Disk Towards a conceptual design M. de Jong  Introduction  Design considerations  Design concepts  Summary.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The ANTARES Offshore Data Acquisition A Highly Distributed, Embedded and COTS-based System S. Anvar, H. Le Provost, F. Louis – CEA Saclay DAPNIA.
Advertisements

Kay Graf Physics Institute 1 University of Erlangen ARENA 2006 University of Northumbria June 28 – 30, 2006 Integration of Acoustic Neutrino Detection.
The Angra Neutrino Detector Detector, VETO and electronics conceptual design Laudo Barbosa (May 18th, 2006) Centro Brasileiro de Pesquisas Físicas (CBPF)
2D Detectors DAQ Overview 2D detectors are organized as tiles providing 10G Ethernet serialized portions of the full.
Alfons Weber Towards Electronics for a Long Baseline Neutrino Detector Alfons Weber STFC & University of Oxford ν.
Fermilab Scientific Computing Division Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory, Batavia, Illinois, USA. The Power of Data Driven Triggering DAQ Topology.
Prototype string for a km3 Baikal neutrino telescope Roma International Conference on Astroparticle Physics V.Aynutdinov, INR RAS for the Baikal Collaboration.
Naba K Mondal, TIFR, Mumbai ICAL ( conceptual) INO Peak at Bodi West Hills Prototype ICAL at VECC 2mX2m RPC Test Stand at TIFR ASIC for RPC designed at.
U niversity of S cience and T echnology of C hina Design for Distributed Scheme of WCDA Readout Electronics CAO Zhe University of Science and Technology.
Deep-sea neutrino telescopes Prof. dr. Maarten de Jong Nikhef / Leiden University.
KM3NeT IDM/TeVPA conference 23  28 June 2014, Amsterdam, the Netherlands Maarten de Jong on behalf of the KM3NeT collaboration The next generation neutrino.
Paolo Piattelli - KM3NeTIAPS - Golden, 6-8 may 2008 KM3NeT: a deep-sea neutrino telescope in the Mediterranean Sea Paolo Piattelli - INFN/LNS Catania (Italy)
Martino Ruppi – KM3NeT 16 – 18 April Pylos Clock distribution and absolute time calibration in NEMO phase 1 Martino Ruppi INFN di Bari.
Coincidence analysis in ANTARES: Potassium-40 and muons  Brief overview of ANTARES experiment  Potassium-40 calibration technique  Adjacent floor coincidences.
SODA: Synchronization Of Data Acquisition I.Konorov  Requirements  Architecture  System components  Performance  Conclusions and outlook PANDA FE-DAQ.
TRIGGER-LESS AND RECONFIGURABLE DATA ACQUISITION SYSTEM FOR POSITRON EMISSION TOMOGRAPHY Grzegorz Korcyl 2013.
P.Vincent LPNHE-Paris for H.E.S.S. collaboraton28 th ICRC - Tsukuba - Japan - 5, August 2003 Performance of the H.E.S.S. cameras Pascal Vincent (LPNHE.
Data acquisition system for the Baikal-GVD neutrino telescope Denis Kuleshov Valday, February 3, 2015.
A sensor architecture for neutrino telescopes on behalf of the KM3NeT consortium Els de Wolf Thank you, Claudio!
ANTARES  Physics motivation  Recent results  Outlook 4 senior physicists, ~5 PhD students, ~5 technicians M. de Jong RECFA 23 September 2005.
KM3NeT International Solvay Institutes 27  29 May 2015, Brussels, Belgium. Maarten de Jong Astro-particle and Oscillations Research with Cosmics in the.
Network Architecture for the LHCb DAQ Upgrade Guoming Liu CERN, Switzerland Upgrade DAQ Miniworkshop May 27, 2013.
Status of the Genova activity on a direction-sensitive optical module toward the KM3 detector M.Taiuti WP3 PYLOS 16/4/2007.
Disk WP-4 “Information Technology” J. Hogenbirk/M. de Jong  Introduction (‘Antares biased’)  Design considerations  Recent developments  Summary.
CKM Data Source System CKM Electronics Group July 2003.
M. Circella and the NEMO Coll., Timing Calibration in NEMO VLV T workshop, Amsterdam, October 2003 Timing calibration in NEMO M. Circella Istituto Nazionale.
VLVnT09A. Belias1 The on-shore DAQ system for a deep-sea neutrino telescope A.Belias NOA-NESTOR.
CEA DSM Irfu Reconstruction and analysis of ANTARES 5 line data Niccolò Cottini on behalf of the ANTARES Collaboration XX th Rencontres de Blois 21 / 05.
