Muon Collider R&D Co-ordination MCTF. INTRODUCTION 2 2 Steve Geer MUTAC REVIEW April 2007 BNL Steve Holmes, March 13 th, 2007: “ … MCOG ask the NFMCC.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
ENQA’S CONSULTATIVE MEMBERSHIP IN THE BFUG - WHAT DOES IT ENTAIL
Advertisements

The US 5 Year Muon Acceleration R&D Program To Boldly Go… MICE Collaboration Meeting Harbin January, 2009.
Labour Market Planning LMDA Service Delivery Advisory Group September 28, 2006 CONFIDENTIAL – NOT FOR DISTRIBUTION.
Beyond the ALCPG David B. MacFarlane Associate Laboratory Director for PPA.
700: Moving Through the Collaboration Continuum to Improve Permanency Outcomes Wednesday, March 20, 2013.
MCTF Harold G. Kirk MUTAC 5-Year Plan Review 22 August Targetry R&D in the 5-Year Plan Harold G. Kirk Brookhaven National Lab.
paul drumm; 3rd December 2004; AFC MM 1 Cost & Schedule Review I Terms of reference: –To review the Cost and schedule of the MICE Muon beam –To review.
MUCOOL Collaboration Meeting February 2002 Steve Geer February 2002.
Introduction to Home/School Compacts
MUON COLLIDER: R&D Status & Opportunities for Participation FNAL, February 24, 2011   1.Motivation & OverviewSteve Geer 2.Accelerator R&DVladimir.
MCTF Michael Lamm MUTAC 5-Year Plan Review 22 August Magnet R&D for Muon Accelerator R&D Program Goals Proposed Studies Preliminary Effort and Cost.
FY Division of Human Resources Development Combined COV COV PRESENTATION TO ADVISORY COMMITTEE January 7, 2014.
Local Strategies and How to Influence them Gillian McDonough Chief officer, Sunderland CVS 3 rd November 2009.
Harold G. Kirk Brookhaven National Laboratory Summary MUTAC Review Brookhaven National Laboratory April 19, 2007.
BENE Meeting April 28, 2006 A. Bross US Contribution to the IDS Aka WDS BENE IDS/FP7 at RAL April 28, 2006 A. Bross.
F Fermilab’s Muon Collider Task Force: Overview, Status and Plans Vladimir Shiltsev Fermilab AAC, August 08, 2007.
MAP Overview Steve Geer Accelerator Physics Center Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory MAP Winter Meeting JLab, February 28, 2011  
The U.S. Muon Accelerator Program Mark Palmer Fermilab MICE Collaboration Meeting 32 STFC-RAL February 8, 2012.
26-Jun-99D.P.Kelsey, HTASC report1 HTASC - Report to HEP-CCC David Kelsey, RAL rl.ac.uk 26 June 1999, FNAL (
Human Services Integration Building More Effective Responses to Peoples’ Needs.
Management subcommittee closeout Jay Marx (chair, LBNL), Joel Butler (Fermilab), Stan Wojcicki (Stanford) Thanks to all for cooperation and openness!!
Sophie Sergent Ifremer European Affairs Department / MariFish WP7 ERANET MariFish COORDINATION OF EUROPEAN MARINE FISHERIES RESEARCH Presentation of MariFish.
March 4, 2011Outlook and Guidance - Zisman1 MAP Outlook and Guidance Michael S. Zisman* Center for Beam Physics Accelerator & Fusion Research Division.
Steve Geer OsC RAL 21 June, Muon Accelerator Program MUON COLLIDER & NEUTRINO FACTORY R&D in the U.S.  
MCTF Fermilab’s Muon Collider Task Force. MCTF - Shiltsev 2MCTF The need Charge/deliverables Current activities Research Directions/Org Structure First.
Neutrino Factory and Muon Collider Collaboration Introduction MUTAC Review April 2007 Alan Bross.
Central Florida Partnership Board of Directors Meeting March 20, 2013 Mark Brewer Member – Leadership Council for “Turning the Page” President/CEO – Community.
Neutrino Factory and Muon Collider Collaboration Meeting Introduction Fermilab March, 2007 Alan Bross.
Central Florida Partnership Board of Directors Meeting January 16, 2013 Alex Martins Chair Leadership Council Report #2.
Muon Acceleration Program Technology Development A. Bross NFMCC CM January 15, A. Bross NFMCC CM January 15, 2009 It is not a Project!
Norman McCubbin1 Report from the Collaboration MICE Project Board (CMPB) Norman McCubbin Director, Particle Physics Department MICE/UKNF Oversight Committee.
