Roxanne M. Williams Ed.D. Michelle Hellman. How many years of teaching experience do you have? 1. Pre-service 2. 0-2 3. 3-5 4. 6-10 5. 11-over.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
USING THE FRAMEWORK FOR TEACHING TO SUPPORT EFFECTIVE TEACHER EVALUATION Mary Weck, Ed. D Danielson Group Member.
Advertisements

Chad Allison May 2013  1-2 Formal Classroom Evaluations  Drop-in Visits.
Charlotte Danielson’s The Four Domains of Teaching Responsibility
Teacher Evaluation New Teacher Orientation August 15, 2013.
Teacher Excellence and Support System
Overarching Question Who does the thinking? Therefore, who does the learning and growing?
Conewago Valley School District Teacher Evaluation Tool Training Please sit at your “building” table. 2. Complete a nameplate – first name only.
Lesson Plans 101. Lesson Components In the following slides, you will find definitions for the most essential lesson components that are found in a well.
C OLLABORATIVE A SSESSMENT S YSTEM FOR T EACHERS CAST
The Marzano School Leadership Evaluation Model Webinar for Washington State Teacher/Principal Evaluation Project.
1. On an index card, please jot down facts you already know about the Danielson FfT. Turn to someone sitting near you and share what you have written.
The “Highly Effective” Early Childhood Classroom Environment
Alaska Educator Evaluation Overview Yukon Koyukuk School District.
Evidence: First… 1. Assemble your district team to include teachers, administrators, association representatives 2. Research and select an instructional.
Introduction Framework for Teaching by Charlotte Danielson
Domain 1: Planning and Preparation
Danielson Rubric Kim Oakes Staff Development Specialist E2CCB/IES Kim Oakes Erie2 BOCES - Adopted ©2010 McKay Consulting, LLC.
August 2014 The Oregon Matrix Model was submitted to USED on May 1, 2014 and is pending approval* as of 8/8/14 *Please note content may change Oregon’s.
Domain 2: The Classroom Environment. ElementUnsatisfactoryBasicProficientDistinguished Teacher interaction with students Teacher interaction with at least.
Evaluating Teacher Performance: Getting it Right CPRE Annual Conference November 21-23, 2002 Charlotte Danielson
What should be the basis of
performance INDICATORs performance APPRAISAL RUBRIC
Differentiated Supervision
 Rubric – Appendix pg. 26  Four components ◦ Planning – will look at tomorrow ◦ Classroom management ◦ Instruction ◦ Professional Notebook.
Domain II Creating and Environment for Learning
Teacher Evaluation Ashley Greene 10/29/13.
APPR How to be a HIGHLY EFFECTIVE World Language Teacher How to be a HIGHLY EFFECTIVE World Language Teacher.
NORTH CAROLINA TEACHER EVALUATION INSTRUMENT and PROCESS
New Teacher Preparation: Compass Teacher Evaluation
Aligning Academic Review and Performance Evaluation (AARPE)
Differentiated Supervision
The Framework for Teaching Charlotte Danielson
The Danielson Framework and Your Evaluation AK Teaching Standard DP_8c: Engages in Instructional Development Activities Danielson Domain 4e: Growing and.
Requirements are now 20 hours per year. July 1 – June 30 1.School calendar changes 2.Out of district opportunities 3.Online opportunities - Safe Schools.
General Instructions 1. Save the Power Pt template to your desktop and a flashdrive used only for your portfolio. Using SAVE AS rename the portfolio with.
Stronge Teacher Effectiveness Performance Evaluation System
An Effective Teacher Evaluation System – Our Journey to a Teaching Framework Corvallis School District.
Compass: Module 2 Compass Requirements: Teachers’ Overall Evaluation Rating Student Growth Student Learning Targets (SLTs) Value-added Score (VAM) where.
BHS Administration “Back to Basics – This is Our time” Part I
Introduction to Working Portfolios Educator Effectiveness System Training.
Your Name Teaching Portfolio (Begin Year-End Year)
Laying the Groundwork for the New Teacher Professional Growth and Effectiveness System TPGES.
Welcome to... Introduction to A Framework for Teaching 10/12/2015pbevan 1.
THE DANIELSON FRAMEWORK. LEARNING TARGET I will be be able to identify to others the value of the classroom teacher, the Domains of the Danielson framework.
The Danielson Framework Emmanuel Andre Owings Mills High School Fall 2013.
Lincoln Intermediate Unit 12 August 11, 2014 Differentiated Supervision: The Danielson Framework.
 Development of a model evaluation instrument based on professional performance standards (Danielson Framework for Teaching)  Develop multiple measures.
BY COURTNEY N. SPEER TECHNOLOGY AS A TOOL SPRING Professional Growth & Self- Reflection.
ENHANCING PROFESSIONAL PRACTICE Framework for Teaching Aug. 27 th Title II Day.
DPASII Criterion Rubrics for Teachers. Component 1: Planning and Preparation Criterion 1a: Selecting Instructional Goals ELEMENT Value, sequence and alignment.
Introduction to... Teacher Evaluation System Teacher Effectiveness 12/6/
Jeffrey Freund. Jeff Freund: Education and Work History Class of 2000 Class of 2004 Elementary Education Middle Level Mathematics.
Teacher Evaluation Overview
Candidate Assessment of Performance CAP The Evidence Binder.
Curriculum and Instruction: Management of the Learning Environment
Candidate Assessment of Performance CAP The Evidence Binder.
Educator Effectiveness: The Danielson Framework Collecting Evidence.
Getting Ready for the Professional Growth & Effectiveness System AISD Getting Ready for the Professional Growth & Effectiveness System AISD.
Teacher Evaluation University of New England - EDU 704 Dr. William Doughty Submitted By: Teri Gaston.
DANIELSON MODEL SAI 2016 Mentor Meeting. Danielson Model  Framework with rubrics  Define specific types of behaviors expected to be observed  A common.
Enhancing Professional Practice
NM Teacher Evaluation Planning & Preparation Creating an Environment of Learning Professionalism Teaching for Learning Evaluation.
Summative Evaluation Shasta Davis. Dimension: Preparation (Score- 4) Plans for instructional strategies that encourage the development of critical thinking,
Last Updated: 5/12/2016 Texas Teacher Evaluation and Support System (T-TESS) Teacher Overview.
Changes to the Educator Evaluation System
MSBSD Educator Evaluation
Teacher Evaluation Process School Year
Introduction to Core Professionalism
HEYWORTH COMMUNITY SCHOOL DISTRICT TEACHER EVALUATION PROCESS
Mapleton Public Schools Educator Effectiveness
Presentation transcript:

Roxanne M. Williams Ed.D. Michelle Hellman

How many years of teaching experience do you have? 1. Pre-service over

 Explain  Model  Rehearse  Review

How familiar are you with PERA? 1. Not at all 2. I heard about it 3. Somewhat 4. Very familiar 5. Familiar enough to explain it

 Accurately or objectively measure how educators are doing  Identify their strengths and areas for growth  Align areas of growth to professional development

 Danielson’s levels of performance (descriptors from framework) ◦ Unsatisfactory (unsafe, lack of, unaware, unclear, unsuitable) ◦ Basic (needs improvement, partial, inconsistent, attempts, moderate, minimal, some) ◦ Proficient (consistent, frequent, successful, appropriate, clear, positive, smooth) ◦ Distinguished (seamless, solid, subtle, skillful, preventative, leadership)

 Example: When a teacher receives distinguished ratings on one area of a rubric and proficient on other areas, what rating will he/she receive?

 Nontenured teachers: minimum of three observations (2 formal)  Tenured teachers that receive overall rating of “basic – needs improvement” or “unsatisfactory”: minimum of three observations (2 formal)  Tenured teachers that receive overall rating of “proficient” or “distinguished – excellent”: minimum of two observations (1 formal)

 Informal Observation – Walk Throughs  Gathering evidence of where teacher is at on the framework  Oral or written feedback  Written documentation will be filed and be used as part of the eventual summative evaluation

How familiar are you with how administrators determine teachers’ level of achievement? 1. Not at all 2. I heard of it 3. Somewhat 4. Very familiar 5. Familiar enough to explain it

 Domain 1: Planning and Preparation  Domain 4: Professional Responsibilities  Domains 1 & 4: “Off stage” – What teachers do to get ready to teach  Tip: Collect evidence and show your administrator

 Domain 2: Classroom Environment  Domain 3: Instruction  Domains 2 & 3: “On stage” – What teachers directly do with students.  Tips from us!

 Format – Madeline Hunter & Current person ◦ Anticipatory set ◦ Objective(s) – Redirect throughout lesson ◦ Teacher input and modeling ◦ Guided practice/monitoring ◦ Check for understanding ◦ Independent practice ◦ Closure

 Understanding by Design ◦ Begin with assessment in mind  Common Core ◦ Begin with assessment in mind

 Domain 2a: Creating an environment of respect and rapport  Domain 2b: Establishing a culture for learning ◦ “Workmanship attitude” ◦ Comfortable ◦ Calm ◦ Respect ◦ We are not doing “stuff” because it is “fun”

 Domain 2c: Managing Classroom Procedures ◦ Danielson Distinguished: Transitions are seamless; routines for handling procedures

 Rules posted  Preventative measures ◦ Circulating, teacher look, say name, say expectation  Modify teacher responses based upon student individual needs

 Furniture arrangements are adjusted per activity - transitioning  Learning materials are accessible ◦ Long term storage ◦ Short term storage ◦ Wheels!

 Domain 3a: Communicating Clearly and Accurately  Domain 3a Distinguished: Teacher directions and procedures are clear to students and anticipate possible student misunderstanding. ◦ Hands on Head ◦ “Visual and Verbal”: Write up on board! ◦ Take students through steps

 Wait Time  Delving  Higher order thinking

 Domain 3c – Distinguished – lnstruction links well to student knowledge & experience; projects to enhance student understanding; ◦ Multiple Intelligences

 Guided practice: It’s not just worksheets! wipe off boards, clickers, whip around pass option Model Whip Around Pass Option

 Closure: Tie in that day’s lesson objective with the next day’s objective to create interest and “tie-in”  Francis technique: “Who will remember tomorrow what we will be learning about?” ◦ Evolved that students wrote the next day’s objective down, so they could “tell.”

 4d: Contributing to the school and district – distinguished: Support and cooperation of colleagues; assume leadership roles; volunteer

 Domain 1: Planning and Preparation  Domain 2: Classroom Environment  Domain 3: Instruction  Domain 4: Professional Responsibilities

 Roxanne M. Williams:  Michelle Hellman: