Jochen Weller XLI Recontres de Moriond March, 18-25, 2006 Constraining Inverse Curvature Gravity with Supernovae O. Mena, J. Santiago and JW PRL, 96, 041103,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Seeing Dark Energy (or the cosmological constant which is the simplest form of DE) Professor Bob Nichol (ICG, Portsmouth)
Advertisements

Dark Energy. Conclusions from Hubble’s Law The universe is expanding Space itself is expanding Galaxies are held together by gravity on “small” distance.
Current Observational Constraints on Dark Energy Chicago, December 2001 Wendy Freedman Carnegie Observatories, Pasadena CA.
L. Perivolaropoulos Department of Physics University of Ioannina Open page S. Fay, S. Nesseris, L.P. gr-qc/
P ROBING SIGNATURES OF MODIFIED GRAVITY MODELS OF DARK ENERGY Shinji Tsujikawa (Tokyo University of Science)
Yashar Akrami Modern Cosmology: Early Universe, CMB and LSS/ Benasque/ August 17, 2012 Postdoctoral Fellow Institute of Theoretical Astrophysics University.
Dark Energy and Extended Gravity theories Francesca Perrotta (SISSA, Trieste)
Observational Constraints on Sudden Future Singularity Models Hoda Ghodsi – Supervisor: Dr Martin Hendry Glasgow University, UK Grassmannian Conference.
Non-linear matter power spectrum to 1% accuracy between dynamical dark energy models Matt Francis University of Sydney Geraint Lewis (University of Sydney)
Cosmological Expansion from Nonlocal Gravity Correction Tomi Koivisto, ITP Heidelberg 1. Outline Introduction 2. Nonlocalities in physics 3. The gravity.
Daniel Schmidt, Liberty University
Modified Gravity Takeshi Chiba Nihon University. Why?
Álvaro de la Cruz-Dombriz Theoretical Physics Department Complutense University of Madrid in collaboration with Antonio L. Maroto & Antonio Dobado Different.
Lecture 2: Observational constraints on dark energy Shinji Tsujikawa (Tokyo University of Science)
Physical Constraints on Gauss-Bonnet Dark Energy Cosmologies Ishwaree Neupane University of Canterbury, NZ University of Canterbury, NZ DARK 2007, Sydney.
PRE-SUSY Karlsruhe July 2007 Rocky Kolb The University of Chicago Cosmology 101 Rocky I : The Universe Observed Rocky II :Dark Matter Rocky III :Dark Energy.
Falsifying Paradigms for Cosmic Acceleration Michael Mortonson Kavli Institute for Cosmological Physics University of Chicago January 22, 2009.
Quintessence – Phenomenology. How can quintessence be distinguished from a cosmological constant ?
1 L. Perivolaropoulos Department of Physics University of Ioannina Open page
Lecture 1: Basics of dark energy Shinji Tsujikawa (Tokyo University of Science) ``Welcome to the dark side of the world.”
Science of the Dark Energy Survey Josh Frieman Fermilab and the University of Chicago Astronomy Lecture 1, Oct
1 What is the Dark Energy? David Spergel Princeton University.
COMING HOME Michael S. Turner Kavli Institute for Cosmological Physics The University of Chicago.
Dark Energy and the Inflection Points of Cosmic Expansion in Standard and Brane Cosmologies Daniel Schmidt, Liberty University Cyclotron Institute--Texas.
Progress on Cosmology Sarah Bridle University College London.
Refining the free function of MOND Workshop Program Dark Matter and Alternative Gravities.
Dark Energy Bengt Gustafsson: Current problems in Astrophysics Lecture 3 Ångström Laboratory, Spring 2010.
THE GRACEFUL EXIT FROM INFLATION AND DARK ENERGY By Tomislav Prokopec Publications: Tomas Janssen and T. Prokopec, arXiv: ; Tomas Janssen, Shun-Pei.
1 f(R) Gravity and its relation to the interaction between DE and DM Bin Wang Shanghai Jiao Tong University.
Chaplygin gas in decelerating DGP gravity Matts Roos University of Helsinki Department of Physics and and Department of Astronomy 43rd Rencontres de Moriond,
Cosmological Tests using Redshift Space Clustering in BOSS DR11 (Y. -S. Song, C. G. Sabiu, T. Okumura, M. Oh, E. V. Linder) following Cosmological Constraints.
