PROMOTION AND TENURE FOR BASIC SCIENTISTS – BOTH PATHWAYS Dana Gaddy, Ph.D. Patricia Wight, Ph.D.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
QU Academic Promotion Policies Prof. Nitham M. Hindi November 26, 2008.
Advertisements

Promotion and Tenure in Department of Family Medicine Faculty Development Workshop August 12, 2011.
1 Whats All This Fuss About Promotion & Tenure? Sandra Burge, Ph.D. Dept. Family & Community Medicine Sandra Burge, Ph.D. Dept. Family & Community Medicine.
Tenure is awarded when the candidate successfully demonstrates meritorious performance in teaching, research/scholarly/creative accomplishment and service.
Promotion and Tenure Workshop for MUSM Faculty A Faculty Development Opportunity Mercer University School of Medicine 2012.
Faculty Promotion and Tenure Program
Carolyn M. Byerly, Ph.D., professor Department of Journalism and Graduate Program in Mass Comm & Media Studies TENURE: BASIC INFO AND ISSUES.
Professor of Teaching Tenure Track Stream at UBC Anna M. Kindler, Vice Provost and AVP Academic May 2013.
PEER REVIEW OF TEACHING WORKSHOP SUSAN S. WILLIAMS VICE DEAN ALAN KALISH DIRECTOR, UNIVERSITY CENTER FOR ADVANCEMENT OF TEACHING ASC CHAIRS — JAN. 30,
Career Planning in Academic Medicine David Coleman, M.D. Faculty Development Seminar Tuesday, September 18, 2007.
PROMOTION AND TENURE FOR CLINICAL ATTENDINGS Sameh Abul-Ezz, M.D. Carmelita Pablo, M.D.
“Tales from the Promotion and Tenure Committee: An Insider’s View and In Depth Analysis of What It Takes to Get Promoted” Dr. Gerard Silvestri and Dr.
Scholarship As defined in the Gold Book Primary basis for academic advancement Encompassing generation of new knowledge and/or the dissemination of knowledge.
Faculty Promotion and Tenure NYU SOM. Faculty Tracks Criteria for appointments and promotions Q&A Faculty Appointments NYU SOM.
Meeting of Assistant Professors Discussion of Promotion and Tenure July 25, 2011.
Pathology Faculty Promotions November, 2013 Faculty Meeting.
Stacy A. Rudnicki, M.D. Brendan C. Stack, Jr., M.D., FACS, FACE.
How Your Application Is Reviewed Vonda Smith, Ph.D. Scientific Review Officer (SRO)
Demystifying Academic Appointments and Promotions Karen Freund MD MPH Jane Freedman MD – Department of Medicine Appointments and Promotion Committee Jackie.
McLean Promotion to Associate Professor at Harvard Medical School Maureen T. Connelly, MD, MPH McLean Hospital February 3, 2010.
Overview of RPT Process and Guidelines John C. Carey, M.D., M.P.H. Chair, ad hoc RPT & DAC Committees.
Mentor Champion Meeting October 16, pm 628HE CSB.
Feinberg School of Medicine Faculty Promotion and Tenure Program June 2015.
What to do While Your Clock is Ticking? Jan Shorey, M.D. Associate Dean of CME &Faculty Affairs UAMS College of Medicine.
PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN WORKSHOP. What is the Professional Development Plan? The Professional Development Plan is a directed planning and evaluation.
Promotion and Tenure Lois J. Geist, M.D. Associate Dean for Faculty Affairs and Development.
Meeting of Assistant Professors Discussion of Promotion and Tenure July 26, 2010.
PROMOTION AND TENURE FOR CLINICAL ATTENDINGS Rhonda Dick, M.D. Tim Martin, M.D.
PROMOTION AND TENURE FOR CLINICAL SCIENTISTS – BOTH PATHWAYS Peter Emanuel, M.D. Laura Lamps, M.D.
PROMOTION AND TENURE FOR CLINICAL EDUCATORS Michele Moss, M.D. Alexander Burnett, M.D.
Promotion in the Clinical Track Lois J. Geist, M.D. Associate Dean for Faculty Affairs and Development.
Jan Shorey Associate Dean for CME & Faculty Affairs.
+ Meeting of Assistant Professors June 29, Faculty and Academic Affairs Leadership Steven Abramson, M.D., Vice Dean for Education, Faculty and.
