Flood Inundation Mapping Program

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Minnesota Silver Jackets Pilot Project Flood Inundation Map and Warning System for Downtown St. Paul Association of State Flood Plain Managers Conference.
Advertisements

NOAA’s NWS and the USGS: Partnering to Meet America’s Water Information Needs Ernie Wells Hydrologic Services Division NOAA National Weather Service May.
Hydrologic Engineering Center1 The Development of a Flood Warning and Response System Cameron Ackerman, P.E. Hydrologic Engineering Center, USACE.
Development of Near-Real-Time and Predicted Flood-Inundation Maps for Internet Display and Hazard Mitigation Planning 4 th International Symposium on Flood.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey February 29, 2012 – Washington, D.C. A GIS Flood Tool for Mapping Extent of Inundation James Verdin.
Better Defining the Flood Threat Flood Inundation Mapping from the National Weather Service 2009 Severe Storms and Hydrology Conference Shreveport, LA.
Floodplain Mapping Using AV-RAS Esteban Azagra and Francisco Olivera, Ph.D. Center for Research in Water Resources University of Texas at Austin.
Floodplain Mapping using HEC-RAS and ArcView GIS Eric Tate Francisco Olivera David Maidment
Processing Geospatial Data with HEC-GeoRAS 3.1
Application of GIS Tools for Hydraulic Modeling
Session 131 Hazard Mapping and Modeling Supporting Emergency Response Operations using GIS and Modeling.
Flood Analysis of Scioto River Using HEC-RAS/GIS Converting HEC-2 Data for HEC-RAS /ArcView GIS Analysis and Inundation Mapping (A pilot using Big Darby.
NOAA’s NWS and the USGS: Partnering to Meet America’s Water Information Needs Dr. Thomas Graziano Acting Chief, Hydrologic Services Division Office of.
Hydrologic/Watershed Modeling Glenn Tootle, P.E. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering University of Nevada, Las Vegas
Oregon Flood Hazard Data Standard v2.0 Summary of Proposed Amendment Collaborative Effort of: Jed Roberts (DOGAMI), Steve Lucker & Christine Shirley (DLCD)
Hydraulic Screening and Analysis Needed for USACE Review
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Development of Inferential Sensors for Real-time Quality Control of Water- level Data for the EDEN.
1 A GIS-Based Flood Inundation Mapping and Analysis Pilot Project Indiana GIS Conference February 19-20, 2008 John Buechler, The Polis Center Moon Kim,
ASSESSMENT OF FLOOD REMEDIATION WITH MINIMAL HISTORIC HYDROLOGIC DATA: CASE STUDY FOR A SMALL URBAN STREAM Robert R. Holmes, Jr., PhD, P.E., D.WRE U.S.
“Rosillo Creek Flood monitoring and mapping in San Antonio-Texas, an Emergency Management point of view” Part II (and what can we do about this for Onion.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Indiana Silver Jackets Real- time Inundation Mapping Pilot Project Scott Morlock USGS Indiana Water.
Streamgage Datum Conversion Great Lakes Region Height Modernization Consortium meeting New Cumberland, PA April 13, 2011.
Streamgage Datum Conversion Eastern Region Height Modernization Consortium Webinar March 4, 2014 Jim Kolva, USGS, Office of Surface Water.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Inter-Agency Datum Establishment and Conversion Collaboration in Missouri. Paul H. Rydlund Jr. PLS.
APPLICATION OF LIDAR IN FLOODPLAIN MAPPING Imane MRINI GIS in Water Resources University of Texas at Austin Source. Optech,Inc.
US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® Consequence Assessment for Dam Failure Simulations Kurt Buchanan, CFM Economist Mapping, Modeling, and Consequences.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Alabama Water Science Center StreamStats: By Kernell Ries and J.
U.S. Geological Survey Streamgaging Program U.S. Geological Survey Streamgaging Program J. Michael Norris Coordinator, National Streamflow.
Automated H&H and Advanced Terrain Processing
National Flood Conference April 22, 2009 Victor Hom Hydrologic Services Division Office of Climate, Water and Weather NOAA’s National Weather Service National.
ArcHydro – Two Components Hydrologic  Data Model  Toolset Credit – David R. Maidment University of Texas at Austin.
by David M. Beekman and Vito A. Cimino
A JOINT PROJECT OF MISSISSIPPI STATE UNIVERSITY AND the Lower Mississippi River Forecast Center PROJECT FUNDED BY NOAA/OAR THROUGH THE NORTHERN GULF INSTITUTE.
Hydraulic and Hydrologic Considerations in Planning Course FLOOD RISK MANAGEMENT Chuck Shadie Mississippi Valley Division.
