POLISH DECENTRALIZATION 1990 – 2005 MILESTONES: (I) Political changes – 1989 (II) Municipalities – 1990 (III) The Cities Act – 1996 (IV) Constitution –

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Civics: Government and Economics in Action
Advertisements

Chapter 13 (“Local Government”)
Multilevel Governance – History or Future? The Swedish Way! 10 March 2011 Carola Gunnarsson First vice president of the Swedish Association of Local Authorities.
Economics of Public Sector The Local Government in CZ Ing. David Slavata, Ph.D.
Chapter Nine State and Local Government Local Government ~~~~~
Basic Functions of Local Govt. Roads Law Enforcement Education Water & Sewer Services Welfare Services Fire Protection Parks Recreation Programs Cemetaries.
Local Self- Government in Hungary. Republic of Hungary Capital-city: Capital-city: Budapest Government: Government: parliamentary republic Neighbouring.
Introducing EU standards in Moldova: towards a new model of cooperation and planning.
Georgia’s Local Governments.
The Treaties, Institutions and Policies of the EU
The Swedish Association of Local Authorities and Regions (SALAR) SALAR represents Sweden’s 290 municipalities and 20 county councils/regions. It acts.
Local Government and Politics in Texas Chapter 22 O’Connor and Sabato American Government: Continuity and Change.
Local Government in Finland.
January 17-18, 2008, Riga, Latvia. Waste management in Latvia -I Latvia: area - 64,589 km 2 ; population - 2,366 thousand people. Administration The territory.
Polish administration
Local Government System in Romania. Map of Europe.
LOCAL SELF- GOVERNMENT IN SLOVENIA. Legal context Slovenia is a "territorially unified and indivisible State“ (art. 4 of the Constitution). It has a bicameral.
Act LXV of 1990 on Local Self-Governments
March 2007, Smolyan Angelos SANOPOULOS, Euroconsultants SA CROSS BORDER COOPERATION Bulgaria-Greece Greek State Structure and Partner Identification.
Local. LOCAL GOVERNMENT Types of Local Government – County & Municipality Municipality – a city, town, or village with an organized government and the.
EBRD Cities in transition seminar CITY OF SOFIA - BULGARIA.
Perspectives for local and regional development in Saxony-Anhalt Conference „EU funds for improvement of services provided by the municipalities“ Riga,
THE GRAND DUCHY OF LUXEMBOURG. The Capital-city: Luxembourg A hereditary duchy with a unicameral parliamentary system An independent state since the London.
2007 Municipalities 33 Inhabitants 1,187,736 Year 2006 Area 11,000 square kilometres Population density106 inhabitants per square kilometre Compared with.
Territorial public administration, budgets and finance.
Structure and Function of Local Government. Structure of Local Government.
Part-financed by the European Union Partnership Joint Technical Secretariat Lead Applicant Seminar for 1st application round Hamburg, April 2008.
County Government Counties – subdivisions of the state set up to carry out governmental functions – 159 counties in GA All county governments must be uniform.
Local self-government in Croatia
Concept of devolution and the demarcation of roles Workshop of PILDAT 29th and 30th of January 2003 Bhurban, Pakistan.
1 One year EU membership - impact on regional development in Latvia Maris Pukis, Senior Adviser, Latvian Association of Local and Regional Governments.
Budgetary Systems, Local Finance, Finance EU Public Economics Filip Hrůza.
Decentralization in Ukraine
Chapter 14 North Carolina Local Governments Important: 2 types: Municipality and County Local governments are not in the Constitution, created by General.
COGITO Professor Ivan Koprić Faculty of Law, University of Zagreb September, 3 rd 2009.
Local Governments Chapter 24 Section1. Created by the State Local governments have no legal independence. Established by the state, they are entirely.
Local self-government in Latvia. Latvijas Republika  Area : km²  Population: inhabitants  Density: 35.7 inhabitants/km²  Capital-city:
LOCAL GOVERNMENT. County Governments County: the largest territorial and political subdivision of a state County: the largest territorial and political.
Local Government in Lithuania. The Republic of Lithuania Area: km² Population: 3,5 million inhabitants. Density: 57 inhabitants per km² Capital-city:
Essential Question: What are the different units of local governments and how are they different?
County Government CH. 13 SEC. 2/CE.7a Mr. Collins and Mrs. Kozlik.
Civics 10 Chapter 9 Local Governments. Definition: Units of government found with a state. Examples: counties, cities (municipal), townships Statistics:
LOCAL SELF GOVERNMENT IN GEORGIA Nino Sukhiashvili 24 November, 2015 Prague.
1 A better life in Skåne Municipalities33 Inhabitants Area km 2 Population density Skåne106 per km 2 Sweden22 per km.
Poland The structural reform – local and regional finances Andrzej Porawski (Association of Polish Cities)
LOCAL GOVERNMENT. County Governments County: the largest territorial and political subdivision of a state County: the largest territorial and political.
Reference material: TOOLKIT ON INTERMUNICIPAL COOPERATION
Chapter 16: State and Local Government Section 3: Local Government & Citizen Participation (pgs )
STANDARDS: SS8CG5 The student will analyze the role of local governments in the state of Georgia. a. Explain the origins, functions, purposes, and differences.
Vojko Obersnel, M.Sc. President of the Association of Croatian Cities
Georgia’s Government:
Section 1: County Government
History and structure of local governments in Germany
LOCAL GOVERNMENT.
SOCIAL STUDIES HIGH SCHOOL – CIVICS
Thursday March 19, 2015 Quiz Reminder
STANDARDS: SS8CG5 The student will analyze the role of local governments in the state of Georgia. a. Explain the origins, functions, purposes, and differences.
Local Government in Georgia
Municipal Self-Government in Germany (Berlin)
The administrative districts in Baden-Württemberg
The Local Government Budget
The Councillors Role: Oversight & Delegation System
Georgia’s Government:
Civics: Government and Economics in Action
Local Government Chapter 24
Local Government Notes
SOL CE.8 “Local Government”
Chapter 9 section 1 & 2 notes
Local Government in Georgia
Local Governments Georgia Studies.
Presentation transcript:

POLISH DECENTRALIZATION 1990 – 2005 MILESTONES: (I) Political changes – 1989 (II) Municipalities – 1990 (III) The Cities Act – 1996 (IV) Constitution – 1997 (V) Counties and regions – 1999

I. Decentralization process (first stage)  Decision to create basic level of self-go- vernment: municipalities  Political agreement = no serious obstacles  Role of partners (politicians, experts, civic committees, media)  Pattern – European standards  Quality of results of the first stage

II. Municipalities (first level) (1)  Outcome of the Process: First democratic election in Poland – 1990 First democratic election in Poland – municipalities (38,2 mln inhab.) 2490 municipalities (38,2 mln inhab.) Average size – inhabitants (similar to European average) Average size – inhabitants (similar to European average) 65 cities with county rights (similar to German „Kreisfreistädte” (12,8 mln inhab.) 65 cities with county rights (similar to German „Kreisfreistädte” (12,8 mln inhab.) 300 towns and 530 town-rural municipalities 300 towns and 530 town-rural municipalities 1600 rural municipalities 1600 rural municipalities

II. Municipalities (first level) (2)  All local responsibilities (land-use planning, environment, public transportation, local roads, water supply, sewage treatment, solid waste management, basic education, social welfare, local culture, open health care, local development, basic administration services);  Municipal council (15 – 45 members), directly elected for a 4-year term; in municipalities of more than inhab. – proportional, in smaller – one-seat districts;  Since 2002 – direct election of mayor (previously - election by council) for the same term

II. Municipalities (first level) (3)  Municipal finances (2004): a) in 2425 municipalities – 1615 PLN / per capita b) in 65 cities with county rights – 2505 PLN / pc  Structure: a) direct income (local taxes and fees) 34,9 % b) shares in PIT and CIT 20,4 % c) general subsidies 32,9 % d) task transfers 11,8 %

III. The Cities Act (1996-8)  Process: 1994 – pilot county project (some tasks of future counties delegated to 46 cities by individual bilateral agreements including financing conditions); 1994 – pilot county project (some tasks of future counties delegated to 46 cities by individual bilateral agreements including financing conditions); 1996 – special law transferring set of tasks of future counties to 46 cities, establishing special financial transfers for these tasks; 1996 – special law transferring set of tasks of future counties to 46 cities, establishing special financial transfers for these tasks;  Outcome: since January 1st, 1999 – these 46 plus additional 19 cities became „cities with county rights”.

