Initial beam size commissioning for ATF2 T.Okugi 3rd ATF2 Project Meeting, KEK 12/ 19/ 2006.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Sha Bai, Philip Bambade, Glen White FJPPL – FKPPL ATF2 workshop LAL, 11~13 February, 2013 Orthogonality of beam waist corrections in the presence of IPBSM.
Advertisements

Summary of the discussion for the commissioning session 2 nd ATF2 Project Meeting KEK, Tsukuba, Japan 6/ 1/ 2006 T.Okugi (KEK)
ILC BDS Alignment and Tuning Studies Glen White SLAC/QMUL 8 November 2005 Progress report and ongoing plans for BDS alignment and tuning strategy.
Status of IPBSM Improvement N. Terunuma, KEK 2012/July/13 ATF2 Weekly Meeting.
-brief report of October runs and some inputs for the Nov/Dec planning – Nobuhiro Terunuma, KEK, ATF ATF session on LCWS13, Tokyo Univ., Nov. 13, 2013.
Analysis of ATF EXT/FF Orbit Jitter and extrapolation to IP (Data of ) ATF2 Project Meeting K. Kubo.
ATF2 Status and Plan K. Kubo ATF2, Final Focus Test for LC Achievement of 37 nm beam size (Goal 1) – Demonstration of a compact final focus.
Vibration measurements on the final doublets and the Shintake Monitor Benoît BOLZON7th ATF2 project meeting, 16/12/08.
1.Beam Tuning Simulation 2.IP Beam Position Stability 2-1 ) Magnet Vibration 2-2 ) IP position jitter subtraction for 2 nd bunch with FONT feedback 2-3.
High Resolution Cavity BPM for ILC final focal system (IP-BPM) ILC2007/LCWS 2007 BDS, 2007/6/1 The University of Tokyo, KEK, Tohoku Gakuin University,
Discussion on Milestone and schedule Toshiyuki Okugi ATF2 commissioning meeting 1 / 7 / 2009.
ATF2 commissioning in Autumn 2009 for discussion Philip Bambade LAL & KEK LCWS09 BDS session Albuquerque, New Mexico October 1, 2009 on behalf of the commissioning.
IPBSM status and plan ATF project meeting M.Oroku.
ATF2 ILC Final Focus Test Beam Line at KEK-ATF References : ATF2 Proposal, KEK Report ATF2 Proposal Vol.2, KEK Report ホームページ:
ATF2 optics … 1 3 rd Mini-Workshop on Nano Project at ATF ATF2 optics, tuning method and tolerances of initial alignment, magnets, power supplies etc.
For Draft List of Standard Errors Beam Dynamics, Simulations Group (Summarized by Kiyoshi Kubo)
ATF2 Magnets ATF2 Magnets 11Mar '08, Weekly MtgCherrill Spencer Status Report ATF2 FD quads 1 Status Report on the ATF2 “Final Doublet” quads being made.
FFS Issues in the 2011 autumn continuous operation Toshiyuki OKUGI (KEK) 1/13/2011 The 11 th ATF2 project meeting SLAC, USA.
Vibration Measurement on the Shintake Monitor and Final Doublet Takashi Yamanaka (Univ. of Tokyo) Benoît Bolzon (LAPP) ATF2 weekly meeting 26 November,
Matching recipe and tracking for the final focus T. Asaka †, J. Resta López ‡ and F. Zimmermann † CERN, Geneve / SPring-8, Japan ‡ CERN, Geneve / University.
T. Okugi and M. WoodleyDecember 21, th ATF2 Project Meeting Summary of Session on Hardware/Devices for Commissioning.
Summary of Commissioning and Tuning session Philip Bambade LAL-Orsay 5 th ATF2 project meeting KEK, 21 December 2007.
ATF2 Optics for the Commissioning Toshiyuki Okugi, KEK 2008 / 10/ 22 ATF2 commissioning meeting.
ATF2 beam commissioning status and beam time request Toshiyuki Okugi 2008 / 11 / 12 ATF2 Commissioning Meeting.
ILC BDS Static Beam-Based Alignment and Tuning Glen White SLAC 1.Aims. 2.Error parameters and other assumptions. 3.Overview of alignment and tuning procedure.
Mark Woodley, SLACATF2 Project March 20-21, Summary of Tuning, Corrections, and Commissioning.
Intermediate  configurations at the IP for commissioning and optimization Sha BAI IHEP/LAL Philip BAMBADE LAL.
ATF2 Accelerator Status and Plans for JFY 2014 runs N. Terunuma, KEK.
8 th Meeting of the ATF TB/SGC 11 June Hardware Status Fast Kicker – FID pulsers have had a reliability problem: this appears to have been solved.
