Using Archived Data to Measure Operational Benefits of a System-wide Adaptive Ramp Metering (SWARM) System Data Collection Plan / Experimental Design May.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
VARIABLE SPEED LIMIT DEPLOYMENT EVALUATION I-270/I-255 Traffic and Safety Conference May 12, 2010 Missouri University of Science and Technology and HDR.
Advertisements

T3 Webinar September 2012 Performance Measures Edward J. Smaglik September 18 th, 2012.
Project Prioritization - 1 Project Prioritization Using Paramics Microsimulation: A Case Study for the Alameda County Central Freeway Project Presented.
Beyond Peak Hour Volume-to-Capacity: Developing Hours of Congestion Mike Mauch DKS Associates.
1 NATMEC 2008 Christopher Monsere Kristin Tufte, Robert L. Bertini, and Soyoung Ahn Intelligent Transportation Systems Laboratory Maseeh College of Engineering.
Transportation Data Palooza Washington, DC May 9, 2013 Steve Mortensen Federal Transit Administration Data for Integrated Corridor Management (ICM) Analysis,
Route 28 South of I-66 Corridor Safety and Operations Study Technical Committee Meeting #2 June 25,
1Chapter 9-4e Chapter 9. Volume Studies & Characteristics Understand that measured volumes may not be true demands if not careful in data collection and.
February 9, 2006TransNow Student Conference Using Ground Truth Geospatial Data to Validate Advanced Traveler Information Systems Freeway Travel Time Messages.
Evaluation Tools to Support ITS Planning Process FDOT Research #BD presented to Model Advancement Committee presented by Mohammed Hadi, Ph.D., PE.
June 16, 2004 Dr. Robert Bertini Michael Rose Evaluation of the “COMET” Incident Response Program Oregon Department of Transportation.
1 Statistics of Freeway Traffic. 2 Overview The Freeway Performance Measurement System (PeMS) Computer Lab Visualization of Traffic Dynamics Visualization.
1 Adaptive Kalman Filter Based Freeway Travel time Estimation Lianyu Chu CCIT, University of California Berkeley Jun-Seok Oh Western Michigan University.
Transnow Student Conference February 9, Techniques for Mining Truck Data to Improve Freight Operations and Planning Zachary Horowitz Portland.
Evaluation of Potential ITS Strategies under Non-recurrent Congestion Using Microscopic Simulation Lianyu Chu, University of California, Irvine Henry Liu,
Implementing the ITS Archive Data User Service in Portland, Oregon Robert L. Bertini Andrew M. Byrd Thareth Yin Portland State University IEEE 7 th Annual.
ATMS Advanced Traffic Management Systems. ATMS Intent of ATMS: –Improve operational control –Adapt control strategies to current/expected traffic –Provide.
Month XX, 2004 Dr. Robert Bertini Using Archived Data to Measure Operational Benefits of ITS Investments: Ramp Meters Oregon Department of Transportation.
Can Multi-Resolution Dynamic Traffic Assignment live up to the Expectation of Reliable Analysis of Incident Management Strategies Lili (Leo) Luo, P.E.,
Using Archived Data to Measure Operational Benefits of a System-wide Adaptive Ramp Metering (SWARM) System Task 4: Pilot Study July 31, 2006 Robert Bertini.
Signalized Intersection Delay Monitoring for Signal Retiming SafeTrip-21 Safe and Efficient Travel through Innovation and Partnership in the 21 st Century.
Assessment and Refinement of Real-Time Travel Time Algorithms for Use in Practice Nov 8, 2006.
Evaluating InSync Performance in Microsimulation Aleksandar Stevanovic, PhD, PE Florida Atlantic University Transpo 2012 Bonita Springs, FL October 29,
An Intelligent Transportation System Evaluation Tool in the FSUTMS Regional Demand Modeling Environment By Mohammed Hadi, Florida International University.
ITS Sketch Planning Tool Webinar 2:00 – 4:00 PM January 8, 2009.
4-1 Model Input Dollar Value  Dollar value of time  Accident costs  Fuel costs  Emission costs.
Using Archived Data to Measure Operational Benefits of a System-wide Adaptive Ramp Metering (SWARM) System TAC Meeting December 13, 2006 Robert Bertini.
Estimating Traffic Flow Rate on Freeways from Probe Vehicle Data and Fundamental Diagram Khairul Anuar (PhD Candidate) Dr. Filmon Habtemichael Dr. Mecit.
Benefit-Cost Analysis of the SMART SunGuide Operations in Fort Lauderdale, Florida June 2006 Steve Corbin District ITS Operations Manager FDOT District.
June 2006 ITE District 6 Annual Meeting June Evaluation of Single-Loop Detector Vehicle-Classification Algorithms using an Archived Data User.
Border Data Warehouse. Vancouver, BC Bellingham, WA The Cascade Gateway.
Accuracy in Real-Time Estimation of Travel Times Galen McGill, Kristin Tufte, Josh Crain, Priya Chavan, Enas Fayed 15 th World Congress on Intelligent.
NATMEC June 5, 2006 Comparative Analysis Of Various Travel Time Estimation Algorithms To Ground Truth Data Using Archived Data Christopher M. Monsere Research.
