Summary of the analysis of the national logistic strategies in the V4 countries Lajos Veres PhD. Chairman Scientific Association for Spatial Development.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Stimulating Entrepreneurship in Rural Areas of Latvia.
Advertisements

European Economic and Social Committee Consultative Committee on Industrial Change "CCMI" P r e s e n t a t i o n of J á n o s T Ó T H Member of the EESC.
1 EU Strategy for the Baltic Sea Region as a tool to implement the EU2020 European Commission Directorate General Regional Policy Territorial Cooperation.
DG REGIO – Unit "Thematic Development" EUROPEAN COMMISSION EN 1 Transport and Regional Policy Transport and Regional Policy Patrick.
The political framework
POLAND Development Management System in Poland Brussels, 2 July 2010.
1 European Union Regional Policy – Employment, Social Affairs and Inclusion Addressing challenges in a changing world: -The future Cohesion Policy- Wolfgang.
Ministry of Health Anna Starzewska-Sikorska, Ph.D. Coordinator of environmental part of Programme Institute for Ecology of Industrial Areas, Katowice POLISH.
TRANSPORT – MITIGATION AND ADAPTATION Tamás Fleischer Institute for World Economics of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences
New opportunities for regional development through cross-border cooperation Ministry of Environmental Protection and Regional Development November 16,
Role and potential small and medium-sized urban areas Latvia’s case
„South East Europe Programme” as a financing opportunity for projects in the Danube region and complementarity to other instruments COMPLEMENTARITY OF.
Ministry of Regional Development MINISTRY OF REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT 14 Ministerial Conference of European Conference of Ministers Responsible.
Logistics and Regions. Trends The regions are becoming integrated in large-scale network economies (new markets conditions, reliance on global supply.
Monika Schönerklee-Grasser JTS CENTRAL EUROPE PROGRAMME The CENTRAL EUROPE Programme Staccato is a project of the concerto initiative co-funded.
Status of the implementation of the Regional R&D Strategy for Innovation for the Western Balkan Ministry of science education and sports - Croatia.
Trans-European Transport Network and the Connecting Europe Facility
04/2007 European Funds in Bulgaria Supported by the European Commission (DG ENV)
The implementation of the rural development policy and its impacts on innovation and modernisation of rural economy Christian Vincentini, European Commission.
Ministry of local Government and Regional Development Polycentric settlement structures (Odd Godal, Adviser, Vilnius, )
East-West Window Final Conference VII All-Russia Forum of Strategic Planning Leaders St. Petersburg, Rupert Kawka Federal Office for Building.
Part-financed by the European Union Priority 2 of the BSR Programme External and internal accessibility of the BSR Ryszard Toczek, City of Gdynia.
The cohesion policy of the European Union Pelle Anita University of Szeged Faculty of Economics and Business Administration.
RESOURCE EFFICIENCY IN LATIN AMERICA: ECONOMICS AND OUTLOOK 1.
Interregional bridging and local benefits : A case of Visegrad University Association prof.Ing. Peter Bielik, PhD Rector SUA Nitra, Slovakia President.
EU Territorial Agenda and aspects related to the Baltic Area Content: Chapter I: Tomorrow´s Territorial Challenges to be tackled today.
Contribution of the Territorial Cooperation Programmes to the EU Strategy for the Danube Region Kiril Geratliev, Director General “Territorial Cooperation.
Ministry for Regional Development of the Czech Republic MEETING OF DIRECTORS GENERAL “Territorial Cohesion” The Implementation of Action 1.1a (Urban –
05 October 2015 Panel Presentation for Industrial Manufacturing Panel Prof. Dr. Gusztáv Báger Budapest International Business Center Conference 2013.
Development and Transfer of Technologies UNFCCC Expert Workshop On Technology Information Technology Transfer Network and Matchmaking Systems: a LA & C.
UITP EUROPEAN POLICIES – A UITP PERSPECTIVE EMTA MEETING, LONDON, 09/10/14.
