Luminosity measurement at LHC (The machine point of view) Enrico Bravin AB/BDI Large part of the material presented here has been produced by the LBNL.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 Accelerator Physics Aspects LHCb Accelerator Physics Aspects LHCb CERN SL/AP n Layout n Crossing Scheme n Luminosity n Collision.
Advertisements

Impact of LHCf on BRAN and beam monitoring Y.Itow, H.Menjo (Nagoya University) The 1 st TAN integration workshop Mar10, 2006.
Super-B Factory Workshop April 20-23, 2005 Super-B IR design M. Sullivan 1 Status on an IR Design for a Super-B Factory M. Sullivan for the Super-B Factory.
June 2-4, 2004 DOE HEP Program Review 1 M. Sullivan for the PEP-II Team DOE High Energy Physics Program Review June 2-4, 2004 PEP-II Status and Plans.
Super-B Factory Workshop January 19-22, 2004 IR Upgrade M. Sullivan 1 PEP-II Interaction Region Upgrade M. Sullivan for the Super-B Factory Workshop Hawaii.
Beam Loss Analysis Tool for the CTF3 PETS Tank M. Velasco, T. Lefevre, R. Scheidegger, M. Wood, J. Hebden, G. Simpson Northwestern University, Evanston,
January 15, 2005D. Rubin - Cornell1 CESR-c Status -Operations/Luminosity December/January vs September/October -Machine studies and instrumentation -Simulation.
LumiReview ppt P. Denes p. 1 Luminosity Monitor Review Concept Instrument TAN (TAS), count n Requirements Implications of the requirements on the.
Beam profile measurements based on modern vertex detectors and beam-gas interactions Slides from: Colin Barschel - TIPP 2014 third international conference.
Beam Commissioning Workshop, 19th January Luminosity Optimization S. White, H. Burkhardt.
1 Luminosity monitor and LHC operation H. Burkhardt AB/ABP, TAN integration workshop, 10/3/2006 Thanks for discussions and input from Enrico Bravin, Ralph.
Ion Programme of LHC Hans-H. Braun Miniworkshop on Machine and Physics Aspects of CLIC based future Collider Option, Ion Programme of LHC Hans-H.
Emittance Growth from Elliptical Beams and Offset Collision at LHC and LRBB at RHIC Ji Qiang US LARP Workshop, Berkeley, April 26-28, 2006.
07-JUL-2003LEADE / JW1 Satellite bunches in the LHC Satellite “definition” Satellite luminosity Satellite detection & tolerances J. Wenninger AB/OP.
Thomas Roser Snowmass 2001 June 30 - July 21, 2001 Polarized Proton Acceleration and Collisions Spin dynamics and Siberian Snakes Polarized proton acceleration.
H. Matis, M. Placidi, A. Ratti, W. Turner [+ several students including S. Hedges] (LBNL) E. Bravin (CERN), R. Miyamoto (BNL – now at ESSS) H. Matis -
Experimental equipment interacting with beam operation D. Macina TS/LEA Many thanks to my colleagues both from the experiments and the machine for their.
October 4-5, Electron Lens Beam Physics Overview Yun Luo for RHIC e-lens team October 4-5, 2010 Electron Lens.
CesrTA Experimental Plan M. Palmer for the CesrTA Collaboration November 17, 2008.
Partikeldagarna, Göteborg 21 September 2007 LHC: Status and Plans Lyn Evans.
C. Fischer – LHC Instrumentation Review – 19-20/11/2001 Gas Monitors for Transverse Distribution Studies in the LHC LHC Instrumentation Review Workshop.
The Large Hadron Collider Contents: 1. The machine II. The beam III. The interaction regions IV. First LHC beam [R. Alemany] [CERN AB/OP] [Engineer In.
US LHC Accelerator Research Program Jim Strait For the BNL-FNAL-LBNL LHC Accelerator Collaboration DOE Meeting 18 April 2003 brookhaven - fermilab - berkeley.
Optimization of Field Error Tolerances for Triplet Quadrupoles of the HL-LHC Lattice V3.01 Option 4444 Yuri Nosochkov Y. Cai, M-H. Wang (SLAC) S. Fartoukh,
Eric Prebys Accelerator Physics Center Program Director, LARP December 7, 2009.
1 BNL LARP Accelerator Physics Program Resources BNL role in national program BNL Accelerator Physics Program.