19/9/2005 Promotion and Tenure: Suggestions for Success Kimberly W. Anderson Professor Chemical and Materials Engineering.
College of Liberal Arts Tenure and Promotion workshop: PROCEDURES AND POLICIES 17 October 2014.
Introduction to the Most Ancient of Orders and its Habits: Appointment, Promotion and Tenure In the Professorial Ranks.
Promotion Process A how-to for DEOs. How is a promotion review initiated? Required in the final probationary year of a tenure track appointment (year.
Preparing for the renewal and tenure processes Bernard Robaire Department of Pharmacology and Therapeutics MAUT Tenure Workshop April 24, 2015 – Faculty.
POST-TENURE REVIEW: Report and Recommendations. 2 OVERVIEW Tenure Field Test Findings Recommendations This is a progress report. Implementation, assessment,
Promotions on the Clinician Educator Track Larry L. Swift, Ph.D. Vice Chair for Faculty Affairs Department of Pathology, Microbiology & Immunology.
Kerstine Wanas, MHA Faculty Appointments Manager College of Medicine, Office of Faculty Affairs.
So You Want to Get Tenure? One Perspective from the Faculty of Medicine Barbara Hales Department of Pharmacology and Therapeutics.
Demystifying Academic Appointments and Promotions Karen Freund MD MPH Chair, Appointments and Promotions Boston University School of Medicine FDDC September.
PROMOTION AND TENURE FOR CLINICAL EDUCATORS Laura Lamps, M.D. Stacy Rudnicki, M.D.
Promotion guide Understanding the tracks Librarian – tenure and non-tenure tracks Clinicians and Researchers - tenure and two non-tenure tracks –Tenure.
The Nuts and Bolts of Compiling a Good Promotion and Tenure Packet Emily Freeman Faculty Appointments and Database Manager Office of Faculty Affairs.
Promotions on the Physician Scientist/Basic Science Investigator Track Larry L. Swift, Ph.D. Vice Chair for Faculty Affairs Department of Pathology, Microbiology.
MUSC College of Medicine Appointments, Promotion, and Tenure Process and Procedures.
DOM Promotions Workshop Ashita Tolwani, M.D. Chair, DOM Appointment, Promotions and Tenure Committee Professor of Medicine, Division of Nephrology November.
QU Academic Promotion Policies Prof. Nitham M. Hindi December 20, 2010.
Overview of Policies and Procedures University of Missouri-Kansas City.
Emily Freeman Faculty Appointments and Training Manager College of Medicine, Office of Faculty Affairs.
Surprising and Not So Surprising Similarities and Differences 1 Richard E. Klabunde, Ph.D. Department of Biomedical Sciences Ohio University College of.
Promotion and Tenure. Quick overview of P&T Requirements Each of these areas has a defined standard/benchmark that faculty are expected to achieve (below-meet-exceed)
From Hire to Promotion What Everyone Should Know About Faculty Appointments Faculty Affairs and Development (FAD) Executive Dean’s Office School of Medicine.
Dossier Preparation P&T Workshop, April 12, 2011
Dossier Preparation P&T Workshop, April 5, 2012
Tenure: How to Prepare for It
Lewis Katz School of Medicine
Promotion: Policy and Procedures for COM Faculty in State College
Promotion to Full Professor: Regulations and Procedures
Faculty Toolkit: Promotion & Tenure
Feinberg School of Medicine Faculty Promotion and Tenure Program
2017 Workshop Tenure and Promotion Policy and Procedures Overview
What you need to know now to be promoted later!
Considerations in Engineering
Promotions on the Physician Scientist/Basic Science Investigator Track
Promotion on the Clinician Educator and Clinical Practice Tracks
TENURE AND PROMOTION IN ECAS
Promotion to Full Professor: Regulations and Procedures
Presentation transcript:

PROMOTION AND TENURE FOR BASIC SCIENTISTS – BOTH PATHWAYS Dana Gaddy, Ph.D. Patricia Wight, Ph.D.

P&T for Basic Scientists  Read the 2011 Guidelines on P&T  Check out the Companion Guide to the P&T Document (  Study the criteria table for your specific academic pathway  Basic Scientist-Tenure Pathway  Basic Scientist-Non-tenure Pathway  Similar criteria - but differ in the extent to which teaching/mentoring and leadership/administrative service are expected

Basic Scientist-TP & Basic Scientist-NTP  Basic Scientists- TP are expected to participate in the full range of academic activities of the College, with emphasis on research and teaching.  Basic Scientists- NTP are expected to develop one major area of focus: either research or teaching.

Basic Scientist – Tenure Pathway  “Full range of activities” means:  Teaching/Mentoring  Research/Scholarly Work  Leadership/Administrative Service  Majority of Basic Scientist-TP faculty will focus strongly on research, and will teach  Minority of Basic Scientist-TP faculty will focus strongly on teaching, and will participate in some research, which could include educational research

Assistant to Associate Professor Basic Scientist-TP

Basic Scientist-TP: Time Allotment DO THE MATH: If your focus is research, you must teach. However, you CANNOT max out teaching and service without going below the research minimum: THIS IS A RESEARCH-INTENSIVE TRACK!!

Research/Scholarly Work  Funding  PI on a major extramural research grant and/or leader of a major project program grant, or alternatively  Substantial and clearly documented contributions as Co-I on multiple extramurally funded research grants NIH is best, but others (e.g. American Heart Association; VA Merit) do count  Institutional General Research Support grants for pilot studies will NOT be counted

Research/Scholarly Work  Publications = scholarly evidence of research productivity  Peer-reviewed scientific articles Quality more important than absolute number The P&T Guidelines speak of 1 – 3 first author or senior author peer reviewed publications per year in rank  Books/book chapters  Participation in national/international meetings Important opportunities to present your work Important opportunities to meet and get to know the experts in your field

Research/Scholarly Work  Publications in your P&T packet:  Copies of your 5 most meritorious publications are required  Must be published or ‘in press’  Middle-author papers count, but must be 1 st or senior author on a significant number of publications  Publication alone does not insure promotion But then, neither does funding if you aren’t being productive

Teaching/Mentoring  Must include  Contact hours in graduate/medical school  List of those you mentor Estimate of contact hours with mentees Evidence of your contributions to their learning and success  Documented evaluation of teaching performance: Your mean scores compared to the department scores, NOT copies of evaluations

Teaching/Mentoring  Can include  Directing graduate seminars/journal clubs  Serving as a major advisor on thesis and dissertation committees  Serving as committee member on thesis and dissertation committees  Evidence of community, local, regional and national education programs  Letters from mentees attesting to time commitment and level of mentoring

Teaching/Mentoring  Can also include:  Service as a graduate or medical school course leader (for those whose major focus is teaching)  Teaching outside one’s own area of interest in other departments within the College in other UAMS Colleges

Teaching/Mentoring  If your major focus is research, while very important, teaching CANNOT compensate for a lack of research productivity. Strike the proper balance.  Form a mentoring committee or, at the very least, consult your chair if you feel like accepting a significant teaching responsibility at this stage of your career will compromise your research  Directing a medical school course at this stage of your career will compromise you research

Leadership/Administrative Service  Expect to have share in “service load” for departmental and university programs – less as an Assistant Prof, more as an Associate Prof and still more as a Professor  Assessed by review of type and complexity of committee and/or administrative work  Document participation and valuable contributions  Document leadership roles and/or other active involvement in administration

Professional Recognition  Should have established a reputation in the national or international medical or scientific community  Participation in appropriate professional organizations and presentations before national and/or international meetings  Note invited presentations  NIH/VA study sections are valued but not required

Professional Recognition Letters of Recommendation  Three letters are required  Authors  Should be recognized national authorities  Should be in your field of interest  Should NOT have employed you or trained you (e.g., not someone who has been your “boss” or a direct teacher/mentor)  Should clearly have reviewed your CV or portfolio and have detailed comments

Obtaining Letters  Provide your Department Chair with a list of names and contact information  Department Chair formally solicits these letters, and sends to those letter-writers:  Letter of request for recommendation  Your CV  COM P&T Guidelines  Solicit more letters than you need to ensure you get three great letters back in time  Additional letters may be a good idea if they add significant information or an importantly different perspective on your contributions.

