John J. LeRose 1.  Roles/Responsibilities/Organization  Approach  Goals and Objectives  Scope  WBS’s  WBS 1  Funding profile  Schedule  Critical.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Session No. 4 Implementing the State’s Safety Programme Implementing Service Providers SMS
Advertisements

GEn_stat_12-05 Hall A Collaboration Meeting December 5-6, 2005 Status Report: G En G. Cates, K. McCormick, B. Reitz, and B. Wojtsekhowski; spokespersons.
Presented to: By: Date: Federal Aviation Administration Safety Management System (SMS) at Airports : Principles APEC TPT-WG AEG-SAF Jim White, Deputy Director.
GEM Detectors for AnDY Nilanga Liyanage University of Virginia 1 Outline GEM chamber concept Large area GEM chamber projects Proposed GEM configuration.
John Arthur PIXEL Project April 7, 2005 Status of the Proposed PIXEL Project John Arthur SSRL/SLAC Photon Instrumentation.
Independent Laboratory Testing PART 6 Regulations Mechanical & Engineering Safety Division Robert Setren Mechanical Engineer.
WHS Management Plans.
Update on the Gas Ring Imaging Cherenkov (GRINCH) Detector for A 1 n using BigBite Todd Averett Department of Physics The College of William and Mary Williamsburg,
SBS Program Management John J. LeRose SBS Collaboration Meeting October 18,
Jefferson Lab Status Hall A collaboration Dec. 16, 2013 R. D. McKeown Deputy Director For Science.
FY2010 PEMP Notable Outcomes October 15, FRA, LLC Board of Directors 10/15-16/2009 Office of Quality and Best Practices Performance Evaluation Management.
Fermilab Implementation of DOE Critical Decision Process FRA Project Management System Presentation by L Edward Temple Jr Head, Office of Project Management.
1 BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES Authorization Basis Plan Steven Hoey, ESH Manager NSLS-II Project Advisory Committee Meeting December 10 – 11, 2009.
John J. LeRose 1.  Roles/Responsibilities/Organization  Approach  Goals and Objectives  Scope  Schedule  Funding profile  Risk management  EH&S.
BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES National Synchrotron Light Source II Project Management Jim Yeck Deputy Director (Project Management)
Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility Page 1 IPR October 18-20, 2011 John J. LeRose Independent Project Review of 12 GeV Upgrade Jefferson Lab.
BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES National Synchrotron Light Source II Project Management Jim Yeck NLSL II Deputy Director (Project Management)
OFFICE OF SCIENCE 1 3. Cost Estimate Gines, Fisher 2.Are the estimated cost and proposed schedule ranges realistic, consistent with the technical and budgetary.
Research Compliance: An Overview of the Players and Issues Involved in Emory’s Research Compliance Programs.
1 BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES NSLS-II Project Baseline Jim Yeck NSLS-II Deputy Project Director NSLS-II PAC Meeting November 20, 2007.
Project Overview How to get here…. Half Way to the Test Run October 18, 2012HPS Project Overview2 …starting from here? John Jaros HPS Collaboration Meeting.
July LEReC Review July 2014 Low Energy RHIC electron Cooling Kerry Mirabella Cost, Schedule, Personnel.
John LeRose March 12, A Program of three “projects” to assemble the Super BigBite Spectrometer for a series of experiments in Hall A There is a.
January LEReC Review 12 – 13 January 2015 Low Energy RHIC electron Cooling Kerry Mirabella Cost, Schedule, Personnel.
Presenter’s Name June 17, Directions for this Template  Use the Slide Master to make universal changes to the presentation, including inserting.
Combined Test Beams Definition of Combined Test Beams Why would we want them? Why we might not want them? Host laboratory issues? Experimenter issues.
The Bigbite second GEM tracker. SBS GEM Trackers Front Tracker Geometry x6 18 modules In Italy  50 cm x 40 cm Modules are assembled to form larger chambers.
