Introduction to process documentation for learning alliances and action research Based on background paper SWITCH Briefing No 6 Ton Schouten.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Christopher Graham Garnet Education UK. I dont do rhetorical questions !
Advertisements

Performance Assessment
Intelligence Step 5 - Capacity Analysis Capacity Analysis Without capacity, the most innovative and brilliant interventions will not be implemented, wont.
EMOWERS Partnership Stakeholder dialogue for better water use and management.
Sidney B. Westley East-West Center Let’s Talk about Reaching Wider Audiences with our Research Results.
Bridging Research, Information and Culture An Initiative of the Research and Planning Group for California Community Colleges Your Name Your Institution.
Understanding effectiveness from the perspective of NGOs working in Cambodia By Rhonda Chapman A paper for the Measuring Effectiveness Conference, “Communities.
SEM II : Marketing Research
PEDAGOGICAL DOCUMENTATION By Cheryl Anderson, QCCI Training & Professional Development Coordinator January 28, 2014.
Developing a high performing Board How do we ensure our Board becomes a real strength of the organisation.
Middle Manager Development Colin Blair Lean Programme Manager NHS Lanarkshire.
Identification of critical success factors for implementing NLLS, through collaboration and exchange of expertise IDENTIFY LLP-2008-RO-KA1-KA1NLLS.
Building & Leading Teams for Impact December 20, 2011.
Introduction to Social Analysis & Action (SAA)
INTEGRATING BENEFICIARY FEEDBACK INTO EVALUATION- A STRUCTURED APPROACH Presentation to UKES Conference May 2015 Theme: Theory and practice of inclusion.
Chapter 5 Leadership and Diversity
Questions from a patient or carer perspective
Health Systems and the Cycle of Health System Reform
1 Classroom-Based Research: How to Be a Researcher in Your Classroom Basic Skills Initiative Teaching and Learning Workshop October 2009 Darla M. Cooper.
Monitoring Evaluation Impact Assessment Objectives Be able to n explain basic monitoring and evaluation theory in relation to accountability n Identify.
Reporting and Using Evaluation Results Presented on 6/18/15.
Using a logic model to help you use the ePortfolio Implementation Framework Katherine Lithgow.
Our Leadership Journey Cynthia Cuellar Astrid Fossum Janis Freckman Connie Laughlin.
Module 3. Session DCST Clinical governance
The Evaluation Plan.
Monitoring and Evaluation in MCH Programs and Projects MCH in Developing Countries Feb 10, 2011.
Elizabeth Godfrey 1.  Periodic assessment of results Appropriateness, effectiveness, efficiency, impact, sustainability  Identifies intended and unintended.
Toolkit for Mainstreaming HIV and AIDS in the Education Sector Guidelines for Development Cooperation Agencies.
A COMPETENCY APPROACH TO HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT
1 Reference Framework for Sustainable Cities (RFSC) Some useful functionalities for Finnish cities.
Wgnho Management for Performance Department of Conservation Management for Performance Project.
Evaluating Effectiveness To what effect? Joanne Sharpe, Office of Development Effectiveness, AusAID.
Monitoring & Evaluation Presentation for Technical Assistance Unit, National Treasury 19 August 2004 Fia van Rensburg.
Tony Karbo, Ph.D. AHSI/UPEACE Africa Program.  Action or inaction taken by interested entities such as NGOs, Think Tanks, government departments, ministries,
