1 Final Report on WTF-CEOP JAXA Prototype system Satoko Horiyama MIURA JAXA/Earth Observation Research Center.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
WTF-CEOP JAXA Prototype Demo (Coordinated Energy and water cycle Observation Project) May 23, 2007 Satoko Horiyama MIURA – JAXA Ben Burford - RESTEC.
Advertisements

1 NASA CEOP Status & Demo CEOS WGISS-25 Sanya, China February 27, 2008 Yonsook Enloe.
ECOOP Data Management System (T2.2/WP2) Declan Dunne 13 th February 2008, Athens.
Integrating NOAA’s Unified Access Framework in GEOSS: Making Earth Observation data easier to access and use Matt Austin NOAA Technology Planning and Integration.
HydroServer A Platform for Publishing Space- Time Hydrologic Datasets Support EAR CUAHSI HIS Sharing hydrologic data Jeffery.
® OGC Web Services Initiative, Phase 9 (OWS-9): Innovations Thread - OPeNDAP James Gallagher and Nathan Potter, OPeNDAP © 2012 Open Geospatial Consortium.
7 +/- 2 Maybe Good Ideas John Caron June (1) NetCDF-Java (aka CDM) has lots of functionality, but only available in Java – NcML Aggregation – Access.
Monitoring the hydrologic cycle in the Sierra Nevada mountains.
CEOP Centralized Data System and integrated analysis tools Kenji Taniguchi 1), Toshihiro Nemoto 2), Eiji Ikoma 3), Masaki Yasukawa 2), Toshio Koike 1)
CEOS/WGISS # 21 、 Budapest, May 8-12, WTF-CEOP Project status May 11, 2006 Osamu Ochiai - JAXA Ben Burford - JAXA/RESTEC.
Integrated Ocean Observing System Data Management and Communications March 2004 The US Integrated Ocean Observing System (IOOS) Plan for Data Management.
The International Surface Pressure Databank (ISPD) and Twentieth Century Reanalysis at NCAR Thomas Cram - NCAR, Boulder, CO Gilbert Compo & Chesley McColl.
Tools for accessing distributed in-situ data collections Donald W. Denbo, NOAA/PMEL-JISAO Jason E. Fabritz, NOAA/PMEL-JISAO Bernard J. Kilonsky, Sea Level.
CEOS/WGISS 20, Kyev, September 12-16, WTF-CEOP Implementation Plan #1 Status (WTF-CEOP first prototype, by JAXA) September 12, 2005 Osamu Ochiai.
Coordinated Energy and water-cycle Observations Peroject A Well Organized Data Archive System Data Integrating/Archiving Center at University of Tokyo.
1 Closing Report on WTF-CEOP Project Team Satoko Horiyama MIURA/JAXA.
Services for an Agricultural Application Shinobu Kawahito JAXA / RESTEC Kengo Aizawa, Satoko Miura JAXA
OPeNDAP and the Data Access Protocol (DAP) Original version by Dave Fulker.
Eric GrahamNathan Yau Staff Ecologist, CENSGraduate Student, Department of Statistics Use CasesSensorBase Coupled Human-Observational Systems Technology.
Unidata’s TDS Workshop TDS Overview – Part II October 2012.
Unidata TDS Workshop TDS Overview – Part I XX-XX October 2014.
CEOS WGISS May 2006 NASA Support for WTF-CEOP Sept 11, 2006 Ken McDonald, NASA Yonsook Enloe, SGT Inc.
CEOP Coordinated Energy and water cycle Observation Project May 14, 2007 Ryousuke Shibasaki – UT Ben Burford - RESTEC.
1 AJAX and Dapper: The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly Joe Sirott PMEL/NOAA.
NOAA’s National Weather Service National Digital Forecast Database: Status Update LeRoy Spayd Chief, Meteorological Services Division Unidata Policy Committee.
1 JAXA Agency Report Oct. 19, 2007 Satoko Horiyama MIURA JAXA/EORC Oct. 19, 2007 Satoko Horiyama MIURA JAXA/EORC.
NcBrowse A Graphical netCDF/OPeNDAP Browser Donald Denbo 1 & John Osborne 2 1 UW/JISAO-NOAA/PMEL, 2 OceanAtlas Software
Coordinated Enhanced Observing Period (CEOP) an Element of WCRPinitiated by GEWEX EOP1: Jul.-Sep EOP3: Oct Sep
1 NOAA IOOS Program Data Integration Framework (DIF) Project Overview Adapted from a brief to the NOAA Data Management Committee August 6, 2008 by Jeff.
1 Dapper and Argo Joe Sirott PMEL/NOAA. 2 What is Dapper? Web server that provides distributed access to in-situ data via OPeNDAP protocol Clients include.
WTF-CEOP Project Task Team JAXA Prototype status May 21, 2007 Satoko Horiyama MIURA - JAXA.
OceanBrowser viewing service, overview and upgrades Alexander Barth (1), Charles Troupin (2), Aida Alvera Azcárate (1), Jean-Marie Beckers (1) (1) University.
Tsukuba, Japan, May 11 – May 15, 2015 CEOS Water Portal Overview and Status Update WGISS-39 Tsukuba, Japan JAXA Shinichi SEKIOKA RESTEC Kaori.
1 NASA CEOP Status & Demo CEOS WGISS-24 Oberpfaffenhofen, Germany October 15, 2007 Yonsook Enloe.
ESIP Federation 2004 : L.B.Pham S. Berrick, L. Pham, G. Leptoukh, Z. Liu, H. Rui, S. Shen, W. Teng, T. Zhu NASA Goddard Earth Sciences (GES) Data & Information.
Soil moisture generation at ECMWF Gisela Seuffert and Pedro Viterbo European Centre for Medium Range Weather Forecasts ELDAS Interim Data Co-ordination.
Jan. 21, 2003APAN 2003 Conference in Fukuoka1 FOREST MONITORING PROTOTYPE SYSTEM USING WEB MAPPING TECHNOLOGY RESTEC Kaori Kuroiwa NASDA Shin-ichi Sobue.
WGISS-40, Sep 28 – Oct 2, 2015 CEOS Water Portal Project Satoko Horiyama MIURA Space Applications and Operations Center (SAOC) JAXA 0.
IODE Ocean Data Portal - ODP  The objective of the IODE Ocean Data Portal (ODP) is to facilitate and promote the exchange and dissemination of marine.
Unidata’s TDS Workshop TDS Overview – Part I July 2011.
NQuery: A Network-enabled Data-based Query Tool for Multi-disciplinary Earth-science Datasets John R. Osborne.
WA-06-05:  Title: Initiate the creation of a coordination mechanism within GEO for global in-situ water observations, including ocean observations, and.
GEOSS ADC GEO Task DA Data Integration and Analysis System Ken McDonald NOAA/NESDIS for: T. Koike, R. Lawford, S. Miura….
An Update on COLA’s Software Development Jennifer M. Adams and Brian Doty.
Vegetation Index Visualization of individual composite period. The tool provides a color coded grid display of the subset region. The tool provides time.
A. Hangan, L. Vacariu, O. Cret, H. Hedesiu Technical University of Cluj-Napoca A Prototype for the Remote Monitoring of Water Parameters.
The TIGGE Model Validation Portal: An Improvement in Data Interoperability 1 Thomas Cram Doug Schuster Hannah Wilcox Steven Worley National Center for.
Distributed Data Analysis & Dissemination System (D-DADS ) Special Interest Group on Data Integration June 2000.
1 Adventures in Web Services for Large Geophysical Datasets Joe Sirott PMEL/NOAA.
GrADS-DODS Server An open-source tool for distributed data access and analysis Joe Wielgosz, Brian Doty, Jennifer Adams COLA/IGES - Calverton, MD
TIGGE Archive Access at NCAR Steven Worley Doug Schuster Dave Stepaniak Hannah Wilcox.
2/18/2016 Data Management Issues Related to Drought Monitoring at Environment Canada Robert Morris Data Analysis and Archive Division Meteorological Service.
Distributed Data Servers and Web Interface in the Climate Data Portal Willa H. Zhu Joint Institute for the Study of Ocean and Atmosphere University of.
March 2004 At A Glance The AutoFDS provides a web- based interface to acquire, generate, and distribute products, using the GMSEC Reference Architecture.
1 WTF-CEOP Project Table of Contents 1. Overall Status : Satoko Miura [15 min] 2. JAXA Prototype System [30min] (1) Status: Satoko Miura (2) Demonstration:
Bill SahrNSF Review May , EVLA Monitor & Control.
1 2.5 DISTRIBUTED DATA INTEGRATION WTF-CEOP (WGISS Test Facility for CEOP) May 2007 Yonsook Enloe (NASA/SGT) Chris Lynnes (NASA)
1. Overview and Status Update (Satoko) : 10min 2. Demonstration (Yoshi) : 20min 3. New Architecture (Yoshi): 15min 4. Q&A, Discussion (All) : 15min 1.
GO-ESSP The Earth System Grid The Challenges of Building Web Client Geo-Spatial Applications Eric Nienhouse NCAR.
NOAA IOOS SOS Implementations in 2008 Jeff de La Beaujardière, PhD NOAA IOOS Program DIF Sr Systems Architect.
The TIGGE Model Validation Portal: An Improvement in Data Interoperability 1 Thomas Cram Doug Schuster Hannah Wilcox Michael Burek Eric Nienhouse Steven.
WTF-CEOP JAXA Prototype Demo September 11, 2006 Satoko Horiyama MIURA – JAXA Ben Burford - RESTEC.
OGC’s role in GEO: Results from the Architectural Implementation Pilot (AIP) George Percivall Open Geospatial Consortium GEO Task IN-05 Coordinator
Data Browsing/Mining/Metadata
Software Overview Sonja Vrcic
Global Precipitation Data Access, Value-added Services and Scientific Exploration Tools at NASA GES DISC Zhong Liu1,4, D. Ostrenga1,2, G. Leptoukh4, S.
CEOP/IGWCO Joint Meeting, Feb.28  March 4, University of Tokyo, Japan
National Water Model (Provided by NOAA)
AIP-6 Water Services CEOS Water Portal integrating with GEO DAB
WTF-CEOP Task Team Table of Contents
Presentation transcript:

1 Final Report on WTF-CEOP JAXA Prototype system Satoko Horiyama MIURA JAXA/Earth Observation Research Center

2 Contents System Overview Lessons & Learned

3 System Ovserview Purpose : to provide user-friendly access to satellite, in-situ and global gridded model output data. Operational since June 2005, upgraded in March, Two entry points on the JAXA WTF-CEOP web site ( for the “Flood monitoring service for Hue, Vietnam” and the other for the “Distributed Data Integration Prototype System”.

4 Flood monitoring service for Hue, Vietnam Focusing on a serious flood that occurred in Users can acquire various information such as the area covered by water, precipitation amount, stream flow information and population density during the flood period in order to understand the damage and also estimate the risk of future floods.

5 System Configuration Web Browser Client Software WMS WCS TRMM 3B42 data (precipitation) WCS Gateway (creating a time series data) Jblob Model Output Data (precipitation) Base map GIS data etc

6 In-situ Data Station (Kim Long) Example

7 Distributed Data Integration Prototype System Handle satellite data, in-situ data, model output data and MOLTS data. Basic functions Access data from distributed archive sites Select data type, location (Reference Site, Station name), variable name, by height or depth, by time range (start time / stop time) “See the data” (plot, animation and view values on the screen) Download data (NetCDF, csv format) Compare in-situ data and MOLTS data Registration (to satisfy CEOP data policy) Tutorial videos and user’s manuals are available on the web site.

8 (i) Satellite Data 250 km x 250 km subset scenes, regridded to Lat/Lon grid, centered over the 35 in-situ data sites Band selection, period selection and download multiple scenes available (ii) In situ Data Four types of CEOP in-situ data from 35 Reference Sites Surface (19 variables), Tower (9 variables), Soil (temperature, moisture), Flux (Sensible Heat, Latent Heat, CO2, Soil Heat Flux) Download of QC flags available (iii) Model Output Data MOLTS – Model Output Location Time Series (time series at model grid point nearest center of in-situ data sites) Gridded Model Output – 2D/3D time series. Model Output, convert from GRIB to NetCDF Available Data

9 Final System Configuration (1/2) Perl Module Ferret NCAR Archive [In-situ] (U.S.) MPI Archive [MOLTS, Model Output] (Germany) CSDIC Archive [Satellite] (Japan) CEOP Data Archives OPeNDAP Interface Custom Interface Web Browser JAXA Prototype: “Distributed Data Integration Prototype System for CEOP ”

10 Final System Configuration (2/2) JavaScript (google maps API).gif Perl Module Backend Application (Ferret) Catalog Meta data (XML) DODS format data Browser DODS serverUser Interface Software Commnand Product http XML request (http) Port “80” Post method

11 Demonstration

12 Lessons & Learned (1/8)

13 Lessons & Learned (2/8) 1.How to collect requests from scientists [Proposal] Focused questions are more effectivewe. For example; Ask scientists what systems they are using for their research Study those systems and made a list of the characteristics, such as the types of data analysis they provided Send the list to them and ask to select or prioritize what they want

14 Lessons & Learned (3/8) 2.Selecting the interface [Proposal] Selecting the “standard” interface is very useful.

15 Lessons & Learned (4/8) 3.Cooperation with each data center [Proposal] Frequent discussions with data centers, especially about interface, formats and protocols are very important and useful to system development.

16 Lessons & Learned (5/8) 4.Open Source software [Proposal] A kind of “limit test” is recommended before selection of open source software.

17 Lessons & Learned (6/8) 5.Transition to operation How to transition from a prototype system to an operational system is a big task. This next step is very important for us and is still unresolved.

18 Lessons & Learned (7/8) 6.Schedule [Proposal] To emphasize gathering all required information as early as possible in the project, in order to minimize the impact and avoid the worst case that the last information causes serious impact on everything.

19 Lessons & Learned (8/8) Summary 1.Focused questions are more effective to collect scientists’ requests 2.Selecting the standard interface (i.e. OpenDAP) is very useful 3.Discussions with data centers are very important. 4.On using Open Source software, a kind of limit test is important. 5.Transition from a prototype system to an operational system is a big task. 6.Collect required information as soon as possible