1 Approved Terms of Reference for HAPUA Working Group No.5-ESI Services Project 6 Bilateral Contract Benchmarking.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Reliability Center Data Request Task Force Report WECC Board Meeting April 2009.
Advertisements

Timeline – Choice of Law in International Contracts Mandate given to conduct feasibility study Working Group formed Third Working.
Councillor Egli Ward 9 Knoxdale- Merivale June 5, 2014.
ASPEC Internal Auditor Training Version
COMMISSION FOR PERSONAL DATA PROTECTION 14 TH Meeting, CEEDPA may, Kyiv LEGAL FRAMEWORK FOR DATA PROTECTION, COMPETENCES AND PRIORITIES OF THE COMMISSION.
3 Dec 2003Market Operations Standing Committee1 Market Rule and Change Management Consultation Process John MacKenzie / Darren Finkbeiner / Ella Kokotsis,
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency How do you know how far you have got? How much you still have to do? Are we nearly there yet? What – Who – When.
Action for establishing a Single Auction Office for CSE Electricity Regional Initiative - Central-South Region 2 nd Stakeholders Group Meeting 21 April.
HAPUA WORKING GROUP NO. 1: GENERATION (HWG1) 10 th Meeting on 26 th Feb 2009, Jakarta, Indonesia PROGRESS REPORT AND ACTION PLAN FOR 2009 BY MR. AHMAD.
Final Report on Improvements to the RAA Steve Metalitz 5 December 2010.
EARTO – working group on quality issues – 2 nd session Anneli Karttunen, Quality Manager VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland This presentation.
Sacramento Local Agency Formation Commission (LAFCo) UPDATE ON PROPOSED SMUD ANNEXATION Presented to Yolo LAFCo September 19, 2005.
Progress Report of Planning Interconnection Sub Working Group Presented to The 8 th Meeting of HAPUA Working Group No.2 - Transmission Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
1 Bilateral Interconnection Agreement Model Presented to HAPUA Working Group 5 (ESI Services), Project 6 By Power Purchase Agreement Division Electricity.
NZTA’s Proposed Changes to the Regional Freshwater Plan for the Wellington Region Part of a proposal of national significance Community Meeting 16 February.
Reject Appeal SEPT OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG Approve EVALUATION – FALL CONTINUE IMPLEMENTATION & SCHEDULING PLAN REVISION DIVISION MANAGEMENT.
Evaluation Plan New Jobs “How to Get New Jobs? Innovative Guidance and Counselling 2 nd Meeting Liverpool | 3 – 4 February L Research Institute Roula.
Timeline for the oneM2M Partnership Project Timeline and Milestones [Joachim Koss, ETSI] Contribution to oneM2M plenary, 05 Mar 2012 Doc: Source: ETSI.
0 Congestion management Congestion management Giedrius Radvila AB “LIETUVOS ENERGIJA” Minifora Vilnius.
International Trade Regulations: the Law of the WTO Professor Mohammad F. A. Nsour Class 3 1.
Trade Defense Instruments in the EurAsEC Customs Union Andrey Zakharov Department for Internal Market Defense Eurasian Economic Commission Brussels - July.
STATUS REPORT SWG SO by PLN HAPUA MEETING WORKING GROUP 2 – TRANSMISSION SUB WORKING GROUP– SYSTEM OPERATION 6th Oct 2010, Kuala Lumpur - Malaysia.
Geographical Enlargement of CERN Associate membership Principles and criteria S. Intoudi / 8 July
WORLD COMPETITION REPORT Geneva - January, 29 th of 2004 Conference of the International Network of Conference of the International Network of Civil Society.
IRES: an update on the revision process Vladimir Markhonko United Nations Statistics Division The 4 th meeting of the Oslo Group on energy statistics Ottawa,
1 Bilateral Investment Treaty Policy Framework Review Briefing to Portfolio Committee on Trade & Industry 6 October 2009 Presented by: Mr Xavier Carim-
SPS Workshop Taipei, 5-6/12/2001 The Transparency Provisions of the SPS Agreement.
HAPUA WG No.5 (ESI Services) Updates The WG2, 5, 6 and Chairman of APGCC Meeting Jakarta, Indonesia ● 26 February 2009 By WG 5 Project Coordinator: MR.
Challenge: Access to Electricity
Exit Capacity Substitution and Revision Transmission Workstream meeting, 3 rd December 2009.
Specific Safety Requirements on Safety Assessment and Safety Cases for Predisposal Management of Radioactive Waste – GSR Part 5.
Draft of Terms Of Reference For Hiring a Consultant “Study for establishing the regulation and tools in implementing of DG connection to distribution network”
Standing Committee on Improvement Implementation Anne Aikman-Scalese, SCI Chair | ICANN-52 | February 2015.
Consideration Of Updates And Additional Revisions To Procedures For Conducting Board and Committee Activities Board Item # 2.
International Recommendations for Energy Statistics (IRES): A progress report Fourth Meeting of the UN Committee of Experts on Environmental-Economic Accounting.
Parks & Recreation Service Delivery Model Review Progress Report #1 City of Pitt Meadows Council January 19,
Second Annual Medical Research Summit March 25, 2002 Washington, D.C.
GNSO Work Prioritization To: GNSO Council Date: 21 April 2010 Presenter: Olga Cavalli (Chair) Work Prioritization Model Drafting Team (WPM-DT)
IEEE /r5 Submission November 2008 John Notor, Cadence Design Systems, Inc.Slide 1 IEEE IMT-Advanced Review Process Date:
TGm Work Plan Adhoc Report IEEE Presentation Submission Template (Rev. 9) Document Number: IEEE C802.16m-09/0747r1 Date Submitted: Source:
Harmonised use of accreditation for assessing the competence of various Conformity Assessment Bodies Dr Andreas Steinhorst, EA ERA workshop 13 April 2016,
Article 4 [Obligations of Applicant] 4.1. As a sole and exclusive owner of the Application, Applicant warrants that.
GTFORCIDI Summary of mandates and proposal for streamlining sectoral ministerial processes.
Power of Choice (PoC) Program Overview
PILOT SCHOOL PRINCIPAL EVALUATION
Objectives of WHO's collaboration with NGOs
Updating the Regulation for the JINR Programme Advisory Committees
REWG activities in LILIIA MALON REWG Chair Prague
INTERCONNECTION GUIDELINES
Grid Code What is the Standard Modification Process? Panel
PROGRAM CONSULTATIVE FORUM Meeting pack
Work Plan for IEEE m Standard & IMT-Advanced Submission
Kansas Educator Evaluation
OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK SEPTEMBER 22, 2014 CITY COUNCIL MEETING RESCIND RESOLUTION NO AND ADOPT A RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING THE RULES GOVERNING.
CASA-1000 TAP Afghanistan’s Energy Connectivity ,Central to South Asia
WG Chair: Charles Ehrlich, NIST, U.S.A. CIML Member
ESB Networks Market Release Meeting of the IGG, March 5th 2009
Informal document GRVA nd GRVA, 28 Jan Feb. 2019
WHAT TO EXPECT: A CROWN CORPORATION’S GUIDE TO A SPECIAL EXAMINATION
CVTS Continuing Vocational Training
Art. 17 EGTC Indicators 13th Meeting of the Expert Group on Delegated and Implementing Acts for the ESI Funds 4th July 2013.
Exit Capacity Substitution and Revision
An Update of COSO’s Internal Control–Integrated Framework
ETS WG, 30 January-1 February 2006 Agenda Item
Adult Education Survey Anonymisation Point 6
BPR AS Review Programme
Meeting of PAP/RAC Focal Points, Split, Croatia, 8-9 May 2019
Inputs Regard to “Test Phase” to TFCS
General information related to the Convention
SOM14 14th Senior Officials’ Meeting December 2018 Manila, Philippines
Presentation transcript:

1 Approved Terms of Reference for HAPUA Working Group No.5-ESI Services Project 6 Bilateral Contract Benchmarking

2 1. Objectives 1.1To establish the criteria for the bilateral contract benchmarking. 1.2To benchmark the bilateral contracts between HAPUA member countries. 1.3To conduct the relevant studies related to commercial issues, including, but not limited to, Tax, Regulation and Tariff system in support of the cross-border electricity trade. 1.4To develop bilateral contract model(s) based on the experiences and examples of the past bilateral contracts, and to recommend for further improvement, (if needed).

3 2. Scope of Work 2.1Initially, the Project 6 will conduct a benchmarking study of bilateral contracts between member countries of Subsystem A. 2.2At the later stage, this study could then be replicated to Subsystem B and Subsystem C upon the directive of the HAPUA Council.

4 3. Deliverables 3.1A Final Report on the Benchmarking Study of the Bilateral Contracts between HAPUA member countries of Subsystem A, including recommendations for further improvement, (if needed); and 3.2Bilateral Contract Model(s).

5 4. Project Leader Mr. Chuchwal Nonthaleeruk Director, Power Purchase Agreement Division Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand (EGAT) THAILAND

6 5. Project Members 5.1Project 6 is open to all HAPUA member countries. 5.2Subsystem A member countries are encouraged to take part. 5.2Each member country shall designate one (1) representative as a member and other participants, if any, as observers. 5.3Representatives are preferably personnel responsible for developing and/or managing the power purchase and sale contracts. 5.4Nomination of representatives and participants is required by December 2008.