Keys to Successful Marketing  Must understand and meet customer needs and wants  To meet customer needs, marketers must collect information.
Quality Assessment July 31, 2006 Informing Practice.
Education That Is Multicultural
PPA 502 – Program Evaluation Lecture 2c – Process Evaluation.
School of SOCIAL AND COMMUNITY MEDICINE University of BRISTOL Shall we meet for coffee? Experiments in ways of bridging the researcher commissioner gap:
Office of International Research, Education, and Development, Virginia Tech SANREM CRSP Communications: Getting the message out Keith M. Moore Associate.
Teaching to the Standard in Science Education By: Jennifer Grzelak & Bonnie Middleton.
BCO Impact Assessment Component 3 Scoping Study David Souter.
Reflection and Learning Workshop April 2015 Imperial Botanical Garden Hotel, Entebbe.
Defending Childhood Protect Heal Thrive January 25-27, 2011 Sandra Spencer Executive Director National Federation of Families for Children’s Mental Health.
The NCATE Journey Kate Steffens St. Cloud State University AACTE/NCATE Orientation - Spring 2008.
Chapter 8 New Wave Research: Contemporary Applied Approaches.
European Public Health Alliance Lobbying, the role of NGOs and communication strategies Tamsin Rose Sofia, 29 October 2005.
Monitoring and Evaluation
Transforming Patient Experience: The essential guide
Developing a Framework In Support of a Community of Practice in ABI Jason Newberry, Research Director Tanya Darisi, Senior Researcher
Quality Assurance Review Team Oral Exit Report School Accreditation AUTEC School 4-8 March 2012.
The UQ student employability vision: The University of Queensland will develop highly sought after graduates who have engaged in a range of opportunities,
Kathy Corbiere Service Delivery and Performance Commission
Communication Strategy Dr. Kaja Tampere
CRITICAL THINKING AND THE NURSING PROCESS Entry Into Professional Nursing NRS 101.
Action Research. How trustworthy are the articles you are reading for your literature review? What other issue are you discovering?
Co-designing urban infrastructures: cases, opportunities and challenges Liesbeth Huybrechts, Faculty of Architecture and Art UHasselt.
Influencing Policy through Research: Introduction to Principles and Tools Arnaldo Pellini:
European Public Health Alliance Advocating for Better Health in the EU Lara Garrido-Herrero (ANME General Assembly) Frankfurt, 11 November 2006.
true potential An Introduction to the Middle Manager Programme’s CMI Qualifications.
LESSONS LEARNT FROM A CASE STUDY OF ITH SALZBURG PAPER: KERSTIN FREUDENTHALER & ANJA HERGESELL PRESENTER: TINA TILLER ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS: CHRISTIAN BAUMGARTNER.
Introduction to Participatory Monitoring & Evaluation (PM&E): A Practical Approach to Engaging Stakeholders and Communities in Monitoring & Evaluation.
Monitoring and Evaluation Systems for NARS organizations in Papua New Guinea Day 4. Session 10. Evaluation.
Localisation in Coordination
Supervision and creating culture of reflective practice
Education That Is Multicultural
PROCESSES AND INDICATORS FOR MEASURING THE IMPACT OF EQUALITY BODIES
Leadership for Safety Through the Case Method
7. EAFM cycle overview Essential EAFM Date • Place 1.
1. A traditional crisis CRISIS
Presentation transcript:

Introduction to process documentation for learning alliances and action research Based on background paper SWITCH Briefing No 6 Ton Schouten

Introduction The planned project intervention The actual course of the project

Introduction Ctd A tool that helps project staff and stakeholders to carefully track meaningful events in their project. It enables reflection and analysis of these events in order to understand better what is happening, how it is happening and why it may be happening.

Introduction Ctd Looking behind the surface, behind the obvious Understanding power relations, culture, traditions, attitudes, social relationships, politics, dependency Understanding resistance to change / understanding dynamics for change Diary: the wheels turning in your head Making visible what is hidden Don’t ignore and do away with the outside world (nasty, standing in the way of the project) but understanding it and making it a factor in the project Stimulate the debate about the hidden factors

Conceptual underpinning “Intervention is visualised in existing models as a discrete set of activities that take place within a defined time-space setting involving the interaction between so-called ‘intervening’ parties and ‘target’ or ‘recipient’ groups. Such an image isolates intervention from the continuous flow of social life and ongoing relations …… intervention never is a ‘project’ with sharp boundaries in time and space as defined by the institutional apparatus of the state or implementing agency.” (Long and van der Ploeg, 1989; page 228).

Conceptual underpinning Into the context: beyond the life time and the institutional boundaries of a project History How things have been done and are being done for years Taking the anecdotes serious and not only a corridor or coffee corner laugh

Capturing, organising, analysing, disseminating Capturing the change process – the stumbling blocks, the acceleration, the dynamics (social relationships, power, politics, resistance to change etc) Organising the captured information to reflect and learn Analysing the information: trends, patterns Disseminating the information

Theory of change What to document? What is the focus? It is the projects theory of change e.g.  joint decision making will result in better services for the poor  community participation will result in more sustainable services Example EMPOWERS: concerted action, joint decision making, empowerment, change of attitudes Indicators to have more specific focus

Why document processes You do it all the time: but not systematically and not for learning Step back: observe trends, warning, opportunities Collection of qualitative information – monitoring Learning from mistakes Deepen understanding – follow curiosity Portrays people concerned in who they are (regardless of a project) Learn internally and externally – communication It is nice It is fun

What to document Who, where, what, when Focus: theory of change:  integration between departments or disciplines or sectors,  coordinated action of all stakeholders,  joint decision making,  participation,  change of attitude and  empowerment Who are involved, what exactly, when and where can you observe, why is it not happening, what is behind the surface, where the project life line makes the sharpest curves etc

Principles Go to the stakeholders, give them a voice Go to the events where there is tension and conflict Study and describe the context Organise stepping back: reflection and analysis Use for internal learning Disseminate and share, stimulate debate

Tools Tools for capturing: interviews, focus group discussions, observation, diaries, visuals (photography, video) Tools for organising: filing and compiling: articles, case studies, photo books, video films, written portraits etc Tools for analysing: time, methods and structures Tools for disseminating: internal meetings, channels (radio, TV, Newsletters, website, presentations, meetings)

Who documents Insiders – the project team Good for internal learning, but is there enough distance (in parallel to and as part of the project) Direct stakeholders Stimulates learning and reflection, gives a voice to groups (participatory video) Outsiders There is (independent and critical) distance, there is experience in looking behind the scene

The process documentation specialist is non-judgmental and can listen to many perspectives without an ‘expert’ hat on; can ask questions that stimulate critical thinking and dig below the surface; is able to stay objective while also seeing the big picture and placing learning in context of the larger vision; is culturally competent; understands the dynamics of human transformation; is trusted by the community, but can report findings without bias; can synthesise large volumes of information to identify key learnings; is skilled at communicating messages in positive ways. Has technical skills

Internal and external Internal project learning (joint learning with direct stakeholders): formats, methods and meetings Communication to the outside world: communication strategy. Stimulate debate, advocate, inform etc. Can serve both purposes

Planning Process documentation plan: Purpose of the process documentation.  Is it for internal project learning?  Is it for communication to the outside world? What is the theory of change of the project: which processes to trace, who to follow throughout the process, where and when. Which tools are needed for capturing the process, organising the information, analysing the findings and disseminating the information? Who will document the processes (project team, a process documentation specialist, direct stakeholders, outsiders)?

Planning Ctd Is it needed to develop skills in process documentation (writing, video, photography, editing, website development)? What will the outputs be, the products – both for the internal learning and the communication strategy? For each output a short synopsis should be written – what is the content of the case study, video byte, photo album etc. and which specific objectives does it serve? How to monitor if the process documentation yielded success?

Politics of process documentation You cannot always share what you have captured! Threatens the projects Threatens your future job How to overcome?

Final remark Process documentation may: help projects to break through their sharp boundaries in time and space. help project interventions to engage with “the continuous flow of social life and ongoing relations”. enable projects to raise issues of general interest and stimulate reflection and debate in wider society. not take external factors for granted or as the nasty assumptions in a logframe be one of the tools to make research projects more relevant.