Understanding by Design grant wiggins & jay mctighe

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Differentiated Instruction (DI) Meets Understand by Design (UbD) UB EDUC- 503 May 29, 2012.
Advertisements

Differentiated Instruction (DI) Meets Understand by Design (UbD) UB EDUC- 503 October 15, 2012.
Performance Assessment
Understanding by Design Stage 3
Assessment In P.E. A Backward Design.
Transdisciplinary Units What is the meaning of Transdisciplinary?
Understanding by Design
Understanding by Design
Ackward esign. Teachers are designers. The effectiveness of their designs corresponds to whether they have accomplished their goals for the end users.
Understanding by Design Planning Instruction Stage Three Prepared for Mercer University EDUC621 by Sherah B. Carr, Ph.D Information adapted from training.
An approach to curriculum designed to engage students in inquiry and uncovering ideas.
Understanding by Design An Overview by Eduardo M. Valerio, Ph.D.
Understanding by Design by Grant Wiggins & Jay McTighe Chapter 7: What is “Uncoverage”? Created & Presented by Jane Cook, EASTCONN Staff Development/Literacy.
It defines acceptable evidence of student’s attainment of desired results. It determines authentic performance tasks that the student is expected to do.
Developing a Rubric for the Design of Learning Spaces: Starting Points
1 Backward Design, Assessment, and Rubrics Based on Understanding by Design By Grant Wiggins and Jay McTighe.
What is Understanding? Understanding is … a mental construct.. An abstraction made by the human mind to make sense of many distinct pieces of knowledge.
The mere imparting of information is not education. Above all things, the effort must result in helping a person think and do for himself/herself. Carter.
Introduction to UbD Stages 1
Copyright (C) 1998 by the Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development. All rights reserved. Workshop Understandings Effective curriculum design.
Redding Elementary School Integrated Learning Experiences Summer 2011 Presentation created by Christopher Wermuth 2011.
Understanding the Process and the Product Professional Development Spring, 2012.
SATURDAY, JANUARY 9, 2010 MARCIE TAYLOR-THOMA World History Writers’ Training.
UBD Backward Planning Understanding by Design - The Backward Planning Model Based on the work of Grant Wiggins and Jay McTighe Plan Backwards!
The 5 E Instructional Model
Design Down Curriculum Planning & Cooperative Learning Douglas Gosse, PhD Nipissing University, Office H120 TEL: ,
Understanding By Design (UbD) An overview Excerpted in large part from Making the Most of Understanding by Design By John L. Brown.
Understanding by Design
From Standards to Transfer. Parkway Mission All students are capable learners who transfer their prior learning to new demands, in and out of school.
USING BACKWARD DESIGN FOR UNIT AND LESSON PLANS * Based on the thinking that if everyone has a clear picture of where they are going before they start,
UNDERSTANDING BY DESIGN
BACKWARD DESIGN Information in the presentation is from Understanding by Design Grant Wiggins and Jay McTighe.
Integrating Differentiated Instruction & Understanding by Design: Connecting Content and Kids by Carol Ann Tomlinson and Jay McTighe.
Session 2: Are We There Yet? Integrating Understanding by Design and Historical Thinking.
Using Understanding by Design
Backward Design Learning with a purpose. Today’s Essential Question How do teachers create student-centered standards-based thematic units that engage.
恭喜恭喜 Gōngxǐ Yan-Fei Li, Jukay Lu, MingMing Zhang, Jingya Zhong.
PLANNING for INQUIRY Backward Design Information to Knowledge Journey Wiggins and McTighe, Kuhlthau, Todd.
The Backward Design Process
Understanding by Design a.k.a. Backward Design
Narrowing the Challenge: Revisiting Understanding by Design Cherie McCollough VaNTH-PER Professional Development June 1, 2004.
Matthew Birtel EDUC 503 FALL 2012 November 27, 2012.
UbD - Stage 3 Planning for Learning. Review Stage 1 : Identify Desired Results –Big Idea: Teach so that others may understand –Essential Question: Do.
Designing Cooperative Learning Applications Karl A. Smith University of Minnesota  Felder & Brent B Course Design  Wiggins & McTighe B Understanding.
Welcome to EDUC 461! Integrated Methods I: Processes Mercer University McDonough RAC.
A Parent’s Guide to Formative Assessment Communication is Key! Education is shared between the home and the school. Good communication is important as.
Understanding By Design
Understanding By Design Stage 1 BestPrep TIW Monday, July 30, 2012 What is UbD?
Understanding by Design the ‘big ideas’ of UbD Copyright: 2002, Grant Wiggins and Jay McTighe.
3 Stages of Backward Design 1. Identify desired results. 2. Determine acceptable evidence. 3. Plan learning experiences & instruction.
Understanding by Design Developed by Grant Wiggins and Jay McTighe Published by the Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development (ASCD) A.K.A.
UNDERSTANDING BY DESIGN
21 st Century Learning and Instruction Session 2: Balanced Assessment.
Cohort Curriculum Spring 2010 ESU 6. Goals Participants will develop curriculum products. Participants will design collaboration networks.
Understanding by Design* *Design – (v) To have purpose and intentions; to plan and execute (Oxford English Dictionary)
Effective lesson planning and design By Debora Chappelle.
T-527 Fall 2005 Developing Curriculum for Deep Learning How is learning assessed? Ongoing assessment and educative evaluation 10 November 2005.
“To begin with the end in mind means to start with a clear understanding of your destination. It means to know where you’re going so that you better understand.
Understanding by Design UMS Opening Day Why UbD?
Understanding by Design DESIGNING CURRICULUM & INSTRUCTION.
Understanding by Design
Understanding by Design
NGSS Standards and Disciplinary Core Ideas
Understanding by Design “Backwards Design”
Understanding By Design Introduction September 17th , 2009
Understanding by Design
Understanding By Design
UbD: Stages of Backward Design
Backward Design, Assessment, and Rubrics
Instructional Program Alignment
Presentation transcript:

Understanding by Design grant wiggins & jay mctighe Chapter 10: Teaching For Understanding

Design, v., - To have purposes and intentions; Understanding, n., - The act of one who understands something, in any sense of the verb; knowledge; discernment; comprehension; interpretation; explanation. - Webster's Revised Unabridged Dictionary Design, v., - To have purposes and intentions; to plan and execute - Oxford English Dictionary

Backward Design, n., an approach to designing a unit that begins with the end in mind and designs toward that end. - Higgins & McTighe

Stage 1: Identify Desired Results Consider goals, big ideas & identify the targeted understandings What should students know, understand, and be able to do? What “enduring” understandings are desired?

Determine Acceptable Evidence Stage 2: Determine Acceptable Evidence How will we know if students have achieved the desired results and met the standards? What will we accept as evidence of student understanding and proficiency? Think in terms of: NOT Assessments to Content to be covered document and validate or understanding Learning activities

Teaching is a means to an end Stage 3: Plan Learning Experiences & Instruction What prerequisite knowledge & skills will students need in order to perform effectively and achieve desired results? What will need to be taught & coached, and how should it best be taught, in light of performance goals? What materials and resources are best suited to accomplish these goals? Is the overall design coherent & effective? Teaching is a means to an end

What is the teacher’s classroom role in helping students understand ? Based on what we know … What is the teacher’s classroom role in helping students understand ?

Teaching = Learning It is not teaching that causes learning … Understanding is the result of the learner successfully making sense of the teaching.

The goal is to make an idea How can we, as teachers, “uncover” our ideas through well-designed learning experiences? The goal is to make an idea accessible and real to the students, regardless of the teaching methods.

This sentence appears, in passing, unexplained, as part of the account of the Revolutionary War in a commonly used U.S. textbook: “Washington had the daring to put [his patriots] to good use , too, as he broke the rules of war by ordering a surprise attack on the enemy in their winter quarters.”

Nothing more is said regarding the “rules of war”. Great classroom discussion points … How can there be rules for all-out battles to the death? And if surprise attacks were something wrong, how did soldiers normally fight? And why?

Possible essential questions … Is all fair in war? How can we be sure that we aren’t being hypocritical when we judge such events? What “rules” exist and by what authority? Have these rules (and crimes) changes over time? What happens (or should happen) when the rules are broken? Is “war crime” a legitimate moral idea or a contradiction in terms – just the vengeance of the victor on the loser?

TEXTBOOKS easily hide the big questions, the issues, the history of the ideas, and the inquiries that led to what we know … The very process needed by the learner to come to an understanding !!!

Textbooks How do we use them? Should we use them? Consider them a resource not the syllabus.

Teacher Student understanding “Uncoverer” of student misunderstandings and persistent performance errors through artful experiences and discussions Teacher Mistakes are not avoidable or shameful key episodes in gaining understanding Student

Usefulness of CFU exercises & Periodic Assessments Create situations where students ask questions, develop strategies for solving problems, and communicate with one another … explaining their answers and discussing how they arrive at their conclusions Assessing understanding through discussion, projects, or tests that demand explanation and extended writing …. Therefore incorporating ELAs. Value of self assessment Through the use of Rubrics

Consider this … Teacher as coach More a guide & assessor than a giver of information Authentic intellectual work involves original application of knowledge and skills, rather than just routine use of facts & procedures.

“Understanding develops as a result of ongoing inquiry and rethinking

“I hear, I forget. I see, I remember. I do, I understand “I hear, I forget. I see, I remember. I do, I understand.” - Chinese Proverb “I never teach my pupils, I only attempt to provide the conditions in which they can learn.” - Albert Einstein

Filters (Design Criteria) What the Final Design Accomplishes The big picture of a Backward Design approach Key Design Question Design Construction Filters (Design Criteria) What the Final Design Accomplishes Stage 1:  What is worthy and requiring of understanding? National Standards. State Standards. PGCPS Standards. Regional topic opportunities. Teacher expertise and interest. - Enduring ideas - Opportunities for authentic, discipline-based work. - Uncoverage - Engaging.   Unit framed around enduring understandings and essential questions. Stage 2:  What is evidence of understanding? Six facets of understanding. Continuum of assessment types. - Valid - Reliable. - Sufficient. - Authentic work. - Feasible. - Student friendly Unit anchored in credible and educationally vital evidence of the desired understandings. Stage 3:  What learning experiences and teaching promote understanding, interest, and excellence? Research-based repertoire of learning & teaching strategies. Essential & enabling knowledge and skill. - WHERE is it going? - Hook the students. - Explore and equip. - Rethink and revise. - Exhibit and evaluate. Coherent learning experiences and teaching that will evoke and develop the desired understandings, promote interest, and make excellent performance more likely.