Enhancing Students’ Self Regulation on Placement 5 th Annual ESCalate ITE Conference Towards a New Era 15 th May, 2009 Robert Collins Moira Paterson Jane.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Practical Learning: Achieving Excellence in the Human Services International Conference January 2008 Edinburgh International Conference Centre.
Advertisements

QAA Enhancement Themes Conference Heriot Watt University Wednesday 5 th March 2008 Poster Presentation by Mhairi Freeman (lecturer), Sally Michie, Stephanie.
A Masters in Education in eLearning The University of Hull.
Post 16 Citizenship Liz Craft Valuing progress Celebrating achievement.
Ofsted ITE Inspection Briefing PCET trainees, ex-MMU PCET trainees, Course Team Leaders, Mentors and Quality Managers.
Securing an outstanding judgement for behaviour and safety
Head of Learning: Job description
Introduction to Coaching and Mentoring
‘Colin, I need to speak to you some time about my own CPD - I’ve been so busy that I just haven’t had time to think about myself… ’. ‘The most important.
Early Level Transitions. Are we confident there is effective progression in children’s learning through early level ? Are we confident there is effective.
Session Objectives: For Mentors to know:
Support for independence. Lessons from the Enhancement of Learning Support project LSIS funded project Phase 1 initial research led by Natspec Phase 2.
Effective support: working with others Effective support: working with others A Twilight Training Session by Gareth D Morewood, Director of Curriculum.
Working with your Head to build an effective Leadership team.
Recording Excellence Nicole Duplain School of Humanities.
The Impact on Practice (ImP) Project: A framework to maximise the impact of continuing professional education on practice Liz Clark, Jan Draper and Shelagh.
“ I never thought how I learn,just that I learn…” – an evaluation of the impact of personal tutor support on first year students engagement with PDP. Julie.
Discussion examples Andrea Zhok.
Developing Business Practice – 302LON Preparing for a Successful Work Experience Unit: 9 Knowledgecast: 2.
Using students’ voices to improve teaching in schools
MMU Faculty of Education Subject Mentor Training
+ Hybrid Roles in Your School If not now, then when?
Welcome to the Secondary PGCE New Mentor meeting.
School Innovation in Science Formerly Science in Schools An overview of the SIS Model & supporting research Russell Tytler Faculty of Education, Deakin.
The Ofsted ITE Inspection Framework 2014 A summary.
Module 1 Introduction to SRL. Aims of the Masterclass Understand the principles of self regulated learning (SRL) and how they apply to GP training Develop.
Thinking Actively in a Social Context T A S C.
International Conference on Enhancement and Innovation in Higher Education Crowne Plaza Hotel, Glasgow 9-11 June 2015 Welcome.
Observation System Kidderminster College June 2012.
Transforming lives through learning Teaching Scotland’s Future: Legacy Event Career Long Professional Learning: Education Scotland Jayne Horsburgh and.
TLE Challenge – Session 2
Planning for Continuing Professional Development – A Whole School Approach A step by step guide to planning CPD including a framework for Teacher Induction.
History PGCE Subject Development Panel Jan Feedback from Chief External Examiner 2013/14 KEY STRENGTHS: 1.Highly efficient and effective communication.
Transforming lives through learning Curriculum Expectations Sadie Cushley HMIE Feb 2014.
Change Agents Conference 2012 The Writing Centre Siân Harris.
MMU Faculty of Education Subject Mentor Training
Aims of Workshop Introduce more effective school/University partnerships for the initial training of teachers through developing mentorship training Encourage.
Association of Educational Development & Improvement Professionals in Scotland (AEDIPS) Conference 2008 Marine Hotel, Troon 23 February 2008.
College of Science and Engineering Learning and Teaching Strategy Planning Meeting Initial Reflections Nick Hulton.
Preparing for Inspection Nov 2013 Primary QIO team.
Action research projects This sequence may help you when planning your case study What does the data identify about this target group? What will.
Our Curriculum Journey Duloch Primary and Nursery Our Curriculum Journey Duloch Primary and Nursery.
Strengthening Student Outcomes in Small Schools There’s been enough research done to know what to do – now we have to start doing it! Douglas Reeves.
Effective Learning Support: The key to quality and success Enhancement of Learning Support.
Towards the Implementation of an Undergraduate Package for Self-Assessment to compliment the PASS Initiative Melanie Giles, School of Psychology Amanda.
Formative and summative assessment: A focus on developing PGCE students’ skills to provide meaningful feedback and judgements aiming to optimize pupil.
PGCE Primary and a Mastery approach …the journey so far
Personalised Learning NOCN Level 2. Induction Welcome and introductions Completion of enrolment forms Qualification Initial assessment Personalised learning.
Differentiation and challenge: Research and Development Group Cycle Meeting 1: selecting the issue.
Name of Pilot Project: Developing pedagogy through collaboration, action research and reflection. Aim of the Project: to set up a collaborative partnership.
Students as Partners: Developing and sustaining a partnership approach to enhancing learning and teaching University of Hertfordshire Karen Clark, Claire.
Module 1 Peer Coaching on Paper Peer Coach Training.
Great Expectations Efficacy and Motivation Developing high expectations of what students, schools and school communities can achieve. Ideas developed in.
Mentor Training Brunel University Primary Partnership Friday 25 th January pm – 4.00pm Barbara Hosier & Alison Silby.
Some quotes from our students to consider
What is assessment for learning?
Innovation What does it look like in Adult Learning?
Module 2 From Curriculum to Compelling Learning. 2Module 2. From Curriculum to Compelling Learning Module 2 | Session 1 By the end of the session, you.
Applying Laurillard’s Conversational Framework to Blended Learning Blogging and Collaborative Activity Design R Papworth, R Walker & W Britcliffe E-Learning.
1 Level 3 Certificate in Coaching Badminton Introduction and the role of the coach.
Teaching and Learning AELP Stakeholder Event 29 th November 2011 – Dissemination of the Chief Inspector Annual Report.
Looking at Our School 2016 A Quality Framework for Post-Primary Schools A tool to support reflection, self-review and evaluation ETBI PRINCIPALS AND DEPUTY.
MMU Faculty of Education Subject Mentor Training
Workshop for ART mentors
Managing performance What is it? Why? How?.
school self-evaluation and improvement toolkit
Today’s session objective:
Standard for Teachers’ Professional Development July 2016
RBWM SCITT Mentor Meetings 2017.
Presentation transcript:

Enhancing Students’ Self Regulation on Placement 5 th Annual ESCalate ITE Conference Towards a New Era 15 th May, 2009 Robert Collins Moira Paterson Jane Thomson

Enhancing self-regulated learning Project Funded project to enhance student self regulation focused on Year 2 and 4 of B.Ed. Degree Aims to develop the students’ responsibility for own learning on Teaching & Learning Programme and on placement Re-examines roles and responsibilities on placement to place more emphasis on student Use of VLE to discuss progress with peers

CONTEXT: internal Faculty Strategy to 2011:Faculty Strategy to 2011: “We will re-examine placement experiences, ensuring that the roles of field professionals, of student self-assessment, and of peer support and assessment are utilised to enhance student learning in the field.” University Excellence Agenda: the imperative to re-examine the balance of staff activities.University Excellence Agenda: the imperative to re-examine the balance of staff activities. Harmonisation in ITE coursesHarmonisation in ITE courses

CONTEXT: external recognition that peer assessment is powerful for all learners, both in the giving and receiving of feedback. changing culture of collaboration and peer observation and mentoring in schools. improved partnership arrangements, the growing confidence of school staff in mentoring and the TEI’s role in mentoring the mentors. HMIE move to a greater emphasis on self evaluation and self regulation in their revised inspection procedures for schools

Following the model developed by Butler and Wynne (1995) learners will be required to: analyse tasks and set task goals, a critical step that establishes the direction of subsequent learning. realise their goals through selecting, adapting or generating tactics and strategies. monitor their performance, i.e. compare their current progress with their goals to judge both the appropriateness of the goals and their own strategic behaviour.

Student – led tutorials Peer evaluations on placement (link to assignment On-line discussion groups Feedback from students through evaluation Feedback from Placement Teachers Feedback from tutors SRL T&L Modular Audits BEd1 Self-assessment quiz University Excellence Agenda Research Questions Impact on Future Learning & Teaching Management SRL Innovation Issues B.Ed 2 Teaching & Learning

Student Experience Self-assessment quizzes Two research questions Group collaboration Student-led tutorials Lecture Increased self-efficacy Deep approach to learning

Aims of the tutorials to make them more student led to provide opportunities for students to develop self regulatory behaviours to encourage them to take increased responsibility for their own learning to engage them in co-constructing knowledge to make learning more pro active

What does self-regulated learning mean to the students? … in the sense you are doing all the learning yourself, you’re finding it out and reflecting on it and thinking what I really learned from me actually doing it rather than someone else teaching me Becoming more independent – using your initiative to improve Taking more responsibility (general agreement) knowing what your goals are, setting out how your plans how you are going to achieve them and evaluating to make sure you fulfil them

How did students judge the teaching and learning module? It was a massive learning curve from first year and I’ve actually enjoyed it, as much as it has been hard work, I’ve learned so much as a result not just about the course, but about myself and how I cope with things And your confidence grew too, you’re doing presentations every week … there were some days I resented having to do it because there were other assignments to be done and seemed so more important and I felt I couldn’t be bothered doing it, and I’d rather have spent the time on other things, but looking at it, it was worth it, looking back it was good ….

