Academic Affairs Instructional and Research Equipment Requests FY 2013-14 Purpose Instructional and research 1 equipment is of increasing concern to our.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Tenure is awarded when the candidate successfully demonstrates meritorious performance in teaching, research/scholarly/creative accomplishment and service.
Advertisements

Promotion and Tenure Faculty Senate May 8, To be voted on.
The School Level Committee The Central Parity Committee Role and Composition.
PEER REVIEW OF TEACHING WORKSHOP SUSAN S. WILLIAMS VICE DEAN ALAN KALISH DIRECTOR, UNIVERSITY CENTER FOR ADVANCEMENT OF TEACHING ASC CHAIRS — JAN. 30,
Budget Office June Participants Understanding Of:  Endowment Definition  Types of Endowment Funds  Terms and Definitions  Income Cost Center.
Carol Shields, Chair, Research Council Successful Research Council Grants
Reaching for Success Grant Writing Workshop November 20, 2014.
Introduction to the Faculty Evaluation System
2 Biennial process for setting deregulated tuition and mandatory fees initiated by the Board of Regents Rates are set for a two year period covering Academic.
Quality Enhancement Cell Dr. Dawar Hameed Mughal Director.
ECM Project Roles and Responsibilities
UNIFORM GUIDANCE OVERVIEW. OMB Circulars Before and After A-21 Cost principles for Educational Institutions A-21 Cost principles for Educational Institutions.
AS /AA Clarification of the Formation, Dissolution, Merger or Movement of an Academic Department- Resubmission.
The Pathway to Success Goal IV Strengthen and Leverage Programs of Strength and Promise.
An Educational Computer Based Training Program CBTCBT.
Funding Strategic Initiatives in Academic Technology A Process for Identifying, Cataloging, and Categorizing IT Needs Campuswide Copyright© D. Tebbetts,
SNRAS-AFES / CES Operations Budget FISCAL YEAR 2011 April 2010.
The general strategic plan for deanship of libraries affairs The strategic goal: Providing academic service at the highest level of quality according to.
Assessment & Evaluation Committee A New Road Ahead Presentation Dr. Keith M. McCoy, Vice President Professor Jennifer Jakob, English Associate Director.
University Strategic Resource Planning Council Budget.
Elizabeth Lord Vice Provost for Academic Personnel Spring Quarter Department Chair Forum May 25, 2007.
Moreno Valley Strategic Planning Schedule Voting Protocol Subcommittee Functions MV Planning Process.
University of Massachusetts Boston FY11 Budget Process February 25, 2010.
Student Involvement in Decision-Making. Policy 2.3 Part 1: To promote appropriate levels of student participation... Part 1:... students shall have the.
FY2008 Service Center Billing Rate Proposal Training Dates:Monday, February 26, 2007 Friday, March 2, 2007 Presented by: Rick Keller, Director – Cost Accounting.
Workload Fulfillment New Faculty Orientation Patricia Linton Senior Associate Dean College of Arts & Sciences.
HECSE Quality Indicators for Leadership Preparation.
2015 FACULTY PROJECT GRANT (Formerly Faculty Enrichment Grant)
University of Idaho Successful External Program Review Archie George, Director Institutional Research and Assessment Jane Baillargeon, Assistant Director.
Post-Secondary Education Program Joint AFN/INAC PSE Program Review with representation from NAIIHL and the Labrador Inuit Regional Information Process.
FY10 Budget Update Finance and Administration Advisory Group July 9, 2009.
Sabbatical Workshop Sabbatical Workshop Friday, April 13, :30 – 4:45 p.m. Room N28 Dr. Wallace Smith, VPAA Dr. Elizabeth K. Hawthorne, Chair, Faculty.
02 April 2012 Provost's Report to College Senate.
Form 100 LAC* Course Specific Fee Request *Legislative Audit Commission.
Sabbatical Workshop Sabbatical Workshop Friday, April 21, :00 – 4:30 p.m. Dr. Wallace Smith, VPAA Prof. Elizabeth K. Hawthorne, chair, sabbatical.
University Senate October 7, University Senate October 7, 2015 Summary Presidential Briefing President Loh provided a briefing on two suggested.
Prepared by the Office of Grants and Contracts1 INDIRECTS vs. REDIRECTS.
Senate 101 California State University, Los Angeles Nancy Warter-Perez, Academic Senate Chair
Fiscal Advisory Committee Highlights. Committee Charge The purpose of this committee shall be to review the University's fiscal resources and.
1 Service Center FY2006 Billing Rate Proposal Preparation.
SPC Advisory Committee Training - TAC Fall 2015 Institutional Research President’s Office 1 Abridged from the SPC Advisory Committee Training on October.
SPC Advisory Committee Training Fall 2015 Institutional Research President’s Office SPC 10/9/20151.
CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY, HAYWARD Academic Affairs MEMORANDUM DATE: October 3, 1995 T0: Department Chairs FROM: Frank Martino Provost & Vice President,
Graduate Enrollment Planning January 15, Graduate Enrollment Plan August 2013 Chancellor Dubois charged the Dean of the Graduate School to conduct.
Budget Call Diana Keelen, Budget Commiteee Co-Chair Dr. Irit Gat, Budget Committee Co-Chair Administrative Council Meeting, November 17, 2015.
Overview of Policies and Procedures University of Missouri-Kansas City.
27 February 2012 Provost's Report to College Senate.
Tenure and Promotion Timeline and Process University of Oklahoma, Spring 2016 Simin Pulat Vice Provost for Faculty Development.
CHAIRS AND DIRECTORS ORIENTATION August 16, 2016.
1 Establishing a New Gallaudet Program Review Process Pat Hulsebosch Office of Academic Quality CUE – 9/3/08: CGE – 9/16/08.
Workload Fulfillment Term Faculty Appointments Patricia Linton
PAc-17 Sabbatical Leave of Absence
FY2007 Billing Rate Proposal Preparation (Part I)
Assessment & Evaluation Committee
Promotion to Full Professor: Regulations and Procedures
Explaining and Communicating Faculty Purview over Curriculum to Board Members and External Stakeholders Larry Galizio, Community College League of California.
Elizabeth Lord Vice Provost for Academic Personnel
2016 Tenure and Promotion Workshop Policy and Procedures Overview
Technology Committee Report to the Budget Committee & College Planning Council March 7, 2012.
Erosion of Senate Authority Over Curriculum?
Assessment & Evaluation Committee
New Faculty Orientation
Supporting SEACs across the Province:
PAc-28 Educational Leave of Absence
Promotion to Full Professor: Regulations and Procedures
PROGRAM REVIEW PROCESS
UND’s Promotion & Tenure Process: Electronic Submission and Next Steps
Sabbatical and Difference-in-Pay Leaves Office of Faculty Advancement
Planning and Budget Policies Committee
Presentation transcript:

Academic Affairs Instructional and Research Equipment Requests FY Purpose Instructional and research 1 equipment is of increasing concern to our faculty, and its importance has been specified in the priorities for the University. We are faced with aging and antiquated equipment, and a growing need for instrumentation for instruction and research. According to the Collective Bargaining Agreement (CBA), our faculty has both instruction and scholarship responsibilities. There is also a natural interrelationship between instruction and scholarship. Scholarship not only provides for professional growth for the faculty, but it also provides mechanisms for the faculty to become better instructors and also mentor students in individualized or group research. Within budgetary constraints, it is the College and University’s responsibility to provide the basic needs for their faculty to fulfill their responsibilities. Thus, both faculty and administrators play an important role in determining the procurement of new instructional and research equipment. It is the responsibility of the Deans 2, Department Chairs, School Director, and Center Directors to ensure that each faculty is provided with an adequate and equitable level of basic support for their instruction and research. To this end, Deans, Department Chairs, School Director, and Center Directors must ensure that all of their faculty members have been informed of this program, and that all requests have been given fair and equitable consideration. It is hoped that with an open and fair process, faculty and Colleges/Departments/School/Centers will develop a better appreciation of the difficulties that are faced across the Colleges, and that together we can build a stronger Academy and support our students better. Procedural Justification A2E2 fees will be used to fund instructional and research equipment that will involve students and faculty from both the Departments/School/Centers/Library/Academic Units and the Colleges setting priorities. These priorities may not always be the same. The following procedure will allow for the participation of faculty and students in establishing the requests and setting priorities, and provides input from the various Academic Affairs’ Units 3 into the decision making process. By providing and exchanging written justifications and lists of funded requests, it is hoped that such an exchange of information with the faculty and students will further the neutrality and objectivity of the process. The maintenance of a five-year record of requests will hopefully instill in the various Academic Affairs’ Units the need for long-range planning and implementation. 1 For the sake of simplicity, the word “research equipment” means any type of equipment used for any type of creative or scholarly endeavor. For example, it would include NMRs and well as pianos). 2 For the sake of simplicity, the word “Dean” means College Dean, University Librarian, Associate Vice President, or Executive Director, where appropriate. 3 Various Academic Affairs’ Units includes the four Colleges, Library, Concord campus, and other Academic Affairs units (e.g. Freshman Year Experience). 1

