Marine Pollution Professor Harry Roque Public International Law Mangaban, Ma. Lourena M. 3-E.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Secretariat of the Basel Convention United Nations Environment Programme Regional Workshop Aimed at Promoting Ratification of the Basel Protocol on Liability.
Advertisements

Civil liability system in the Republic of Latvia.
Basel Convention Secretariat United Nations Environmental Programme ___________________________________ Key Elements of the Protocol Laura Thompson Legal.
Oil Pollution Act of 1990 (OPA) By: Casey Marshall Period 4 -On March 24, 1989, shortly after midnight, the oil tanker Exxon Valdez struck Bligh Reef in.
Dr T H Moller Technical Team Manager INTERNATIONAL TANKER OWNERS POLLUTION FEDERATION STATUS OF THE INTERNATIONAL COMPENSATION CONVENTIONS.
Oil Pollution act Was a response to the Exxon Valdez Incident
IAEA International Conference on the Safe and Secure Transport of Radioactive Materials: Session 4B P2 Liability Issues Thursday 20 October 2011 Kevin.
European Commission: Environment Directorate General Slide: 1 EC Environmental Liability Directive (ELD) Training course in European and International.
AIDA XIV World Congress 2014 Rom, 30 th September 2014 Marine Insurance WP “Sue and labour expenses – H&M on German terms or P&I?” Dr. Maximilian Guth,
© Webber Wentzel 2012 Maritime Law Association of South Africa Conference – Shelley Point – 15 September 2012 PLACES OF REFUGE FOR SHIPS IN NEED OF ASSISTANCE.
© DET JURIDISKE FAKULTET UNIVERSITETET I OSLO Owners’ liability EVE DE CONING Room 561, Domus Nova.
© DET JURIDISKE FAKULTET UNIVERSITETET I OSLO OWNER’S LIABILITY SECOND LECTURE LIMITATION OF LIABILITY.
The introduction of SCOPIC ( The Special Compensation P&I Clause)
Axel Luttenberger, Ph.D., Full Professor Faculty of Maritime Studies Rijeka DRIVES FOR THE INTERNATIONAL CONVENTION ON LIABILITY AND COMPENSATION FOR DAMAGE.
Subrogation under Japanese Law
THE INTERNATIONAL REGIME GOVERNING COMPENSATION FOR TANKER OIL SPILLS Måns Jacobsson Former Director International Oil Pollution Compensation Funds Baltic.
Raymond P. Hayden “The Changing Rules on the Playground” President The Maritime Law Association of the U.S.
Consequences of Fukushima accident on international framework for nuclear liability and compensation Open lecture, Higher School of Economics, National.
By: Noah Szajowitz. Oil Pollution Act Of 1990 Drafted into legislation on August 18,1990 by the 101 st United States Congress and signed into law by George.
Legal aspects of the marine environment protection and oil transportation: example of the Baltic Sea.
THE ATHENS PROTOCOL & THE IMPLICATIONS FOR FINANCIERS OF PASSENGER SHIPS Graham Barnes BankServe Insurance Services Ltd.
Oil Pollution and Compensation an overview of oil the international oil spill compensation regimes Tim Wilkins Regional Manager Asia-Pacific Environmental.
THE MERCHANT SHIPPING CIVIL LIABILITY AND THE MERCHANT SHIPPING INTERNATIONAL OIL POLLUTION COMPENSATION FUND BILLS,2013 ADV A MASOMBUKA 08 OCTOBER 2013.
IAEA 1 Liability During Transport: Principles of Nuclear Liability Law Steven McIntosh Chairman, International Expert Group on Nuclear Liability (INLEX)
Bahamas Ship Owners’ Association (BMA) Maritime Labour Convention Ammendments Maurice Kelleher Manager, Management Systems Certification, ABS Americas.
Maritime Liability and Compensation Conventions
MARITIME TRANSPORTATION MANAGEMENT
NEW AMENDMENTS TO THE CROATIAN MARITIME CODE Koper, 30 May 2013 Jasenko Marin University of Zagreb Faculty of Law.
Follow the Fortunes Clauses in Reinsurance Law – Practical Problems in Ensuring their Effectiveness Ralph Fearnhead.
A PRESENTATION TO THE SELECT COMMITTEE ON PUBLIC SERVICES (NCOP) 24 OCTOBER 2007 BY MPATLISENG RAMAEMA CHIEF DIRECTOR: MARITIME TRANSPORT REGULATION DEPARTMENT.
International Treaties on Insurance and Liability related to Nuclear Accidents Michel Vandersmissen Attorney-at-law, Brussels Bar AEEC, 23 November 2009.