National Research Council Mapping Science Committee Floodplain Mapping – Sensitivity and Errors Scott K. Edelman, PE Watershed Concepts and Karen Schuckman,
September 4, 2012 California Department of Water Resources Central Valley Floodplain Evaluation and Delineation (CVFED) Program Presented for the FMA 2-D.
NWS FLDWAV ANALYSIS TOOL
NOAA’s NWS and the USGS: Partnering to Meet America’s Water Information Needs Dr. Thomas Graziano Chief, Hydrologic Services Division NOAA National Weather.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Silver Jackets Innovative Collaboration to Maximize Solutions.
Assessment of Economic Benefits of the North Carolina Floodplain Mapping Program Hydrologic and Hydraulic Case Studies Adapted from a Presentation to NRC.
Flood Map Modernization and North Dakota Julie Prescott, ND Map Modernization Coordinator North Dakota State Water Commission And Brian Fischer, CFM, GIS.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Marie C. Peppler USGS FIM Program Liaison Flood Inundation Mapping Program Project needs overview.
HYDROLOGIC DATA. BACKGROUND Analysis and synthesis of data is required to perform any hydrologic computation. The engineer needs to: Identify and define.
The U. S. Geological Survey Streamgaging Network Supporting Society’s Water-Resource Decisions Presented by: Bob Hainly, Assistant Director USGS-PA Water.
US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® Cooperative Efforts in Nashville Flood Preparedness Jamie G. James, P.E. Water Resources Section Nashville.
Development of a Geographic Framework for an Integrated Flood Modeling System Oscar Robayo Tim Whiteaker August 10, 2004 University of Texas at Austin.
Description of WMS Watershed Modeling System. What Model Does Integrates GIS and hydrologic models Uses digital terrain data to define watershed and sub.
1 Triangulated Irregular Network Node Edge Face. 2 3D Structure of a TIN.
1 Integrating Water Resources Engineering and Geographic Information Systems (GIS) National Weather Service NWSRFS International Workshop October 21-23,
Afghan Water Task Progress Report September 7, 2006 EROS Data Center, Sioux Falls, SD Gregg J. Wiche Doug G. Emerson U. S. Geological Survey Bismarck,
FLOOD MAPPING Menaxhimi i rezikut te permbytjeve Objektivat Gjenerale.
Minnesota Silver Jackets Pilot Project Flood Inundation Map and Warning System for Downtown St. Paul National Flood Risk Management and Silver Jackets.
Boise River, Idaho: Many Agencies Working Towards One Version of the Truth Ellen Berggren, USACE Walla Walla District Idaho Silver Jackets USACE Flood.
Harrisburg Flood Inundation Mapping Project – Many Agencies Working Together USACE Flood Risk Management and Silver Jackets Workshop 23 August 2012 Presented.
David Tarboton Digital Elevation Models, Flood Inundation Mapping and River Hydraulic Properties David Tarboton
NOAA’s NWS and the USGS: Partnering to Meet America’s Water Information Needs Peter Gabrielsen Chief, Hydrologic Services Division Eastern Region NOAA’s.
Floodplain Mapping using TINs Triangulated Irregular Networks (TINs) Representation of stream channels using TINs Floodplain delineation using HEC-HMS,
Focus areas of the NWS Missouri/Souris River Floods of May-August 2011 Service Assessment – Per the NOAA and NWS Strategic Plans, gather stakeholder input.
LIDAR Flood mapping for Brownsville and Matamoros Gueudet Pierre GIS in Water Resources University of Texas Austin Fall 2002.
Hydrological impacts of climate change over the contiguous United States: Project overview.
US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® Proposed Floodplain Inundation Mapping on the Flathead River Travis Ball Hydraulic Engineer
River Mechanics Activities River Mechanics Group Hydrology Laboratory Office of Hydrologic Development National Weather Service National Oceanic and Atmospheric.
WATERWAYS AND BRIDGES IN TEXAS “Final” Presentation by: Brandon Klenzendorf CE 394K Dr. Maidment.
Experience ∙ Innovation · Results CALCASIEU PARISH – SABINE RIVER AND BAYOU LACASSINE BASINS STORMWATER MASTER PLAN Engineers ∙ Surveyors · Environmental.
Development of a High-Resolution Flood Inundation Model of Charles City, Iowa Nathan Young Associate Research Engineer Larry Weber.
Regional to Engineering Scale HUC8 HUC12 Catchment Engineering Hydrology Engineering Hydraulics Personal – a flooded home.
Week 1.
Flood Monitoring Tools 2011 OFMA Annual Conference
Regional Hydraulic Model for the City of Austin
Presentation transcript:

Flood Inundation Mapping Program Project needs overview Feel free to call anytime if you have any questions. Marie Peppler, 703.648.5314 Marie C. Peppler USGS FIM Coordinator

Flood Inundation Maps translate a hydrograph into operational maps that communicate risk and consequences Translates a hydrograph (vertical stage point information) into a series of concentric inundation maps (area based information) that have many uses. Focus on deterministic mapping for all flood stages – NOT probabilistic mapping (ie 1% chance floodway, etc.)

USGS and NWS Data Networks The FIM Program is built upon these existing data and all of the expertise that is required to develop and maintain them. USGS handles 93% of the nation’s real-time river gages. Over 8,000 USGS Gages reporting current stream conditions in NWIS Over 4,000 NWS Flood Forecast/Warning locations in AHPS

Creation of Flood Inundation Map Libraries Stream Selection Model Flood Heights Delineate Flood Extents Compute Flood Depths Process Map Library Overview of the 5 Easy Steps! Waterloo IA 2008, USGS photo archive

1. Stream Selection Streamflow information Flood Forecast information Elevation data availability Topography Bathymetry Structural surveys Flood Impact Locations Critical infrastructure Routes of egress Populations Gage location in the reach and ensuring that the reach covers the area of interest/DEM availability are key The process begins with a local community that is interested in determining its flood risk. The first step is to identify the location where the flood modeling will be performed. The best locations are streams or rivers located in a populated area. Ideally, the chosen section will be near an existing USGS streamgage, but a gage can be installed if needed. If the community is also interested in real-time flood monitoring and response activities, the streamgage should also be a National Weather Service (NWS) forecast location. The NWS produces flood forecasts at about half of existing USGS streamgages, and the community can work with them to establish forecasting if their gage is not currently served.

Gather Data Real-time streamflow information from a gage within the selected reach Historical flood levels at that gage Current and historical rating curves at that gage Short-term probabilistic forecasts at that gage High-resolution elevation data (dictates the quality of the maps more than any other factor) Existing hydraulic models (if available and recent)

2. Model Flood Heights Hydraulic model calibrated to a USGS gage rating curve Rating curve extensions possible Can be any generally accepted appropriate model The model is run multiple times at incremental stream stages over the range of flooding conditions from near-bankfull to record flooding levels, producing a series of water-surface profiles that define flood heights throughout the reach.  USGS gage or qualified transmitting furnished record with rating curve required Rating curve extensions must follow USGS policy (see memo)

Hydraulic Modeling details Calibrate model to streamgage record and current land cover Well developed rating curves are crucial Any appropriate model is accepted USACE HEC-RAS is common Model must be peer-reviewed and documented Modeled flood scenarios are chosen to reflect local conditions (bridge conditions, levees, temporary structures, etc.) In highly complex flow situations, a 2D model might be warranted

3. Delineate Flood Extents Geospatial Processing Create TIN models using cross sections and the modeled water surface profile Intersect the TIN with the DEM to generate predicted inundated areas depth grids Clean up and QA data Repeat for all modeled water surface profiles to generate a library of maps

4. Compute Flood Depths Flood extents are processed with the topographic data to produce estimated depths across the floodplain The next step is to model how deep the flooding would be for each grid cell in the inundation area. Once the depth grids have been determined, surface and inundation extents are calculated for all flood levels along the reach. Each extent represents a single flood inundation map, and provides a full picture of the flooding scenario - both how far and how deep the flood waters could reach. Each library’s modeling and development process is documented and reviewed by other flood scientists to ensure the modeling was done correctly and produced valid results.  Depths in the stream channel are usually estimated. Depths are presented as a range based on the uncertainty of the model layers (hydraulic calibration and DEM uncertainty)

5. Process Map Library The hydraulic model, flood extents and flood depths are peer reviewed and documented Maps are overlaid onto city maps to aid in planning and response The last step is to overlay the probable areas of floodwater inundation onto city maps, which helps communities visualize, plan, and respond to floods. A flood inundation map library is the full set of maps showing flood inundation from near-bankfull river levels to record flooding levels. Once the map library is reviewed and approved, it is published and uploaded to the USGS Flood Inundation Mapper where it can be seen and utilized by the public.  The documentation and approval is necessary for all maps published to the USGS mapper. Minimum documentation standards and approval/submission guidelines are available on the webpage.

Peer-Reviewed Documentation Required: Uncertainty and Use Limitations Study area and scope Hydrologic data Hydraulic model calibration and performance Accuracy assessment Metadata Recommended: Technical Summary Notebook of the hydraulic model Project QA/QC checklist completed by the project team Published to a public website http://water.usgs.gov/osw/flood_inundation/toolbox/librarytools.html

FIM Mapper – more than just maps + USGS Real-time streamgage NWS Flood Forecast Flood Library Turns the modeled map data into an operational tool by combining data together with tools that enhance the utility and don’t require any Modeling or GIS software or skills

USGS Office of Surface Water Questions Marie C. Peppler USGS Office of Surface Water mpeppler@usgs.gov Title: Flooding in Finchfield, IA Description: Flooding level shown against a speed limit sign Location: Finchfield, IA, USA Date Taken: Jun 10 2008 Photographer: Don Becker , U.S. Geological Survey http://water.usgs.gov/osw/flood_inundation/