JATAP Joint Air Toxics Assessment Project 2011 National Tribal Forum for Air Quality Spokane, WA June 14-16, 2011 A Successful Multi-Jurisdictional Research.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Nez Perce Tribe Air Quality Program Air Toxics Monitoring.
Advertisements

Near-Roadway Mobile-Source Air Toxics (MSATs) Exposures Along U.S. 95 in Las Vegas, Nevada Prepared by: Paul T. Roberts, Michael C. McCarthy, and Steve.
EPA Air Toxics Programs Ruben R. Casso Toxics Coordinator EPA Region 6 Phone
DIESEL EMISSION REDUCTION ACT (DERA) MINING EQUIPMENT RETROFIT SALT RIVER PIMA MARICOPA INDIAN COMMUNITY Community Development Department (CDD) Environmental.
Update: National Ambient Air Quality Standards Association of California Airports September 15, 2010 Phil DeVita.
Air Pollution in New York City Jack Lebeau MD E Global Solutions – Anthony Straggi January 2005.
Houston Regional Monitoring HRM Houston Regional Monitoring Network Overview.
Clean Energy and Transportation City of Seattle Presented by Margaret Pageler Seattle Councilmember and Former Chair of Puget Sound Clean Air Agency An.
Transportation and Air Quality in the Treasure Valley.
Salt River Pima-Maricopa Indian Community Environmental Protection & Natural Resources Air Quality Program.
Nature of Air Pollution in California
Air Quality Management Initiatives for Kuala Lumpur: A study of stakeholder roles, emission sources, and vulnerable populations Dr. Scott Kennedy Energy.
Diesel Pollution Reduction Initiative The West Oakland Environmental Indicators Project and Pacific Institute.
AMATS Air Quality Update April 2012 Municipality of Anchorage Department of Health and Human Services.
Overview of the California Air Resources Board Bart Croes, Chief Research Division
Marti Lindsey Maureen King Leroy Williams Gila River Indian Community Community Action for a Renewed Environment Level I (Pilot) Project (GRIC CARE) The.
Zhihua (Tina) Fan Environmental and Occupational Health Sciences Institute Sponsored by RWJMS-UMDNJ and Rutgers University Piscataway, NJ NUATRC Air Toxics.
Ohio’s Clean Diesel School Bus Retrofit Grant Program Winner of a 2008 Leadership Award from the.
Houston Air Quality John D. Wilson Galveston-Houston Association for Smog Prevention
Lakeshore Air Toxics Study (LATS) Jeff Stoakes Senior Environmental Manager Indiana Department of Environmental Management (IDEM ) 1.
Community Air Risk Evaluation (CARE) Program Philip Martien, Ph.D. Senior Advanced Projects Advisor Bay Area Air Quality Management District CAPCOA Conference.
Performance Analysis Presentation to the National Capital Region Transportation Planning Board (NCR-TPB) November 28, 2012 Adopted: July 18, 2012 Item.
What Does a Tribal Air Program Look Like? James Payne Morongo Band of Mission Indians Environmental Department.
Commission for Environmental Cooperation Keith Chanon, Program Manager Pollutants and Health Characterizing Chemicals in Commerce: Using Data on HPV Chemicals.
Air Toxics Study Prepared in collaboration with the University of Louisville, School of Public Health Depts. Epidemiology and Clinical Investigation Sciences.
1 Community Tools and Resources for Tribes Maeve Foley, Air Division, EPA R9 Marti Lindsey, University of Arizona Charles Swanson, Waste Division, EPA.
Commission for Environmental Cooperation SMOC Meeting March 4-5, 2008 Tucson, Arizona Orlando Cabrera Rivera, Program Manager - Air Quality/PRTR North.
Mississippi Air Quality Update Mississippi Dept. of Environmental Quality Air Division August 6, 2010.
Health Impacts of Air Pollution on Communities Source Category Regulations Dan Donohoue Air Resources Board California Environmental Protection Agency.
American Indian Policy Institute JATAP Joint Air Toxics Assessment Project A Successful Multi-Jurisdictional Research Partnership National Congress of.
1 GRIC Tribal Implementation Plan Development Dan Blair, Air Program Mgr. Gila River Indian Community (GRIC) Department of Environmental Quality.
CONCEPTUAL MODELING PROTOCOL FOR THE NEIGHBORHOOD ASSESSMENT PROGRAM.