Antares Slow Control Status 2007 International Conference on Accelerator and Large Experimental Physics Control Systems - Knoxville, Tennessee - October.
Time over Threshold electronics for an underwater neutrino telescope G. Bourlis, A.G.Tsirigotis, S.E.Tzamarias Physics Laboratory, School of Science and.
Astroparticle physics with large neutrino detectors  Existing detectors  Physics motivation  Antares project  KM3NeT proposal M. de Jong.
VLV T – Workshop 2003 Read Out and Data Transmission Working Group Synchronous Data Transmission Protocol for NEMO experiment.
KM 3 Neutrino Telescope European deep-sea research infrastructure DANS – symposium Maarten de Jong.
Time and amplitude calibration of the Baikal-GVD neutrino telescope Vladimir Aynutdinov, Bair Shaybonov for Baikal collaboration S Vladimir Aynutdinov,
CODA Graham Heyes Computer Center Director Data Acquisition Support group leader.
Calibration of Under Water Neutrino Telescope ANTARES Garabed HALLADJIAN October 15 th, 2008 GDR Neutrino, CPPM, Marseille.
S.Anvar, V.Gautard, H.Le Provost, F.Louis, K.Menager, Y.Moudden, B.Vallage, E.Zonca, on behalf of the KM3NeT consortium 1 IRFU/SEDI-CEA Saclay F
A Brand new neutrino detector 「 SciBar 」 (2) Y. Takubo (Osaka) - Readout Electronics - Introduction Readout electronics Cosmic ray trigger modules Conclusion.
F. Simeone – University “Sapienza” and INFN Sec. Roma1RICAP 11 Conference Roma May 2011 The data acquisition and transport design for NEMO phase.
F. Simeone – INFN, Sez. Roma1 RICAP07 Conference, Rome June 2007 Data taking system for NEMO experiment RICAP07.
August 24, 2011IDAP Kick-off meeting - TileCal ATLAS TileCal Upgrade LHC and ATLAS current status LHC designed for cm -2 s 7+7 TeV Limited to.
Isabella Amore VLV T08, Toulon, France April 2008 International Workshop on a Very Large Volume Neutrino Telescope for the Mediterranean Sea Results.
KM3NeT M. de Jong Staff overleg 12 Mei  M. de Jong, P. Kooijman, G. v.d. Steenhoven, E. de Wolf (R. v. Dantzig, J. Engelen, P. de Witt Huberts,
Firmware and Software for the PPM DU S. Anvar, H. Le Provost, Y.Moudden, F. Louis, E.Zonca – CEA Saclay IRFU – Amsterdam/NIKHEF, 2011 March 30.
Event Display The DAQ system architecture The NOA Data Acquisition system with the full 14 kt far detector P.F. Ding, D. Kalra, A. Norman and J. Tripathi.
The Neutrino Telescope of the KM3NeT Deep-Sea Research Infrastructure Robert Lahmann for the KM3NeT Consortium Erlangen Centre for Astroparticle Physics.
KM3NeT Neutrino conference 2-7 June 2014, Boston, U.S.A. Maarten de Jong on behalf of the KM3NeT collaboration The next generation neutrino telescope in.
IRFU The ANTARES Data Acquisition System S. Anvar, F. Druillole, H. Le Provost, F. Louis, B. Vallage (CEA) ACTAR Workshop, 2008 June 10.
 13 Readout Electronics A First Look 28-Jan-2004.
The dynamic range extension system for the LHAASO-WCDA experiment
DAQ ACQUISITION FOR THE dE/dX DETECTOR
Deep-sea neutrino telescopes
DAQ read out system Status Report
DAQ (i.e electronics) R&D status in Canada
Front-end Electronic for a neutrino telescope : a new ASIC SCOTT
“FPGA shore station demonstrator for KM3NeT”
Sebastian Kuch University Erlangen-Nürnberg
Els de Wolf, Nikhef/UvA KM3NeT WP345-meeting 23 February 2009
Data acquisition system for the Baikal-GVD neutrino telescope
White Rabbit in KM3NeT Mieke Bouwhuis NIKHEF 9th White Rabbit Workshop
Enrico Gamberini, Giovanna Lehmann Miotto, Roland Sipos
KRB proposal (Read Board of Kyiv group)
Baikal-GVD (technical report)
A First Look J. Pilcher 12-Mar-2004
Example of DAQ Trigger issues for the SoLID experiment
Status of muon monitor R&D and construction
Commissioning of the ALICE-PHOS trigger
Read Out and Data Transmission Working Group
The LHCb Front-end Electronics System Status and Future Development
Readout electronics system for Laser TPC prototype
Presentation transcript:

disk Towards a conceptual design M. de Jong  Introduction  Design considerations  Design concepts  Summary

