FIRM TRANSPORTATION GAS SUPPLIER PRESENTATIONS GAS LOAD FORECAST.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Market Support Generation Workshop October 2, 2000.
Advertisements

Natural Gas Aggregation and Marketing Programs Brooke E. Leslie, Senior Counsel, NiSource Inc. January 14, 2014.
BG&E’s PeakRewards SM Demand Response Program Successful Approaches for Engaging Customers August 20, 2014.
Jefferson County PUD 1 Presented by: Gary Saleba, President EES Consulting, Inc. A registered professional engineering and management consulting firm with.
TVPPA Accounting & Finance Conference October 21, 2011 Cost of Service, Hydro Credit, Environmental Adder, and Fuel Cost Jim Sheffield 1.
2013 SDG&E Summer Saver Load Impact Evaluation Dr. Stephen George DRMEC Spring 2014 Load Impacts Evaluation Workshop San Francisco, California May 7, 2014.
FIRM TRANSPORTATION GAS SUPPLIER PRESENTATIONS CUSTOMER INFORMATION LIST.
Assessment of Climate Change Impacts on Electricity Consumption and Residential Water Use in Cyprus Theodoros Zachariadis Dept. of Environmental Science.
1 Managing Revenues in Regulated Industries Rate Design May 2008 Richard Soderman Director-Legislative Policy and Strategy.
Overview – Non-coincident Peak Demand
Zero – Energy Building What constitutes a zero energy building? A building that uses a “net” of zero energy – typically producing excess energy via renewables.
FIRM TRANSPORTATION GAS SUPPLIER PRESENTATIONS GAS SUPPLIER SWITCHING PROCESSES.
U.S. Energy Information Administration Independent Statistics & Analysis Short-Term Energy Outlook and Winter Fuels Outlook For NASEO Winter.
Presentation Overview
TVA Generates Power and sends it down Transmission Lines to Newport Utilities Distribution Substations TVA Newport Utilities Substations Distributes the.
1 Load Forecast and Scenarios David Bailey Customer Energy & Forecasting Manager Soyean Kim Rate Design Manager.
ARIZONA CORPORATION COMMISSION NATURAL GAS FORUM SEPTEMBER 8, 2005 CITY OF MESA UTILITIES DEPARTMENT FRANK McRAE RESOURCES DIVISION DIRECTOR.
Natural Gas Prices An Overview and a Look Ahead to the Heating Season News Media & Public Briefing October 27, 2006 Andrew Melnykovych Communications.
Electric / Gas / Water Eric Fox Oleg Moskatov Itron, Inc. April 17, 2008 VELCO Long-Term Demand Forecast Methodology Overview.
Farmers Rural Electric Cooperative Corporation 2006 Load Forecast Prepared by: East Kentucky Power Cooperative, Inc. Forecasting and Market Analysis Department.
®® QUESTAR GAS Transportation Balancing Susan Davis, Director, Account & Community Relations February 28, 2014 We develop, transport and deliver clean.
VIRGINIA Market Profile January VIRGINIA Market Service Map 496,000 Potential Customers.
1 Resurrecting A Load Research Program Susan Romer NSTAR 2006 AEIC Load Research Conference September 2006.
Natural Gas Rate Study and Long-Term Financial Plan Presented November 19, 2013 Capex Consulting Group
NGEIR Technical Conference Presentation May 16, 2006.
© 2007, Itron Inc. VELCO Long-Term Demand Forecast Kick-off Meeting June 7, 2010 Eric Fox.
Technical Conference on Net Metering Load Research Study November 5, 2014.
Why is WPL filing a rate case?  Last Base Case Rates were set January, 2007  Cost of our utility investments must be reflected in prices our customers.
CHAPTER 8 RECEIVABLES. Learning Objective 1 Describe the common classes of receivables.
FIRM TRANSPORTATION GAS SUPPLIER PRESENTATIONS GAS SUPPLIER CERTIFICATION/REGISTRATION.
Grayson Rural Electric Cooperative Corporation 2006 Load Forecast Prepared by: East Kentucky Power Cooperative, Inc. Forecasting and Market Analysis Department.
