PSRC FOCUSED INTERVENTION T EAM P ROCESS January 17, 2013 HAPPY NEW YEAR.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
WASC Visiting Committee Report 3/28/2007. Areas of Strength Organization The Co Principals and the School Leadership Team provide direction and support.
Advertisements

Professional Learning Communities Connecting the Initiatives
Through Instructional Rounds
 Reading School Committee January 23,
Service Agency Accreditation Recognizing Quality Educational Service Agencies Mike Bugenski
Forward Moving Districts Information Summarized by Iowa Support Team as they Study Identified Buildings and Districts Actions in those Buildings and Districts.
INSTRUCTIONAL LEADERSHIP: CLASSROOM WALKTHROUGHS
1 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations – for all students – for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through the.
Leadership Role in Creating an Effective Mathematics Classroom.
This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation Grant No Building, Supporting, and Sustaining Professional Growth.
Best Practices. Overview of Best Practices Literacy Best Practice Documents: Were developed by curriculum staff and area specialists, with coaches’ and.
Keystone State Reading Conference October 29, 2012 Dr. Deb Carr, King’s College.
TIMELESS LEARNING POLICY & PRACTICE. JD HOYE President National Academy Foundation.
The Instructional Core Team (ICT). The Charge 1. Understand the charge of the ICT and decide whether you want to commit to it This may be the most challenging.
1. 2 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations –for all students –for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through.
Southern Regional Education Board HSTW An Integrated and Embedded Approach to Professional Development and School Improvement Using the Six-Step Process.
Jackson Public School District Holistic Accountability in Action.
TODAY Observations Hypotheses Connection to Student Performance CSIP ASPIRING Goal(s) Objectives & Actions.
State Role in Supporting Educators C HRIS M INNICH M AY 2012 | SCEE M EETING.
Leadership: Connecting Vision With Action Presented by: Jan Stanley Spring 2010 Title I Directors’ Meeting.
The Direction of the Baldwin-Woodville Area School District August 2010.
Citywide Instructional Expectations, Teacher Teams and the QR—Implications for Mary Barton SATIF CFN 204 May 17, 2013.
Elementary & Middle School 2014 ELA MCAS Evaluation & Strategy.
Segment 5: Sample Activities Federal Accountability Requirements School Leadership Instructional Supervision 1.
Angilee M. Downing, M.Ed. Vision: Educational Excellence For All Students.
Classroom Data Feedback, Follow Up and Follow Through Feedback, Follow Up and Follow Through CSDE CSDE CAS CAS C.E.S. C.E.S.
Type Date Here Type Presenter Name/Contact Here Making Evaluation Work at Your School Leadership Institute 2012.
Effective Coaching for Success Presenter: Dr. Wendy Perry 2015.
1. Housekeeping Items June 8 th and 9 th put on calendar for 2 nd round of Iowa Core ***Shenandoah participants*** Module 6 training on March 24 th will.
Intro to TPEP. A new evaluation system should be a model for professional growth, supporting collaboration between teachers and principals in pursuit.
The College Board Standards for College Success CCSSO – SEC State Collaborative Alignment Study CCSSO-SEC Meeting and Content Analysis Workshop San Diego,
Teresa K. Todd EDAD 684 School Finance/Ethics March 23, 2011.
A state-wide effort to improve teaching and learning to ensure that all Iowa students engage in a rigorous & relevant curriculum. The Core Curriculum.
Expeditionary Learning Queens Middle School Meeting May 29,2013 Presenters: Maryanne Campagna & Antoinette DiPietro 1.
AdvancED District Accreditation Process © 2010 AdvancED.
Building and Recognizing Quality School Systems DISTRICT ACCREDITATION © 2010 AdvancED.
SACS-CASI Southern Association of Colleges and Schools Council on Accreditation and School Improvement FAMU DRS – QAR Quality Assurance Review April 27-28,
WASC/CDE Visiting Committee Final Presentation ___________________ Dublin High School ___________________ March 9-11, 2009.
Building and Recognizing Quality School Systems Brevard Public Schools District Accreditation.
Distinguished Educator Initiative. 2 Mission Statement The Mission of the Distinguished Educator is to build capacity in school districts to enable students.
Reform Model for Change Board of Education presentation by Superintendent: Dr. Kimberly Tooley.
RtII Response to Instruction and Intervention paTTAN.
READING FIRST IN ACTION Knowing and Acting: A Practical 8-Week System to Improve Achievement By Betsy Eaves and Jessica Evans.
Curriculum Overview New Teacher Staff Development August 2007.
Southern Regional Education Board High Schools That Work Jo Kister, SREB Consultant Archived Information.
A Signature Tool of The Institute for Learning
Common Core State Standards Implications for Leadership Curriculum Leadership Council Networking Session.
Activity 5a Systems of Professional Learning Module 5 Grades K–5: Focus on Deepening Implementation.
The Leadership Challenge in Graduating Students with Disabilities Guiding Questions Joy Eichelberger, Ed.D. Pennsylvania Training and Technical Assistance.
Loudon County Schools External Review Exit Report February 19-21, 2013.
October 10, Start/end on time All technology is on-task Hold each other accountable Dive in to make this your own: no acting Stop and ask your burning.
Dr. Derrica Davis Prospective Principal Candidate: Fairington Elementary School.
Zimmerly Response NMIA Audit. Faculty Response Teacher input on Master Schedule. Instructional Coaches Collaborative work. Design and implement common.
Vision Statement We Value - An organization culture based upon both individual strengths and relationships in which learners flourish in an environment.
Building and Recognizing Quality School Systems DISTRICT ACCREDITATION GRAVES COUNTY SCHOOLS © 2010 AdvancED.
Quality Review Updates for Presented by Mary Barton, SATIF CFN 204 Assistant Principals’ Conference September 2, 2011.
Kentucky Core Academic Standards Pike County Schools.
Presented by Mary Barton SATIF CFN 204 Principals’ Conference September 16, 2011.
Developed in partnership with the Montgomery County Public Schools (MD), Forward is a K–5 instructional system of services, tools, and curriculum. Forward.
Instructional Leadership and Application of the Standards Aligned System Act 45 Program Requirements and ITQ Content Review October 14, 2010.
Teaching and Learning Cycle and Differentiated Instruction A Perfect Fit Rigor Relevance Quality Learning Environment Differentiation.
ACS WASC/CDE Visiting Committee Final Presentation Panorama High School March
Avon Grove School District October 2009
By: Alice Tackett and Jill Maynard
Instructional Personnel Performance Appraisal System
Instructional Personnel Performance Appraisal System
Leadership for Standards-Based Education
February 21-22, 2018.
Instructional Personnel Performance Appraisal System
Instructional Personnel Performance Appraisal System
Presentation transcript:

PSRC FOCUSED INTERVENTION T EAM P ROCESS January 17, 2013 HAPPY NEW YEAR

P URPOSE OF FIT PROCESS District level leadership recognizes that all schools continually strive to improve. The FIT is designed to support those efforts by providing districts and schools with a clear view of their strengths, areas of development, challenges and successes.

DIMENSIONS OF FIT Instructional Excellence and Alignment Teaching and Learning Support for Student Achievement Job-Embedded Professional Development Leadership Capacity Relationship Building

D ISTRICT F OCUS What do we want to accomplish? Close the achievement gap between groups of students Create a culture of high expectations and provide students with support they need to be successful. Provide a rigorous curriculum that challenges and prepares students for the next academic level Engage students with quality instructional practices that emphasize key literacy, numeracy and science instructional practices and motivate students to make the effort to meet grade-level standards Create a shared vision of continuous improvement among school leaders and faculty Meet local, state and federal standards

S TAGES OF FIT P ROCESS Preparation Site Visits Exit Conference (Feedback/Strengths/Challenges) Follow-up Visits Final Report

P REPARATION Prior to visit: Team leader will meet with team members to discuss expectations and protocol, review Code of Conduct, schedule, observation form, verification form Team leader will meet with principal to begin the relationship building process – discuss process & needs, obtain master schedule, identify key practices, discuss benchmark data, professional development focus etc., Meet with all staff after school to state expectations, best practice checklist, Common Core Implementation in the Classroom, observations, etc Team assignment and schedule

S ITE VISIT Day One -Team leader will identify instructional rounds protocols Classrooms identified and assigned Team leader will accompany team members on at least one class observation the first day. This is to ensure consistency of judgment Instructional rounds elements to identify – lesson plans, use of technology, student engagement, vocabulary usage, essential questions, literacy integration, evidence of student work, real-world connections, I Can statements, etc Debriefing – Team members Debriefing with principal – Team Leader

S ITE VISIT Semester visits ( This process will be completed with teachers) Check for Evidence & Impact- Team members meet with teachers during planning for debriefing – instructional rounds feedback ( identify areas of strengths and improvements), discuss best practices checklist, plan next lesson, review samples of student work, discuss span of control, formative assessment data, benchmark data, and plans for remediation and intervention. Semester visits - Observe planned lesson & Debriefing with Team Leader Semester visits – Provide feedback and collaborate with teacher

S ITE VISIT Semester Visits – Team Member follow-up visits continue (specific to the needs of assigned teachers) Debriefing – Team leader & team members will work schedule– 2 days/month mimimum from February – May 10, 2013 After May 10– Team leader will provide feedback to principal and staff