June 15, 2002David Finley to Aspen PAC Slide 1 Report on 132 nsec Operation Report to the Fermilab.
» RHIC Polarimetry « Oleg Eyser for the RHIC Polarimetry Group 2014 RHIC Retreat, August 14.
ILC MDI workshop January 6-8, 2004 PEP-II IR M. Sullivan 1 Interaction Region of PEP-II M. Sullivan for the ILC MDI workshop January 6-8, 2005.
Damping Ring Parameters and Interface to Sources S. Guiducci BTR, LNF 7 July 2011.
1 Experience at CERN with luminosity monitoring and calibration, ISR, SPS proton antiproton collider, LEP, and comments for LHC… Werner Herr and Rüdiger.
First Collision of BEPCII C.H. Yu May 10, Methods of collision tuning Procedures and data analysis Luminosity and background Summary.
Beam-beam deflection during Van der Meer scans
LHC-CC Validity Requirements & Tests LHC Crab Cavity Mini Workshop at CERN; 21. August Remarks on using the LHC as a test bed for R&D equipment.
Beam-beam compensation at RHIC LARP Proposal Tanaji Sen, Wolfram Fischer Thanks to Jean-Pierre Koutchouk, Frank Zimmermann.
February 5, 2005D. Rubin - Cornell1 CESR-c Status -Operations/Luminosity -Machine studies -Simulation and modeling -4.1GeV.
PPAC in ZDC for Trigger and Luminosity Edwin Norbeck University of Iowa Luminosity Workshop November 5, 2004.
Van der Meer Scans. Basic Formula Beam Height Essentially the width of the beam (name is historical) i.e. if all the luminosity of the beam were delivered.
Beam-Beam head-on Limit J. Barranco, X. Buffat, T. Pieloni, C. Tambasco, J. Qiang, K. Ohmi, M. Crouch for the Beam-Beam team BI BSRT Team George and Enrico.
BRANs at HL-LHC Sune Jakobsen (BE-BI-PM) 1st HL-LHC WP13 Project Meeting
Gas detectors in a ZDC (at LHC) Edwin Norbeck and Yasar Onel University of Iowa For7 th CMS Heavy-Ion meeting at Delphi June 2003.
Present MEIC IR Design Status Vasiliy Morozov, Yaroslav Derbenev MEIC Detector and IR Design Mini-Workshop, October 31, 2011.
H. Matis, S. Hedges, M. Placidi, A. Ratti, W. Turner [+several students] (LBNL) R. Miyamoto (now at ESSS) H. Matis - LARP CM18 - May 8, Fluka Modeling.
Crossing Schemes Considerations and Beam-Beam Work plan T. Pieloni, J. Barranco, X. Buffat, W. Herr.
BRAN at IR2 and IR8: status, commissioning and operation Enrico Bravin AB-BI Joint LHC Machine-Experiments Workshop on Very Forward Detectors 25 January.
Eric Prebys Accelerator Physics Center Program Director, LARP Important material Contributed by Elliott McCrory (FNAL), Ryoichi Miyamoto (BNL), Alan Fisher.
Requirements from BI and new instruments after LS1 LHC Optics Measurement and Correction Review; B.Dehning 1 Bernd Dehning CERN BE/BI
ODR Diagnostics for Hadron Colliders Tanaji Sen APC.
LARP Mtg Oct 2004 page 1 John Byrd Status of the luminosity monitor 20 Oct, 2004 John Byrd.
Luminosity monitor and LHC operation
BEAM LOSS MONITORING SYSTEM
Impact of running with LHCf and early Totem 90 m optics
A.-L. Perrot, TS/LEA-int LEMIC A.L. Perrot – TS/LEA/int LEMIC
The Interaction Region
Emmanuel Tsesmelis TS/LEA 26 January 2007
Beam-beam Effects in Hadron Colliders
BEAM LOSS MONITORING SYSTEM
LHC (SSC) Byung Yunn CASA.
Luminosity measurement at LHC (The machine point of view)
Interaction Region Design Options e+e- Factories Workshop
LHC Beam Operations Past, Present and Future
Luminometer Integration at IR2
How can we study the magnetic distortion effect?
MEIC New Baseline: Luminosity Performance and Upgrade Path
LHC LUMINOSITY (RATE) MONITORS
HE-JLEIC: Boosting Luminosity at High Energy
Summary – what we discussed and learned (accelerator)
Crab Crossing Named #1 common technical risk (p. 6 of the report)
MEIC Alternative Design Part III
CLIC luminosity monitoring/re-tuning using beamstrahlung ?
Presentation transcript:

Luminosity measurement at LHC (The machine point of view) Enrico Bravin AB/BDI Large part of the material presented here has been produced by the LBNL team, M.Placidi and E.Gschwendtner

Scope of the machine luminometers Provide a quantitative tool for the operators –bringing the beams in collision –optimizing the machine Monitor and eventually correct drifts in the performances of the machine during coasting Equalize luminosity among the various experiments.

Machine parameters that affect luminosity Beam size (emittance, β*) Beam separation (transverse offset) Beam overlap (timing) Crossing angle Collective effects “Packman” effects etc.

Plan of action Install rate monitors in straight line of fly of neutral particles from the Interaction Point D1tripletTAS tripletD1 TAN IP 140 m n LL RR

IP Instrument a Copper Bar IP1 & IP5 have TAN’s (neutral absorbers)

What rate monitors can measure The foreseen detectors are position sensitive (four quadrants) and fast (40MHz) The absolute signal value is proportional to the number of particles i.e. to luminosity The asymmetry among the four quadrants can be used to compute the position of the center of gravity

Spatial distribution of n and 

Detector technology The first choice was to use a ionization chamber to measure the integral luminosity Dynamic range considerations and collective effects suggested a bunch by bunch measurement A fast ionization chamber capable of resolving the 40MHz filling pattern was proposed and is currently under development (LBNL) An alternative solid state CdTe detector was explored. The radiation hardness of this technology is however not sufficient for IP1 & 5 (CERN/LETI)

Project status of the detector LBNL (Berkeley) is responsible for the whole luminosity monitor system. The financing of the project comes trough LARP Due to under founding and general resources scarcity the R&D for the F.I.C. is in an advanced state but not yet completed

Project status A project review was held in Berkeley mid of April. The results of the review can be summarized in three points –The F.I.C. design and planning look sound –According to the resources allocated to Berkeley by LARP for this project, LBNL commits to installing F.I.C.s in point 1 and 5 only. –If CERN does not contribute with field support (integration/installation) it will be difficult to obtain the desired results. (currently CERN only offers a contact person, E. Bravin) Installation in point 2 and 8 are therefore at CERN charge, (replicating the LBNL system). No resources are foreseen for this at the moment. The LHC management does not consider this item very important.

Our wishes Our (and other’s) wishes are collected in the document LHC-B-ES-007 “On The Measurement of The Relative Luminosity at The LHC”. This document contains the specifications according to which we are developing our detectors Nature and resources, though, might limit the results…

Summary of the specifications Total p-p L / b.-b. p-p L / Crossing angle0/+/- 150  rad Beam finding (set up) resolution ~10% int. time minutes. Nominal L p-p (coasting for physics) resolution ~1% in 1s (reproducibility from fill to fill at the same level) Absolute calibration (with experiments or other method ex. Van der Meer) 5 – 10%

Luminosity modes at IR1&5 Bunch population Number of bunches Bunch spacing Mode IP beta Luminosity [cm -2 s -1 ] Collision studies with single pilot bunch, no crossing angle 5x10 9 1p-p18 m2.0  Collision studies with single high intensity bunch 1.1  p-p18 m9.9  Nominal p-p luminosity run 1.1  nsp-p0.5 m1.0  Ion runs 7  Pb-Pb0.5 m0.9   Pb-Pb 0.5 m0.5  10 27

Resolution and integration times Luminosity sub-rangeparticleResolution integration time Beam structure Luminosity 1.0  1.0  p-pbeam  10% ~ 1 mn 1.0  3.0  p-pbeam  1% ~ 1 s 1.0  3.0  p-pbunch ~  1% ~ 10s 1.0  5.0  Pb-Pbbeam  10% ~ 1 mn 5.0  0.5  Pb-Pbbunch  1% ~ 1 s

Produced by John Byrd - LBNL