Proposed Regulatory Framework Kentucky Air Toxic Program (KATP) Presentation to: Kentucky Chemical Industry Council November 10, 2005 Environmental & Public.
Diesel Risk Reduction Plan California Environmental Protection Agency Air Resources Board.
1 CAPCOA Health Impacts of Air Pollution on Communities September 19-20, : :35 Current Paradigms: Strengths and Limitations Source Category.
Status of Garfield County’s Air Quality Monitoring Program April 6, 2006 Energy Advisory Board Meeting.
Estimate of Air Emissions from Shale Gas Development and Production in North Carolina July 8, 2015 Presented to the Environmental Management Commission.
Grace Hill Clean Air Partnership - Overview Doug Eller, Grace Hill Settlement House Gwen Yoshimura, Region VII EPA For Air Quality Advisory Committee July.
CPHA 2014 Cumulative Impacts of Air Pollution Mapped at a Neighbourhood Level Stephanie Gower Toronto Public Health May 27, 2014 Co-authors: Ronald Macfarlane,
Latvian Environmental, Geology and Meteorology agency Future development scenarios for traffic system and air pollution in Riga city Iveta Steinberga La.
P. Otorepec, M. Gregorič IVZ RS Use of rutinely collected air pollution and health data on local level for simple evaluation of health impact.
Air Quality/Transport and Low Emissions: The National Perspective Care4Air 2009 Robert Vaughan National and Local Air Quality Defra 17 September 2009.
Icfi.com April 30, 2009 icfi.com © 2006 ICF International. All rights reserved. AIR TOXICS IN MOBILE COUNTY, ALABAMA: A MONITORING AND MODELING STUDY WEBINAR:
Transboundary Air Pollution Plan of Islamic Republic of Iran
Talking About Air Toxics John D. Wilson Galveston-Houston Association for Smog Prevention
Air Toxics Update Melanie Loyzim February 25, 2010.
Ondrea Barber GRIC DEQ Executive Director
Strategic Planning for an Air Quality Program Ondrea Barber Salt River Pima-Maricopa Indian Community.
Health Effects of Air Pollution
Technical Projects Update WRAP Board Meeting Salt Lake City, UT November 10, 2004.
Clean Diesel Engine Implementation Workshop Panel on Other Perspectives Chicago, August 7, 2003.
Ozone Transport that Impacts on Tribal Land: Case Study Stan Belone Salt River Pima-Maricopa Indian Community.
Statewide Protocol: Regional Application August 27, 2003 Air Resources Board California Environmental Protection Agency Luis F. Woodhouse.
Public Workshop UCLA March 4, 2005 Draft Air Quality and Land Use Handbook: A Community and Health Perspective.
The Proposed London Low Emission Zone
PARTICULATE MATTER: REGULATORY RESPONSE Presented by: Karl Loos.
Joint Urban Air Toxic Study Maricopa County, Arizona Daniel Blair, Air Quality Specialist Gila River Indian Community Sacaton, Arizona.
NJDEP Air Toxics Program Olga Boyko NJDEP Division of Air Quality Health Effects of Air Pollution Workshop Bordentown, NJ July 30, 2008.
Air Toxics & Public Health Committee Update Heidi Hales Monitoring and Assessment Committee Meeting Troy, NH April 24, 2007.
Garfield County Air Quality Monitoring Network Cassie Archuleta Project Scientist Board of County Commissioners – Regular Meeting.
Expertise SR 710 North Study An Evaluation of the DEIR/EIS Presentation to the City of San Gabriel City Council February 2, 2016 Leland C Dolley, Special.
New Ozone NAAQS Impacts: What Happens Next with a Lower O3 Standard? Nonattainment Designation and Industry’s Opportunity to Participate New Ozone NAAQS.
NEWSLETTER | AUGUST 2016 SOLAR ULTRAVIOLET RADIATION, RADON AND FINE PARTICULATE MATTER ARE LARGEST CONTRIBUTORS TO ENVIRONMENTAL BURDEN OF CANCER IN ONTARIO.
Which method is most appropriate for assessing exposure?
Air Monitoring Trends in New Jersey
Designations for Indian Country
Leroy Williams GRIC DEQ Air Program
Air Toxics Program Laura McKelvey.
JDS International seminar 2018
EPA FY2008 Air Monitoring Budget Guidance
Presentation transcript:

JATAP Joint Air Toxics Assessment Project 2011 National Tribal Forum for Air Quality Spokane, WA June 14-16, 2011 A Successful Multi-Jurisdictional Research Partnership

