Innovation Web 2.0 By Jeffery Hammond EDUC 7101 Instructor Dr. Robert Hancock

Stages of Innovation Stage 1: Problem or Need Stage 2: Research Stage 3: Development Stage 4: Commercialization Stage 5: Diffusion and Adoption Stage 6: Consequences

Stage 1: Problem or Need  Visual Learners  Multi-taskers  Use technology to express  Use instant messages and text messages to interact

Stage 1: Problem or Need  Collaboration  Flexibility  One to Many Communication  Common Work Place

Stage 2: Research Findings  Open Data  Architecture of Participation  Rich User Experience

Stage 2: Research Lead Thinkers  Darcy DiNucci  John Battelle  Tim O’Reiley

Stage 3: Development of Web 2.0  Asynchronous JavaScript  Ajax (XML)  Adobe Flash  Adobe Flex  Java Script/Ajax

What is AJAX

Development Problems  Thinking every problem has a technological solution  Hackers could invade personal files  Cool application, no business model

Commercialization  Improve collaboration with consumers with social networks  Offer free services using advertisement to finance  Marketers paying for information of users

Diffusion Of Web 2.0 Timeline  Knowledge Stage  Persuasion Stage  Decision Stage 2010  Implementation Stage  Confirmation Stage Information for timeline came from 20-adoption-curve /

Adoption and the S-Curve

Communication Channels  Wikis  Online Communities  Social Networking  Virtual Assistant  Real Simple Syndication  Avatars  Crowdsourcing  communications.tmcnet.com/topics/dynamic- enterprise/articles/ leveraging-web-20-tools- social-media-enhance-customer.htm

What is a Wiki?

What is Social Networking

Perceived Attributes of Innovation INNOVATORS & EARLY ADOPTERS  Technology Companies -  Financial Services  Technology Efficient Teachers

Andrew McAfee Web 2.0 Early Adopters

Perceived Attributes of Innovation LAGGARDS  Veteran Teachers – Set in their ways and are scared to break their comfort level  Teachers who fear technology  Skeptics

Perceived Attributes of Innovation CRITICAL MASS  Compatibility- Teachers will be more likely to adopt Web 2.0 tools if they are able to connect them with “existing values, past experiences, and needs of potential adopters” (Rogers, 2003)  Trial ability- “If an innovation can be designed so as to be tried more easily, it will have a more rate of adoption” (Rogers, 2003)

Critical Mass  Web 2.0 has reached critical mass  Students use – Social networking – Wikis – Blogs – Google docs – E-Portfolios  Web 3.0 is developing

Change Agents Key Change Agents: Teachers an administrators that are willing to address the needs of students Use of Seven Roles: Identify and discuss a need Exchange information with others that can help Analyzing the problem Develop possible solutions and began action Determine level of stability and respond accordingly

Champion’s Role Need For Web 2.0 In Education Collaboration Hands on Participatory learning Learner centered

Champion’s Role Matching Programs With Need Podcasts Blogs Wikis RSS Social Networking