The role of impact assessment in promoting Policy Coherence for Development Meeting of the national focal points for Policy Coherence for Development 1.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Niels Keijzer PCD focal points meeting OECD, 9 February 2012 Promoting Policy Coherence for Development Exploring new opportunities for measurement.
Advertisements

Meeting of National Focal Points for PCD 9 February 2012 Karen Jorgensen Institutional mechanisms for PCD Lessons from DAC Peer Reviews.
SGA1 – The evolving role of UNAIDS in a changing financial environment UNAIDS has adapted to a new funding environment and developed strong and positive.
Civil Society Days Strengthening democratic spaces for civil society in the European public sphere Civil dialogue practices in Europe The example.
FOREST EUROPE Preparing the Sixth Ministerial Conference, including a possible legal instrument on forests EFI Annual Conference 15 September 2010, Dresden,
Progress Toward Impact Overall Performance Study of the GEF Aaron Zazueta GEF Evaluation Office Hanoi, March 10, 2010.
Key dilemmas for advancing PCD Dr. Paul Engel, Director, ECDPM 13 th June 2013 Insights from developments in national PCD systems.
Policy Coherence for Development. POLICY COHERENCE FOR DEVELOPMENT „…means working to ensure that the objectives and results.
Towards a more effective Belgian Development Cooperation: concentration, specialisation, task division Geert Laporte Assises of the Belgian Development.
The Outcomes of the Fourth High Level Forum on Aid Effectiveness (HLF-4) Aid Quality & Architecture Division Development Co-operation Directorate OECD.
The integrated management of human activities under the Marine Strategy Framework Directive Carlos Berrozpe Garcia European Commission (DG ENV) Greenwich,
INTEGRATION POLICY IN THE EUROPEAN UNION THE QUESTION OF COMPETENCE John Handoll.
David Halldearn, ERGEG Conference on Implementing the 3 rd Package 11 th December 2008 Implementating the 3rd Package: An ERGEG Consultation paper.
A Common Immigration Policy for Europe Principles, actions and tools June 2008.
Local authorities’ role in implementing European Employment Strategy - case Finland Mr. Lauri Lamminmäki, Senior Adviser Association of Finnish Local and.
GEO Work Plan Symposium 2012 ID-05 Resource Mobilization for Capacity Building (individual, institutional & infrastructure)
Integrated Growth Pillar 1 of the SEE 2020 Strategy SEEIC Meeting Sarajevo, 19 June 2013.
New partnership dynamics in a changing Cohesion policy context Laura Polverari and Rona Michie Meeting with Economic and Social Partners European Commission,
GEF National Dialogue Initiative Sub-Regional Workshop for GEF Focal Points in Middle East, North Africa & West Asia Cairo, Egypt, October 2009.
Consultation Workshop Module 2 Economic and Social Research Foundation (ESRF) & European Centre for Development Policy Management ECDPM, 17 September 2014.
PANEL III: The Istanbul Convention – Objectives and Implementation Coordinated efforts - Toward new European standards in protection of women from gender.
GUIDELINES “TOWARDS SUSTAINABLE URBAN DEVELOPMENT” Nairobi, January, 2005.
Strengthening Institutional Frameworks for Sustainable Development Pre-event on Institutional Frameworks for Sustainable Development in Africa: Integrating.
1 Consultative Meeting on “Promoting more effective partnership between INGOs and other CSOs” building on Oxfam’s “Future Roles of INGO in Cambodia”, 24.
O F F I C E O F T H E Auditor General of British Columbia 1 OAG Review of the Performance Agreements between MoHS and Health Authorities.
11 Workshop on Establishment of a Continental Accreditation Agency for Higher Education in Africa 10 – 11 April 2013, Addis Ababa Rationale for Establishing.
Assistance to Coordinated Assessment Process 1 Feedback from consultations with NDMOs.
Study on EU Mechanisms to Promote PCD Round Table on the Coherence of Belgian External Policy Belgian Federal Parliament 14 February 2008 James Mackie,
The EU Water Initiative National Policy Dialogues in Armenia & Moldova Pierre Hecq UNDP Water-CoP Meeting Almaty, October 2007.
Development and Cooperation EU Structured Dialogue with Civil Society and Local Authorities Angelo Baglio Head of Unit D2 "Civil Society and Local Authorities"
