A Swedish perspective on adaptation to Climate Change Jörgen Nilsson Swedish Meteorological and Hydrological Institute Norköping
Nordic hydropower in % of total electricity production Norway 100%123 TWh Sweden 45% 66 TWh Finland 12% 8 TWh (approximate figures)
Inflow to the Swedish hydropower reservoirs in relation to the average for the period (TWh/year) Source: Svensk Energi
We need regional information Source: Monitor No. 18, x300km 50x50km
Precipitation change downscaled by the regional RCO: HadAM3H ECHAM4/OPYC3 Emission scenario A2Emission scenario B2
Annual runoff change (mm) Hadley/A2 Annual runoff change (mm) Echam/A2 Annual runoff change (mm) Hadley/B2 Annual runoff change (mm) Echam/B2
National hydrograph for Sweden vs
Future production potential in Swedish rivers vs
Implications: Less demand for heating … but more for cooling CDD HDD Heating degree days per year, T<17 o C Cooling degree days per year, T>20 o C A2
Swedish guidelines on hydrological design of dams
Upgrading of dam safety, new spillway for the Håckren dam
Impacts on design floods in Sweden % change in design flood peak, vs
Changes in 100-years floods according to E/A2 and E/B2 scenarios
Changes in 100-years floods according to H/A2 and H/B2 scenarios
The Nordic energy sector is very sensitive to global warming: It effects production (inflow to hydropower, wind, biomass) It effects consumption (heating) It effects safety (storms, dam safety) It effects distribution (storms)
The most evident impact is that on hydropower, impacts on wind power are more inconclusive Hydropower production is expected to increase The annual rythm in river flow will be more favorable Impact on dam safety is not self-evident and has to be analysed carefully, case by case The development of the future European energy market will have strong impact on the Nordic hydropower industry
The Swedish Commission on Climate and Vulnerability Addresses impacts, vulnerability, responsibilities and costs due to climate change Sub-report on flooding, November 2006 Final report, October 2007
Future flood risks around the big Swedish lakes Stockholm Gothenburg Karlstad Mälaren Hjälmaren Vänern Vättern Göta älv Örebro
Stockholm 1924
Stockholm in April 2003 Foto: Sten Bergström, SMHI
Lake Mälaren and Stockholm, summary of the problems 1.Decree for regulation in Pressure on exploitation, shore lines are not secure under today’s climate. Important downtown infrastructure is at risk, including the subway 3.Important shipping But… 1.No river downstream hinders discharge 2.Sea level rise is compensated by uplift of land 3.Climate change does not seem to increase the problems
Uplift of land in Sweden (mm per year)
Large land slides in the Göta älv valley 1: Jordfallsskredet 1150, 65 har 3: Intagan , 27har 6: Ballabo mars 1733, 3 har 9: Utby , 4,5 har 10: Västerlanda ca 1830, >5 har 12: Surte , 24 har 14: Göta , 32 har 15: Agnesberg , 0,25har 16: Ballabo , 0,7 har Source: Statens Geotekniska Institut
Inundated areas at peak level if Climate Change is considered will be about 50 cm higher than today
Change in 100-year levels(cm)New return periods RCAO – H/A RCAO – H/B RCAO – E/A RCAO – E/B Changes in the 100-years levels and return periods for Lake Vänern according to climate scenarios
Tunnel?
Attractive near-shore developments in the city of Karlstad Foto: Sten Bergström, SMHI
Vänern- Göta älv, summary of the problems 1.Decree for regulation in Pressure on exploitation, shore lines are not secure under today’s climate 3.Hydropower in the river 4.Important shipping 5.Unstable geology limits discharge in the river. Land slides may risk water supply for citizens 6.Sea levels hinder discharge 7.Climate change increases the problems
Conclusions Big lakes mean big problems in metropolitan areas Today’s flooding problems will be aggravated by climate change in western Sweden Stockholm can be secured by a doubling of the discharge capacity of Lake Mälaren There is no simple solution for Lake Vänern and River Göta älv. A combination of measures will be needed. Cautious physical planning is necessary to avoid future problems everywhere
How to handle all that unavoidable uncertainty? Use ensembles of climate models and scenarios Develop flexible adaptation strategies Add safety margins wherever reasonably possible Communicate!