Stuart Kerachsky Deputy Commissioner National Center for Education Statistics May 20, 2010.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Stuart Kerachsky Acting Commissioner National Center for Education Statistics October 14, 2009 EMBARGOED until October 14, :00 a.m. E.D.T.
Advertisements

The Social and Educational Factors Contributing to the Outcomes of Hispanics in Urban Schools.
2013 Mathematics and Reading Trial Urban District Assessment National Assessment of Educational Progress at Grades 4 and 8 Dr. Peggy Carr Associate Commissioner.
Jack Buckley Commissioner National Center for Education Statistics May 10, 2012.
Jack Buckley Commissioner National Center for Education Statistics June 27, 2013 #NAEP.
NYC ACHIEVEMENT GAINS COMPARED TO OTHER LARGE CITIES SINCE 2003 Changes in NAEP scores Leonie Haimson & Elli Marcus Class Size Matters January.
1 Graduation Rates: Students Who Started 9 th Grade in 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008 and 2009.
WEEK 6: GLOBALIZATION AND THE CITY. READ: CHAPTER 4 (CHANGE TO MEGAPOLITAN AREAS, READ HANDOUT) WEEK 7: TELECOMMUNICATIONS AND THE CITY. READ: CHAPTER.
Stuart Kerachsky Deputy Commissioner National Center for Education Statistics March 24, 2010.
1 RESULTS. 2 60% % % 1986 (first year NYC tracked four-year graduation rate) CITY GRADUATION RATES.
Dianne Chadwick Iowa NAEP Coordinator Iowa Department of Education November 8, 2011.
Jack Buckley Commissioner National Center for Education Statistics October 3, 2013.
1 Vanessa Westbrook, Division Director Multicultural/ Equity in Science National Science Teachers Association Charles A. Dana Center University of Texas.
Highlights from PIRLS and TIMSS 2011 Jack Buckley National Center for Education Statistics Washington, DC December 11, 2012.
1 NAEP th Grade Economics Assessment. 2 ► First NAEP assessment of economics ► Content areas: market economy, national economy, and international.
Grade 3-8 English. 2 The Bottom Line This is the first year in which students took State tests in Grades 3,4,5,6,7, and 8. With the new individual.
Mark DeCandia Kentucky NAEP State Coordinator
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Program for International Student Assessment (PISA) 2009 Results Stuart Kerachsky Deputy Commissioner December 7, 2010.
New England Common Assessment Program (NECAP) Summary of October 2011 Results Developed for the Providence School Board February 27, 2012 Presented by:
1 Jack Buckley Commissioner National Center for Education Statistics June 2011.
The Nation’s Report Card 2009 Reading and Mathematics – Grade 12 National and State Results.
Jack Buckley Commissioner National Center for Education Statistics December 7, 2011.
NYC ACHIEVEMENT GAINS COMPARED TO OTHER LARGE CITIES SINCE 2003 Changes in NAEP scores Class Size Matters August
Highlights from PIRLS and TIMSS 2011 Jack Buckley National Center for Education Statistics Washington, DC December 11, 2012.
1 Results for Students and Individuals with Disabilities September 2008.
Jack Buckley Commissioner National Center for Education Statistics January 25, 2011.
Jack Buckley Commissioner National Center for Education Statistics February 24, 2011.
1 The Nation’s Report Card: 2007 Writing. 2 Overview of the 2007 Writing Assessment Given January – March 2007 – 139,900 eighth-graders – 27,900 twelfth-graders.
Warm-up 2.1 Visualizing Distributions: Shape, Center and Spread.
Stuart Kerachsky Deputy Commissioner National Center for Education Statistics December 8, 2009.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Jack O’Connell, State Superintendent of Public Instruction Results of the 2005 National Assessment of Educational Progress.
0 Michele Sonnenfeld NAEP State Coordinator Florida Department of Education October 2006 Florida Association of Science Supervisors.
English Language Arts (ELA) & 2007 English Language Arts (ELA) Total Public In grades 5-8, the percentage of students meeting the ELA Learning.
Mark DeCandia Kentucky NAEP State Coordinator
UMELA Cohort 2 Meeting Dallas, Texas Westin City Center November 3-5, 2009.
Institute for Urban Policy and Research Analysis, Professor Tang November 19, 2013 Ryan Robinson City Demographer Planning & Development Review Department.
NAEP 2011 Mathematics and Reading Results Challis Breithaupt November 1, 2011.
2005 NAEP Results Mathematics San Diego City Schools Board of Education Workshop January 17, 2006 S D CS.
NAEP 2011 Mathematics and Reading Results NAEP State Coordinator Mark DeCandia.
A Collaboration among: Los Angeles USD University of California, San Diego San Diego State University University of California, Irvine Preparing for Success.
The Nation’s Report Card: U.S. History National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP)
The Nation’s Report Card Science National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP)
THE 2005 NAEP HIGH SCHOOL TRANSCRIPT STUDY. THE 2005 HIGH SCHOOL TRANSCRIPT STUDY Today ’ s Presentations.
Jack Buckley Commissioner National Center for Education Statistics February 21, 2013.
CAHSEE Results Board Report 1 Lodi Unified School District 2009 California High School Exit Examination Results September 15, 2009.
NAEP The Nation’s Report Card: The Urban District By: Katie Urbanczyk Chris Vanderhorst Russell Marzullo Jessica Hartle.
The Nation’s Report Card: Geography National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP)
Grade 3-8 English Language Arts and Math Results.
Academic Excellence Indicator System Report For San Antonio ISD Public Meeting January 23, 2006 Board Report January 23, 2006 Department of Accountability,
The Nation’s Report Card 4th-Grade Reading SOURCE: National Center for Education Statistics, National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP),
N ATIONAL ASSESSMENT OF EDUCATIONAL PROGRESS BPS 2015 NAEP RESULTS Office of Data and Accountability OCTOBER 26, 2015.
Jack Buckley Commissioner National Center for Education Statistics May 4, 2011.
N ATIONAL ASSESSMENT OF EDUCATIONAL PROGRESS BPS 2015 NAEP RESULTS Nicole Wagner Lam, Office of Data and Accountability Presentation to Boston School Committee.
DPS students post nation-worst science scores among large urban cities BY CHASTITY PRATT DAWSEY 9:46 AM, Feb. 24, 2011 DETROIT FREE PRESS
ACT ASPIRE GROWTH REPORTS. DISTRICTS AND SCHOOLS THAT PARTICIPATED IN ACT ASPIRE ASSESSMENTS (READING, MATH, ENGLISH, SCIENCE AND WRITING) WITH AN N COUNT.
Jack Buckley Commissioner National Center for Education Statistics December 6, 2012.
The Nation’s Report Card: Trial Urban District Assessment: Science 2005.
The Nation’s Report Card: 2005 Reading and Mathematics Trial Urban District Assessments.
2009 Grade 3-8 Math Additional Slides 1. Math Percentage of Students Statewide Scoring at Levels 3 and 4, Grades The percentage of students.
Peggy G. Carr Associate Commissioner National Center for Education Statistics June 2010 Peggy G. Carr Associate Commissioner National Center for Education.
The US in 1900 and today Jan 19, Population million Foreign born 7.4% Black 11.5% Hispanic ? Under 1840% Over 654% Married (age 18+)(60%)
1. 2 National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) Survey of academic achievement for the nation and the states Assesses various subjects at grades.
Presentation to NNIP September 14, 2016 Rebekah Dorman, PhD.
Percentage of secondary schools that had an asthma action plan on file for all students with known asthma Newark Detroit Chicago Philadelphia San Francisco.
The US in 1900 and today Jan 17, 2017.
IT’S ALL ABOUT GROWTH!. Hemet Unified School District’s Use of Measures of Academic Progress (MAP)
2017 TUDA NAEP Results for Miami-Dade
If {image} find the Riemann sum with n = 5 correct to 3 decimal places, taking the sample points to be midpoints
Program for International Student Assessment (PISA) 2009 Results
Unit 3 Lesson 5: Regional Cities
Presentation transcript:

Stuart Kerachsky Deputy Commissioner National Center for Education Statistics May 20, 2010

Trial Urban District Assessment (TUDA) Background Collaboration among National Center for Education Statistics, National Assessment Governing Board, and Council of the Great City Schools Voluntary participation by selected districts varying in location and demographic makeup Common yardstick to compare district performance 2

Trial Urban District Assessment Map 3

Overview District samples ranged from approximately 800 to 2,400 students at each grade Results reported as – Average scale scores (on a 0–500 scale) – Percentage at or above achievement levels Compared to public school students in – The nation – Large cities, a peer group for comparison (cities of 250,000 or more) 4

Demographic Context Urban districts have a wide range of student demographics – Black students – Hispanic students – English language learners – Students from lower-income families 5

6 6

Scores increase since 2007 for four districts 7

8 * Significantly different ( p <.05) from Percentile scores for the nation show no significant change since 2007 Gains since 2007 for lowest-performing students in large cities

One district scores higher than the nation Six districts score higher than large cities Nine districts score lower than the nation and large cities * Significantly different ( p <.05) from large city. ** Significantly different ( p <.05) from the nation. How districts compare to the nation and large cities 9

Percentages at or above Basic range from 27 to 71 percent 10 # Rounds to zero. NOTE: Detail may not sum to totals because of rounding.

11 NOTE: Only those districts with student groups large enough to report results are listed. DCPS = District of Columbia Public Schools.

12

13

14

Sample 4th-Grade Question: Integrate and Interpret 15 58% of students in the nation received an “Essential” or better rating 51% of students in large cities received an “Essential” or better rating More than 58% of answers received an “Essential” or better rating in: Austin, Charlotte, Jefferson County (KY), Miami-Dade, New York City Fewer than 58% of answers received an “Essential” or better rating in: – Atlanta, Baltimore City, Boston, Chicago, Cleveland, Detroit, District of Columbia (DCPS), Fresno, Houston, Los Angeles, Milwaukee, Philadelphia, San Diego

16

Scores increase since 2007 for large cities and two districts 17

18 Gains since 2007 for students across the percentile range Gains since 2007 for students at the 25th, 50th, and 75th percentiles in large cities * Significantly different ( p <.05) from 2009.

How districts compare to the nation and large cities Two districts not significantly different from the nation Five districts score higher than large cities Seven districts score lower than the nation and large cities 19 * Significantly different ( p <.05) from large city. ** Significantly different ( p <.05) from the nation.

Percentages at or above Basic range from 40 to 73 percent 20 # Rounds to zero. NOTE: Detail may not sum to totals because of rounding.

21

Sample 8th-Grade Question: Critique and Evaluate 22 65% of students in the nation selected the correct answer to this question 60% of students in large cities responded correctly to the question More than 65% answered correctly in: – Boston, Charlotte, Houston, Jefferson County (KY), New York City Fewer than 65% answered correctly in: – Atlanta, Austin, Baltimore City, Chicago, Cleveland, Detroit, District of Columbia (DCPS), Fresno, Los Angeles, Miami-Dade, Milwaukee, Philadelphia, San Diego

Highlights of District Profiles 23

For More Information Photo Credits: © Thomas Barwick/Digital Vision/Getty Images ; © Jamie Grill/Tetra Images/Jupiter Images # ; © Dougal Waters/Photodisc/Jupiter Images #sb i-001; © Image Source/Jupiter Images # ; © Image Source/Getty Images #