NFMCC 5-year Plan Update Michael S. Zisman NFMCC Project Manager Center for Beam Physics Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory MUTAC Review–LBNL April.
Muon Accelerator Program Overview Michael S. Zisman Center for Beam Physics Accelerator & Fusion Research Division Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory.
WG3 – Part 3 - Design Studies Introduction Introduction View from Europe - RE View from Europe - RE “ “ Japan- Yoshi Kuno “ “ Japan- Yoshi Kuno “ “ US-
1 EMS Fundamentals An Introduction to the EMS Process Roadmap AASHTO EMS Workshop.
WHO EURO In Country Coordination and Strengthening National Interagency Coordinating Committees.
9/2/2004 TB Strategy J. Yu 1 LC Test Beam Funding and Strategy Large number of detector R&D groups made great progress Technology decision provides great.
Neutrino Factory and Muon Collider Collaboration DOE Briefing Meeting Alan Bross.
MCTF Steve Geer AAC Meeting May MUON COLLIDER & NEUTRINO FACTORY R&D AT FERMILAB Overview of organization, budgets, and plans.
Harold G. Kirk Brookhaven National Laboratory Report from the NFMCC MUTAC REVIEW Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory April 8, 2008.
International Design Study for a Neutrino Factory in the 5 Year Plan A. Bross NFMCC CM January 15, A. Bross NFMCC CM January 15, 2009.
Muon Collider R&D Plans & New Initiative 1.Introduction 2.Muon Collider Schematic 3.Conceptual Breakthrough 4.Ongoing R&D 5.Muon Collider Task Force 6.Muon.
Muon Accelerator Program Review Highlights Michael S. Zisman Center for Beam Physics Accelerator & Fusion Research Division Lawrence Berkeley National.
1 Future Circular Collider Study Preparatory Collaboration Board Meeting September 2014 R-D Heuer Global Future Circular Collider (FCC) Study Goals and.
MICE Funding Update (U.S.) Michael S. Zisman Deputy Spokesmouse Center for Beam Physics Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory CMPB Meeting August 1, 2007.
Management February 20, Annual Review of the Muon Accelerator Program (MAP) Subcommittee members: Ron Prwivo, Ron Lutha, and Jim Kerby.
Key Concepts in Health Promoting Schools Communities Facilitated by: Steve Manske, EdD, Rebecca Bassett Gunter, PhD Workshop with: Shaping the Future Conference,
Muon Collider R&D at the MuCool Test Area Andreas Jansson Muon Beam Experiment at the MTA.
Fermilab’s Muon Collider Task Force: Status and Plans Vladimir Shiltsev Fermilab NFMCC CM - ShiltsevMarch 17-20,
Update to SDCG 3-Yr Work Plan SDCG-8, Session 11 Stephen Ward (Australia) 24 Sep 2015, Bonn.
Neutrino Factory and Muon Collider Collaboration Meeting UCLA January, 2007 Alan Bross.
Muon Collaboration Meeting Steve Geer MUTAC Review, Jan, 2003 Muon Collaboration WELCOME.
Fermilab: Introduction Young-Kee Kim DOE KA12 (Electron Research)Review June 22-23, 2010.
Long-Term Muon Collider Vision Vladimir Shiltsev Fermilab MUTAC - ShiltsevApril 8-10,
August 24-26, 2010MAP ProgMgmt - Zisman 1 August 24-26, Program Management Michael S. Zisman Center for Beam Physics Accelerator & Fusion Research.
The SiD LOI Proposed Milestones and Schedules SiD Collaboration Phone Meeting September 6, 2007 John Jaros.
Community Resilience Jill J Artzberger, MPH 2011 Texas Emergency Management Conference Thursday, April 28, 2011.
Comments on the February DOE Review
Annex III to BS/SC/PDF/A(2003)1
IUCN’s ‘One Programme’ approach:
m+ m- n MAP Overview Steve Geer Accelerator Physics Center
Developing a new City Partnership Partnership Executive
ESMF Governance Cecelia DeLuca NOAA CIRES / NESII April 7, 2017
Parent and Family Engagement Policy
Strategic Plan Implementation July 18, 2018
CEOS Organizational Matters
Strategy
Preliminary Project Execution Plan
Why we are Here? (Our Purpose)
4th Meeting of the Expert Group on the Integration of Statistical and Geospatial Information (UN EG-ISGI) – Nov 2017 Summary of progress Martin Brady,
Presentation transcript:

Muon Collider R&D Co-ordination MCTF

INTRODUCTION 2 2 Steve Geer MUTAC REVIEW April 2007 BNL Steve Holmes, March 13 th, 2007: “ … MCOG ask the NFMCC and MCTF to form a Coordinating Committee composed of the management of each organization. This would include Geer, Shiltsev, Bross, Kirk, and Zisman. I would like to suggest doing this immediately, i.e. before the MUTAC meeting. The general charge would be to provide effective coordination that maximizes the integrated effort. … “  Steve Holmes has asked, on behalf of MCOG, that a NFMCC & MCTF coordinating committee be formed to coordinate the NFMCC & MCTF Muon Collider activities, & ensure the overall R&D is coherent & effective.  The Muon Collider Coordinating Committee (MCCC) had its first meeting March 19 th, and second meeting April 3 rd. This talk summarizes the MCCC discussions/agreements/plans from these two meetings.

CO-ORDINATION GROUP 3 3 Steve Geer MUTAC REVIEW April 2007 BNL MEMBERS: Alan Bross: NFMCC co-spokesperson, MCTF Steering Group Member Steve Geer: MCTF co-leader, NFMCC Exec. Board Member Harold Kirk: NFMCC co-spokesperson Vladimir Shiltsev: MCTF co-leader Mike Zisman: NFMCC Project Manager PURPOSE: To co-ordinate the NFMCC and MCTF proposed and ongoing R&D activities to maximize their joint effectiveness and facilitate cross-participation in these activities where it makes sense.

CO-ORDINATION OF CURRENT R&D 4 4 Steve Geer MUTAC REVIEW April 2007 BNL NFMCC LEADERSHIP MCTF LEADERSHIP MUON COLLIDER R&D CO-ORD GROUP + NFMCC MANAGED MC R&D SUBACTIVITIES MCTF MANAGED MC R&D SUBACTIVITIES MUON COLLIDER R&D PROGRAM

CO-ORDINATION MEETINGS 5 5 Steve Geer MUTAC REVIEW April 2007 BNL  MCCC formed 19 th March, & has had 2 telephone conferences in the last 4 weeks.  MCCC plans to meet about once per month.  In addition there is a framework of working meetings that enable R&D needs and plans to be jointly discussed and formulated:  Weekly NFMCC Friday meetings which MCTF and Muons Inc. participants attend.  Weekly MCTF Thursday meetings which NFMCC and Muons Inc. members attend.  Annual meetings attended by NFMCC, MCTF & Muons Inc. members (e.g. the NFMCC annual meeting, the Low Emittance Muon Collider Workshop Organized by Muons Inc.), and their international partners (e.g. NUFACT meetings).