SBS Management John J. LeRose Project Manager. Good News/ Bad News We are an official DOE program (project(s), whatever…) – Good because we are more likely.
Contractor Assurance System Peer Review April Page 1 NSTAR 2011 May 16, 2011 Jefferson Lab Hugh Montgomery.
Comments from Physics Division Rolf Ent Associate Director for Experimental Nuclear Physics SOLID collaboration meeting, February 03, 2012 Thomas Jefferson.
7/26/2006 Wyatt Merritt 1 DECam CD1 Documentation DOE Critical Decision Process Documentation Requirements.
1 Zoe Van Hoover 1 User Safety: Commissioning and Early Experiments NEH ARR User Safety: LCLS NEH Commissioning and Early Experiments.
LIGO-G M Organization and Budget Gary Sanders NSF Operations Review Caltech, February 26, 2001.
Address Recommendations Jian-ping Chen, JLab SoLID Collaboration Meeting May 14-15, 2015.
Vina Punjabi Norfolk State University Hall A Collaboration Meeting June 10-11, 2010 GEp-V Experiment to Measure G Ep /G Mp.
Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility Page 1 Bob May ESH&Q Deputy Internal Assessment Process BNL Accelerator Safety Workshop Aug 17-19, 2009.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency Methodology and Responsibilities for Periodic Safety Review for Research Reactors William Kennedy Research Reactor.
DOE Stanford Site Office Office of Science U.S. Department of Energy 1 U.S. Department of Energy’s Office of Science Office of Science Review of the LCLS.
MOLLER Collaboration Meeting May 2014 Hall A Update Thia Keppel 1.
Transverse Momentum Dependence of Semi-Inclusive Pion and Kaon Production E : Spokespersons Peter Bosted, Rolf Ent, Hamlet Mkrtchyan 25.5 days.
Mark Reichanadter LCLS October 9-11, 2007 LCLS BCR Overview and EIR LOIs Project Progress / Status Revised Project Baseline.
John J. LeRose 1.  Roles/Responsibilities/Organization  Approach  Goals and Objectives  Scope  Schedule  Funding profile  Risk management  EH&S.
StatusUpdate Jian-ping Chen, JLab SoLID Collaboration Meeting September 11-12, 2015.
Modifying the PMP (remove some GEM’s add a scintillator coordinate detector) -JJL (8/29/2012)
The 12 GeV equipment Hall D – Hall D – GLUEx detector for photoproduction experiments Hall B – Large acceptance detector CLAS12 for high luminosity measurements.
Hall A Installation Review John J. LeRose 2/25/2009.
Homestake DUSEL Project Management and Systems Engineering Richard DiGennaro LBNL April 20, 2007.
Early Career Internal Review Measurement of Double DVCS using SuperBigBite Spectrometer Nuclear Physics Alexandre Camsonne.
Mike Scharfenstein LUSI DOE Review August 19, 2008 ES&H Overview p. 1 LCLS Ultrafast Science Instruments (LUSI) M. Scharfenstein.
Update/Overview of SoLID Jian-ping Chen, Jefferson Lab SoLID Collaboration Meeting Dec , 2012.
DOE Review of LARP – Feb 17-18, 2014 DOE Critical Decision Process Ruben Carcagno February 17,
Cost and Schedule Breakout Session Paul Weinman Pacific Northwest National Laboratory.
PIP-II Environment, Safety, Health & Quality Assurance Strategy John Anderson Jr. DOE Independent Project Review of PIP-II 16 June 2015.
University of Southern California Center for Systems and Software Engineering Barry Boehm, USC CS 510 Fall 2010 Software Planning Guidelines.
Camera PDR/CD1 Planning 19 September 2008
Resource Loaded Schedule and Budget Profile
Head, Office of Project Management Oversight (OPMO)
Electronics for GEM R&D at the University of Virginia
Jefferson Lab Overview
Jefferson Lab Reliability Task Force and Initiatives
OHS Staff Introduction Training
Preparations for a Lehman Review
1 Zoe Van Hoover 1 User Safety: Commissioning and Early Experiments NEH ARR User Safety: LCLS NEH Commissioning and Early Experiments.
Project Management Issues John N. Galayda, SLAC April 24, 2002
PIXEL Project Status John Arthur Photon Instrumentation for
SOLID Collaboration Meeting
Conventional Facilities
X-Ray Endstation Systems (XES) 2006 Schedule
TDIS mTPC update Nilanga Liyanage and Kondo Gnanvo UVa
Management of Change GROUP HSE RULE (CR-GR-HSE-302)
Presentation transcript:

John J. LeRose 1

 Roles/Responsibilities/Organization  Approach  Goals and Objectives  Scope  WBS’s  WBS 1  Funding profile  Schedule  Critical Path  Risk management  WBS 2  …  WBS 3  …  Change Control  EH&S  Summary  Roles/Responsibilities/Organization  Approach  Goals and Objectives  Scope  WBS’s  WBS 1  Funding profile  Schedule  Critical Path  Risk management  WBS 2  …  WBS 3  …  Change Control  EH&S  Summary 2

SBS Organization Associate Director Experimental Physics R. Ent (Acting) Director H. Montgomery Deputy Director Science & Tech R. McKeown Hall A Leader R. Michaels (Acting) Program Manager J. LeRose Collaboration Committee Experiment spokespersons, etc.. GEM Detectors N. Liyanage (U.Va) Electronics M. Khandaker (NSU) Trigger System R. Gilman (Rutgers) Detector Stands C. Perdrisat (W&M) Magnet/Infrastructure Installation R. Wines (JLab) External Review Panel Appointed as needed Internal Review Panel Appointed as needed Project Scientists B. Wojtsekhowski (principal) G. Cates K. de Jager 3

 Multiphased  SBS Basic  Neutron Form Factor measurement  Proton Form factor measurement  Multiphased  SBS Basic  Neutron Form Factor measurement  Proton Form factor measurement 4

 Construct research equipment (SBS) capable of handling high momentum with large solid angle and momentum acceptance and extreme rate capabilities in the detectors.  Make precise measurements of the neutron and proton form factors.  The neutron form factor measurements only require a partial completion of the SBS  The proton form factor measurement will require its full capability.  Construct research equipment (SBS) capable of handling high momentum with large solid angle and momentum acceptance and extreme rate capabilities in the detectors.  Make precise measurements of the neutron and proton form factors.  The neutron form factor measurements only require a partial completion of the SBS  The proton form factor measurement will require its full capability. 5

6 Work Breakdown Structure

7 The basic instrumentation needed to do any experiment with SBS

8

9

 The critical path for the SBS Basic project is theVend Fab Lead Tube Platform activity whose start date is constrained by FY15 funds availability.  This activity has 73 days of total float based upon the must finish date for the project. 10

11 Risk Event Cost of Event Likelihood of Event Mitigation Strategy Magnet Risk Schedule impact <1% Careful detailed design Platform Risk Schedule impact <1% Careful detailed design Beamline Risk Schedule impact <1% Careful detailed design

12WBS2. Neutron Form Factor 2.2Detectors2.2.1GEM's2.2.2 GEM electronics InstitutionProductdateNSU Front-End-Electronics and Data Acquisition electronics 8/30/2014 UVaGEM's8/30/2014

13

14

 The critical path for the Neutron Form Factor project is the NSU Phase 1 activity whose start date is constrained by FY14 funds availability.  This activity has 15 days of total float based upon the must finish date for the project. 15

16 Risk Event Cost of Event Likelihood of Event Mitigation Strategy Failure of GEM Foil $2k~12% Will have extras available 30% extra foils/20% extra chamber modules Failure of GEM Electronics Module $2k~12% Plan to make 18% extra modules

17 WBS 3

18

19 WBS 3: Schedule

 The critical path for the Proton Form Factor project is the Vend Fab Detector Supports (Frames) activity whose start date is constrained by FY17 funds availability.  This activity has 11 days of total float based upon the must finish date for the project. 20

21 Risk Event Cost of Event Likelihood of Event Mitigation Strategy Platform Risk Schedule impact <1% Careful detailed design Beamline Risk Schedule impact <1% Careful detailed design Failure of GEM Foil $2k~12% Will have extras available 30% extra foils/20% extra chamber modules Failure of GEM Electronics Module $2k~12% Plan to make 18% extra modules Trigger Risk <1%none

22

23 All phases of the SBS program will be carried out in accordance with the Jefferson Lab Environment, Health and Safety (EH&S) policies and procedures as documented in the Jefferson Lab “EH&S Manual” including obeying all local, state and federal regulations. management SBS program work will be conducted under the laboratory’s existing Integrated Safety Management (ISM) Program. ISM is an integral part of Jefferson Lab’s management structure spelled out in detail in the “EH&S Manual”, the “Quality Assurance Manual”, and various management manuals and training documents. Proposed program work will be performed under the standards and codes set forth in the TJNAF DOE JSA contract, Federal Occupational Safety and Health Act (OSHA), 29 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) 1926, 10 CFR851, and Virginia OSHA as supplemented by Jefferson Lab work rules. All experiments will be subjected to the JLab Physics Division “Readiness Review” process.

24  A management plan exists  Yes, it’s still under development  Costs are assessed  Risks are assessed  A detailed schedule exists  EH&S issues are addressed  A management plan exists  Yes, it’s still under development  Costs are assessed  Risks are assessed  A detailed schedule exists  EH&S issues are addressed PMP