Consistency of Moderation Languages 7-10. What is moderation? Moderation is a process where teachers compare judgements to either confirm or adjust them.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Ko te pae tawhiti whaia kia tata
Advertisements

Primary Strategy Literacy Subject Leader Meeting Session 4 March 2009 Leading on learning – making best use of Assessment for learning in Literacy.
Getting started – support for reflection and engagement classical languages.
Planning for Learning and Teaching, Assessment and Moderation
Using the P Scales launch conferences 2009 Richard Byers University of Cambridge Faculty of Education.
School Based Assessment and Reporting Unit Curriculum Directorate
© Myra Young Assessment All rights reserved. Provided for the use of participants in AM circles in North Lanarkshire Council.
K-6 Science and Technology Consistent teaching – Assessing K-6 Science and Technology © 2006 Curriculum K-12 Directorate, NSW Department of Education and.
Consistency of Teacher Judgement
Implementing Mathematics K-6
[Insert faculty Banner] Consistency of Assessment
Victorian Curriculum and Assessment Authority
Ensuring consistency in teacher assessment
PDHPE K-6 Using the syllabus for consistency of moderation © 2006 Curriculum K-12 Directorate, NSW Department of Education and Training.
What is moderation and why should we moderate?
[Insert faculty Banner] Consistency of Teacher Judgement
3 to 18 Curriculum Early Level - pre-school to P1 First Level – P2 to end of P4 Second Level – P5 to P7 Third and Fourth Level – S1- S3. Many pupils will.
[Insert faculty Banner] Consistency of Moderation Mathematics 7-10.
Consistency of Teacher Judgement Human Society and Its Environment 7-10 © 2007 Curriculum K-12 Directorate, NSW Department of Education and Training.
Consistency of Assessment
In Crookfur Primary School.  5-14 Assessment  Standardised Test information  Gathered assessment information termly  Target Setting  Skills planner.
Consistent Teacher judgement
Implementing Mathematics K-6 Using the syllabus for consistency of teacher judgement © 2006 Curriculum K-12 Directorate, NSW Department of Education and.
Assessment Human Society and Its Environment 7-10 © 2007 Curriculum K-12 Directorate, NSW Department of Education and Training.
Consistency of assessment Technology subjects (7-12)
Technology subjects (7-12) Consistency of moderation.
Queensland Studies Authority Quality-assurance processes.
Consistency of Teacher Judgement. CTJ is a key strategy for implementing the curriculum and monitoring its effect on students’ learning. (p.17)
 Supporting excellence in assessment  Encouraging professional development for individuals involved in assessment  Disseminating good practice  Proving.
The draft NSW English K-10 syllabus Version 2 February, 2012.
-Sign in and take a name tag. - Leave you student samples in the pile. - Help yourself to refreshments! - We’ll begin at 8:45! Ontario Numeracy Assessment.
Overall Teacher Judgements
PDHPE K-6 Using the syllabus for consistency of assessment © 2006 Curriculum K-12 Directorate, NSW Department of Education and Training.
© Myra Young Assessment All rights reserved. Provided for the use of participants in AM circles in North Lanarkshire Council.
Cluster Literacy and Assessment Focus (2010) St Leonards School Ravensbourne School Sacred Heart School Broad Bay School Waihola School.
October ISIS – Cluster Moderation Assessment and moderation in CfE is a process, not an event! Aims of the morning: To further inform participants in the.
Workshop 3 Early career teacher induction: Literacy middle years Workshop 3 Literacy teaching and NSW syllabus 1.
K-6 Science and Technology Consistent teaching – Moderation K-6 Science and Technology © 2006 Curriculum K-12 Directorate, NSW Department of Education.
Developing a Quality Framework for Community Languages Schools Dr Tim Wyatt Dr Bob Carbines Erebus International Victorian Annual Conference 7 July 2007.
Workshops to support the implementation of the new languages syllabuses in Years 7-10.
[Insert faculty Banner] Consistency of Teacher Judgement Mathematics 7-10.
Sheila Nolan Director of School Improvement
Consistency of Teacher Judgement Creative Arts 7-10.
1 Using the Learning Progression Framework (LPF) to Enhance the Learning, Teaching and Assessment of English Language at Primary Level 8 & 10 December.
Teacher-led assessment (TA) Implications for qualifications and assessment?
Assessment Design. Four Professional Learning Modules 1.Unpacking the AC achievement standards 2.Validity and reliability of assessments 3. Confirming.
Equality and Assessment Andy Ashley. Common Inspection Framework B- Quality of provision –B1. How effectively do teaching, training and assessment support.
Human Society and its Environment K-6 (HSIE) Using the syllabus for consistency of assessment © 2006 Curriculum K-12 Directorate, NSW Department of Education.
The Literacy and Numeracy Secretariat Le Secrétariat de la littératie et de la numératie October – octobre 2007 The School Effectiveness Framework A Collegial.
[Insert faculty Banner] Moderation in Practice Science 7-10.
Consistency of Moderation
© Crown copyright 2008 Subject Leaders’ Development Meeting Spring 2009.
1 Assessment. 2  Formative assessment – assessment for learning  Summative assessment – assessment of learning.
Moderation and Validation of Teacher Judgements in School.
Assessing Student Learning Workshop 2: Making on-balance judgements and building consistency.
Helmingham Community Primary School Assessment Information Evening 10 February 2016.
The Literacy and Numeracy Secretariat Le Secrétariat de la littératie et de la numératie October – octobre 2007 The School Effectiveness Framework A Collegial.
Australian Curriculum English Achievement Standards PRESENTER: CHRIS THOMPSON SAETA COUNCIL MEMBER.
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION AND TRAINING DET Staff Site.
An Analysis of the Grade 3 Department of Basic Education workbooks as curriculum tools Ursula Hoadley & Jaamia Galant University of Cape Town Presentation.
MATHEMATICS KLA Years 1 to 10 Planning MATHEMATICS Years 1 to 10.
1 2 Assessing Pupils’ Progress Spring term 2009.
EDU704 – Assessment and Evaluation
What is moderation and why should we moderate?
Assessment.
Consistency of Teacher Judgement
COMPETENCIES & STANDARDS
Information and Guidelines booklets
The MODERATION cycle.
Moderating Age Related Expectations
Presentation transcript:

Consistency of Moderation Languages 7-10

What is moderation? Moderation is a process where teachers compare judgements to either confirm or adjust them. The process involves close collaboration to establish a shared understanding of what achievement of syllabus standards looks like and whether or not the student has demonstrated achievement of the syllabus standards. Teachers work towards making judgements that are consistent and comparable.

Why we moderate To: develop shared or common interpretations of standards and expectations of what constitutes achievement of syllabus standards develop shared understandings of what students’ achievements look like develop accuracy and reliability in making judgements ensure judgements are equitable in terms of implications for student learning strengthen the value of teachers’ judgements inform well-targeted teaching and learning programs

Moderation Techniques Which processes facilitate moderation? Examples: Teachers are familiar with the Curriculum Standards Framework (CSF) and are able to set tasks designed to meet learning outcomes Criteria for assessment are agreed upon, so that teachers know what they are looking for Criteria for judgement are explicit and easy to see Appropriate and realistic tasks are set for particular levels to meet students’ capabilities Tasks are sufficiently open-ended to allow students to demonstrate achievement more widely across levels Details of the context are provided Substantial amounts of work are sought from the students Provision is made for pooling and discussing opinions about students’ work

Examples of Professional Dialogue Discussion of the generic framework for the K-10 Languages syllabuses Discussion across languages of generic objectives, outcomes, and Learn about/Learn to statements Sharing interpretations and understandings Examining work samples collaboratively Shared understanding of student achievement at a particular point