ATF2 Software tasks: - EXT Bunch-Bunch FB/FF - IP Bunch-Bunch FB - FB Integration Status Javier Resta-Lopez JAI, Oxford University FONT meeting 1th August.
ATF2 Commissioning Toshiyuki Okugi 2008 / 7 /9 ATF2 beam commissioning meeting, KEK.
Low emittance tuning in ATF Damping Ring - Experience and plan Sendai GDE Meeting Kiyoshi Kubo.
Plan in summer shutdown Magnet -SF1FF -Swap of QEA magnet - Multipole field of Final Doublet IP-BSM improvement.
Production and Installation Policy of IP-BPM ATF2 Project Meeting, 2006/12/18 Y. Honda, Y. Inoue, T. Hino, T. Nakamura.
Analysis of Multipole and Position Tolerances for the ATF2 Final Focus Line James Jones ASTeC, Daresbury Laboratory.
Commissioning Hardware and IP Configuration of ATF / 12 / 19 ATF2 project meeting at KEK Toshiyuki Okugi (KEK)
IP instrumentation configuration for Autumn 2010 ATF2 runs Toshiyuki OKUGI, KEK 2010 / 7/ 1 10 th ATF2 project meeting.
Mark Woodley, SLACATF2 Project March 20-21, Next version of MAD decks (v3.7): what needs to be added/deleted?
Location of the LW detector- Simulation of the LW signals Lawrence Deacon RHUL ATF2 meeting August 23 rd 2006 KEK.
Task Lists of ATF2 commissioning Toshiyuki Okugi ATF2 Project Meeting 12 / 17 / 2008.
ATF2: Summary of Scheduling Strategy Session Grahame Blair Feedback and Feedforward systems Fast Kicker for ILC bunch train structure Laser-wire Shintake.
ATF2 Magnets ATF2 Magnets 2 Oct 2007Cherrill Spencer Info for ATF2 magnet alignment discussion 1 Information on Alignment Issues for ATF2 magnets: for.
ATF2 beam operation status Toshiyuki OKUGI, KEK The 9 th TB&SGC meeting KEK, 3-gokan Seminar Hall 2009/ 12/ 16.
Summary of Tuning, Corrections, and Commissioning ( Short summary of ATF2 meeting at SLAC in March 2007 ) and Hardware Issues for beam Tuning Toshiyuki.
COMPENSATION OF DETECTOR SOLENOID FIELD WITH L*=4.1M Glen White, SLAC April 20, 2015 ALCW2015, KEK, Japan.
Taikan SUEHARA et al., LCWS2007 & DESY, 2007/06/01 R&D Status of ATF2 IP Beam Size Monitor (Shintake Monitor) Taikan SUEHARA, H.Yoda, M.Oroku,
IP diagnostics Toshiyuki Okugi 2008 / 6 /19 ATF2 Software mini-workshop LAL, Orsay.
Simulation of the α, dispersion, coupling and β multiknobs in large β optics Sha Bai, Philip Bambade, Benoit Bolzon, Javier Resta Lopez
Taikan SUEHARA, Joint Meeting of PRPPC in Honolulu, Hawaii, 2006/10/30 Laser Fringe Stabilization of 35nm IP Beam Size Monitor (Shintake monitor) for ATF2/ILC.
2nd ATF2 Project Meeting (May 30, 2006)M. Woodley [SLAC]1 ATF2 Layout/Optics (v3.3) nBPM (SLAC) nBPM (KEK) FONT Compton / laserwire ODR Existing ATF Extraction.
ATF2 Software tasks: - EXT Bunch-Bunch FB - IP Bunch-Bunch FB - FB Integration Status and plans Javier Resta-Lopez JAI, Oxford University ATF2 commissioning.
ILC BDS Commissioning Glen White, SLAC AWLC 2014, Fermilab May 14 th 2014.
Integrated ATF2 Dynamic Tuning Simulations Glen White, LAL/SLAC ATF2 Software Workshop June 2008 Simulation overview. Tuning for 37nm IP vertical beam.
Hardwares for commissioning 2 nd ATF2 Project Meeting KEK, Tsukuba, Japan 5/ 31/ 2006 T.Okugi (KEK)
Simulation for Lower emittance in ATF Damping Ring Kiyoshi Kubo Similar talk in DR WS in Frascati, May 2007 Most simulations were done several.
IP Tuning Task Updates Glen White, SLAC January
Alignment and stability session
Summary FD Support System
Measurements and analysis of beam parameters at post-IP wire-scanner
Expected hardware status and Priority of the commissioning task
Emittance Diagnostics
For Discussion Possible Beam Dynamics Issues in ILC downstream of Damping Ring LCWS2015 K. Kubo.
ATF2:Summary of Tolerance
ATF2 IP Tuning Task Simulation Updates
3rd ATF2 Project Meeting, December 18-20, 2006
ATF ICB meeting, LCWS08, UIC, Chicago, 11/18/2008
IP configuration session
IR Lattice with Detector Solenoid
Yuri Nosochkov Yunhai Cai, Fanglei Lin, Vasiliy Morozov
Presentation transcript:

Initial beam size commissioning for ATF2 T.Okugi 3rd ATF2 Project Meeting, KEK 12/ 19/ 2006

Initial beam size commissioning It is difficult to measure the beam size above 350nm with Sintake monitor. How to achieve under 350nm beam size at IP - One idea to use IP-BPM was proposed by Glen White yesterday. - It is convenient to have the beam size monitor with 350nm resolution and with wide dynamic range around IP. - This monitor should be as fast as possible. Candidates for the Beam size monitor. - Carbon wire scanners Well-developed devices and wide dynamic range, but pure resolution (1micron ) - Honda BSM ( presented by Y.Honda yesterday) Good resolution, but not wide dynamic range ( micron ? )

We cannot put the BSM at IP, because we will put the Shintake monitor at IP - Where to put the BSM with a few hundred resolution?? If you put the 2 nd IP BSM at s=20cm, sigma_y = 50micron. We don’t have any beam size information from BSM. Beam size profile around IP

The vertical beam size at s=+/-50cm Is 180nm. It is possible to minimize the nonlinear field around IP by using BSM at s=+/-50cm. However, we can make the beam size small at non-IP location by changing the strength of the final doublet, QF1 and QD0. - No change for sextupole field. Shintake monitor BSM1 BSM2 50cm

Simple simulation of beam size tuning Assumed errors 1% strength errors for all quads and sexts No misalignments - QF1 and QD0 fields are set to be ax=ay=0 at s=+/- 50cm. - Sextupole fields were optimized with BSM with 200nm resolution at s=+/- 50cm. - QF1 and QD0 fields are set to be ax=ay=0 at s=0 and measure the beam size. We can achieve comparable beam size to the resolution of both side of BSMs.

Beam position scan for beam size measurement. - Carbon wire scanner needs the beam scan, but Shintake monitor and Honda monitor groups said not to use at the presentation in yesterday. Methods 1; by using sweeping magnet Advantage : Easy to operate Easy to calibrate Disadvantage : We need additional device at crowed location. Methods 2; by using magnet mover. Advantage : No additional devices Disadvantage : We need careful calibration and take care of beam size enhancement.

Simulation results of the vertical position scan by magnet mover Example of the beam size enhancement by mover scan Beam size is very sensitive for magnet position of some quads.

Simulation results of the vertical position scan by magnet mover Magnet Name Step (Dy = 30nm) Scan Range ( < 40nm ) QF5 400nm +/- 850nm QF5A 300nm +/- 4000nm QD4 200nm +/- 3000nm QD4A 200nm +/- 2000nm QD2B 300nm +/- 450nm QF3 2000nm +/- 50nm QD2A 2000nm +/- 50nm QF1 100nm +/- 2200nm QD0 30nm +/- 2100nm Some magnets are narrow scan range. Some magnets are required very small step size for scanning. Other magnets has step size errors from beam optics …

Discussion 1) BSM around IP - Enough space to put BSM around IP ? - Should we prepare the additional BSM, Carbon wire scanners (1micron resolution), Honda monitor for the ATF2 commissioning ? 2) Vertical beam position scan at IP - Enough space to put sweeping magnet between QD0 and IP ? - Should we prepare the sweeping magnet, or use the vertical mover of quads for vertical position scan?