Presented by: Leroy Williams, Environmental Engineer Department of Environmental Quality Air Quality Program Gila River Indian Community

Joint Air Toxics Assessment Project (JATAP) Multi-Jurisdictional Collaboration : tribal, state, county, federal governments  determine types, distribution and sources of air toxics in central Arizona (local-scale, high quality data for modeling and risk assessment)  determine health risks from air toxics  reduce health risks from air toxics

Air Pollution Does Not Recognize Political Boundaries To understand air toxics, Tribes, State and Counties need data from on and off their jurisdictions - sampling for 1 year at all 7 sites; also meteorological data - 24 hour average samples taken every 6th day

Key Tribal Interests Are air toxics coming onto tribal lands from neighboring urban areas? What air toxics are being emitted from freeways on tribal lands? Loop SRPMIC SRPMIC

JATAP is a Successful Multi- jurisdictional Project  Multi-jurisdictional Steering Committee Consensus decision-making; ADEQ Tribal Policy  Coordination and TA ASU American Indian Policy Institute (ITEP for the first phase)  Funding EPA Grants; EPA scientist on special detail; State and Tribal funds

JATAP Participants Agencies with Monitoring Sites Salt River Pima-Maricopa Indian Community EPNR Gila River Indian Community DEQ Arizona DEQ Other participants Fort McDowell Yavapai Nation Maricopa County & Pinal County Air Quality Control Districts EPA Region 9 & OAQPS City of Phoenix

JATAP monitored for Gaseous Air Toxics and Fine Particulates FROM:  mobile sources (cars, trucks) 1,3-butadiene, acetaldehyde, formaldehyde, benzene, ethylbenzene, toluene; PM 2.5  stationary sources (industry) chloroform, methylene chloride, trichloroethylene, tetrachloroethylene, styrene, o,m,p-xylenes, hexachlorobutadiene, vinyl chloride  background (throughout US) carbon tetrachloride

Fine Particulate Air Toxics Species  arsenic, cadmium, chromium VI, nickel, cobalt, manganese, Diesel Particulates Greatest Health Risks (cancer): -diesel particulates (90%) -formaldehyde; 1-3 butadiene acetaldehyde; benzene; chloroform arsenic; cadmium

RISK ASSESSMENT Stationary source dispersion and exposure modeling (HEM-AERMOD model) -developed emissions inventory (EI) containing emission point entries (model ready) Urban area-wide mobile source modeling (CAMx model) -developed EI -includes diesel PM Mobile source dispersion modeling to identify near- roadway concentrations and exposures -highest mobile source concentrations within 250m of freeways; drop off at 500m [anticipated]

Geographical Distribution of Risk Tribal Locations Salt River (transport; freeway emissions)  Gila River emissions closer to background  Exposure

Annual Average Daily Traffic Volume (vehicles per day)

Arizona JATAP Study Area ARIZONA

Monitoring Sites

 Modeling and Risk Assessment (no NAAQS)  Outreach Messages: include Action Plan for risk reduction FROM MONITORING TO RISK ASSESSMENT FROM DATA TO POLICY AND ACTION

Case Study of Unintended Consequences  Multiple Air Toxics Exposure Study (South Coast, CA 1999)  ban on new schools or expansions near freeways; school over-crowding Possible Options: -filters in near roadway buildings -targeted reduction in outdoor activities -school bus anti-idling and retrofit -buffer zones (land use planning) -roadway design -trees and vegetation

Gila River Indian Community JATAP Outreach Message  The Gila River Indian Community’s air quality is good (particularly from a regional perspective)  Data indicates essentially no health risk in District 6 of air toxics coming from industries in urban areas  There is a low level increase in air toxics (benzene) from vehicles; these air toxics are distributed though the whole Valley; at Gila River the levels are lower than at Salt River and only slightly higher than at Queen Valley (a fairly remote site)

Gila River Indian Community JATAP Outreach Message  The primary health risk from these vehicle air toxics is an increased risk of cancer (leukemia); essentially all urban areas in the U.S. have levels of air toxics that pose some increased cancer risk  High traffic roadways and freeways will increase air pollution near the roadway; air pollution declines 60% at 320 feet from the roadway and drops to background levels at 650 feet

Gila River Indian Community JATAP Outreach Message  There are mitigation measures that potentially reduce health risks from near- roadway pollution  JATAP is researching these measures and working in the Community to develop projects to reduce air toxics, particularly at schools

THANK YOU! For More Information: Leroy Williams (520)