CO-ORD GROUP PERSPECTIVE 6 6 Steve Geer MUTAC REVIEW April 2007 BNL  Both NFMCC & MCTF are actively engaged in Muon Collider R&D. Creation of the MCTF provides a welcome opportunity to expand the Muon Collider R&D program in an effective and well coordinated way.  It seems natural that the MCTF manage those activities that require Fermilab to play a significant role as a host laboratory, and the NFMCC manage those activities with an international character.  We desire & expect NFMCC participation in MCTF managed R&D.  Successful and timely completion of the NFMCC international commit- ments (MERIT, MICE, International NF Studies) is seen as a high priority.  The coordination group will strive to ensure:  Clear lines of responsibility for each R&D sub-activity  Adequate discussion of R&D priorities to inform decisions  No artificial barriers to cross-participation between NFMCC-managed and MCTF-managed activities.

MANAGEMENT OF CURRENT R&D 7 7 Steve Geer MUTAC REVIEW April 2007 BNL NFMCC (Project Manager) US MICE MUCOOL component R&D (rf, absorbers) MERIT (& targetry R&D) Design studies (NF + MC) MCTF (APC Management) HCC magnet 6D Manx HTS magnet MTA beams Design studies (MC) Present emphasis on design work and international activities (e.g. MICE & MERIT) Present emphasis on design work and activities where FNAL plays major role as host lab.

MANAGEMENT OF CURRENT R&D 8 8 Steve Geer MUTAC REVIEW April 2007 BNL NFMCC (Project Manager) US MICE MUCOOL component R&D (rf, absorbers) MERIT (& targetry R&D) Design studies (NF + MC) MCTF (APC Management) HCC magnet 6D Manx HTS magnet MTA beams Design studies (MC) Present emphasis on design work & International Activities Present emphasis on design work & activities where FNAL plays major role as host lab. CROSS-PARTICIPATION

MCTF-NFMCC PROTOCOL 9 9 Steve Geer MUTAC REVIEW April 2007 BNL 1. The NFMCC and its members are invited to participate in the MCTF program. 2. If the mutually agreed upon activities require MCTF resources, the resources, milestones and deliverables would be defined by an MOU between Fermilab and the NFMCC. 3. NFMCC institutions receiving support for MCTF activities would do so within the framework of the NFMCC (i.e., through the process defined in point 2). 4. Institutions participating in the MCTF that are not presently part of the NFMCC would be encouraged to join the NFMCC if this seems appropriate (decided by mutual discussion between the MCTF and NFMCC leadership). We desire and expect NFMCC participation in MCTF managed R&D. To facilitate this, we have formulated a protocol to follow. MCOG endorsement of this (or a suitably modified version) would be welcome.

ADDITIONAL AREAS OF COORDINATION 10 Steve Geer MUTAC REVIEW April 2007 BNL  Co-ordination of Muon Collider Design studies in the NFMCC and MCTF. There is already a lot of cross-participation in working meetings. The MCCC will solicit a coherent plan from the relevant co-leaders in the NFMCC and MCTF design study groups.  Joint Meetings. The MCCC will identify those meetings that should be jointly organized between the NFMCC and MCTF. We will also encourage meetings jointly organized with Muons Inc.  Evolving R&D priorities. The MCCC will encourage cross-participation in main NFMCC & MCTF meetings to help facilitate a common understanding of the R&D challenges and priorities as they evolve.

SUMMARY 11 Steve Geer MUTAC REVIEW April 2007 BNL  Steve Holmes (on behalf on MCOG) requested the formation of a NFMCC-MCTF Muon Collider R&D coordination group (MCCC).  We think we have made a good start with a solid plan for how to make the NFMCC and MCTF efforts coherent, complementary, and “effort-effective”.  We are at an exciting period in the development of Muon Collider concepts … the challenges are great, but we think that together, the ongoing and proposed NFMCC and MCTF R&D programs give us the best chance of meeting the challenges for the next step in the R&D.  The MCCC is eager to maximize the effectiveness of the joint Muon Collider R&D programs.