IV. New Constitution  Subsidiarity in the Constitution’s preamble,  Municipality – basic level of self-govern- ment, other tiers defined by law;  Chapter 7 - Self-government (includes all basic statements od European Charter of Local Self-Government).

V. Decentralization process (second stage)  Decision to create other levels of self- government: counties and regions  Obstacles of the process (main – central administration’s negative behavior)  Role of partners (politicians, experts, civic organizations, media)  Advocacy role of municipal associations  Quality of results of the second stage

V. Counties (second level) (1)  Outcome: First election – October 1998; First election – October 1998; Beginning of legal acting – January 1st, 1999; Beginning of legal acting – January 1st, 1999; 307 counties; 8 new added in 2001; 307 counties; 8 new added in 2001; 65 cities with county rights (municipalities exercising all county responsibilities, receiving both municipal and county financial resources); 65 cities with county rights (municipalities exercising all county responsibilities, receiving both municipal and county financial resources);

V. Counties (second level) (2)  Those local responsibilities which are „over- municipal” (administration services, environ- ment, county roads, secondary education, employment policy, social welfare, culture, basic public hospitals, fire protection, local safety);  County council (15 – 29 members), directly elected for a 4-year term in proportional elections;  County board (executive body) elected by council for the same term;

V. Counties (second level) (3)  County finances (2004): a) in 315 counties – 500 PLN / per capita b) in 65 cities with county rights – 2505 PLN / pc  Structure (since 2004): a) direct income (local fees) 14,2 % b) shares in PIT and CIT 10,7 % c) general subsidies 50,9 % d) task transfers 24,2 %

V. Regions (third level) (1)  First election – October 1998;  Beginning of legal acting – January 1st, 1999 ;  16 regions (voivodships);  Regional council (30 – 48 members), directly elected for a 4-year term in proportional elections;  Regional board (executive body) elected by council for the same term;

V. Regions (third level) (2)  Regional finances (2004): in 16 regions (av.) – 185 PLN / per capita  Structure (since 2004): a) direct income (local fees) 3,2 % b) shares in PIT and CIT 55,9 % c) general subsidies 18,5 % d) task transfers 22,4 %

Decentralization of public finances Some indicators: - decentralization degree – 10,3% of GDP - decentralization degree – 10,3% of GDP ( Denmark – 32 %, Sweden – 25 %, Germany, Nether- lands – %, France, UK, all other new EU members – less than 10% ); ( Denmark – 32 %, Sweden – 25 %, Germany, Nether- lands – %, France, UK, all other new EU members – less than 10% ); - structure of public finances (2004): - structure of public finances (2004): - central budget 197,7 bln PLN (43,6 %), - central budget 197,7 bln PLN (43,6 %), - local and regional budgets 91,5 bln PLN (20,3 %), - local and regional budgets 91,5 bln PLN (20,3 %), - National Health Fund 31,4 bln PLN (6,9 %), - National Health Fund 31,4 bln PLN (6,9 %), - other task funds 133,0 bln PLN (29,3 %). - other task funds 133,0 bln PLN (29,3 %).

Structure of decentralized public finances (2004, bln PLN)  Municipalities 40,94 (44,8%)  Cities with county rights 32,14 (35,2%) altogether (80,0%) altogether (80,0%)  Counties12,44 (13,6%)  Regions 6,00 (6,4%) TOTAL91,52 (100 %)

Local and regional investment (bln PLN)  Municipalities 7,47 (49,2%)  Cities with county rights 4,71 (31,0%) ( altogether) (80,2%) ( altogether) (80,2%)  Counties 1,27 (8,4%)  Regions 1,74 (11,4%) TOTAL 15,19 (100%) = 4 bln Euro