Lt Col Tim Brown HQ AFSPC/DA5F Launch and Test Range Activities Update May 2006.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Planning, Budgeting, Acquisition & Management of Capital Assets Capital programming is an integrated process within an agency for planning, budgeting,
Advertisements

Advanced Hypersonic Weapon Flight Test Overview to the Space & Missile Defense Conference 14 August 2012 Ms. Debra G. Wymer Director, Technical Center.
Roadmap for Sourcing Decision Review Board (DRB)
State of Indiana Business One Stop (BOS) Program Roadmap Updated June 6, 2013 RFI ATTACHMENT D.
AF Aerial Layer Network Approach
Supply Chain Management System (SCMS) ICT4D Conference: Accra, Ghana, March 2013 SCMS Overview 1.
Using Mitigation Planning to Reduce Disaster Losses Karen Helbrecht and Kathleen W. Smith United States: Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) May.
Global Positioning System (GPS) III Requirements Process
Georgina Anthony Antonella Demartini Chanell Fletcher Jacob Lile Serenay Usta.
Systems Engineering in a System of Systems Context
Science Operations Status Maria Santos-Lleo EPIC cal & ops meeting, Madrid March, 2010.
Roadmap Name Strategic Roadmap #n Interim Report April 15, 2005.
Slide: 1 27 th CEOS Plenary |Montréal | November 2013 Agenda Item: 15 Chu ISHIDA(JAXA) on behalf of Rick Lawford, GEO Water CoP leader GEO Water.
Army Doctrine Publication (ADP) 3-37; and Army
Reducing the cost of sustained operations through technology infusion April 2004 Darin Skelly NASA Kennedy Space Center Transformational Spaceport & Range.
TEMPO Mission Project July 23, 2013 Project Manager: Alan Little.
Modernization and GPS III Southern California Section ION Meeting 11 March 2009 Lt Col David Goldstein, US Air Force Chief Engineer GPS Wing This briefing.
Module 3 Develop the Plan Planning for Emergencies – For Small Business –
Collaboration to Meet Future T&E Needs ITEA 14 September Mr. Mike Crisp Deputy Director, Air Warfare Operational Test and Evaluation.
Test Organization and Management
DoD Acquisition Domain (Sourcing) (DADS) Analysis of Alternatives (AoA) E-Business/SPS Joint Users’ Conference November 15-19, 2004 Houston, TX.
Agenda Teams Responsibilities Timeline Homework and next steps.
Information Technology Architecture Group ITAG, version 2.0 We need resource commitments! February ITLC.
NIST Special Publication Revision 1
Frank Shipley, Chair, S-TEK Subcommittee Mary Mahaffy, Science Coordinator Karen Jenni, Insight Decisions - Facilitator S-TEK Implementation Plan.
Maj Richard “Krash” Krasner Directorate of Requirements Headquarters Air Force Space Command Air Force Space Command's Environmental Monitoring Requirements.
Adoption of Commercial EDI Standards for DoD Logistics Business Transactions Integrated Product Team (EDI IPT) – Expanded DEFENSE LOGISTICS AGENCY Report.
1 SPSRB Decision Brief on Declaring a Product Operational Instructions / Guidance This template will be used by NESDIS personnel to recommend to the SPSRB.
CoCom Involvement in the Joint Capabilities Process November 4, 2003.
.1 RESEARCH & TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT CENTER SYSTEM AND INFORMATION SCIENCES JHU/MIT Proprietary Titan MESSENGER Autonomy Experiment.
Commercial Range User Requirements Process Mr. Kelvin Coleman Lt. Col. Tim Brown October 26, 2005.
US DOT Planning for Operations Initiative – An Update AASHTO SCOH Annual Meeting June 14-17, 2009 Manchester, NH Rick Backlund – FHWA Office of Operations.
Government Procurement Simulation (GPSim) Overview.
Personnel Requirements for Implementing the New Triad Robert B. Barker December 15, 2005.
US Army Corps of Engineers South Atlantic Division One Corps Serving The Army and the Nation US Army Corps of Engineers South Atlantic Division One Corps.
SIP Improvement: Current initiatives Anna Marie Wood Director Air Quality Policy Division Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards U.S. EPA WESTAR.
Office of Acquisition and Property Management Proposed Changes to Attachment G FY 2011 – FY 2015 Five Year Plan.
AFRL Nuclear S&T Investment Strategy Dr. David Hardy SES Associate Director for Space Technology Air Force Research Laboratory 27 August 2010.
Search Engine Optimization © HiTech Institute. All rights reserved. Slide 1 What is Solution Assessment & Validation?
Request for Proposal (RFP)
03/11/021 Spaceport Vision Team Members. 03/11/022 Systems Definition Spaceport System Spaceport Stakeholder Needs High-Level Trade Study Performance.
March 2004 At A Glance NASA’s GSFC GMSEC architecture provides a scalable, extensible ground and flight system approach for future missions. Benefits Simplifies.
Jackie Voss Manager, Global Standards Development ATIS All-IP Transition Initiatives September 30, 2015.
Earned Value Management Update Nancy L. Spruill Director, Acquisition Resources and Analysis Office of the Under Secretary of Defense (Acquisition, Technology.
SOLUTION What kind of plan do we need? How will we know if the work is on track to be done? How quickly can we get this done? How long will this work take.
1 Global Design Effort: Controls & LLRF Controls & LLRF Working Group: Tuesday Session (29 May 07) John Carwardine Kay Rehlich.
Overview of RUP Lunch and Learn. Overview of RUP © 2008 Cardinal Solutions Group 2 Welcome  Introductions  What is your experience with RUP  What is.
Evaluate Phase Pertemuan Matakuliah: A0774/Information Technology Capital Budgeting Tahun: 2009.
Office of Space Flight Spaceport and Range Technology Development Initiative Al Sofge NASA Headquarters May 15, 2001.
ASTWG Vision Team Group Exercise: Initial Summary of Results.
542d Automatic Test Sustainment Group Automatic Test System (ATS) Acquisition & Sustainment Processes Value Stream Analysis Automatic Test System (ATS)
Replacing Your LMS: Why, When, What & How? When considering the viability of your LMS, it’s critical to deeply consider your organization and its needs.
Continual Service Improvement Methods & Techniques.
Integrity  Service  Excellence Challenges of Transitioning Technology to Programs Maj Gen Charles R Davis AAC/CC 3 Sep 09 Air Force Materiel Command.
This Briefing is Unclassified Space Situation Awareness (SSA) for the Warfighter 25 August 2005 HQ AFSPC/DRC Lt Col Troy Pannebecker.
March 2004 At A Glance The AutoFDS provides a web- based interface to acquire, generate, and distribute products, using the GMSEC Reference Architecture.
Leadership Guide for Strategic Information Management Leadership Guide for Strategic Information Management for State DOTs NCHRP Project Information.
Project Management Methodology Project Closing. Project closing stage Must be performed for all projects, successfully completed or shut off by management.
Maj John Tieken HQ AFSPC/A5FG Launch and Test Range Activities Update October 2006.
Environment, Safety, and Occupational Health Opportunities in DoD Business Transformation May 4, 2006.
1 Integration of Process Initiatives And Assessments Common Process Framework Integration of Management System Standards and Initiatives (QMS/CMMI/Lean/PMBP)
Supportability Design Considerations
Life Cycle Logistics.
Milestone A to Milestone B Requirements Management Activities
Identify the Risk of Not Doing BA
One ODOT: Positioned for the Future
Phase 1 Tollgate Review Discussion Template
Project Ideation Agile Down-to-Earth © 2016.
ONGARD Modernization Closeout Certification Presentation for PCC Energy, Minerals and Natural Resources Department State Land Office Taxation and Revenue.
OU BATTLECARD: E-Business Suite Courses and Certifications
Presentation transcript:

Lt Col Tim Brown HQ AFSPC/DA5F Launch and Test Range Activities Update May 2006

1 Overview  Operational Requirements Document (ORD) Analysis  Future Range Integrated Product Team (FRIPT)  Ballistic Missile Range Safety Technology (BMRST) System  Future Range Planning Project (FRPP)  Responsive Launch Traffic Control (RLTC)

2 Operational Requirements Document (ORD) Analysis 2003 ORD is the primary requirements repository for the modernization of the Launch and Test Range System (LTRS) ORD was written to facilitate spiral development of the LTRS in an incremental fashion Original timelines for meeting incremental ORD requirements have been affected by lack of sufficient funding ORD analysis effort initiated to get a bearing on where HQ AFSPC and SMC are with respect to: Meeting ORD requirements Validating the sense of what requirements are being met by modernization efforts Formulating a future plan to address and meet ORD requirements

3 Future Range IPT (FRIPT) Next-Generation Range Near-TermMid-TermFar-Term SLRSC RSA IIA FY11 FY18 (revised to FY23) LTRS Ops Responsive Launch Traffic Control (RLTC) Acquisition RLTC Ops AoA Sustainment Current Range Today FY05 Mid-Term Guidance Keep ranges fully mission capable Provide interim support to limited responsive launch Maintain complementary to far-term architecture 14 AF/CC request (then Lt Gen Hamel) for range vision 45 SW/CC (then Brig Gen Pavlovich) request for mid-term roadmap