7 6. Host and Venue of Meeting 6.1The first meeting of Project 6 shall be organized by EGAT in Thailand. 6.2Host and venue of additional meeting(s) shall be rotated according to alphabetical order of the Project 6 member countries, or as agreed by the Project members.

8 7. Time Line 7.1To start the Project implementation in January To report the progress to HAPUA Council in the next meeting tentatively scheduled in May/June To complete the Project (Phase I) by end of 2009.

9 8. Confidentiality 8.1Any information or data arising during the study shall be kept in strict confidence. 8.2Confidential information or data shall not be disclosed to third parties without prior written consent from all members. 8.3Confidentiality of the contracts may be subjected to policy and governing rules of each member country. Any confidential issues may be escalated to the higher level committees. 8.4Those data not available due to the confidentiality shall be recorded for further reference.

10 9. Project Action Plan (9/1) DescriptionDateResponsibility 1. Internal Study on Criteria and Model(s) of Bilateral Contracts for Benchmarking Jan – Feb 09WG5 Project 6 Leader and Members 2. The 1 st HAPUA WG5 Project 6 Meeting - Presentation on Criteria and Model(s) of Bilateral Contract - Discussion and Model Benchmarking Feb 09WG5 Project 6 Leader and Members 3. Meeting Summary for Reporting to HAPUA WG5End of Feb 09WG5 Project 6 Leader 4.Development of the 1 st Draft of Bilateral Contract Model(s) for Subsystem A Mar 09WG5 Project 6 Members (to be initiated by Project 6 Leader) 5.Circulation of the 1 st Draft of Bilateral Contract Model(s) for Comments End of Mar 09WG5 Project 6 Leader 6.Tentative Joint Meeting with HAPUA WG5 Meeting and 2 nd HAPUA WG5 Project 6 Meeting Apr–May 09WG5 Project 6 Members

11 9. Project Action Plan (9/2) DescriptionDateResponsibility 7. Progress Report to HAPUA Council MeetingJun 09WG5 Project 6 Leader 8. Development of the 2 nd Draft of Bilateral Contract Model(s) as Commented Jul – Aug 09WG5 Project 6 Members (to be initiated by Project 6 Leader) 9.Circulation of the 2 nd Draft of Bilateral Contract Model(s) for Comments End of Aug 09WG5 Project 6 Leader 10.The Final HAPUA WG5 Project 6 Meeting - Discussion on the 2 nd Draft Bilateral Contract Model(s) Sept 09WG5 Project 6 Leader and Members 11.Development of the Final Draft of Bilateral Contract Model(s) as Commented Oct – Nov 09WG5 Project 6 Members (to be initiated by Project 6 Leader) 12.Submission of the Final Report and Bilateral Contract Model(s) to HAPUAWG5 Dec 09WG5 Project 6 Leader

12 9. Project Action Plan (9/3)

13 Thank you

WC Meeting Decision & Advice  TOR for WG5 Project 6 was approved by the WC.  Updates on the project to be presented to the Council (around May 2009)  WC instructed WG5 to modify the Project 6 title and come up with a better term other than a benchmarking study of the existing bilateral arrangements concerning cross border/country interconnections. The project title should describe the salient points of the interconnection arrangement concerning tax, tariff, country regulations, etc. A suggested title would be: Models of Bilateral Interconnection Arrangement.  The adoption of Project 6 TOR template as reference for all future project TORs. Project name: Bilateral Interconnection Arrangement.

WC Meeting Decision & Advice (2)  As to the APGCC meeting, WG5 was instructed to:  Conduct the study and identify features of existing bilateral arrangements to be used later to Multilateral Arrangement for the APGCC.  Carry out study on bilateral basis first between Members countries of Subsystem A. Relevant studies related to Commercial Issues, Tax, Regulation, Tariff System and Social Impact are to be included in the study.  Provide various contractual models base on the experience and examples of past contracts between two countries and recommend for further improvement if needed. This study could then be replicated to other bilateral subsystem connections.  Prioritize the major issue on the commercial/regulation tax and tariff aspect of the interconnection which may impasse the study. 1.Need to clear with APGCC, It is for project 5.

Summary “Social impact” would be an issue of WG5 project 5. Report to WC. The project title is changed to “Bilateral Interconnection Arrangement”, which consist of report and Bilateral Interconnection Agreement. In the first step, WG5 Pro.6 will do only bilateral contract. Bilateral contract means contract for interconnection(s) between two countries.