MARINE UNDERWRITERS OF SAN FRANCSICO, INC. Marine Seminar Wednesday, April 29, 2009.
Underwriting Submission – Theory and Practice David Pereira Aon’s 11 th Energy Insurance Training Seminar.
© DET JURIDISKE FAKULTET UNIVERSITETET I OSLO OWNER’S LIABILITY THIRD LECTURE OIL POLLUTION LIABILITY.
The International Regime for Compensation for Tanker Oil Spills Working Group on Integrated Maritime Policy 24 March 2011 Måns Jacobsson Former Director,
INTERSPILL 2012 Bunkers Convention 2001 LLMC Conventions Jonathan Hare
José Maura International Oil Pollution Compensation Funds Maritime Institute of Technolgoy and Graduate Studies Maryland, 6 June 2011 Addressing Potential.
Rotterdam Rules: Between Old Problems and New Solutions Jana Rodica May 2009.
26/29 June - Dipartimento di Scienze Giuridiche Unisalento Room R 27 International legal framework for environmental maritime crime: UNCLOS, IMO and MARPOL.
International Group of P&I Clubs Presentation to EU Transport Attachés Third Maritime Safety Package – Civil Liability of Shipowners Directive Brussels.
Introduction Marine pollution by ships The extent of compensation by the polluter The consequences when not fully compensated Four areas of discussion.
The Development of Environmental Salvage and Review of the Salvage Convention 1989 Archie Bishop Holman Fenwick Willan.
INTERTANKO ATHENS TANKER EVENT THE REGULATORY ENVIRONMENT Jonathan Hare Skuld Colin de la Rue Ince & Co April 2005.
INTERNATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL LAW Nuclear energy. OECD Convention on Third Party Liability in the Field of Nuclear Energy (Paris 1960) Convention on Civil.
WALA Conference, Ciudad Real, 18/19 May 2009 Damages to third parties on the surface Update of Rome Convention Heinz Dillmann Vice President Special Legal.
THE MERCHANT SHIPPING CIVIL LIABILITY AND THE MERCHANT SHIPPING INTERNATIONAL OIL POLLUTION COMPENSATION FUND BILLS,2013 ADV A MASOMBUKA 30 JULY 2013.
MCGILL CONFERENCE ON INTERNATIONAL AVIATION LIABILITY & INSURANCE Liability for Acts of Terrorism: The New Unlawful Interference Convention General The.
Oil Pollution Act By D.J. Magee Period 3. Summary The Oil Pollution Act was signed into law by the U.S. legislature in August, The bill was passed.
POLLUTION FROM SHIPS Legal Developments and Handling of Incidents
Oil Pollution Act of 1990 Draft year: 1990 by the 101 st United States Congress. Amendment years: None; this legislation is national. By, Maddie McMahon.
New York 5 May 2016 Report on Legal Framework for Civil Liability for Vessel Source Oil Spills in Polar Regions LARS ROSENBERG OVERBY.
LAW AND THE ENVIRONMENT 2016 THURSDAY 21 APRIL 2016 THE HNS CONVENTION AND THE NEW EU DRIVE TOWARDS IMPLEMENTATION HELEN NOBLE.
Adriana V. Padovan, Ph.D. Adriatic Institute
Liability and Compensation
THIRD LECTURE LIMITATION OF LIABILITY
CARRIAGE OF PASSENGERS AND THEIR LUGGAGE BY SEA
Eastern Mediterranean University
RATIFICATION OF NAIROBI INTERNATIONAL CONVENTION ON REMOVAL OF WRECKS ,2007 PRESENTATION TO PORTFOLIO COMMITTEE OF TRANSPORT 23 SEPTEMBER 2014.
Oil Pollution Act of 1990 (OPA)
New York 5 May 2016   Report on Legal Framework for Civil Liability for Vessel Source Oil Spills in Polar Regions LARS ROSENBERG OVERBY.
Department for Maritime and Transport Law| May 24th 2018 Dr. Iva Savić
Department for Maritime and Transport Law| 21 May 2018 Dr. Iva Savić
Carriage of Goods by Sea – liability of a carrier
CARRIAGE OF PASSENGERS AND THEIR LUGGAGE BY SEA
RATIFICATION TO THE HAZARDOUS AND NOXIOUS SUBSTANCE BY SEA CONVENTION 2010 PRESENTATION TO NCOP:SELECT COMMITTEE ON ECONOMIC AND BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT.
1996/2010 HNS Convention.
The Oil Pollution Act (1990)
Rotterdam Rules: Between Old Problems and New Solutions
HNS INCIDENT SCENARIOS
2018 Marine Liability Act Amendments and the Wrecked, Abandoned or Hazardous Vessels Act : What it means for the Ship-source Oil Pollution Fund.
Presentation transcript:

Marine Pollution Professor Harry Roque Public International Law Mangaban, Ma. Lourena M. 3-E

States are bound to prevent and control marine pollution from any source and are liable for damages caused by the violation of their international obligations to combat pollution. Mangaban

Outline Civil Liability Convention of 1969 Civil Liability Convention of 1969 International Fund Convention of 1971 International Fund Convention of Protocols 1984 Protocols 1992 Protocols 1992 Protocols TOVALOP TOVALOP CRISTAL CRISTAL Liabilities Liabilities Mangaban

EXXON incident In 1989, Exxon Corporation caused one of the worst environmental disasters. On March 24, the Exxon Valdez oil tanker ran aground, spilling 250,000 barrels (an amount equal to more than 10 million gallons) of oil into Alaska's Prince William Sound. Efforts to contain the spill were slow and Exxon's response was even slower. Mangaban

What is CLC? Civil Liability Convention (CLC) was adopted to ensure that adequate compensation is available to persons who suffer oil pollution damage resulting from maritime casualties involving oil-carrying ships. Civil Liability Convention (CLC) was adopted to ensure that adequate compensation is available to persons who suffer oil pollution damage resulting from maritime casualties involving oil-carrying ships. The Convention places the liability for such damage on the owner of the ship from which the polluting oil escaped or was discharged. The Convention places the liability for such damage on the owner of the ship from which the polluting oil escaped or was discharged. The Convention covers pollution damage resulting from spills of persistent oils suffered in the territory (including the territorial sea) of a State Party to the Convention. The Convention covers pollution damage resulting from spills of persistent oils suffered in the territory (including the territorial sea) of a State Party to the Convention. Mangaban

The Convention requires ships covered by it to maintain insurance or other financial security in sums equivalent to the owner's total liability for one incident. The Convention requires ships covered by it to maintain insurance or other financial security in sums equivalent to the owner's total liability for one incident. The Convention applies to all seagoing vessels actually carrying oil in bulk as cargo, but only ships carrying more than 2,000 tons of oil are required to maintain insurance in respect of oil pollution damage. The Convention applies to all seagoing vessels actually carrying oil in bulk as cargo, but only ships carrying more than 2,000 tons of oil are required to maintain insurance in respect of oil pollution damage. Mangaban

CLC limitations 1. Warships or other vessels owned or operated by a State and; 2. Used for government non-commercial service. Adoption: 29 November 1969 Entry into force: 19 June 1975 Mangaban

International Fund Convention of 1971 One of the two original components of the worldwide regime for compensating victims of oil pollution damage (the other: CLC 1969) One of the two original components of the worldwide regime for compensating victims of oil pollution damage (the other: CLC 1969) Compensation payable for an incident involving a spill of persistent oil from a tanker: 60m SDR (about US$76m) Compensation payable for an incident involving a spill of persistent oil from a tanker: 60m SDR (about US$76m) Amended by the 1992 Civil Liability Cenvention and the 1992 Fund Convention Amended by the 1992 Civil Liability Cenvention and the 1992 Fund Convention Mangaban