European Commission Introduction to the Community Programme for Employment and Social Solidarity PROGRESS
Strategic Priorities of the NWE INTERREG IVB Programme Harry Knottley, UK representative in the International Working Party Lille, 5th March 2007.
Assessment of Regional Coordination Capacities Szepesi Balázs Lead Evaluator Workshop on introducing territorial development evaluations April 25, 2013.
Economic Growth Strategy: A Challenge for our Future Efficient Financial Flows and Institutional Environment: Description and Comments Petr Zahradník,
EU STRATEGY FOR THE DANUBE REGION - EUSDR Conference on TEMPUS project – Lifelong learning for sustainable agriculture in Alps-Danube-Adriatic Region Zagreb,
International Relations Department Belgrade, September 28 TH, 2007 NBS PROJECT PROPOSALS.
Boris ŽIVEC RailNetEurope Management Board Vice-president 1 LjubljanaSlovenia 19 November 2012 Views from regional organisations The Danube Region Transport.
ALPINE SPACE Margarita Jančič MOP - DEZI Kranj,
Regional Policy as a Tool of Regional Development Support Chapter IV. Pavol Schwarcz Slovak University of Agriculture in Nitra.
IRS Institute for Regional Development and Structural Planning Sabine Zillmer ESPON Pre-accession aid impact analysis - Third Interim Report - ESPON.
TRACECA CONSTRUCTION OF INTERMODAL TERMINAL IN THE REGION OF RUSE CITY BULGARIA Infrastructure Working Group Kiev, 11 May 2011.
RIS WIELKOPOLSKA “Contribution of Innovation Strategies to Regional Development – Sub-regions” George Strogylopoulos Innovation Policy Expert Chairman,
EU FUNDING INSTRUMENTS – GENERAL REVIEW. EU's funding structure and the associated instruments and programmes  Pre-Accession Assistance:
Affordable Housing and the EU Urban Agenda
Experience of the Slovak Republic European Grouping of Territorial Cooperation.
Experience of Accessing EU Financial Support in Lithuania 4th PG Funding Meeting , Paris.
EU A new configuration of European Territorial Cooperation Vicente RODRIGUEZ SAEZ, DG Regional Policy, European Commission Deputy Head of Unit.
The National Strategy of Slovak Republic Ing. Iveta Kubasáková, PhD.- Ing. Ivana Šimková University of Zilina, Faculty of Operation and Economics of Transport.
CLUSTERING PROJECT Oto Hudec Faculty of Economics Technical University of Košice.
Synchronization and development of national strategies of logistics in V4 countries Lajos Veres Ph.D chairman Scientific Association for Spatial Development.
Interreg IIIB Trans-national cooperation: Budget comparison : 440 million EURO 420 m EURO (Interreg IIC prog.) + 20 m EURO (Pilot Actions)
National strategic reference framework Jela Tvrdonova.
Transport Integration of cross-border transport infrastructure TEN-T strategy on large cross- border cooperation projects Gudrun Schulze, Team leader,
Summary of the State of the Art of Programme Implementation CENTRAL EUROPE PROGRAMME Project development seminar Prague, 1-2 February 2010 Monika.
Developing coherence mechanisms (ERDF/EARDF) in Poland Andrzej Hałasiewicz, PhD Nicolaus Copernicus University in Torun Foundation of Assistance Programmes.
Regional Policy Future of Cohesion Policy and Investments in Health Christopher Todd, Head of Unit, Slovakia European Commission, Directorate General for.
European Union Public Policy Professor John Wilton Lecture 11 Regions and the E.U. public policy process.
Strategic Environmental Assessment for the Operative Programmes Anita Gulam Ana Kovačević Ministry of Environmental and Nature Protection, Republic of.
he transport development progress in Slovenia the EASYCONNECTING hint
Legal Aspects Related to Brownfield Regeneration
Feasibility study on infrastructural interventions in Port of Split
South-East European Space
Expert presentation by:
dr Paweł Wais Deputy Directort Department for Regional Development
Macro-regional strategies Rapporteur: Etele Baráth Dr
Enabling multi-modality and efficient freight logistics
Eurostat Management Plan for Regional and Urban statistics
Biodiversity, Natura 2000 & Green Infrastructure in the Regional Policy Mathieu Fichter European Commission, DG Regio Team leader "sustainable.
Environment in Cohesion Policy framework for
Presentation transcript:

Summary of the analysis of the national logistic strategies in the V4 countries Lajos Veres PhD. Chairman Scientific Association for Spatial Development Source: Attila Korompai (author of the part of study)

Comparative analysis of the logistic performance of the V4 countries The logistic performance of the V4 countries will be compared by using the LPI values (overall). The values of LPI and its components for the V4 countries are presented in the star diagrams below based on available data of the World Bank for the years 2007, 2010, 2012 and Source: World Bank

The average logistics performance path of the V4 countries shows an increase from 2007 till 2010, but by 2012 there was a slight decrease. After 2012 the average LPI index has increased again. The dominant values in this path were connected to the Czech and Polish logistics. The path was similar for the Slovak Republic but at a lower level.

The Hungarian path was different, because after 2007 there was a strong decrease till 2010 but after that the path showed a continuous growth, and by 2014 the values of the Czech Republic, Hungary and Poland were quite close to each other. The lowest values were presented by Slovakia. Source: World Bank The overall LPI rank of V4 countries

Infrastructure Based on the infrastructure scores, the Czech Republic had the best values in 2010 and 2014, the second one in 2007, but interestingly was ranked last in This was the year when Poland jumped to the second best place while in other years it was positioned near the last place with Slovakia. Hungary was on the top in 2007 and 2012, in other years it was around the V4 average value.

Regarding the infrastructure, the international position of the Czech Republic has not changed (36) and that of Poland and Slovakia has not improved significantly. It was only Hungary among the V4 countries, whose position was stagnating. Source: World Bank The infrastructure LPI scores of V4 countries

Timeliness Timeliness is a crucial component of the reliability and quality of logistics services. Despite some decrease, the highest values among the V4 countries are still connected to Poland. Source: World Bank Timeliness LPI scores of V4 countries

Similarly to some other LPI scores, Hungary’s score in timeliness decreased from the best value to the worst one, followed by a gradual increase approaching the top value by Slovakia continuously improves its value from the lowest to around the average of the V4 countries. The evaluation of the Czech timeliness shows individual tendencies in relation to its other LPI components. While in 2010 the country received the second best value, after a continuous decrease its value in 2014 was the lowest of the V4 countries.

In each year the best position in timeliness among the V4 countries was achieved by Poland, with the exception of 2007 when Hungary preceded by 6 places. In international comparison, Poland was ranked 2nd in 2010, and 15th in Source: World Bank The timeliness LPI rank of V4 countries

Overall LPI scores and rank values of the V4 neighboring countries in 2014 Source: World Bank

Common approaches to logistics and transport in the country strategies Each strategy emphasizes the long-term strategic importance of logistics and transport for the national economies and social wellbeing. The contribution to the national economic growth and to the increase of social wellbeing is organic part of the general objectives of each transport and logistics strategy. Common requirement is the close connection to the national (macro level) and European development programs and strategies.

Each strategy was elaborated on governmental initiation and contribution with the participation of various business and NGO organizations. The development along the Trans-European transport corridors to meet the high quality requirements is emphasized in each strategy. On the other side the strategies strongly concentrate on internal transport and logistics. In the national level it is considered necessary to improve connections between the regional centres and the major cities in Europe, and to consolidate internal territorial cohesion, through the improvement of transportation both between the main centres of the country and smaller subregions. The international relations receive attention in most cases in connection with the development of border stations particularly at the Eastern borders.

The system of objectives includes in each strategy (directly or indirectly on various levels): the integrated development of a modern and coherent transport and logistics system, the creation of favorable conditions for the smooth functioning of the transport market, and increasing the sector’s competitiveness. increasing the efficiency and the quality of services and operation, improving the safety and reliability, developing opportunities for multi-modal connections, and multimodal logistic centers, development and integration of urban transport systems on regional and local levels, with the inclusion of rural areas, developing the infrastructure for high speed interurban connections, rational financing solutions.

