Preventing & Responding to Problem Behavior: Review of Best Practice Gene Thompson, Martha Wally, Brandi Simonsen, George Sugai Center on Positive Behavioral.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
How is My Classroom Management?
Advertisements

Sustained Implementation of School-wide PBIS for All Students George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS Center for Behavioral Education & Research University of.
Responsiveness to Intervention & School-wide Positive Behavior Support George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS Center for Behavioral Education & Research University.
Schoolwide Positive Behavior Interventions and Support -SWPBIS- Mitchell L. Yell, Ph.D. University of South Carolina
SWPBS: Preventing & Reducing Effectiveness of Bullying Behavior George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS Center for Behavioral Education & Research University.
Optional PBIS Coaches Meeting November 15, 2010 Tier 2 and Tier 3 Interventions and Supports.
CT PBS Coaches’ Meeting Coaching SWPBS Basics December 9, 2008 Brandi Simonsen, Kari Sassu, & George Sugai.
Preventing & Responding to Problem Behavior: Review of Best Practice
Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports CCSD
George Sugai & Rob Horner OSEP Center on PBIS University of CT & OR
SWPBS: Reducing Effectiveness of Bullying Behavior George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS Center for Behavioral Education & Research University of Connecticut.
Vermont Positive Behavior Support Services
CT PBS Coaches’ Meeting Coaching SWPBS Basics December 9, 2008 Brandi Simonsen, Kari Sassu, & George Sugai.
SWPBS: Preventing & Reducing Effectiveness of Bullying Behavior
SWPB Action Planning for District Leadership George Sugai & Susan Barrettt OSEP Center on PBIS University of Connecticut February 14,
School-wide Positive Behavior Support: Outcomes, Data, Practices, & Systems George Sugai Center on Positive Behavioral Interventions & Supports University.
Preparing for End & Beginning SWPBS Year: Evaluation & Action Planning George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS Center for Behavioral Education & Research University.
Training/Coaching Meeting & Team Training Debriefing George Sugai Center for Behavioral Education & Research Center on Positive Behavioral Interventions.
SWPBS: Implementing with Accuracy & Durability George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS Center for Behavioral Education & Research University of Connecticut May.
School-Wide Positive Behavior Support: Year One RI PBIS Team & George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS Center for Behavioral Education & Research University of.
Sustaining Change: RtI & SWPBS George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS Center for Behavioral Education and Research University of Connecticut March 10,
V 2.1 Tier II Critical Features Building the Infrastructure to Support Tier 2.
RTI: Reasons, Practices, Systems, & Considerations George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS University of Connecticut December 6,
Sustained Implementation of Tiered System of Behavior Support George Sugai Center for Behavioral Education & Research Center on Positive Behavioral Interventions.
BULLYPROOFING AND PBIS: PART II Teri Lewis Oregon State University.
SWPBS: Leadership Team Guidelines George Sugai University of Connecticut Center on Positive Behavioral Interventions & Supports October 31,
SWPBS: Sustainability George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS University of Oregon Center for Behavioral Education & Research University of Connecticut March.
Bridging Primary & Secondary/Tertiary Tier Practices & Systems: Responding to Unresponsive Behavior Brandi Simonsen & George Sugai Center on Positive Behavioral.
Is PBIS Evidence-based? George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS University of Oregon Center for Behavioral Education & Research University of Connecticut August.
Understanding & Planning for Non- Responsive Behavior (Secondary/Tertiary Tier) George Sugai Center on Positive Behavioral Interventions & Supports University.
SWPBS: Reducing Effectiveness of Bullying Behavior George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS Center for Behavioral Education & Research University of Connecticut.