4 FRIPT Roadmap FY2008 FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012 FY2013 FY2014 FY2015 FY2016 FY2017 FY2018 Integrated Priorities List Worst ActorsOM&S projects in Range Out Year Plan to meet the remainder of the LTRS ORD requirements Legacy Systems Sustain as necessary to meet needs of range users & operators Instrumentation Modernization Complete by end of FY12 if done in parallel; by end of 2014 if done serially Radars—ROSA Integrate/Operate New Range Systems to Address Needs Range Technology Demo Program GALT Range 1 Develop/demonstrateCertify on ER & WR REDUCE NEED FOR REDUNDANT RANGE ASSETS IN FAVOR OF NEW, MORE RELIABLE SYSTEMS Cooperatively assess & prioritize to select technologies to demonstrate 3. Demonstrate utility of technology for range capability4. Decide whether to incorporate into ranges RSA IIA SLRSC Development Two 2-year options extend SLRSC beyond FY06 Telemetry system upgrades Command system upgrades Optics system upgrades GOAL: REDUCE O&M COSTS AS A RESULT OF WORKING OFF DEFERRED SUSTAINMENT ITEMS 1. Gather user needs & technology opportunities REDUCE O&M COSTS BY REPLACING SYSTEMS WITH MORE EFFICIENT APPROACHES ORD Increments Increment 1 Increment 2 Increment x

5 FRIPT Report Conclusions 1.Sustainment must be the first priority for the ranges in the FY08 POM 2.Costly redundancy is used to compensate for degrading reliability 3.Instrumentation modernization must be defined and defendable for the FY08 POM 4.Range user needs are generally being met and future needs are not well defined 5.Responsive range requirements are currently being defined; ranges can currently meet the scenarios as identified today 6.SPO is addressing most ORD requirements though most are not yet currently met 7.Range technologies have been identified by range user community as potential solutions to certain needs

6 Ballistic Missile Range Safety Technology (BMRST) HQ AFSPC is considering the integration and employment of the BMRST system as a potential asset for use in the Launch and Test Range System (LTRS) architecture BMRST has potential for meeting telemetry and command destruct requirements from the LTRS Operational Requirements Document BMRST was examined via an Integrated Product Team venue with splinter groups researching and reporting on four areas: Requirements, Concept of Employment, Test/Certification, and Logistics AFSPC has tasked 14 AF for it’s operational perspective and analysis and SMC for it’s cost effectiveness and overall system suitability analysis Analysis results will be presented to AFSPC/CC for a decision on integrating BMRST into the operational LTRS architecture

7 BMRST Operational View The Ballistic Missile Range Safety Technology (BMRST) System, with spiral development upgrades, provides telemetry tracking and command destruct system capability in stand-alone or integrated modes of operation

8 Future Range Planning Project Brand new effort catalyzed by the Future Range IPT results and led by SMC/LRR to develop a long-term acquisition plan for the Launch and Test Range System Charter currently under development—intent is to: Develop a cohesive modernization architecture and executable implementation plan Kickoff underway late May 06 Effort to yield POM inputs for FY10 POM

9 Range Launch Traffic Control (RLTC) RLTC Initial Capabilities Document (ICD) Approved at Air Force level on 16 March 2006 Preparing for Joint validation this summer RLTC Analysis of Alternatives (AoA) Study plan under development Still hope to get funding Launch vehicle autonomy critical for near-term interim capability Satellite data relay On-board tracking such as GPS metric tracking Autonomous flight termination Integrated systems health management (ISHM) Adaptive guidance and control

10 Summary  Operational Requirements Document (ORD) Analysis  Future Range Integrated Product Team (FRIPT)  Ballistic Missile Range Safety Technology (BMRST) System  Future Range Planning Project (FRPP)  Responsive Launch Traffic Control (RLTC)

11 Backups

12 Results of Initial Analysis Regarding Status of LTRS ORD Increment 1 Threshold Requirements—SPO Performance Requirements Addressed 38% 17% 22% 16% 7% 77% Requirements Addressed 15% 42% 19% 12% 69% Requirements Addressed Requirements Addressed

13 Results of Initial Analysis Regarding Status of LTRS ORD Increment 1 Threshold Requirements—to Justify POM Inputs Of 139 requirements, initial analysis identified 38% as met on the Eastern Range; 12% on the Western Range—need analysis to identify items at risk of becoming unmet Requirements Not Met 38% 17% 22% 16% 7% 62% Requirements Not Met 15% 42% 19% 12% 88% Requirements Not Met Requirements Met Requirements Not Met Requirements Met

14 ORD Analysis HQ AFSPC/A5FG assessed all 139 LTRS ORD Increment 1 Threshold Requirements in light of Met, Partially Met, and Unmet Capabilities