Decentralization = New Supply? The North Bay Watershed Association’s Satellite Treatment Plant Study.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
WATER FOR THE 21 st CENTURY ECONOMY AND ENVIRONMENT Santa Ana River Watershed Conference April 11, 2013.
Advertisements

David Purkey, SEI Rob Lempert, RAND
1 Wastewater and Water Re-Use in Israel Eng. Alexander Kushnir Director General Israel Water & Sewage Authority March 2012.
AQUAREC Project Centre for Water Systems AQUAREC Project Centre for Water Systems D. Joksimovic.
Metropolitan Council Environmental Services A Clean Water Agency Presented to the Environment Committee November 9, 2010 Information Item Master Water.
Water Conservation in the San Diego Region Bill Jacoby San Diego County Water Authority North Bay Water Association April 2, 2004.
IBM Smarter Cities Challenge City of Tucson Award Recipient for 2013 November 14, 2012.
Creating a Sustainability Index for Water Planning in Southern California Presented at: AWWA ACE-09 June 18, 2009 Dan Rodrigo Vice President CDM 523 West.
Financing “Greenfield” Developments An Overview of Financing Options for a combined Water System Presentation to NARUC Water Committee July 2007 By Keith.
Sharing Water, Sharing Practices
Location Planning and Analysis
8 McGraw-Hill/Irwin Operations Management, Eighth Edition, by William J. Stevenson Copyright © 2005 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
Analysis of Water Resources Management Strategies for the Santa Ana River Watershed Region: Reuse, Recharge, Use Efficiency Nathan Adams Heather Allen.
Overview of Indian Wells Valley Hydrogeology and Management Presenters.
Municipal and Industrial Conservation and Water Reuse Workgroup Elizabeth Lovsted Sr. Civil Engineer Urban Water Institute Annual Water Policy Conference.
Seawater Desalination and Water Supply Reliability in Marin County Louis Armstrong, URS Corporation.
1 Analytical Tools, Data & Scenarios Workshop July 29, 2004 California Water Plan Update 2004.
1 Recycled Water Program for the City of Los Angeles.
Broward County-wide Master Reuse Plan
2 nd Public Meeting - Options March 30, Agenda  Overview of Water Issues  What is a WIRP?  Purpose of WIRP  Evaluation Process  WIRP Objectives.
Climate Policy Development Tom Peterson The Center For Climate Strategies August 25, 2005.
1 Improving Analytical Capabilities of the California Water Plan Rich Juricich, California Dept. of Water Resources.
Bay Area Integrated Regional Water Management Plan North Bay Watershed Association Meeting November 3, 2006 Working together to enhance sustainable water.
Building a Legacy: Integrated Water Resource Management in Damascus, Oregon Oregon Water Conference May 25, 2011 WBG PDX GS
Water for Monterey County Regional Project Capital and O&M Cost Description 1 Lyndel Melton, P.E. RMC Water and Environment.
San Diego County Water Issues 2010 Update Maritime Business and Technology Summit November 16, 2010 Seawater Desalination for San Diego.
NBWA 2010 Conference Administrative Steering Committee Meeting- May 14, 2009 Target dates *One Friday in April- April 2, 9, or 16 Location Sheraton, Petaluma.
Introduction A GENERAL MODEL OF SYSTEM OPTIMIZATION.
Location planning and analysis
State Perspective… Water Reliability, Conservation, Recycling Bill Bennett Department of Water Resources NBWA Conference, Napa April.
A Vision for the Future Presented to the North Bay Watershed Association by the Sonoma County Water Agency and Zone 7 Water Agency.
Las Gallinas Valley Sanitary District 588 kW Solar System Megan Clark Board of Directors North Bay Watershed Conference April 2008.
