2. BAIRWMP Update 10/1/2010 Background Prop 50 Supplemental funding
Prop 1-E- Flood Management
Prop 84
Planning Grant
IRWMP Implementation

3. Background Prop 50 supplemental -BAIRWMP not funded 7 applicants
Funded-Total $7,389,000
Monterey County Water Resources Authority $997,000
North Coast IRWM $2,176,860
Tahoe Sierra IRWM $2,115,272
Upper Kings Basin IWMA $2,099,868
Prop 1-E
Applications due April 2011

4. Planning Guidelines $20 million statewide $ 1 million max per grant
25 % match
New Plan elements
Land use
Climate Change
Must commit to update plan if you get Implementation funds

5. BAIRWMP Plan Proposal Submitted September 27, 2010 MMWD is applicant
Grant request-$842,556
Match $569,761 ( ~ 40 %)
Cash- $210,494
In kind- $359,267
Includes- SVCSD -Groundwater plan
Salt and Nutrient Management Planning
$205k request & 50% match ( 25 % cash, 25% in kind)

6. F u n d I n g Areas

7. Implementation DWR Guidelines
IRWM implementation grant competition is slightly different in that funding is allocated to individual funding areas. If there are multiple IRWM regions in a funding area, those IRWM regions are competing for the funding allocated to that funding area. DWR will make funding decisions based on application scores within a funding area. In order to ensure wise investments of State general obligation bond funds, minimum scores for various criteria may be implemented to ensure that quality proposals are awarded funding.

8. Implementation Proposal
“Regional” projects
Reviewed by Project Screening Sub committee
Decision by BAIRWMP Coordinating Committee
Application due January 7

9. Proposals as of 9/21/2010
Regional Drought Relief & Water Conservation ($6.5 m)
Regional Recycling ($6 m)
Regional Green Infrastructure Capacity Building($10.9 m)
Bay Area Wetland Ecosystem Restoration ($3 m)
Disadvantaged Communities Watershed program (1.2 m)
Interactive Flood and Waterways Infrastructure Map($.75k)
Evaluating Regional Ecosystem Restoration using Steelhead ($.371k)

10. Drought Relief &Water Conservation
11 water districts
MMWD, City of Napa, SCWA, Solano
This consists of 5-6 rebate elements (outdoor & indoor)
Education and training element (StopWaste.org),
Regional outdoor landscape calculator element ($375 k).
$6.5 million request, & $8.5 million match
~ $485/care foot

11. Recycling BACWA presented ~ 54 projects totaling ~ $500 million
West-1 East- 4
North-14 South- 35
Directed to develop $5-6 million proposal

12. Green Infrastructure SFEP- “ catalyst” for more projects
Request $ 10.9 million, $7.9 million match
North- $1.675
SCWA ($ 850 k) and Napa FCWCD ($825k)
East- $3.75 m San Pablo Avenue-
West- $1.93 m, 3 projects
South-$ m
SFEP/SFEI-$300k

13. Wetlands State Coastal Conservancy
Requested $ 3 million for 3 projects
North-Sears Point
$1 million request, $14 million match
South –Bair Island
$1 million request
Dutch slough-outside region (dropped 9/30/10)
$1 million request-9/30/10-will identify replacement

14. Floodplains Mapping -BAFPAA & SFEI DAC & Watersheds
Request $750 k , $250 k match
DAC & Watersheds
-Request $1.2 million, $ 650 k match
- Marin City (out), Richmond, San Francisquito, Pescadero
Combined- (9/30/10) $ 1.5 million total
Steelhead Monitoring- CEMAR
-Request $382 k, match-$114k (< 25%)*

15. Screening Process Projects total ~ $29 million- Evaluation of projects
$15 Million likely available
Evaluation of projects
Score-Plan and DWR scoring
–IRWMP (28-46) + Cost/Benefit (15)+
Preferences (10)
Screening factors
timeliness/ feasibility/ CEQA

16. Scoring 84 50 Workplan 15 Funding match /////// 5 (10%)
Scientific Merit
////////
F. A Balance?
(5)
////
Budget 5
Schedule
Mon. & Ass..& Perf. Meas.
WS-Econ. Anal.-Cost/benefit
(20)-> 15
W Q & Other benefits
(5)-> 15 10
Flood Damage-C/B ?
Program Preferences
Total 85 80

17. -Efficient use of resources
Develop Options
Minimize number of projects
Emphasize scoring or objective(s) or CA preferences . . .
Proportionally reduce all eligible regional projects
Emphasize Effectiveness and Economic Analysis
?? Combination, Other
& Criteria
-Efficient use of resources
- Maintain stakeholder involvement
?Encourage regional collaboration
? Anticipate plan update
Recommendation to Coordinating Committee- October 25

18. DWR questions
1) How is DWR approaching the first round of Prop 84 funding?- State overview- Raps approved and available funding.
2) What are DWR preferences and priorities?
3) What are expectations for future rounds of funding?
4) How is DWR approaching the 3 IRWM areas that are coterminous with the funding region (North Coast, Bay Area, SAWPA)?
5) Will DWR defer to the BAIRWMP Project Selection Process?
6) How will cost benefit analysis be applied for the 3
coterminous regions?