Structure formation in dark energy cosmology La Magia, April 2005.
Large distance modification of gravity and dark energy
1 Dynamical Effects of Cosmological Constant Antigravity Μ. Αξενίδης, Λ. Περιβολαρόπουλος, Ε. Φλωράτος Ινστιτούτο Πυρηνικής Φυσικής Κέντρο Ερευνών ‘Δημόκριτος’
Modified (dark) gravity Roy Maartens, Portsmouth or Dark Gravity?
Jochen Weller Benasque August, 2006 Constraining Inverse Curvature Gravity with Supernovae O. Mena, J. Santiago and JW PRL, 96, , 2006.
Probing the Reheating with Astrophysical Observations Jérôme Martin Institut d’Astrophysique de Paris (IAP) 1 [In collaboration with K. Jedamzik & M. Lemoine,
Dark energy I : Observational constraints Shinji Tsujikawa (Tokyo University of Science)
Constraints on Dark Energy from CMB Eiichiro Komatsu University of Texas at Austin Dark Energy February 27, 2006.
Dark Energy and Modified Gravity Shinji Tsujikawa (Gunma National College of Technology ) Collaborations with L. Amendola, S. Capozziello, R. Gannouji,
1 1 Eric Linder University of California, Berkeley Lawrence Berkeley National Lab Interpreting Dark Energy JDEM constraints.
Cosmological structure formation and dark energy Carlo Baccigalupi Heidelberg, May 31, 2005.
PHY306 1 Modern cosmology 4: The cosmic microwave background Expectations Experiments: from COBE to Planck  COBE  ground-based experiments  WMAP  Planck.
Dark Matter and Dark Energy components chapter 7 Lecture 4.
Michael Doran Institute for Theoretical Physics Universität Heidelberg Time Evolution of Dark Energy (if any …)
Cosmic Inhomogeneities and Accelerating Expansion Ho Le Tuan Anh National University of Singapore PAQFT Nov 2008.
Astro-2: History of the Universe Lecture 10; May
Latest Results from LSS & BAO Observations Will Percival University of Portsmouth StSci Spring Symposium: A Decade of Dark Energy, May 7 th 2008.
ERE 2008September 15-19, Spanish Relativity Meeting 2008, Salamanca, September (2008) Avoiding the DARK ENERGY coincidence problem with a COSMIC.
Dark Energy and baryon oscillations Domenico Sapone Université de Genève, Département de Physique théorique In collaboration with: Luca Amendola (INAF,
Has elasticity anything to do with cosmology? Angelo Tartaglia RELGRAV.
1 1 Dark Energy with SNAP and other Next Generation Probes Eric Linder Berkeley Lab.
Dark Energy Phenomenology: Quintessence Potential Reconstruction Je-An Gu 顧哲安 National Center for Theoretical Sciences NTHU Collaborators.
Dark Energy Phenomenology: Quintessence Potential Reconstruction Je-An Gu 顧哲安 National Center for Theoretical Sciences CYCU Collaborators.
Probing Dark Energy with Cosmological Observations Fan, Zuhui ( 范祖辉 ) Dept. of Astronomy Peking University.
Jochen Weller Decrypting the Universe Edinburgh, October, 2007 未来 の 暗 黒 エネルギー 実 験 の 相補性.
Cosmology Scale factor Cosmology à la Newton Cosmology à la Einstein
The Nature of Dark Energy David Weinberg Ohio State University Based in part on Kujat, Linn, Scherrer, & Weinberg 2002, ApJ, 572, 1.
The HORIZON Quintessential Simulations A.Füzfa 1,2, J.-M. Alimi 2, V. Boucher 3, F. Roy 2 1 Chargé de recherches F.N.R.S., University of Namur, Belgium.
Constraining Dark Energy with Double Source Plane Strong Lenses Thomas Collett With: Matt Auger, Vasily Belokurov, Phil Marshall and Alex Hall ArXiv:
J. Tang, J. Weller, A. Zablocki
Long distance modifications of gravity in four dimensions.
Probing the Coupling between Dark Components of the Universe
Recent status of dark energy and beyond
Observational Constraints on Viable f(R) Gravity Models
Detection of integrated Sachs-Wolfe effect by cross-correlation of the
Graduate Course: Cosmology
Measurements of Cosmological Parameters
Kinematic Dipole Anisotropy from COBE
6-band Survey: ugrizy 320–1050 nm
Presentation transcript:

Jochen Weller XLI Recontres de Moriond March, 18-25, 2006 Constraining Inverse Curvature Gravity with Supernovae O. Mena, J. Santiago and JW PRL, 96, , 2006

Jochen Weller XLI Recontres de Moriond March, 18-25, 2006 Supernovae Measurements The expansion of the Universe is accelerating !  SNe allow measurement of distance - redshift relation at large redshifts: The expansion of the Universe is accelerating !  Perlmutter et al.; Riess et al.; Knop et al.; Astier et al.

Jochen Weller XLI Recontres de Moriond March, 18-25, 2006 Dark Energy  Simplest explanation; consistent with SNe, CMB, LSS, clusters of galaxies,...  Cosmological Constant problem: Why  << (TeV) 4 ?  Why now:  m    ?  Maybe something else...

Jochen Weller XLI Recontres de Moriond March, 18-25, 2006 Maybe gravity is standard at short distances...

Jochen Weller XLI Recontres de Moriond March, 18-25, 2006 but gets modified on large distances...

Jochen Weller XLI Recontres de Moriond March, 18-25, 2006 New Gravitational Action Simple approach: F(R) = R+mR n

Jochen Weller XLI Recontres de Moriond March, 18-25, 2006  Well known for n>1  early de Sitter e.g. Starobinsky (1980) n<0  Interest here: Late time modification  n<0 (inverse curvature)  modification becomes important at low curvature and can lead to accelerated expansion [Capozziello, Carloni, Troisy (’03), Carroll, Duvvuri, Trodden, Turner (’03), Carroll, De Felice, Duvvuri, Easson, Trodden, Turner (’04)]  Simplest model (  1/R) ruled out by solar system data [Chiva (‘03), Soussa, Woodard (‘03),...] but: accelerated attractor: [CDDETT] H dH/dt

Jochen Weller XLI Recontres de Moriond March, 18-25, 2006 The new model  Flat metric  Corrections negligible in the past (large curvature), but dominant for R   2 ; acceleration today for   H 0 (Again why now problem ?)  Late time accelerated attractor [CDDTT’04]  Passes solar system tests and no ghosts under certain circumstances (see Karel van Acoleyen talk on Friday)

Jochen Weller XLI Recontres de Moriond March, 18-25, 2006 Modified Friedman Equation  Stiff, 2nd order non-linear differential equation, solution is hard numerical problem - initial conditions in radiation dominated era are close to singular point.  Source term is matter and radiation: NO DARK ENERGY  Effectively dependent on 3 extra parameters:

Jochen Weller XLI Recontres de Moriond March, 18-25, 2006 Solving the Friedman Equation for n=1  Numerical codes can not solve this from initial conditions in radiation dominated era or matter domination  Approximate analytic solution in distant past

Jochen Weller XLI Recontres de Moriond March, 18-25, 2006 Approximation and Numerical Solution  Very accurate for z ≥ few (7), better than 0.1% with H E 2 =8  G/  the standard Einstein gravity solution at early times.  Use approximate solution as initial condition at z=few (7) for numerical solution (approximation very accurate and numerical codes can cope)

Jochen Weller XLI Recontres de Moriond March, 18-25, 2006 Dynamical Analysis   is fixed by the dynamical behavior of the system  Four special values of   For    1 : both values of  are acceptable  For  1     2 :  =+1 hits singularity in past  For  2     4 :  =-1 hits singularity in past  For  2     3 : stable attractor that is decelerated for  <32/21 and accelerated for larger .  For  3     4 : no longer stable attractor and singularity is reached in the future through an accelerated phase. For small this appears in the past.

Jochen Weller XLI Recontres de Moriond March, 18-25, 2006  Include intrinsic magnitude of Supernovae as free parameter: Degenerate with value of H 0 or better absolute scale of H(z). Measure all dimensionful quantities in units of  Remaining parameters:  and    1 leads to very bad fits of the SNe data; remaining regions Fit to Supernovae Data low high

Jochen Weller XLI Recontres de Moriond March, 18-25, 2006  Fit to Riess et al (2004) gold sample; a compilation of 157 high confidence Type Ia SNe data.  very good fits, similar to  CDM (  2 = 183.3) Universe hits singularity in the past

Jochen Weller XLI Recontres de Moriond March, 18-25, 2006 low high Combining Datasets  In order to set scale use prior from Hubble Key Project: H 0 = 72  8 km/sec/Mpc [Freedman et al. ‘01]  Prior on age of the Universe: t 0 > 11.2 Gyrs [Krauss, Chaboyer ‘03] marginalized 0.07 < m < 0.21 (95% c.l.); require dark matter

Jochen Weller XLI Recontres de Moriond March, 18-25, 2006 CMB for the Brave Small scale CMB anisotropies are mainly affected by the physical cold dark matter and baryon densities and the angular diameter distance to last scattering

Jochen Weller XLI Recontres de Moriond March, 18-25, 2006 Angular Diameter Distance to Last Scattering For the brave: Angular diameter distance to last last scattering with WMAP data - might as well be bogus !

Jochen Weller XLI Recontres de Moriond March, 18-25, 2006 No need for dark energy !  Inverse curvature gravity models can lead to accelerated expansion of the Universe and explain SNe data without violation of solar system tests and being ghost free. No need for dark energy !  Use of other data sets like CMB, LSS, Baryon Oscillations and clusters require careful analysis of perturbation regime and post - Newtonian limit on cluster scales (in progress)  No alternative for dark matter !  No alternative for dark matter ! But only studied one functional form (n=1) ! But see Karel van Acoleyen talk on Friday. Conclusions

Jochen Weller XLI Recontres de Moriond March, 18-25, 2006 The Model vs Dark Energy  Require also small parameter:   Ghost free version has only scalar degree of freedom: is there a simple scalar-tensor theory ?  Is there any deeper motivation for this model ? “If at first an idea is not absurd, there is no hope for it”

Jochen Weller XLI Recontres de Moriond March, 18-25, 2006 Baryon Oscillations as Cosmological Probe  Measuring acoustic oscillations of baryons with SDSS large scale correlations  angular diameter distance scale to position of oscillation peak at z = 0.35 Eisenstein et al. 2005

Jochen Weller XLI Recontres de Moriond March, 18-25, 2006 Using Baryon Oscillations for the Invincible  angular diameter scale to acoustic peak at z=0.35 Growth of Perturbations ???

Jochen Weller XLI Recontres de Moriond March, 18-25, 2006 Putting it all together  Combined constraints form SNe, H 0, Age, WMAP and BAO