Regional Policy Results Indicators 2014+ Findings of the Pilots Veronica Gaffey Evaluation Unit, DG for Regional Policy.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

1 Evaluating Communication Plans Cvetina Yocheva Evaluation Unit DG REGIO 02/12/2009.

Advertisements

Linking regions and central governments: Indicators for performance-based regional development policy 6 th EUROPEAN CONFERENCE ON EVALUATION OF COHESION.

A NEW METRIC FOR A NEW COHESION POLICY by Fabrizio Barca * * Italian Ministry of Economy and Finance. Special Advisor to the European Commission. Perugia,

1 EU Strategy for the Baltic Sea Region Evaluation: Setting Outcome Indicators and Targets Seminar: 15 March 2011, La Hulpe Veronica Gaffey Acting Director.

1 European Union Regional Policy – Employment, Social Affairs and Inclusion Draft guidance on monitoring and evaluation : Concepts and recommendations.

Performance Framework

A Fresh Look at the Intervention Logic of Structural Funds

Regional Policy Revised version Marielle Riché Evaluation Unit DG Regional Policy International Monitoring Conference Budapest 11 th November 2011 Brussels.

Second Tier Cities in Age of Austerity: Why Invest Beyond the Capitals? Professor Michael Parkinson CBE ESPON Seminar Aalborg, June 2012.

RTPI Workshop: The Future of Competitive European Cities/ Manchester 2 December 2010 New ESPON Project (SGPTDE) Secondary Cities: Performance, Policies.

European Social Fund Evaluation in Italy Stefano Volpi Roma, 03 maggio 2011 Isfol Esf Evaluation Unit Human Resources Policies Evaluation Area Rome, Corso.

1 W ORKSHOP ON S TRATEGIC P ROGRAMMING, M ONITORING AND EVALUATION F OCUSING ON P ERFORMANCE AND RE SULTS Madrid, 22 February 2013 Ines Hartwig DG Employment,

Regional Policy Meta-Evaluation Some Reflections Evaluation Conference, Warsaw 12/13 November 2012 Veronica Gaffey Head of Evaluation DG for Regional.

Lesson 2: Project: Evaluation, Monitoring, Auditing Macerata, 22 nd October Alessandro Valenza, Director, t33 srl.

Strengthening the Performance of Cohesion Policy through Performance Reserve and Ex-Ante Conditionality Sabina De Luca Italian Ministry of Economic Development.

Integrated Territorial Investment (ITI)

Monika Schönerklee-Grasser JTS CENTRAL EUROPE PROGRAMME The CENTRAL EUROPE Programme Staccato is a project of the concerto initiative co-funded.

Evidence Based Cohesion Policy Focus on performance incentives Thomas Tandskov Dissing Senior Adviser Ministry of Economics and Business Affairs Danish.

Policy for Cities in the Age of Austerity: Why Invest Beyond the Capitals? SGPTDE Project Professor Michael Parkinson CBE ESPON Seminar, Krakow 2011.

Improving the Synergies between the Structural Funds and the Lisbon Strategy Dr. Jens Henrik Haahr Danish Technological Institute.

1 Monitoring and evaluation after 2013 – some first ideas, mainly for ERDF / CF Evaluation network DG REGIO 14 th October 2010.

Strategic Environmental Assessment and environmental issues in programme evaluation Ivana Capozza Italian Evaluation Units Open Days Roma, July 5, 2006.

Lesson 3: Monitoring and Indicator Macerata, 23 nd October Alessandro Valenza, Director, t33 srl.

Evaluation methods and tools (Focus on delivery mechanism) Jela Tvrdonova, 2014.

EU-Regional Policy Structural actions 1 LESSONS FROM THE THEMATIC EVALUATION OF THE TERRITORIAL EMPLOYMENT PACTS Veronica Gaffey, DG Regional.

VERONICA GAFFEY Acting Director – Policy Development DG FOR REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT Przyszłość polityki spójności V Raport Kohezyjny a wnioski z ewaluacji.

Estonia and the European Union NGO Eurohouse Europe Direct Kuressaare inforelay 10A Tallinna str., Kuressaare Phone and fax:

Session 4 “Assessing research integration and its potential impact” Prof. Beate Kohler-Koch University of Mannheim / University of Bremen Findings from.

Evaluation workshop on the Economic Development OP Budapest, 24 April 2013 Jack Engwegen Head of Unit, Hungary DG Regional and Urban Policy European Commission.

Update of the Territorial State and Perspectives of the EU and review of the Territorial Agenda Action 4.3. and 5.3. Dr. Péter Szaló Prague, 18 May 2009.

Regional Policy Veronica Gaffey Evaluation Unit DG Regional Policy International Monitoring Conference Budapest 11 th November 2011 Budapest 26 th September2013.