Abstract Transportation sustainability is of increasing concern to professionals and the public. This project describes the modeling and calculation of.
Abstract The Portland Oregon Regional Transportation Archive Listing (PORTAL) is the official intelligent transportation systems data archive for the Portland.
Abstract The Portland Oregon Transportation Archive Listing (PORTAL) archives high resolution traffic data including speed, volume, and occupancy collected.
November 15, 2005 Dr. Robert Bertini Dr. Sue Ahn Using Archived Data to Measure Operational Benefits of a System-wide Adaptive Ramp Metering (SWARM) System.
Dr Hamid AL-Jameel 1 Developing a Simulation Model to Evaluate the Capacity of Weaving Sections.
Travel Time and Reliability: Is Data Quality a Showstopper? The Georgia Navigator Experience Angshuman Guin URS Corporation
Assessment and Refinement of Real-Time Travel Time Algorithms for Use in Practice November 8 th, 2007.
Robert L. Bertini Sirisha M. Kothuri Kristin A. Tufte Portland State University Soyoung Ahn Arizona State University 9th International IEEE Conference.
Company LOGO Ramp Meters. Company LOGO What are Ramp Meters? Part of NaviGAtor, Georgia DOT’s Intelligent Transportation System (ITS) Also includes electronic.
January 23, 2006Transportation Research Board 85 th Annual Meeting Using Ground Truth Geospatial Data to Validate Advanced Traveler Information Systems.
Abstract This project is to evaluate the benefits of the System-Wide Adaptive Ramp Metering (SWARM) system implemented in the Portland Metropolitan area.
April 18, 2006 Dr. Robert Bertini Dr. Sue Ahn Dr. Chris Monsere Using Archived Data to Measure Operational Benefits of a System-wide Adaptive Ramp Metering.
Comparative Analysis Of Various Travel Time Estimation Algorithms To Ground Truth Data Using Archived Data Christopher M. Monsere Research Assistant Professor.
1 Using Automatic Vehicle Location Data to Determine Detector Placement Robert L. Bertini, Christopher Monsere, Michael Wolfe and Mathew Berkow Portland.
Portland State University 11 By Maisha Mahmud Li Huan Evaluation Of SCATS Adaptive Traffic Signal Control System.
Review of the Texas Transportation Institute (TTI) 2007 Urban Mobility Report By Ronald F. Kirby Daivamani Sivasailam TPB Technical Committee October 5,
1 Lessons From Developing an Archived Data User Service: Who Is Using It? Lessons from Developing an Archived Data User Service in Portland, Oregon: Who.
SIGNAL OPTIMIZATION STUDY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT.
1 Using Archived ITS Data to Automatically Identify Freeway Bottlenecks in Portland, Oregon Robert L. Bertini, Rafael J. Fernández-Moctezuma, Jerzy Wieczorek,
2004 Transportation M etropolitan A tlanta P erformance Report – Congestion Measures Presentation to ITS Georgia August 29, 2005.
PORTAL Data Quality & Aggregation Sue Ahn, Kristin Tufte.
Abstract The value of creating an ITS data archive is somewhat undisputed, and a number exist in states and major metropolitan regions in North America.
July 13, 2005ITE District 6 Annual Meeting Using Ground Truth Geospatial Data to Validate Advanced Traveler Information Systems Freeway Travel Time Messages.
1 Intelligent Transportation Systems: Saving Lives, Time and Money PORTAL: Transportation Data Archive Intelligent Transportation Systems Laboratory Deena.
Hcm 2010: BASIC CONCEPTS praveen edara, ph.d., p.e., PTOE
Performance Evaluation of Adaptive Ramp Metering Algorithms in PARAMICS Simulation Lianyu Chu, Henry X. Liu, Will Recker California PATH, UC Irvine H.
Performance Measures Used in the DFW Region – How to Track and Report the M & O Investment and Results AMPO Management and Operations Work Group September.
ITE District 6 June 27, 2006 Incorporating Incident Data into a Freeway Data Archive for Improved Performance Measurement ITE District 6 June 27, 2006.
1 Bottleneck Identification and Forecasting in Traveler Information Systems Robert L. Bertini, Rafael Fernández-Moctezuma, Huan Li, Jerzy Wieczorek, Portland.
1 Toward Implementing Weather- Responsive Advanced Traffic Management and Information Systems Meead Saberi K. Robert L. Bertini Alex Bigazzi 2009 ITS World.
Toward Understanding and Reducing Errors in Real-Time Estimation of Travel Times Sirisha Kothuri, Kristin Tufte, Enas Fayed, Josh Crain, Robert L. Bertini.
Temporal Aggregation Effects on ITS Data Freeway performance measures 1ITS Data Aggregation Effects – Alex Bigazzi Alex Bigazzi, Portland State University.
ATDM Analytical Methods for Urban Streets Urban Streets Subcommittee Meeting January 10, 2016 David Hale.
METRO Dynamic Traffic Assignment in Action COST Presentation ODOT Region 4 April 1,
Soyoung Ahn1, Robert L. Bertini2, Christopher M
Using Ground Truth Geospatial Data to Validate Advanced Traveler Information Systems Freeway Travel Time Messages CTS Transportation Seminar Series, January.
SIMULATION RESULTS.
Presentation transcript:

Using Archived Data to Measure Operational Benefits of a System-wide Adaptive Ramp Metering (SWARM) System Data Collection Plan / Experimental Design May 9, 2006 Robert Bertini Sue Ahn

Agenda Corridors Selected Corridors Selected OR-217 SB OR-217 SB I-205 NB I-205 NB Data Collection Plan Data Collection Plan Evaluation Objectives Evaluation Objectives Data Sources and Tools Data Sources and Tools Data Collection Schedule Data Collection Schedule

OR 217S

Corridors Selected: OR-217S Length of Corridor: 7 miles Length of Corridor: 7 miles SWARM operation hours: SWARM operation hours: 6 – 9:30 AM (and 1 – 7 PM) 6 – 9:30 AM (and 1 – 7 PM) 11 on-ramps, 10 off-ramps 11 on-ramps, 10 off-ramps No. of loop stations: 11 (36 detectors) No. of loop stations: 11 (36 detectors) No loop station at US 26 (uncontrolled) No loop station at US 26 (uncontrolled) No. of cameras: 7 No. of cameras: 7 can be adjusted to allow better views of traffic on on-ramps. can be adjusted to allow better views of traffic on on-ramps. Additional cameras from US 26 and I-5 may also be used. Additional cameras from US 26 and I-5 may also be used.

I-205N

Corridors Selected: I-205N Length of Study Corridor: 9 miles Length of Study Corridor: 9 miles From Gladstone (MP 11) to Division (MP 20) From Gladstone (MP 11) to Division (MP 20) SWARM operation hours: SWARM operation hours: 6 – 10 AM and 1 – 7 PM 6 – 10 AM and 1 – 7 PM 9 on-ramps and 7 off-ramps 9 on-ramps and 7 off-ramps No. of loop stations: 9 (37 detectors) No. of loop stations: 9 (37 detectors) No. of cameras: 10 (one at Stark) No. of cameras: 10 (one at Stark) No direction: Stark, Powell, and Lawnfield No direction: Stark, Powell, and Lawnfield

Data Collection Plan Evaluation Objectives Freeway Conditions Freeway Conditions On-ramp Conditions On-ramp Conditions (Arterial Conditions) (Arterial Conditions) Safety Safety Air Quality Air Quality (Traffic Diversion) (Traffic Diversion)

Data Collection Plan: Freeway Measures Measures Flow, Occupancy, Speed Flow, Occupancy, Speed Travel Time, Delay, VMT, VHT Travel Time, Delay, VMT, VHT Data Sources Data Sources Loop detector data from TMOC: PORTAL Loop detector data from TMOC: PORTAL 20-second readings of Volume, Occupancy, and Speed 20-second readings of Volume, Occupancy, and Speed Use 5-min aggregates (after basic data cleaning) Use 5-min aggregates (after basic data cleaning) Probe runs for travel time and bottleneck Probe runs for travel time and bottleneck

Data Collection Plan: Data Quality Current Data Fidelity Measure Current Data Fidelity Measure Percent good readings (status = 0, 2, and 3) Percent good readings (status = 0, 2, and 3) No activity + OK + Suspicious No activity + OK + Suspicious Satisfactory for SWARM operation Satisfactory for SWARM operation Additional Filtering Additional Filtering Questions Questions (volume, speed, occupancy, status) = (0, 0, 0, 2) What does this mean? (volume, speed, occupancy, status) = (0, 0, 0, 2) What does this mean?