Even small things, like our tutorials were student led, so we had to organise everything, how we sat, how the groupings were, how we were presented the information, so we were learning all the time and everything was relevant to placement, there was nothing we didn’t use. Teaching and learning presentations, I didn’t realise at the time, it was only after all the assessments and reflecting on it, our doing the presentations week on week meant in the classroom you were much more confident, taking the floor, taking the kids ….

SRL Innovation Issues Description/ Justification of SRL Toolset Comparative Student Evaluations 07/08-08/09 Evaluation Strategy 2008/09 Initial Evaluation Analysis: Students Initial Evaluation Analysis: Mentor Teachers Initial Evaluation Analysis: Tutor NGT results SRL T&L Modular Audits BEd1/BEd3 Pre-existing SRL Range & Flexibility in Module PC403 Strategic Management Overview New SRL Operational Management Innovations Impact on Future Learning & Teaching Management

New Tools and Processes Supporting SRL: Session 2008/09 Self efficacy tool Joint student-teacher evaluation Online discussion groups Tutor Visit 2

Student Perspective SAADASDANR Self –efficacy tool 5%19%31%43% Peer evaluation 42%40%12%2%3% Tutor Visit 1 80%14%0%2% Triadic meeting 42%35%13%1%5% Joint evaluation 46%37%9%3% Tutor Visit 2 67%24%2%3%2% Online discussion groups 3%7%21% 46% The following have contributed to my professional development:

Student Perspective SAADASDANR Self –efficacy tool 5%19%31%43% Peer evaluation 42%40%12%2%3% Tutor Visit 1 80%14%0%2% Triadic meeting 42%35%13%1%5% Joint evaluation 46%37%9%3% Tutor Visit 2 67%24%2%3%2% Online discussion groups 3%7%21% 46% The following have contributed to my professional development:

Student Perspective ‘’I found the self-efficacy tool useful but I added in numbers as well to represent always sometimes hardly ever and never and found this was easier to complete’’ ‘’I feel the self-efficacy tool could be more specific to your individual needs. I felt the headings of the self-efficacy tool were all very similar ‘’ ‘’Self efficacy tool-This too was not seen to be important or explained or adapted for us. It would have been more beneficial if the point of this had been more stressed from the beginning’’ ‘’Learnonline may have been more useful for students who were on their own or who were in a school far away from any others’’ ‘’Learn on line discussion groups were not useful as I tended to discuss with teachers friends and stage partner’’. ‘’Learn on line groups were not used at all’’

Student Perspective SAADASDANR Self –efficacy tool 5%19%31%43% Peer evaluation 42%40%12%2%3% Tutor Visit 1 80%14%0%2% Triadic meeting 42%35%13%1%5% Joint evaluation 46%37%9%3% Tutor Visit 2 67%24%2%3%2% Online discussion groups 3%7%21% 46% The following have contributed to my professional development:

Student Perspective ‘‘I felt the second tutor visit was a very good idea as it allowed you to talk about placement as a whole and not just the one lesson’’ ‘’The 2nd visit is not needed in all cases. However knowing that the tutor is there for you if you needed him is very important in your well being and confidence’’ ‘’Two tutor visits per placement are required. Students need this support and reducing it to one visit puts too much pressure on all involved and is completely unrealistic’’ ‘’I feel I would have benefited from completing the joint evaluation earlier on in the placement to enable me to focus action points for my own learning. I feel I would have benefited from completing the joint evaluation earlier on in the placement to enable me to focus action points for my own learning’’

Student Perspective n% Observation and assessment2321% Discussion on professional development8274% There was no difference in the value that students placed on the second tutor visit with almost 70% of both groups strongly agreeing that it had contributed to their professional development.

Student Perspective Teacher 07/08 08/09(SA/A) Tutor 07/08 08/09(SA/A) My teacher/tutor explained the evidence on which s/he based my school assessment for: Professional knowledge & understanding 79% 82%96% 98% Professional skills & abilities80% 93%94% 97% Professional values and commitment 79% 91%96% 97%

Student Perspective Self-Regulated LearningSAA 1 Regular self-reflection has increased my awareness of my professional knowledge and skills as a teacher 67%30% 2 I enjoy setting myself challenging goals in the classroom46%50% 3 Monitoring the rate of my progress has helped my motivation to improve45%47% 4 I am now more aware of the teaching strategies I use and the effectiveness of my practice 69%31% 5 I am now more aware that monitoring my self-confidence relates to my success in teaching 51%42% 6 I am now more willing to persevere to achieve challenging goals49%47% 7 I am now more aware that using professional feedback supports my learning72%27% 8 I am now more aware that using peer feedback supports my learning48%46% 9 I am now more aware that the opportunity to discuss issues with peers impacts positively on my learning 62%36%