1969 Civil Liability and 1971 Fund Convention Established with the aim of ensuring prompt payment of compensation after an oil spill without the need for victims to prove any negligence. Established with the aim of ensuring prompt payment of compensation after an oil spill without the need for victims to prove any negligence. CLC imposes strict liability (liability without fault) CLC imposes strict liability (liability without fault) The Fund's purpose is to provide a supplementary compensation in cases where the amount payable by the shipowner or his insurer is insufficient to provide full compensation to the victims. The Fund's purpose is to provide a supplementary compensation in cases where the amount payable by the shipowner or his insurer is insufficient to provide full compensation to the victims. Mangaban

The Protocol of 1976 Adoption: 9 November 1976 Entry into force: 8 April 1981 The 1976 Protocol provided for a new unit of account, based on the Special Drawing Rights (SDR) as used by the International Monetary Fund (IMF). The 1976 Protocol provided for a new unit of account, based on the Special Drawing Rights (SDR) as used by the International Monetary Fund (IMF). Mangaban

The Protocol of 1984 Adoption: 25 May 1984 Entry into force: 12 months after being accepted by 10 States, including six with tanker fleets of at least 1 million gross tons. Status: Superseded by 1992 Protocol Increased limits of liability Increased limits of liability Contrary to the Oil Pollution Act of 1990 of The United States Contrary to the Oil Pollution Act of 1990 of The United States Mangaban

The Protocol of 1992 Adoption: 27 November 1992 Entry into force: 30 May 1996 Compensation limits are those originally agreed in 1984: For a ship not exceeding 5,000 gross tonnage, liability is limited to 3 million SDR (about US$3.8 million) For a ship not exceeding 5,000 gross tonnage, liability is limited to 3 million SDR (about US$3.8 million) For a ship 5,000 to 140,000 gross tonnage: liability is limited to 3 million SDR plus 420 SDR (about US$538) for each additional unit of tonnage For a ship 5,000 to 140,000 gross tonnage: liability is limited to 3 million SDR plus 420 SDR (about US$538) for each additional unit of tonnage For a ship over 140,000 gross tonnage: liability is limited to 59.7 million SDR (about US$76.5 million) For a ship over 140,000 gross tonnage: liability is limited to 59.7 million SDR (about US$76.5 million) Mangaban

The Protocol of 1992 Widened the scope to cover pollution damage caused in the exclusive economic zone (EEZ) or equivalent area of a State Party Widened the scope to cover pollution damage caused in the exclusive economic zone (EEZ) or equivalent area of a State Party Allowed expenses for preventive measure Allowed expenses for preventive measure Made applicable to both laden and unladen tankers, including spills of bunker oil from such ships Made applicable to both laden and unladen tankers, including spills of bunker oil from such ships Mangaban

The 2000 Amendments Adoption: 18 October 2000 Adoption: 18 October 2000 Entry in force: 1 November 2003 Entry in force: 1 November Amendments1992 Protocol For a ship not exceeding 5,000 gross tonnage, liability is limited to 4.51 million SDR (US$5.78 million) For a ship 5,000 to 140,000 gross tonnage: liability is limited to 4.51 million SDR (US$5.78 million) plus 631 SDR (US$807) for each additional gross tonne over 5,000 For a ship over 140,000 gross tonnage: liability is limited to million SDR (US$115 million) The limit 3 million SDR (US$3.8 million The limit was 3 million SDR (US$3.8 million) plus 420 SDR (US$537.6) for each additional gross tonne) The limit was 59.7 million SDR (US$76.5 million) Mangaban

Tanker Owners Voluntary Agreement Concerning Liability for Oil Pollution (TOVALOP) Also known as the “Standing Agreement” Also known as the “Standing Agreement” Purpose: To provide mitigation and compensation for damage by oil pollution from tankers Purpose: To provide mitigation and compensation for damage by oil pollution from tankers Took effect in 1969 Took effect in 1969 As 1987, ninety eight percent (98%) of the free world's tanker owners had become signatories to TOVALOP As 1987, ninety eight percent (98%) of the free world's tanker owners had become signatories to TOVALOP Mangaban