Procedure 1.The Chair/Director of each of the Department/School/Center/Library/Academic Unit is responsible for submitting a priority list, definitive costs and justifications for the unit’s instructional and research equipment request to their A2E2 Instructional and Research Equipment Committee. The priority list and justifications are to be prepared according to these guidelines using the attached request form. Connectivity requests and individual personal computer requests shall not be included in the instructional and research equipment request (specialized software for instruction and research will be considered). Each of the various Department/School/Center/Library/Academic Unit may submit up to 10 requests. 2.Requests that indicate that they are interdisciplinary (for instruction or research) must be requested by all affected Academic Affairs’ Units (e.g., if a piece of equipment is stated as interdisciplinary, then it must appear on the priority list for all units involved). 3.The various Academic Affairs’ Units A2E2 Instructional and Research Equipment Committee, which is comprised of equal numbers of faculty and students, will review their unit’s requests. The A2E2 Instructional and Research Equipment Committee will advise the Dean on the funding priorities of the submitted requests. 4.The Dean recommends funding decisions based on a prioritized list of instructional and research equipment requests across their Academic Unit. 5.The Dean will forward their unit’s final priority list, the Dean’s funding recommendations, and all request forms to the Provost, where final allocations will occur. 6.An Academic Affairs Unit that is funded for a “big ticket” item or has received substantially larger allocations in one year may receive reduced funding the next year. 7.Partially funded and/or unfunded requests are expected to be resubmitted the next year and be so designated. 8.The various Academic Affairs’ Units are encouraged to seek funding from external and other internal sources whenever possible. 9.The Dean’s and Provost’s Office will keep records of instructional and research equipment requests, justifications, and funding for five years. 10.The Chair/Director of each of the Departments/Schools/Centers/Library/Academic Units shall keep their faculty, teaching staff, and students aware of the funding priority list established by the Dean as they receive this information. Guidelines for Academic Affairs Instructional and Research Equipment Requests 1. All instructional and research equipment requests will be submitted through the Chair/Director of the Department/School/Center/Library/Academic Unit. 2

2.Each request must be included on the ANNUAL EQUIPMENT REQUEST FORM (provided), and submitted electronically. 1.Each Department/School/Center/Library/Academic Unit must provide a summary page that identifies the Department/School/Center/Library/Academic Unit seeking funding, provides a list in decreasing priority of all items being requested, a definitive price for each item, and the total amount being sought by the Department/School/Center/Library/Academic Unit. 2.Items on the list should be clearly prioritized under the "Department/School/Center/Library/ Academic Unit” on the Annual Equipment Request Form. 3.Items on the list should be clearly categorized in terms of their relation to priorities of the University, and indicated in the space provided on top of the REQUEST FORM. These are the categories: Category 1: Replacement of broken, worn-out or stolen equipment. Category 2: Equipment’s main purpose is for use in graduate program courses (when justified by student demand). Category 3: Equipment’s main purpose is for use in upper-division major courses (when justified by student demand). Category 4: Equipment’s main purpose is for use in lower-division major courses (when justified by student demand). Category 5: Equipment’s main purpose is for use in non-major service courses (when justified by student demand). Category 6: Equipment’s main purpose is for use in General Education courses (when justified by student demand). Category 7: Equipment to enhance faculty access to computing in support of instruction or research. Category 8: Equipment to provide access to new technology in the field. Category 9: Equipment to make possible the addition of new courses, specializations or other activities. Note: A Department/School/Center/Library/Academic Unit may decide that an item in Category 2, for example, is of higher priority that one in Category 1, because some worn-out equipment may not need to be replaced as urgently as equipment needed to provide access to a course. 1.The justification of the equipment request should indicate for which course(s) or activity the equipment will be used, whether the course(s) is (are) General Education, service course, required for the major, lower or upper level. It is also required to indicate the number of students involved in the course(s) for which equipment is being requested. If the equipment is to be used for research, then the list of faculty that will be using the device should be listed. 3

7.The justification of the equipment request should briefly explain the instructional and/or research purpose(s) for which the equipment will be used in language understood by all faculty. This justification can be done on the REQUEST FORM or on additional pages as required. This justification is the primary means for determining funding. 1.Although not necessarily a part of the request, it is important that Departments/School/Centers/ Library/Academic Unit explore other funding sources. If other internal or external funding has been sought for some items, this needs to be made clear. 2.Although not necessarily a part of the request, it is important that Departments/School/Centers/ Library/Academic Unit take into consideration maintenance, repair, service and other responsibilities (e.g., training) associated with equipment. 3.It is imperative that Departments/School/Centers/Library/Academic Unit ensure that individuals from other Departments/School/Centers/Library/Academic Unit are not adversely affected by magnetic fields, vibrations, noise and other disturbances associated with the operation of the equipment they request. 4.No equipment request under $2,000 will be accepted. Timetable for Requests (FY ) Departments, School, Centers, Library and other Academic Units prepare requests with budget. Budget for requested items must be actual costs (including tax and shipping) for each item. It will be the responsibility of the Department/School/Center/Library/Academic Unit to fund any unreasonable and unjustifiable cost overruns. Departments/School/Centers/Library/Academic Unit submit requests with established Budgets to the Dean’s Office by noon. Friday, June 7, 2013 The Academic Affairs’ Units A2E2 Instructional and Research Equipment Committee receives copies of all requests by noon. Friday October 11, 2013 The Academic Affairs’ Units A2E2 Instructional and Research Equipment Committee provides Dean input on requests by noon. Friday, November 1, 2013 Dean informs Departments/School/Centers/Library Academic Unit of funding priorities by noon. Friday, November 15, 2013 Dean submits requests to Provost Office by 5pm. Friday, November 15, 2013 Provost informs Deans/AVPs of funding allocations. Friday, November 29, 2013 Departments/School/Centers/Academic Units submit purchase orders (and sole source documents, if necessary) to the Dean’s Office by noon. Friday, January 18, 2014 Revised April 15,