1. John J. LeRose 1

2.  Roles/Responsibilities/Organization  Approach  Goals and Objectives  Scope  Schedule  Funding profile  Risk management  EH&S  Roles/Responsibilities/Organization  Approach  Goals and Objectives  Scope  Schedule  Funding profile  Risk management  EH&S 2

3. SBS Organization Associate Director Experimental Physics R. Ent (Acting) Director H. Montgomery Deputy Director Science & Tech R. McKeown Hall A Leader R. Michaels (Acting) Project Manager J. LeRose Collaboration Committee Experiment spokespersons, etc.. GEM Detectors N. Liyanage (U.Va) Electronics M. Khandaker (NSU) Trigger System R. Gilman (Rutgers) Detector Stands C. Perdrisat (W&M) Magnet/Infrastructure Installation R. Wines (JLab) External Review Panel Appointed as needed Internal Review Panel Appointed as needed Project Scientists B. Wojtsekhowski (principal) G. Cates K. de Jager 3

4.  Multiphased  SBS Basic  Neutron Form Factor measurement  Proton Form factor measurement  Multiphased  SBS Basic  Neutron Form Factor measurement  Proton Form factor measurement 4

5.  Construct a multipurpose spectrometer system capable of handling high momentum with large solid angle and momentum acceptance and extreme rate capabilities in the detectors.  Make precise measurements of the neutron and proton form factors.  The neutron form factor measurements only require a partial completion of the SBS  The proton form factor measurement will require its full capability.  Construct a multipurpose spectrometer system capable of handling high momentum with large solid angle and momentum acceptance and extreme rate capabilities in the detectors.  Make precise measurements of the neutron and proton form factors.  The neutron form factor measurements only require a partial completion of the SBS  The proton form factor measurement will require its full capability. 5

6.  Modified 48D48 magnet (from BNL)  Associated platforms, shielding, power supply, target chamber, and beamline  GEM detectors for high rate position tracking  Associated GEM electronics (front end processing and DAQ)  Trigger electronics  Modified 48D48 magnet (from BNL)  Associated platforms, shielding, power supply, target chamber, and beamline  GEM detectors for high rate position tracking  Associated GEM electronics (front end processing and DAQ)  Trigger electronics 6

7. 7 Work Breakdown Structure

8. 8 The basic instrumentation needed to do any experiment with SBS

9. 9

10. 10 Accelerator Schedule

11. 11 Risk EventCost of Event Likelihoo d of Event Mitigation Strategy Magnet Risk<1%None Platform Risk<1%None Beamline Risk<1%None

12. 12WBS2. Neutron Form Factor 2.2Detectors2.2.1GEM's2.2.2 GEM electronics InstitutionWBSProductdateNSU2 Front-End-Electronics and Data Acquisition electronics 8/30/2014 UVa2GEM's8/30/2014

13. 13

14. 14

15. 15 Risk Event Cost of Event Likelihood of Event Mitigation Strategy Failure of GEM Foil $2k~12% Will have spares available 30% extra foils/20% extra chamber modules Failure of GEM Electronics Module $2k~3% Plan to make spare modules

16. 16 WBS 3

17. 17

18. 18 ScheduleSchedule Accelerator Schedule

19. 19 Risk Event Cost of Event Likelihood of Event Mitigation Strategy Platform Risk <1%none Beamline Risk <1%none Failure of GEM Foil $2k~12% Will have spares available 30% extra foils/20% extra chamber modules Failure of GEM Electronics Module $2k~3% Plan to make spare modules Trigger Risk <1%none

20. 20 from project management link to pdf file

21. 21

22. 22 In general risks are all small In general risks are all small Magnet and platform are very low risk GEM’s are low risk, but expect some failures Will deal with GEM risk by preparing ~20% spares (electronics and GEM Chambers) In general risks are all small In general risks are all small Magnet and platform are very low risk GEM’s are low risk, but expect some failures Will deal with GEM risk by preparing ~20% spares (electronics and GEM Chambers)

23. 23

24. 24 All phases of the SBS program will be carried out in accordance with the Jefferson Lab Environment, Health and Safety (EH&S) policies and procedures as documented in the Jefferson Lab “EH&S Manual” including obeying all local, state and federal regulations. SBS program work will be conducted under the laboratory’s existing Integrated Safety Management (ISM) Program. ISM is an integral part of Jefferson Lab’s management structure spelled out in detail in the “EH&S Manual”, the “Quality Assurance Manual”, and various management manuals and training documents. Proposed program work will be performed under the standards and codes set forth in the TJNAF DOE JSA contract, Federal Occupational Safety and Health Act (OSHA), 29 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) 1926, 10 CFR851, and Virginia OSHA as supplemented by Jefferson Lab work rules. All experiments will be subjected to the JLab Physics Division “Readiness Review” process.

25. 25  A management plan exists  Yes, it’s still under development  Costs are assessed  Risks are assessed  A detailed schedule exists  EH&S issues are addressed  A management plan exists  Yes, it’s still under development  Costs are assessed  Risks are assessed  A detailed schedule exists  EH&S issues are addressed PMP

26. 26

27. 27

28. 28