Opportunities of co-operation between the V4 countries for transport and logistics development The integrated development of the transport systems of individual V4 countries should be realized in harmony not only within the V4 community but it is a requirement on the level of the EU in the frame of the European transport and logistic systems. There are many aspects of this co-ordination from which several important points are listed below: o co-ordination of development along the Trans-European transit corridors on the roads, railways, water- and air transport, different energy networks both in the development of the linear and the nodal components, as well as the technological aspects, o the development of high-speed transport opportunities between national and regional centers in international perspective, o the co-ordination of the development and configuration of safety systems both for various transport braches and logistics,

o in harmony with the EU processes the elaboration of common standardization principles for transport and logistics to improve efficiency and quality of services, as well as to promote innovation processes, o while there is a competition between the V4 countries in the field of transit in East–West relations, the co-operation and co- ordination either in the development of transit network, or in the distribution of transport could increase the efficiency and reliability, o the co-operation in the development of multimodal logistic centers to improve modal split utilization opportunities, o within the EU regulation a V4 level regional co-ordination of regulation systems for transport and logistics, o special field of opportunity to co-operate in education for transport and logistics sector that is included in several development strategies,

o co-ordination of industrial policies from the aspect of the transport and logistics sector (particularly production of transport means, energy policy, information technologies and software development etc.), o co-operation and co-ordination for decreasing environmental risk and impact of the transport and logistics sector, o particular attention has to be given to the impact of climate change in the transport and logistics sector – in this aspect radical change may take place in the role of the ports in Poland for the V4 countries, because they may increase owing to the opening Nordic/polar passage on the sea, o comparative studies to investigate the social impact of transport and logistics, o establishing and operating efficient financial funds and systems for transport and logistics sector development in co-operation with various European funds, o establishing and operating a V4 level body or institution for continuous monitoring and to promote co-operation in transport and logistics development.

Policy recommendations For the sake of efficient concentration of resources the ranking of tasks and the appropriate selection for realisation of projects are necessary. Two evaluation criteria have to be balanced in the frame of this process: priority should be given to eliminate the narrow sections or to those investments which have the largest multiplicative impact. This balance is different either for individual countries or for various branches, or for various LPI components. Therefore the body of national experts have to come to an agreement by keeping the efficiency and interest of the V4 community in view. One of the first steps should be the clarification and co- ordination of the mutually accepted terminological system. This may be connected to the development of the co-ordinated vocational education in this field.

Particular attention has to be devoted to strengthening the V4 aspects of network components in the development strategies. Priorities have to be given to the co-ordinated development of north-south transport lines and border crossing points, co- ordination of developing the safety systems, standardisation and shipment organisation as well as the application of information technologies. To preserve or improve competitiveness of the V4 countries the values gained in other LPI components of individual countries have to be maintained or rather by their further development or modernization stepping forward in ranking. Both for development of the transport and logistics and for the development of international co-operation in economic and environmental issues particular attention has to be devoted to the utilization of industrial multiplicative impacts of the transport and logistics, especially in the field of research and development (i.e. the innovation policy).

Suggestions for the next continuing phase of the project The most urgent and most relevant work for a next project could be the clarification and co-ordination of a common terminology. In the frame of the present project the first steps were necessary to take, but just this problem has raised the idea to make a systematic work on this topic. Based on the results of this analysis of the national strategies the evaluation and selection of those possible development project proposals which may contribute most effectively to the increased competitiveness of the operation of transport and logistics on the territories of the V4 countries. This meets with the EU development policies. The elaboration of a mutually acceptable training program for various level of education.

Studying the environmental and social impact of transport and logistics development on the V4 co- operation and its perspectives. Analyzing the industrial multiplicative impact of the transport and logistics sector. The institutional framework development for promoting the V4 co-operation in transport and logistics development.

Thank you for your kind attention! Lajos Veres PhD. Chairman Scientific Association for Spatial Development