freshwater water quality Pacific oysters 2 LU/LC scenarios: 1.Status quo 2.Future climate (Envision)
freshwater
Freshwater Yield & Nutrient Loading Demand
Average Annual Discharge Compared To USGS and WADOE gauge observations Average Annual Discharge Compared To USGS and WADOE gauge observations 2006 Snapshot: Land Cover Available Water Content Soil Depth Topography Watersheds Sub-Watersheds Snapshot: Land Cover Available Water Content Soil Depth Topography Watersheds Sub-Watersheds Annual Values: Precipitation Potential Evapotranspiration Annual Values: Precipitation Potential Evapotranspiration LU Tables: Rooting Depth Plant ET coefficient Water Demand LU Tables: Rooting Depth Plant ET coefficient Water Demand
SAMPLE OUTPUT
water quality
Water quality model v.1
Skokomish Duckabush Hamma Dosewallips Big Quilcene Little Quilcene Big Beef Creek SAMPLE OUTPUT
High Water Quality Low Water Quality 0%20%40%60%80%100% Water Quality Index (relative to the source contaminant of fecal coliform) A. BaselineC. Industry ExpansionB. Conservation Water quality model v. 2
Pacific oysters
Pacific Oyster Production Model $: Commercial and Recreational
SAMPLE OUTPUT: SQ harvest volume
Shellfish harvest SAMPLE OUTPUT: scenarios