Data Collection Plan: Data Quality Filtering erroneous 20-second readings Filtering erroneous 20-second readings Single variable Single variable Volume > 17 (>3500 vph) Volume > 17 (>3500 vph) Occupancy > 95% Occupancy > 95% Speed > 100 mph Speed > 100 mph Speed < 5 mph Speed < 5 mph Multi-variable relationship Multi-variable relationship Volume = 0 and Speed > 0 Volume = 0 and Speed > 0 Volume > 0 and Speed = 0 Volume > 0 and Speed = 0 Volume = 0 and Occupancy > 0 Volume = 0 and Occupancy > 0

Data Quality: OR-217S March 2006

Data Quality: I-205N March 2006

Data Collection Plan: On-ramps Measures Measures Flow, Speed, Travel Time, Delay Flow, Speed, Travel Time, Delay Queue length Queue length Queue spill-over from on-ramp to arterial Queue spill-over from on-ramp to arterial Frequency of queue spill-over Frequency of queue spill-over Impact to arterials – feasible? (usually network- wide impact) Impact to arterials – feasible? (usually network- wide impact) (Compliance: Violation of metering) (Compliance: Violation of metering)

Data Collection Plan: On-ramps Data Sources Data Sources Loop detector data from TMOC in PORTAL Loop detector data from TMOC in PORTAL At the location of a meter At the location of a meter 20-second readings of Volume 20-second readings of Volume Use 5-min aggregates Use 5-min aggregates Road tubes (or other count device) Road tubes (or other count device) At the entrances to on-ramps: 2 at each entrance to detect queue spill-over At the entrances to on-ramps: 2 at each entrance to detect queue spill-over Uncontrolled on-ramp (e.g. US 26 on OR-217S) Uncontrolled on-ramp (e.g. US 26 on OR-217S) Measure queue length, travel time, and delay (using queueing theory) if there is no spill-over Measure queue length, travel time, and delay (using queueing theory) if there is no spill-over

Data Collection Plan: On-ramps Data Sources con’t Data Sources con’t Field observation Field observation Queue length at several busy on-ramps Queue length at several busy on-ramps prioritize on-ramps by volume/queue storage ratio prioritize on-ramps by volume/queue storage ratio a few days with SWARM on and with it off a few days with SWARM on and with it off Speed measurement using radar gun Speed measurement using radar gun For the on-ramp with error in speed measurement (OR-217S, Walker Rd (Lane 1)) For the on-ramp with error in speed measurement (OR-217S, Walker Rd (Lane 1)) Quantify systematic error to calibrate measurement Quantify systematic error to calibrate measurement

Data Collection Plan: On-ramps Data Sources con’t Data Sources con’t Field metering rates – TMOC ? Field metering rates – TMOC ? Ramp meter on and off times Ramp meter on and off times SWARM on and off times (communication failure) SWARM on and off times (communication failure) CCTV cameras (video inventory during peaks) CCTV cameras (video inventory during peaks) Limited number of VCRs (How many?) Limited number of VCRs (How many?) Back-up source for malfunctioning loops Back-up source for malfunctioning loops Queue length Queue length Ramp-meter violations (probably not all locations) Ramp-meter violations (probably not all locations)

Data Collection Plan: Safety Measures: Measures: Number and Duration of Incidents by Number and Duration of Incidents by Metering type (SWARM vs. Pre-timed) Metering type (SWARM vs. Pre-timed) Incident type (Collision, Flat tire, etc.) Incident type (Collision, Flat tire, etc.) Vehicle type (Car, Van, Semi-truck, etc.) Vehicle type (Car, Van, Semi-truck, etc.) Severity (fatality, property damage only, etc.) Severity (fatality, property damage only, etc.) Data Sources Data Sources ATMS incident database (1995 – 2006 ?) ATMS incident database (1995 – 2006 ?) ODOT/PDOT crash database (1995 – 2004): only before data and no duration ODOT/PDOT crash database (1995 – 2004): only before data and no duration

Data Collection Plan: Air Quality Measures Measures Fuel Consumptions Fuel Consumptions Engine Emissions Engine Emissions No additional data collection is necessary No additional data collection is necessary Use existing estimation models Use existing estimation models Input data: volume, speed, etc. Input data: volume, speed, etc.

Data Collection Schedule Phase 1 (SWARM OFF): 2 weeks Phase 1 (SWARM OFF): 2 weeks Phase 2 (SWARM ON): 2 weeks Phase 2 (SWARM ON): 2 weeks Adjustment period? Adjustment period?

Data Collection Efforts Preparation prior to phase 1 Preparation prior to phase 1 Placement of road tubes Placement of road tubes Test data stream before study Test data stream before study CCTV camera adjustment (angle, zoom, etc.) CCTV camera adjustment (angle, zoom, etc.) Field observation plan Field observation plan Selection of busy on-ramps Selection of busy on-ramps Days and times for field observation Days and times for field observation