Expert group meeting on draft delegated act on the European code of conduct on partnership (ECCP) under cohesion policy
Development and Cooperation - EuropeAid Future directions in EU development policy Françoise Moreau DG Development and Cooperation – Europe Aid European.
Mozambique The United Nations At Work THE UN REFORM In Mozambique DaO Evaluability Study, Report and Recommendations May 2009.
111 Synthesis of Questionnaires. Thematic concentration  Most of the new member states support the suggested principle while maintaining the element.
Towards comprehensive responses to interrelated global challenges Dr Ir. Paul G.H. Engel Director ECDPM 12 November 2014.
Promoting Policy Coherence for Development Do institutional mechanisms matter? workshop, Brussels, 26 April 2012 Niels Keijzer.
1 E u r o p e a n C o m m i s s i o nDirectorate General Environment EU Water Initiative The EU Water Inititative The EECCA component.
1 E u r o p e a n C o m m i s s i o nDirectorate General Environment EU Water Initiative The EU Water Inititative The EECCA component National Policy Dialogue.
Monitoring the Paris Declaration in 2011 Preliminary Findings Working Party on Aid Effectiveness Paris, 5-8 July 2011.
Second African CSO consultation on AU/EU joint Strategy, 19 October 2007 Issues arising from the Strategy and the Action Plan Marie-Laure de Bergh, ECDPM.
Aid Coordination Roundtable Meeting 09 July 2009 Accra Agenda of Action and The Paris Declaration.
1.Policy Coherence for Development (PCD) 2.EU Coherence Programme 3.Interest for National Platforms 4.Training and Lobby Opportunities Training and Lobby.
Delivering results for PCD? Danish experiences Presentation April 2012.
A Primer on the CSO Development Effectiveness Process October
Kathy Corbiere Service Delivery and Performance Commission
Madrid Forum 6-7 November 2008 Implementating the 3rd Energy Package: An ERGEG Consultation paper Lord Mogg, ERGEG chairman.
Policy Coherence for Development at the level of the European Union CNCD seminar on PCD 26 April 2012 Blandine Bouniol CONCORD.
European Disability Strategy Disability Strategy Adopted EC - November main areas key actions / each area to meet general objectives.
Paris, Accra, Busan. Paris Declaration of 2005 Provides foundation for aid effectiveness agenda. Introduces aid effectiveness principles which remain.
FAO’s role in enabling effective food security and nutrition policies Mark McGuire Senior Programme Coordinator, SO1 team member, ESD, FAO-HQ FSN Forum.
Bangladesh Joint Country Assistance Evaluation: Assessing Total ODA at the Country Level Presentation to OECD DAC November 2006 Bruce Murray Director General.
European Health Forum Gastein Workshop International Quality Comparisons 6 October 2005 "Measuring the patient's perspective: Current and future work in.
1 Sharing information on implementation of national strategies and reporting on progress towards biodiversity targets between global, regional and national.
Council of Europe Child Participation Assessment Tool Agnes von Maravic Children’s Rights Division Council of Europe Based on slides prepared by Gerison.
External Action: Thematic Programme For Environment and Sustainable Management of Natural Resources including Energy Structure: I- INTRODUCTION II - CONTEXT.
Session 3:10 – SDG Towards Coherence From PCD to PCSD James Mackie PhD Head of Learning & Quality Support, ECDPM Visiting Professor, IRD Dept, College.
The Global Partnership Monitoring Framework Purpose and Scope of Monitoring, Role of Participating Countries UNDP-OECD support team Copenhagen, 12 June,
FlorenceForum November 2008
Capacity-building Initiative for Transparency
Spanish Presidency: Priorities in the field of Cohesion Policy
Session 3 The monitoring framework
Overview of working draft v. 29 January 2018
Overview of Initiative
The role of the ECCP (1) The involvement of all relevant stakeholders – public authorities, economic and social partners and civil society bodies – at.
SOCIAL DIALOGUE WITHIN THE SCOPE OF EUPAN
EU Marine Strategy DG Environment B.1.
European Commission, DG Environment, Marine Unit
Concept paper on the assessment of WFD River Basin Management Plans
Public consultation on the Joint EU-Africa Strategy
Towards PCSD: building on the experience of the European Commission in the promotion and the implementation of PCD Hellenic MFA and Hellenic Aid, 7 May.
Presentation transcript:

The role of impact assessment in promoting Policy Coherence for Development Meeting of the national focal points for Policy Coherence for Development 1 October 2010, OECD Paris

Introduction ECDPM aims to improve relations between the EU and countries in Africa, the Caribbean and the Pacific Selected work on PCD since 2003: Scoping Study and Joint Evaluation of EU efforts to promote PCD (Led by France) /2007 Evaluation of the Dutch PCD Unit /2009 Impact study of EU policies in six developing countries and, review of EU progress, contributions to EU Report on PCD Discussion paper: analysis of Working Paper and assessment of PCD – 2010 (copies in the room) PCD is about development effectiveness, not aid

© OECD 2008 ■ OECD Policy Coherence Cycle We know what to do; are we doing it?

General agreement on what is needed to ensure PCD 1)Broad political commitment to, and action on PCD, across countries and parties 2)National and international administrative and policy coordination mechanisms for screening relevant policy decisions, creating synergies and resolving incoherencies 3)Adequate systems for monitoring, analysis and reporting

Achieving PCD is a complex, political process Source: ECDPM

Achieving PCD is a political process; always diverse strategic interests involved; it needs permanent broad political momentum to be able to advance Complexity of multi-stakeholder processes leading to PCD, or lack of it; continuous feedback is essential Legal ambiguity: i.e. EU has legal obligation to make an effort (Lisbon Art 208), yet no obligation to be successful For the EU: The absence of clear PCD objectives, indicators and baselines; adds to ambiguity So far, little interest in systematic evidence-based monitoring, research and impact assessment for PCD What makes achieving PCD impact so difficult?

Lack of EU operational PCD focus was recognized by the EU Council in November 2009: “Further work is needed to set up a more focused, operational and result-oriented approach to PCD” It also recognised the need to create political momentum, and was served by the new European Parliament, who took up PCD very seriously, i.e. agreeing on a standing rapporteur The Work Program prepared by EC between end- December 09 and April 2010 however received a lukewarm reception from the Council of Ministers in June. EU: Consensus on the way forward?

Screening texts for potential synergies/ incoherencies between new policies (e.g. comparing with Treaty provisions) Questionnaires/interviews to monitor progress regarding PCD implementation Incident-based studies (finding our what went wrong; localized evidence of the impact of one policy) Composite indices based on available quantitative data Very few empirical studies/evaluations of impact of more than one international policy (incipient efforts EC) - complex and resource-intensive Current practices for assessing PCD

Vital elements for assessing impact are still missing Any impact assessment or report is as good as the information/field data it is based upon No clear commitment as yet to gather field- based evidence on PCD impact in a systematic way; i.e. no PCD focal points in EU Delegations Regional and in-country PCD/development impact assessment can only be organised jointly with partners; incipient efforts yet no agreed upon joint frameworks/spaces available No effective recourse mechanisms for those adversely affected (Art 12 CPA)

Some ideas for improving PCD impact assessment Strengthening ‘across-policy’ linkages between (1) ex-ante development impact assessments, (2) ex-post joint evaluations and (3) joint programming and monitoring systems Increase available resources for (i) methodology development, (ii) field data gathering (iii) multi-actor information production and exchange, (iv) specialized components in (joint) development impact assessments Systematically inform on PCD results, the global public and governance fora, in order to enable political debate and momentum for development effectiveness Enhance multi-stakeholder monitoring of PCD impact, including recourse mechanisms for those who feel affected by international policies

Thank you! For more information about ECDPM’s work on ACP-EU relations please visit: Paul Engel – The OECD should lead on developing and promoting an evidence-based PCD, i.e. development impact, assessment framework