School-Wide PBIS: Action Planning George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS Center for Behavioral Education & Research University of Connecticut August 11, 2008.
Systems Logic for Sustained Large Scale Implementation George Sugai National Center on Positive Behavioral Interventions & Supports UConn Center for Behavioral.
SWPBS: Sustainability, Classroom Management, Interventions for Individual Students Celeste Dickey & George Sugai University of Oregon & Connecticut Center.
School-wide Positive Behavior Support: Discipline & Beyond George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS Center for Behavioral Education and Research University of.
SWPBS: Leadership Team Follow-up Jon Dyson, Lavonne Nkomo, George Sugai Center on Disabilities University of Connecticut Center on Positive Behavioral.
School-wide Positive Behavior Support for All Lou DeLoreto E.O. Smith High School George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS Center for Behavioral Education & Research.
Review & Re-establish SW PBIS Tier 1 SRIP – Cohort 9 August 2014.
SWPBS: Reducing Effectiveness of Bullying Behavior George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS Center for Behavioral Education & Research University of Connecticut.
Developing & Implementing a State Plan George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS Center for Behavioral Education & Research University of Connecticut October 9,
SWPBS Fidelity & Sustainability George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS University of Oregon Center for Behavioral Education & Research University of Connecticut.
+ Positive Behavior Interventions & Supports Lilja Elementary School Respect. Responsibility. Kindness. Engaged Learning.
Introduction to School-wide Positive Behavior Support.
Sustaining Change: RtI & SWPBS George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS Center for Behavioral Education and Research University of Connecticut May 9,
Plants, Camps, Special Education, & Prevention Science George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS Center for Behavioral Education and Research University of Connecticut.
Introduction to PBIS Forum George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS Center for Behavioral Education & Research University of Connecticut October
Systems, Data, & Practices to Move PBIS Forward in Ravenswood City School District Sheldon Loman, Ph.D.
Review & Re-establish School-Wide PBIS: Tier 1 Cohort 10 August 2015 *
Review & Re-establish SW PBIS Tier 1 Continuum of Support *
Evolution of RtI & SWPBS George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS Center for Behavioral Education and Research University of Connecticut January 23,
SWPBS & RtI for All George Sugai University of Connecticut OSEP Center on PBIS September 24, 2008
Irvine H.S. (IHS), Vista Verde (VV), Bernice Ayer Middle School (BAMS) Team driven (IHS) & establishing local expertise (VV) Data based decision making.
SRBI/PBIS Implementation: Considerations George Sugai & Jen Freeman Center for Behavioral Education & Research Center on Positive Behavioral Interventions.
School-Wide Positive Behavior Support: Rationale, Readiness, Features George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS Center for Behavioral Education & Research University.
W. M. Anderson Primary: School- Wide Positive Behavior Support Plan James Carraway, Chairperson Macie Davis Debra Fulmore Pam Lee Lerlisa McKnight Gail.
RTI: Linking Academic and Behavior Support Wesley Temple Dawn Davis.
Kayla Locklear- Behavioral Specialist Leon Maynor – Behavioral Specialist SCHOOL-WIDE POSITIVE BEHAVIOR SUPPORT: DISCIPLINE & BEYOND.
SWPBS: Implementation Fidelity & Durability George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS Center for Behavioral Education & Research University of Connecticut Apr 7,
School-Wide Positive Behavior Support: Getting Started George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS University of Connecticut April 6,
SWPBS: Sustainability
SWPBS Overview: Establishing Continuum of Support for All
PBIS PRACTICES.
SWPB Action Planning for District Leadership
Reaching All Students: RtI & SWPBS
Evidence-Based Intervention Practices
Sustainability & Scaling & Failure of Friday In-service Day
Adapted from Brandi Simonsen, Kari Sassu,& George Sugai, 2008
DW Leadership: Sustainable & Scalable SWPBS
SWPB Action Planning for District Leadership
MN SW Positive Behavior Support Initiative
Presentation transcript:

Preventing & Responding to Problem Behavior: Review of Best Practice Gene Thompson, Martha Wally, Brandi Simonsen, George Sugai Center on Positive Behavioral Interventions & Supports University of Connecticut January 21, 2009

PURPOSE Practices & systems for responding to norm violating problem behavior. Review of SWPBS Discipline Best Practices, Emphases, & Considerations Understanding & Managing Escalations Action Planning

PBS – Respect & Responsibility

Behavior Situations “Jaime’s all over the place. He touches other kids stuff, disrupts their concentration, & always getting in fights. I don’t know what to do with him!” “What can I do to reduce # of kids who come to class late?” “A few kids in my 5 th period class never raise their hands when they have a question…they blurt out.” “When I tell Sasha what to do, I’m ignored. When I repeat, I’m ignored again. So, I repeat again & tell her that if she doesn’t answer, I’m sending her to the office. She gets up & leaves! I want compliance.” “Every other word out of Margindale’s mouth is sexually or culturally inappropriate….how do I get rid of her comments?”

Discussion Pre-requisites School-wide in place w/ integrity Team meets at least monthly Behavioral capacity in school >80% staff participation Active administrator participation

SWPBS is approach for…. Improving classroom & school climate Decreasing reactive management Maximizing academic achievement Establishing continuum of evidence-based behavior interventions for all students Integrating academic & behavior initiatives

Evidence-based Investments to Prevent Youth Violence Surgeon General’s Report on Youth Violence (2001) Coordinated Social Emotional & Learning (Greenberg et al., 2003) Center for Study & Prevention of Violence (2006) White House Conference on School Violence (2006) Positive, predictable school-wide climate High rates of academic & social success Formal social skills instruction Positive active supervision & reinforcement Positive adult role models Multi-component, multi-year school- family-community effort

SWPBS Conceptual Foundations Behaviorism ABA PBS SWPBS Laws of Behavior Applied Behavioral Technology Social Validity All Students IDEA: Positive Behavioral Interventions & Supports

SYSTEMS PRACTICES DATA Supporting Staff Behavior Supporting Student Behavior OUTCOMES Supporting Social Competence & Academic Achievement Supporting Decision Making Integrated Elements

Classroom Evidence-based SWPBS Practices Non-classroom Family Student School-wide Smallest # Evidence-based Biggest, durable effect

SCHOOL-WIDE 1.Leadership team 2.Behavior purpose statement 3.Set of positive expectations & behaviors 4.Procedures for teaching SW & classroom- wide expected behavior 5.Continuum of procedures for encouraging expected behavior 6.Continuum of procedures for discouraging rule violations 7.Procedures for on-going data-based monitoring & evaluation EVIDENCE- BASED INTERVENTION PRACTICES CLASSROOM 1.All school-wide 2.Maximum structure & predictability in routines & environment 3.Positively stated expectations posted, taught, reviewed, prompted, & supervised. 4.Maximum engagement through high rates of opportunities to respond, delivery of evidence- based instructional curriculum & practices 5.Continuum of strategies to acknowledge displays of appropriate behavior. 6.Continuum of strategies for responding to inappropriate behavior. INDIVIDUAL STUDENT 1.Behavioral competence at school & district levels 2.Function-based behavior support planning 3.Team- & data-based decision making 4.Comprehensive person-centered planning & wraparound processes 5.Targeted social skills & self-management instruction 6. Individualized instructional & curricular accommodations NONCLASSROOM 1.Positive expectations & routines taught & encouraged 2.Active supervision by all staff (Scan, move, interact) 3.Precorrections & reminders 4.Positive reinforcement FAMILY ENGAGEMENT 1.Continuum of positive behavior support for all families 2.Frequent, regular positive contacts, communications, & acknowledgements 3.Formal & active participation & involvement as equal partner 4.Access to system of integrated school & community resources

Primary Prevention: School-/Classroom- Wide Systems for All Students, Staff, & Settings Secondary Prevention: Specialized Group Systems for Students with At-Risk Behavior Tertiary Prevention: Specialized Individualized Systems for Students with High-Risk Behavior ~80% of Students ~15% ~5% CONTINUUM OF SCHOOL-WIDE INSTRUCTIONAL & POSITIVE BEHAVIOR SUPPORT ALL SOME FEW

IMPLEMENTATION W/ FIDELITY CONTINUUM OF EVIDENCE-BASED INTERVENTIONS STUDENT PERFORMANCE CONTINUOUS PROGRESS MONITORING DATA-BASED DECISION MAKING & PROBLEM SOLVING UNIVERSAL SCREENING RtI Response to Intervention

Universal Targeted Intensive All Some Few RTI Continuum of Support for ALL Dec 7, 2007