“All-data-to-shore” photon detection information transmission information management information distribution detector f mf m f 1f 1 f f m+1 m minimum number of time-position correlated photons

“All-data-to-shore”  Scientifically –maximise neutrino detection efficiency –maintain flexibility (also after construction) –enable different physics (e.g. Magnetic Monopole)  Technically –reduce data transmission to a linear problem (scalability) –locate all complexity on shore (reliability) –optimisation of data filter (quality)

Photon detection  Position – resolution ~10 cm  Time – resolution ~1 ns  Charge – two-photon purity >99% – dynamic range 10-20

Detector hierarchy ‘building brick’  Photo-cathode area  Photo-cathode segmentation  Geometry  Signal/Noise  Power

Information transmission  Information – time‘TDC’ – charge‘ADC’ – address(ID, DWDM,…)  Network tree – optical power budget  Bandwidth km 1 2 n Back End fibre e/oo/e Front End local cluster

Information management  I/O data rates  Operation – remote – multi-user  Event – definition – efficiency – purity disk events Front End Back End Event Builder Data base User Control

Information distribution  Bandwidth  Number of computing centers  Event processing speed  Information feedback disk Computing center Server events calibration operation

Design considerations

Functional geography  Photon detection –High data rate –Uni-directional –Low information density –Timing ~ns  Instrumentation –Low data rate –Bi-directional –High information density –Timing ~ms separation of functionalities

Separation of functionalities  Optimise implementation  Reduce cost  Parallel design/production  Reliability versus redundancy Detection UnitsInstrumentation Units requires proof of concept for calibration

Photon counting  Large PMT –Slow –Analogue –Q -integrator –ADC  Small PMT –Fast –Digital –single photon counting –Time-over-threshold two-photon purity

Probability to detect 2 (or more) photons as a function of  photo-cathode area  distance between muon and PMT

 wavefront Cherenkov light cone ~1 km 1-2 abs

R [m] P(#   ≥ 2) – 0.01 m 2 – 0.02 m 2 – 0.03 m 2 – 0.04 m 2 – 0.05 m 2 Probability to detect 2 (or more) photons QE = 25% photo-cathode area: 2 x larger PMT does NOT see twice as far

Time stamping  Off-shore TDC –Distributed clock system Master clock Network Many slave clocks –A-synchronous readout  On-shore TDC –Local clock system Master clock ‘smart’ TDCs –Synchronous readout Software (protocol) Hardware (‘analogue’) minimise off-shore electronics

Example off-shore TDC port TX/RX DAQ TX/RX clock master ADC TDC clock slave protocol on-shoreoff-shore complex off-shore electronics

Example on-shore TDC optical TX/RX optical modulator ‘smart’ TDC clock protocol on-shore off-shore  Protocol – DWDM: (,fiber)  TDC – auto-calibration – multi-threshold (‘waveform’) ~no off-shore electronics

Time slice (or “ how-to-get-all-data-in-one-place ”) time muon takes to traverse detector

Trigger time Ethernet switch off-shore on shore

Trigger time Ethernet switch off-shore on shore

Trigger time Ethernet switch off-shore on shore

Design concepts (to be updated…)  à la Antares  1-1 mixed copper/fibre network  photonics based

à la Antares  Design of new front-end chip (Guilloux, Delagnes, Druillole)  Design of new FPGA/CPU (Herve, Shebli, Louis)  Design of data transmission (Jelle, Henk, Mar)  New clock (?)  New slow control (Michel)  Network optimisation –copper/fibre (Louis, Henk, ?) –Ethernet switch (Louis)  Both slow control & data acquisition (mjg)

1-1 mixed copper/fibre network  Design of multi-functional FPGA system –FPGA/CPU integration (Herve, Shebli) –Slow control (Michel?) –Front end (Guilloux, Delagnes, Druillole)  Integration of clock & data transmission system –Time synchronisation & calibration (?, Herve, Henk) –Hardware/software (Nemo)  Network optimisation (Jelle, Nemo?, ?)

Photonics based  Design of front-end electronics-photonics (Sander, Jelle, …) –Optical modulator (Mar)  Optical network (Jelle, )  On-shore multi-  laser  Mar, Jean Jennen)  Synchronised readout (mjg)  On-shore smart TDC (?, Saclay?, )  Limited slow control (WP2)

Summary  Readout based on “All-data-to-shore” concept  Big questions: –Where (off-shore/on shore) to do time stamping? –How to distribute data (TCP/IP)? –How to achieve good two-photon resolution? –Can we separate functionalities? –Other?