Demand Response Products. Discussion Points 1.Setting the scene….. 2.Virtual Power Station 3.Reserves deployment order 4.Demand Response Products.
DELAWARE Market Profile September DELAWARE Market Service Map 498,000 Potential Customers.
Unbilled Revenue Presented by Mindy Willis Orlando Utilities Commission.
WINTER PREPAREDNESS PLAN ALLIANT GAS. Alliant Gas is the propane gas company that operates as a regulated utility in the towns of Payson and.
Results for Market Forecast June 2007 Copyright 2007, A New Story Foundation, Inc All rights reserved.
Rocky Mountain Power - Utah Workgroups I and II Load Research and Peak-Hour Forecasting Presented by UTAH INDUSTRIAL ENERGY CONSUMERS Salt Lake City, Utah.
FIRM TRANSPORTATION GAS SUPPLIER PRESENTATIONS GAS SUPPLIER CREDIT AND COLLATERAL REQUIREMENTS.
Questar Gas Company Customer Meeting Sept. 15, 2014 Stonebridge Country Club West Valley City, Utah Making lives better with natural gas.
SDG&E’s Proposal to Implement AB 920 July 9, 2010.
Example of Revenue Decoupling Utah Committee of Consumer Services Witness: David Dismukes Docket No T01 Exhibit CCS-2.1 Allowed Revenue per Customer.
Blue Grass Energy Cooperative Corporation 2006 Load Forecast Prepared by: East Kentucky Power Cooperative, Inc. Forecasting and Market Analysis Department.
Methodology for Demand Forecasts for Bandera Electric Cooperative, Inc. Brian D. Bartos, P.E. Manager, Engineering Presented to ERCOT Reliability & Operations.
Natural Gas Outlook The Tennessee Regulatory Authority Natural Gas Symposium August 19, 2003 Roy Kass Energy Information Administration (EIA)
Building Blocks for Premise Level Load Reduction Estimates ERCOT Loads in SCED v2 Subgroup July 21, 2014.
ILLINOIS Market Profile July ILLINOIS Market 20.9 Million Potential Customers Market Size: $21.7 Billion Potential Market.
FIRM TRANSPORTATION GAS SUPPLIER PRESENTATIONS PERCENTAGE OF INCOME PAYMENT PLAN (PIPP) GAS SUPPLIER PROCEDURE.
FIRM TRANSPORTATION GAS SUPPLIER PRESENTATIONS PURCHASE OF ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE (PAR)
The Commonwealth of Virginia 2016 State Contracts Meeting – Compass Energy Placeholder.
June 17, 2015 (Regina) June 18, 2015 (Saskatoon) SaskEnergy 2015 Rate Application.
Default price-quality paths for gas pipeline services Briefing on the Commission’s final decision for financial market analysts 28 February 2013.
DRMEC Spring 2016 Load Impacts Evaluation Workshop San Francisco, California May 10, SDG&E Summer Saver Load Impact Evaluation.
Calculations of Peak Load Contribution (PLC) AND Network Service Peak Load (NSPL) As of 1/1/2016.
2015 SDG&E PTR/SCTD Evaluation DRMEC Spring 2016 Load Impact Workshop George Jiang May 11 th, 2016 Customer Category Mean Active Participants Mean Reference.
2013 Load Impact Evaluation of Southern California Edison’s Peak Time Rebate Program Josh Schellenberg DRMEC Spring 2014 Load Impact Evaluation Workshop.
1 PG&E’s Response to the Summer 2006 Heat Storm LIOB Meeting September 14, 2006 Sacramento, CA.
Revised draft decision: Initial default price-quality paths for gas pipeline services Briefing for financial market analysts 24 October 2012.
Alternative Ratemaking Methodologies Docket No. M
Customer Select Supply/Storage
UNC Modification Proposal 0202 National Grid Distribution
Narragansett Electric Rate Classes
PLC = Peak Load Contribution (aka “ICAP”)
Customer Select Supply/Storage
City of Lebanon, Missouri Electric Department
Ohio – Natural Gas SEPTEMBER 2017 MARKET INFORMATION
Ohio – Natural Gas JULY 2017 MARKET INFORMATION
Ohio – Natural Gas OCTOBER 2017 MARKET INFORMATION
System Operational Update and Review December 4, 2018
Ohio – Natural Gas AUGUST 2017 MARKET INFORMATION
PA Supplier Workshop Net Metering September 10, 2019.
Presentation transcript:

FIRM TRANSPORTATION GAS SUPPLIER PRESENTATIONS GAS LOAD FORECAST

2 GAS LOAD FORECAST OVERVIEW Daily Forecast Process Indexed Temperature Usage Factors Review Past Years Imbalances Imbalance Report TSQ at 80% of MDQ 2006/2007 Activity

3 DAILY FORECAST PROCESS

4 INDEXED TEMPERATURE Takes into account the effect wind, sun and lag have on the average temperature as it relates to gas load Examples: Oct. 16, 2003 – Average temperature was predicted to be 54 degrees with 7 mph wind and 40% sun. Previous day’s average temperature was 51 degrees. The effective or Indexed Temperature is 54 degrees. Oct. 17, 2003 – Average temperature was predicted to be 46 degrees with 10 mph wind and 50% sun. Previous day’s average temperature was 54 degrees. The effective or Indexed Temperature is 49 degrees.

5 DAILY FORECAST PROCESS Oct. 16, 2003 – indexed temperature is 54 degrees The forecast model then calculates a “typical” load for each revenue class at 54 degrees Typical Residential =.1626 Mcf Typical Commercial =.8959 Mcf Typical Industrial = Mcf Typical OPA= Mcf

6 DAILY FORECAST PROCESS (cont.) Example: Supplier “A” has 2 customers – one is an industrial customer and the other is a commercial customer The industrial customer has a UF =2.5 and the commercial customer has a UF =0.5 The TSQ for this Supplier is calculated as: Typical Ind. (6.9679) * UF (2.5) = Typical Com. (.8959) * UF (0.5) =.4480 Raw TSQ = Mcf

7 USAGE FACTORS Calculated once per year by month, by billing cycle and by revenue class for all Duke Energy Ohio, Inc. customers Example: industrial customer on the previous slide This customer is in billing cycle 1 Last October, the meter was read on the first of the month – the October 2002 bill was for Mcf The previous meter read was on September 1, 2002 The Mcf accounts for gas used from September 2, 2002 to October 1, 2002 (a 30-day period)

8 USAGE FACTORS (cont.) To calculate the Oct. UF for this customer: Take the actual “indexed temperatures” from Sept. 2, 2002 to Oct. 1, 2002 Calculate “typical” industrial for each day The sum of the “typical industrial” is totaled for the 30-day period (140.5) and compared to the customer’s actual usage for the same 30-day period UF = Actual usage (351.4) / (140.5) = 2.5

9 REVIEW LOAD FORECAST PROCESS Index temperature (effective temperature) Forecast a “typical” for each revenue class based on weather response functions (residential, commercial, industrial, OPA) Apply a customer UF (Usage Factor) to the “typical” forecast Scale to system forecast

10

11

12 TSQ IS AT 80 % OF MDQ Two options available to you: Deliver your TSQ Deliver 80 % of MDQ Difference is cashed out at Duke Energy’s cost of producing propane/air or alternate peaking supply

ACTIVITY New UF (Usage Factors) Weather response functions and load forecast methodology will remain the same. The calculation of imbalance was changed beginning July 1, 2006 to reflect deliveries from the 16th of the previous month to the 15th of the current month This matches billed usage with deliveries more closely and should reduce month to month imbalances caused by unbilled revenue