Tanker Owners Voluntary Agreement Concerning Liability for Oil Pollution (TOVALOP) Tanker owners are expected to: Tanker owners are expected to: Take preventive measures and/or Take preventive measures and/or Threat removal measures as our practicable under the circumstances Threat removal measures as our practicable under the circumstances “Preventive Measures” any reasonable measures taken after an incident had occurred to prevent or minimize pollution damage “Preventive Measures” any reasonable measures taken after an incident had occurred to prevent or minimize pollution damage “Threat Removal Measures” as any reasonable measures taken after an incident had occurred for the purposes if removing the threat of an escape or discharge of oil. “Threat Removal Measures” as any reasonable measures taken after an incident had occurred for the purposes if removing the threat of an escape or discharge of oil. Mangaban

Contract Regarding an Interim Supplement to Tanker Liability for Oil Pollution (CRISTAL) Also known as the “Supplemental Agreement” Also known as the “Supplemental Agreement” Purpose: designed to address oil pollution damage by supplementing TOVALOP Purpose: designed to address oil pollution damage by supplementing TOVALOP Parties: Various oil companies “engaged in the production, refining, marketing, storing, terminaling of oil or any one or more of whose affiliates are so engaged or receives oil in bulk for its own consumption or use.” Parties: Various oil companies “engaged in the production, refining, marketing, storing, terminaling of oil or any one or more of whose affiliates are so engaged or receives oil in bulk for its own consumption or use.” First took effect in 1971 First took effect in 1971 Mangaban

Defenses available to both TOVALOP and CRISTAL Exceptions to liability: Exceptions to liability: Where the damage occurs in a geographic area covered by the CLC Where the damage occurs in a geographic area covered by the CLC The damage is the result of an act of war, hostilities, civil war, insurrection or a natural phenomenon of an exceptional, inevitable and irresistible character The damage is the result of an act of war, hostilities, civil war, insurrection or a natural phenomenon of an exceptional, inevitable and irresistible character Wholly caused by an act or omission of a third party done with the intent to cause damage Wholly caused by an act or omission of a third party done with the intent to cause damage Wholly caused by the negligence or other wrongful act of an Government or other authority responsible for the maintenance of lights or other navigational aids in the exercise of that function. Wholly caused by the negligence or other wrongful act of an Government or other authority responsible for the maintenance of lights or other navigational aids in the exercise of that function. Mangaban

Compensation Scheme TOVALOPCRISTAL $ per ton, with a maximum amount of compensation available of $16.8 million for a vessel of 105,000 gross tons $ per ton, with a maximum amount of compensation available of $16.8 million for a vessel of 105,000 gross tons The aggregate compensation available under CRISTAL, after the minimum payouts were met, was 32 million SDR's (or $40.32 million) for a tanker of 5,000 tons or less For a tanker in excess of 5,000 tons, 652 SDR's (or $819.00) for each ton in excess of 5,000, up to a maximum of 120 million SDR's (or $151.2 million) limit 3 million SDR (US$3.8 million Mangaban

LIABILITY under the CLC Liability imposed on the shipowner Liability imposed on the shipowner Exempting circumstances: Exempting circumstances: Resulted from an act of war, hostilities, civil war, insurrection or a natural phenomenon or an exceptional, inevitable and irresistible character Resulted from an act of war, hostilities, civil war, insurrection or a natural phenomenon or an exceptional, inevitable and irresistible character Was wholly caused by an act or omission done with intent to cause damage to third party Was wholly caused by an act or omission done with intent to cause damage to third party Was wholly cause by the negligence or other wrongful act of any Government or other authority responsible for the maintenance or lights are other navigational aids in the exercise of that function Was wholly cause by the negligence or other wrongful act of any Government or other authority responsible for the maintenance or lights are other navigational aids in the exercise of that function Mangaban

LIABILITY under CLC Action must be brought within three years from date of occurrence of damage or 3 years from the date of first occurrence if damage results from a series of occurrences. Action must be brought within three years from date of occurrence of damage or 3 years from the date of first occurrence if damage results from a series of occurrences. *** *** Mangaban