conformity Wade Hobbs FHWA CADO January 15, 2014.
Air Quality and Conformity Issues James M. Shrouds, Director Office of Natural and Human Environment Federal Highway Administration AASHTO SCOE Meeting.
Ozone Regulation under the Clean Air Act Darcy J. Anderson AZ Dept. of Environmental Quality.
SIP Development and Implementation in New Mexico - and Why it Matters to Tribes Rita Bates Planning Section Chief Air Quality Bureau New Mexico Environment.
Recent Developments in Transportation Conformity Beverly Chenausky Multimodal Planning Division – Air Quality Breakout Session: Transportation Conformity/Air.
Presentation for Air Quality Coalitions The 2015 Proposed Ozone Standard.
Transportation Conformity in North Carolina. Transportation Planning Framework Required by NCGS §136 ‑ In MPOs, includes 20 year fiscally constrained.
Early Action Compacts Presented by Karen Borel EPA Region 4 March 25, 2003.
Inventory Needs and Legal Requirements Martin Johnson Emission Inventory Workshop Air Resources Board March 13, 2006.
1 National Ambient Air Quality Standards and State Implementation Plans North Carolina Division of Air Quality National Ambient Air Quality Standards and.
1 PM2.5 Redesignation Request for the Metropolitan Washington,D.C. Region Joan Rohlfs Chief, Air Quality Planning Metropolitan Washington COG.
ANPR: Transition to New or Revised PM NAAQS WESTAR Business Meeting March 2006.
National Ambient Air Quality Standards and Current Status of Air Quality Laura Boothe North Carolina Division of Air Quality MCIC Workshops March 2012.
1 SJVAPCD DRAFT SCHEDULES May 2, Hr OZONE ATTAINMENT DEMONSTRATION PLAN PM10 ATTAINMENT DEMONSTRATION PLAN.
Clean Air Act  The Federal Clean Air Act, passed in 1970 and last amended in 1990, forms the basis for the national air pollution control effort.
Final Clean Air Fine Particle Implementation Rule Briefing for NTAA EPA Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards April 17, 2007.
1 Mississippi Air Quality Update Mississippi Dept. of Environmental Quality Air Division August 5, 2011.
1 CMAQ and the New Air Quality Standards Air Quality Team, FHWA Summer, 2004.
State Implementation Plans Could Rule Your Life or why NAAQS Are Important Chuck Sams R9 Air Quality Program Manager.
Transportation Conformity Overview H-GAC Conformity Workshop May 30, 2007.
1 MAPS. Counties With Monitors Violating Alternate 8-hour Ozone Standards of and parts per million 398 counties violate.075 ppm 135 additional.
NAAQS and Criteria Pollutant Trends Update US EPA Region 10.
1 Modeling Under PSD Air quality models (screening and refined) are used in various ways under the PSD program. Step 1: Significant Impact Analysis –Use.
National and Regional Programs to Reduce Ozone Transport Metropolitan Washington Air Quality Committee April 27, 2005.
Timely Implementation of TCMs. History  RACM developed for Severe Ozone Rate of Progress (ROP) Plan  2003 Incorporated in 2003 PM-10 Plan.
1 Designations & Classifications for the 8-hour Ozone NAAQS U.S. EPA Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards.
Survivor’s Guide to Ozone Conformity Breakout Session 9: Air Quality 2015 California Transportation Planning Conference: Partnering for Sustainable Transportation.
Reasonable Further Progress Policy and Mid-Course Reviews John Summerhays EPA Region 5 June 20, 2007.
PM2.5 NAAQS Implementation Interactive Session NACAA Annual Meeting May 8, 2013 St. Louis, MO 1.
Air Quality, Transportation Conformity, and the FSTIP FTIP/FSTIP Workshop February 9, 2016.
Session 3: When Do You Do Conformity? FHWA Transportation Conformity and CMAQ Workshop Summer 2004.
OAQPS Update WESTAR April 3,  On March 12, 2008, EPA significantly strengthened the National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) for ground-level.
TRANSPORTATION CONFORMITY OVERVIEW TRAINING 1. Training Objectives Understand the Following : – Why is air quality relevant to transportation? – What.
TRANSPORTATION CONFORMITY
PM 2.5 Attainment Re-designation Approvals
Department of Environmental Quality
Bill Harnett USEPA NACAA Membership Meeting October 21, 2008
PM2.5 NSR and Designations
Implementing 8-Hour Ozone, PM2.5, and Regional Haze Standards
CAIR Update WESTAR October 2, 2008.
PM 2.5 Designation Process and Timeline
Uinta Basin General Conformity
Presentation transcript:

Session 2: Background FHWA Transportation Conformity and CMAQ Workshop Summer 2004

2 New 8-hour ozone standard l Same pollutant as 1-hour ozone standard, but different way of measuring, and different standard »Readings are over an 8-hour period rather than a 1-hour period »The 3-year average of the 4th highest ozone readings must be < 0.08 ppm l Phase 1 Final 8-hour implementation rule published April 30, 2004 (69 FR 23951) »EPA developing Phase 2 final rule now

3 New 8-hour ozone standard l Areas designated for the 8-hour ozone standard: April 15, 2004 l Effective date of designation: June 15, 2004 »Not for areas with an Early Action Compact (EAC), where effective date is deferred l 8-hour conformity applies: June 15, 2005 »Not for areas with an EAC

4

5 The 1-hour ozone standard l Will be revoked one year after the effective date of designation: June 15, 2005 for most areas »Conformity for the 1-hour standard no longer applies at that point, except for 1-hour maintenance areas that are 8-hour EACs (Denver, Greensboro, Nashville) l Coordinated with date conformity for the 8-hour standard applies »To ensure conformity not required for both ozone standards at same time

6 Conformity under the 1-hour ozone standard l In general, final rule does not change 1-hour ozone conformity requirements l During the one-year conformity grace period for the 8-hour standard: »conformity for the 1-hour standard continues to be required for new plan, TIP, and project approvals »existing adequate and approved SIP motor vehicle emissions budgets (“budgets”) for the 1-hour standard must continue to be used »if a 1-hour lapse occurs during the grace period, the lapse ends when the 1-hour standard is revoked, and if the area is nonattainment for the 8-hour standard, DOT has made an 8-hour conformity determination

7 EAC Areas and Conformity l 8-hour conformity will not apply in EAC areas, unless an EAC milestone is missed and nonattainment designation no longer deferred l 1-hour conformity applies in 1-hour maintenance areas with EACs until one year after effective date of 8-hour designation, which will be either when: »they attain the 8-hour standard, or »they miss an EAC milestone (and become an 8-hour nonattainment area)

8

9 New PM 2.5 standards l PM 2.5 is a different pollutant than PM 10, not just a different standard l PM 2.5 standards: »annual standard: 15 µg/m3 »24 hour standard: 65 µg/m3 l EPA intends to designate areas by Nov/Dec 2004 »Effective date Jan/Feb 2005 »Conformity applies 1 year after effective date: Jan/Feb 2006 l Broader PM 2.5 implementation strategy rule under development

10 Conformity under the PM 10, CO, and NO 2 standards l In general, final rule does not change conformity requirements in PM 10, CO, and NO 2 areas l What final rule provisions do affect these areas? Those that: »are related to March 1999 decision and existing federal guidance »offer flexibility (e.g., latest planning assumptions) »miscellaneous streamlining and clarifications