Agreements Team Data-based Action Plan ImplementationEvaluation GENERAL IMPLEMENTATION PROCESS

Sustainability Guiding Principles Relevant outcomes Local expert capacity & professional development Evidence based Data-driven Resource consolidation Leadership priority Implementation integrity Is Student Affected Directly Continuous Regeneration

Discipline Handout Steps, policies, or actions to support teaching & learning environments so likelihood of student academic & social success is promoted –Increases in likelihood of occurrences of socially appropriate behavior –Decreases in likelihood of occurrences of problem violating behavior –Decreases in intensity, frequency, & duration of severe problem behavior

Discipline Emphases Teaching & reinforcing context-appropriate social behaviors or skills. Removing antecedent factors that trigger occurrences of problem behavior. Adding antecedent factors that trigger occurrences of context appropriate social skills. Removing consequence factors that maintain (function) occurrences of problem behaviors. Adding consequence factors that maintain occurrences of context appropriate social behaviors.

Considerations 1.Data 2.Benchmarks for measuring non- responsiveness 3.Discipline for academic success 4.Research validated practices 5.Prevention 6.Universal screening 7.Measurement for effectiveness 8.School-wide leadership team

Other Guidelines 1.Behavior does not occur in vacuum; environment is big deal 2.No pain, humiliation, injury 3.Punishment defined by decrease 4.More positives than negatives 5.Discipline is screening 6.Secondary/tertiary is about teaching more desirable behavior

REMEMBER SW discipline is for 80% SW discipline is screener for non-responders By definition, behaviors of “non-responders” are slow to change & require specialized local supports SW discipline is preventive SW discipline is balanced response for problem & expected behavior “Getting tougher” is ineffective for non- responders

1. Appropriate Behavior Look continuously for appropriate behavior Label appropriate behavior Appropriate positive reinforcement

2. Prompts for desired behavior Use effective signal/prompt Label display of expected behavior

3. Minor, non-interfering problem behavior Remove attention Wait for desired behavior, then reinforce Positively reinforce other-student displays of desired behavior Prompt expected behavior Use positive reinforcement

4. Minor, interfering problem behavior Signal error or problem behavior Remind ask student for expected behavior Display/practice expected behavior Positively reinforce 1 & 2

5. Repeated minor problem behavior Identify context/setting when problem behavior likely Conduct FBA Develop BIP 1 & 2

6. Classroom managed major Develop precorrection plan Teach/practice desired behavior Conduct FBA 1 & 2

PRECORRECTION Identify & analyze setting in which problem behavior most likely –Triggers & function –Expected & acceptable behaviors BEFORE –Modify setting –Check-in w/ student –(Re)teach & remind –Reinforce –Re-direct DURING –Monitor & reinforce –Re-direct AFTER –Reinforce –Revise, (re)teach, remind

7. Office managed problem behavior Follow school & district disciplinary procedures 1 & 2

REMEMBER Be business like; use “teaching” voice Stick to protocols, procedures, agreements Work as team w/ non-responders Use data for decisions Anticipate & pre-correct Reinforce at high rates, continuously

~80% of Students ~15% ~5% ESTABLISHING CONTINUUM of SWPBS SECONDARY PREVENTION Check in/out Targeted social skills instruction Peer-based supports Social skills club TERTIARY PREVENTION Function-based support Wraparound Person-centered planning PRIMARY PREVENTION Teach SW expectations Proactive SW discipline Positive reinforcement Effective instruction Parent engagement SECONDARY PREVENTION TERTIARY PREVENTION PRIMARY PREVENTION

~80% of Students ~15% ~5% ESTABLISHING A CONTINUUM of SWPBS SECONDARY PREVENTION Check in/out Targeted social skills instruction Peer-based supports Social skills club TERTIARY PREVENTION Function-based support Wraparound/PCP Specially designed instruction PRIMARY PREVENTION Teach & encourage positive SW expectations Proactive SW discipline Effective instruction Parent engagement Audit 1.Identify existing practices by tier 2.Specify outcome for each effort 3.Evaluate implementation accuracy & outcome effectiveness 4.Eliminate/integrate based on outcomes 5.Establish decision rules (RtI)