1 Monitoring & evaluation 2013+: concepts and ideas (ERDF & CF) CMEF meeting, 17 th June 2011, Kai Stryczynski, DG REGIO Evaluation Unit.

Regional Policy Result Orientation of future ETC Programes Veronica Gaffey Head of Evaluation & European Semester 23 April 2013.

Regional Policy How are evaluations used in the EU? How to make them more usable? Stockholm, 8 October 2015 Kai Stryczynski, DG Regional and Urban Policy.

Regional and Urban Policy Expected Results for Low Carbon Economy and Transport Ivanka Lakova and Jan Marek Ziółkowski Evaluation and European Semester.

EX 2 EX 2 Experience Exchange Programme for Visegrad Countries Officials July 2009.

EN Regional Policy EUROPEAN COMMISSION National evaluation conference Marielle Riché Evaluation unit, DG REGIO Bucharest, 18.

State of play of OP negotiations and OP implementation ESF Technical Working Group Luxembourg, 2 December

Ministry of Enterprise, Energy and Communications Sweden Smart Regulation in Sweden – at regional and local level 3 April 2012, Nicosia Åsa Talamo Ministry.

"The challenge for Territorial Cohesion 2014 – 2020: delivering results for EU citizens" Veronica Gaffey Acting Director EUROPEAN COMMISSION, DG for Regional.

Regional Policy Operational Programmes.

New Trends in Cohesion Policy Grincoh, Ljubljana 25 September 2014 Veronica Gaffey DG Regional & Urban Policy.

Session 9 – Data exploitation and publication

Workshop on Strategic Programming, Monitoring and evaluation Focusing on Performance and REsults Madrid, 22 February 2013 Ines Hartwig DG Employment,

Veronica Gaffey & Antonella Schulte-Braucks

Ex post evaluation of ERDF and Cohesion Fund

State of play of OP negotiations and OP implementation

Performance Framework

Marine Strategy Framework Directive:

How to improve their contribution to programme quality?

ESF Evaluations by MS Antonella Schulte-Braucks

Responses were received from:

Evaluation network DG REGIO 14th April 2011

State of play of OP negotiations and OP implementation

South East Europe 2020 indicators

Results Indicators Findings of the Pilots Veronica Gaffey

Evaluation Network Meeting: Brussels, October 2010

Adam Abdulwahab Evaluation network meeting Brussels, 25 February 2010

Operational Programmes Selected Impressions from Negotiations

State of play of OP negotiations

Regional Operational Programme under Objective 1 of Cohesion Policy case of Pomorskie Region in Poland Stanislaw Bienias on behalf of Pomorskie Region.

Making it happen Delivering Cohesion Policy

Result Orientation of Interreg Programmes

Smart Specialisation: monitoring and evaluation

TASK doing more with available data

eEurope 2005 What’s new? What’s still important?

The Atlantic Forum Process and outcomes European Commission – DG MARE

Evaluation and Impact Assessment Unit DG EMPL Ines Hartwig

ESF monitoring and evaluation in Draft guidance

DG REGIO Evaluation-Related Activities State of play

Presentation transcript:

Regional Policy Results Indicators Findings of the Pilots Veronica Gaffey Evaluation Unit, DG for Regional Policy

Regional Policy Location of Pilots Hungary (Central) Italy (Sardegna, Marche) Poland (Pomorskie) Spain (Galicia) Sweden (South) France (Aquitaine, Rhône-Alpes, Martinique) Netherlands (West) Slovakia (Regional OP and Competitiveness & Economic Growth)

Regional Policy Questions for the Pilots What change to you wish to achieve with this priority? What indicator can capture this change? Do you know the baseline for 2007 or now? Will your output indicators contribute to change in the result indicator? How? Could you evaluate it? How?

Regional Policy Learning 1.New approach feasible, but not without significant change in mindsets & practice 2.No pilot region uses the new approach 3.Indicators mostly do not reflect the intended effects of the priorities 4.Results focus must be part of programme design 5.Concentration a pre-condition 6.Decisions on what to fund and what not to fund – political choice

Regional Policy Learning 7.With concentration – fewer indicators 8.Result indicators – close to policy 9.Statistics often will not be appropriate; explore administrative data, specific surveys, benchmarks; use ex ante evaluations 10.Baselines and Targets essential – they can be qualitative or quantitative 11.Reflect when change can be expected – intermediate results

Regional Policy Learning 12.Reflect on how to evaluate: counterfactual, theory based, before and after studies 13.Reflect on “other factors” contributing to results 14.A final point: Indicators do not tell us everything. Evolution of result indicator should prompt debate – not the last word on performance of the policy.

Regional Policy Thank you!