Water – Energy Nexus WETCAT and Climate Change
SFEP/EPA Proposal Background- prior NBWA grant EPA Funds and Process SFEP Process EPA Approval and Schedule NBWA Proposal-$1.5 Million Other Funds.
Watershed Council June 25, DWR Funding and Bay Area IRWMP Project Selection Background Regional Acceptance Process (RAP) Regional Projects North.
Maximizing Water Supply Sustainability for the Goleta Valley Ryan Drake Water Supply and Conservation Manager 2015 Central Coast Sustainability Summit.
SantaBarbaraCA.gov/Water PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT WATER RESOURCES DIVISION EMBEDDED ENERGY OF “NEW” WATER Joshua Haggmark, Water Resources Manager UCSB.
November 17, 2015 Charting the Future of Water Reuse for the City of Raleigh Sheryl D. Smith, P.E. – CDM Smith Eileen M. Navarrete, P.E., PMP – City of.
Sonoma Valley Groundwater Management Planning. 2 Presentation Overview SCWA/USGS Groundwater Study Stakeholder Assessment Groundwater Management Work.
A Traditional vs. Ecosystem Services Approach to Surface Water Management September 16, 2010 PRESENTED BY Carol Murdock, Clackamas County WES Mark Anderson,
McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2007 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. 8 Location Planning and Analysis.
Location Planning and Analysis
Marin Economic Conference Forecasting the Future The Impact of the Drought October 29, 2015.
One Water LA is a collaborative approach to develop an integrated framework for managing the City’s watersheds, water resources, and water facilities in.
McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2007 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. 8 Location Planning and Analysis.
1 CouncilUpdateJan702pet104i ppt ELLIS CREEK WATER RECYCLING FACILITY PETALUMA, CA North Bay Watershed Association Conference April 9, 2010.
BAIRWMP Update September 9, 2011 Prop 84 Prop 84 Plan Update Plan Update Implementation Grant Implementation Grant North Bay Process North Bay Process.
Climate Literacy 201 Department of Water Resources May 22, 2013.
1 EASTERN MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT Water Supply Strategic Plan Brian Jack Powell, P.E. Director of Planning June 17, 2015.
Water and Wastewater Infrastructure Project Financing 1.
> Las Vegas Valley Watershed Advisory Committee Regional Water Quality Plan.
DEPARTMENT OF LAND RESOURCE MANAGEMENT  Waste Stabilization Ponds – 56 communities, Darwin (+CAS), Palmerston, Katherine, Tennant Creek,
The Dane County Regional Hydrologic Study. Conceptualized groundwater flow system for Dane County Source: Bradbury and others, 1999.
Metropolitan North Georgia Water Planning District DRAFT Water Resource Management Plan Review
5th Shire River Basin Conference 22 February 2017 Shire River Basin Management Project Shire Basin Planning Tool Sub-Component A1 Development of a.
Advanced Technologies Decentralized Recovery and Reuse
A Payment for Ecosystem Services Approach
The Feasibility Study: something we already know
Indian Wells Valley Groundwater Basin
Water Resources Plan 2040 Update
Development of an Integrated Energy Market in Saudi Arabia
Recycled Water Project – Sharon Heights GCC
Water Reclamation Plant Feasibility Study Update May 28, 2014
Operations Management
Location Planning and Analysis
Florida and Reclaimed Water
City of Sunrise Wastewater Reuse Program
Production and Operations Management
BAIRWMP Update 10/1/2010 Background Prop 50 Supplemental funding
Status after Second Year of Work Implementing the Recommendations of the Santa Cruz Water Supply Advisory Committee Joint Meeting Santa Cruz City Council.
Presentation transcript:

Decentralization = New Supply? The North Bay Watershed Association’s Satellite Treatment Plant Study

The Satellite Treatment Plant Study develops a framework for evaluating the feasibility of decentralized Water Recycling Systems That Framework is then applied to case studies in Marin, Sonoma and Napa Counties

The Study is a Cooperative Effort between DWR & NBWA General Criteria that can be translated Attention to Energy Efficiency Reliable New Water Supply Wastewater Benefits from Reduced Mass Loading Innovative Solution for a Tough Market

The General Criteria Outlined a number of basic Analysis Techniques Decision Criteria Market Analysis Techniques Influent Flow Considerations Process & Distribution Overview Cost Calculator Economic Evaluation Techniques

Decision Criteria Balances Costs of new Supply and Benefits of Recycling Need for New Water Supply Reduced Wastewater Discharge & Mass Loading Expand Raw Potable Centralized Recycling Satellite Recycling Desalination

Considerations for The Initial Screening Analysis are Outlined Quantifying Water Use –Available Records or Assumptions Based on Land Use Quantifying Wastewater Flow –Available Records or Assumptions Based on Land Use Available Mapping –GIS is a great tool Point of View of the “Client” –Water Agency; Wastewater Agency; Full-Service City Operational Realities –Satellite Plants required Wastewater Operators

Conceptual Facility is the Basis of Cost Estimates

The General Criteria includes a “Cost Calculator” Treatment Direct Filtration for Central Plant Upgrade Membrane Bio Reactor for Satellite Plant Land Included for Satellite Electricity Rates $0.15 kw/hr Piping Costs $150 - $260/ linear foot MMWD data – constrained urban conditions Cost Data Points Are Curves Used to Build Comparative Data can be UpdatedFor Changing Variables

Calculator “output” facilitates Economic Analysis

The Site Specific Analysis Applies the General Criteria Central Marin Service Area – 6 sites North Marin Service Area – 2 sites Sonoma Valley Service Area – 2 sites Napa Service Area – 2 sites

Types of Conclusions We Expected General Rule of Thumb…. Satellites become cost effective at distances greater than 4 miles from the Central Plant

The Site Specific Analysis can also be described as “reality sets in” “reality sets in”

Central Marin Challenges Coordination with thirteen distinct sanitation agencies A relatively wet climate damps irrigation demand A strong conservation ethic results in “frugal” landscaping A mature residential community without many “anchor tenants”

Central Marin Analysis

Central Marin Conclusions 1. Satellites Can be Cost Effective!! Satellite Location Reliable Yield AF/Y Cost $/AF/Y Central Plant Alternative Cost $/AF/Y Least Cost Alternative Mill Valley Golf Course 145$7,200Expand SASM$2,300Central Strawberry Peninsula 102$4,324Expand SASM$9,067Satellite Mt. Tamalpias Cemetery 64$5,633Expand Las Gallinas $2,605Central Peacock Gap Golf Course 248$2,803Upgrade CMSA$7,820Satellite San Anselmo103$3,726Upgrade CMSA$9,722Satellite

Central Marin Conclusions 2. But Not at Cost Effective as the Next Increment of Potable Water Satellite Location Reliable Yield AF/Y Central Plant Alternative Least Cost Alternative Potable Cost $/AF/Y Cost Above Potable Mill Valley Golf Course 145Expand SASM Central$1,800$500 Strawberry Peninsula 102Expand SASM Satellite$1,800$2,524 Mt. Tamalpias Cemetery 64Expand Las Gallinas Central$1,800$805 Peacock Gap Golf Course 248Upgrade CMSA Satellite$1,800$1,003 San Anselmo103Upgrade CMSA Satellite$1,800$1,926

Central Marin Conclusions 3. Outside Contributions Can tip the Balance!! LocationCapital CostOutside Contribution (25%) Annualize d Capital Cost $/AF/Y O&M $/AF/Y Total Cost $/AF/Y Potable Cost $/AF/Y Cost Above Potable $/AF/Y Mill Valley$3,146,000$786,500$1,182$545$1,727$1,800($73) Strawberry Peninsula $5,000,000$1,250,000$2,671$578$3,249$1,800$1,449 Mt. Tamalpias $896,000$224,500$765$245$1,010$1,800($790) Peacock Gap $4,570,000$1,142,500$1,004$216$1,222$1,800($578) San Anselmo $4,320,000$1,080,000$2,285$495$2,780$1,800$960 Totals$17,932,000$4,483,500

Decentralized Recycled Water Presents a new frame for reviewing feasibility Presents a new frame for reviewing feasibility Can provide a potential new supply in urban areas Can provide a potential new supply in urban areas