Associate to Full Professor Basic Scientist-TP

Professorship  Reserved for those members of the faculty who have demonstrated outstanding ability  Not based on length of service alone  Should also have:  Considerable time and experience in rank  Additional publications  Other evidence of scholarly activity and professional recognition

Basic Scientist – TP Associate Professor to Professor  Same “full range of activities”  “Outstanding record in at least two of the following three mission areas”:  Research/Scholarly Activities  Teaching/Mentoring  Leadership/Academic Service  Most will have excelled in the first two areas  Study the criteria table carefully

Assistant to Associate Professor Basic Scientist-NTP

 Basic Scientists- NTP are expected to develop one major area of focus: either research or teaching.  Majority of Basic Scientist-NTP faculty will focus strongly on research  Minority of Basic Scientist-NTP faculty will focus strongly on teaching, and will participate in some research, which could include educational research

Basic Scientist-NTP: Time Allotment

Research/Scholarly Work If your focus is research:  Funding  PI on a major extramural research grant and/or leader of a major project program grant, or alternatively  Substantial and clearly documented contributions as Co-I on multiple extramurally funded research grants NIH is best, but others (e.g. American Heart Association; VA Merit) do count  Institutional General Research Support grants for pilot studies will NOT be counted

Research/Scholarly Work If your focus is research:  Publications = scholarly evidence of research productivity  Peer-reviewed scientific articles Quality more important than absolute number The P&T Guidelines speak of 1 – 3 first author or senior author peer reviewed publications per year in rank  Books/book chapters  Participation in national/international meetings Important opportunities to present your work Important opportunities to meet and get to know the experts in your field

Teaching/Mentoring If your focus is teaching:  Must include  Contact hours in graduate/medical school  List of those you mentor Estimate of contact hours with mentees Evidence of your contributions to their learning and success  Documented evaluation of teaching performance: Your mean scores compared to the department scores, NOT copies of evaluations

Teaching/Mentoring If your focus is on teaching:  Can include  Directing graduate seminars/journal clubs  Serving as a major advisor on thesis and dissertation committees  Serving as committee member on thesis and dissertation committees  Evidence of community, local, regional and national education programs  Letters from mentees attesting to time commitment and level of mentoring

Teaching/Mentoring If your focus is on teaching:  Can also include :  Service as a graduate or medical school course leader (for those whose major focus is teaching)  Teaching outside one’s own area of interest in other departments within the College in other UAMS Colleges

Leadership/Administrative Service  Leadership/Administrative Service is largely the responsibility of the Basic Science-TP faculty.  Assistant Professors on the Basic Science-NTP may have small leadership/administrative service roles.  Associate Professors on the Basic Science-NTP may have larger leadership/administrative service roles, and Professors on the Basic Science-NTP may devote as much as 10% of their time allotment to leadership/ administrative service.  Typically, the most successful candidates align their committee work with their research and/or teaching interests.

Professional Recognition  Should have established a reputation in the national or international medical or scientific community  Participation in appropriate professional organizations and presentations before national and/or international meetings  Note invited presentations  NIH/VA study sections are valued but not required

Professional Recognition Letters of Recommendation  Three letters are required  Authors  Should be recognized national authorities  Should be in your field of interest  Should NOT have employed you or trained you  Should clearly have reviewed your portfolio and have detailed comments

Obtaining Letters  Provide your Department Chair with a list of names and contact information  Department Chair formally solicits the letters, and sends to those letter-writers:  Letter of request for recommendation  Your CV  COM P&T guidelines  Solicit more letters than you need to ensure you get three great letters back in time

Associate to Full Professor Basic Scientist-NTP

Professorship  Reserved for those members of the faculty who have demonstrated outstanding ability  Not based on length of service alone  Should also have:  Considerable time and experience in rank  Additional publications  Other evidence of scholarly activity and professional recognition

Basic Scientist – NTP Associate Professor to Professor  Having made the decision to focus on either Research or Teaching, candidates for promotion to Professor will have made outstanding contributions in Research or Teaching.  Study the criteria table carefully

Both Tracks  If your department has a Promotion and Tenure committee, the results of their vote should be included in your binder.  When possible, have your packet reviewed by someone in your department who has been on the P&T Committee.

How can you help to assure your own success?  Know the rules!  Study the companion guide (  Talk to P&T committee chair in department or faculty affairs representative before finalizing your initial appointment or if you have unresolved concerns.  Get a mentor.  Attend P&T workshops.  Prepare a concise, neat, well-organized packet that makes it easy for the reviewer to find support that you have met criteria.

COM Deadline  Two paper packets are still required and are due to the Office of Faculty Affairs, Central Building (old hospital) 4D40, by 4:30pm on Monday, October 1,  Deadline for submission of your electronic packet and 2 paper copies of your packet is Monday October 1,  The electronic system is available at:

Questions?