Mapping Greenland Using NASA’s Full- Waveform, Medium/High-Altitude, LVIS Lidar System: Potential 2009 Coverage and Expected Performance Michelle Hofton.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Helen Amanda Fricker Scripps Institution of Oceanography Ted Scambos National Snow and Ice Data Center Bob Bindschadler NASA/GSFC Space Flight Center Laurie.
Advertisements

ESTO Advanced Component Technology 11/17/03 Laser Sounder for Remotely Measuring Atmospheric CO 2 Concentrations GSFC CO 2 Science and Sounder.
David Prado Oct Antarctic Sea Ice: John N. Rayner and David A. Howarth 1979.
High-Resolution Maps of Outlet Glacier Surface Elevation Change from Combined Laser Altimeter and Digital Elevation Model Data (ID # ) Joanna Fredenslund.
The ICESat-2 Mission: Laser altimetry of ice, clouds and land elevation T. Markus, T. Neumann NASA Goddard Space Flight Center W. Abdalati Earth Science.
ICESat Overview H. Jay Zwally NASA Goddard Greenbelt, Maryland Bob E. Schutz The University of Texas at Austin Center for Space Research Laser Ranging.
ReCover for REDD and sustainable forest management EU ReCover project: Remote sensing services to support REDD and sustainable forest management in Fiji.
Airborne Laser Scanning: Remote Sensing with LiDAR.
Interoperable Data Systems for Satellite, Airborne and Terrestrial LiDAR Data C. Meertens and J. McWhirter, UNAVCO S-J. S.Khalsa and T. Haran, NSIDC/CU.
OIB Long Range Planning Luthcke and Jezek. OIB Long Term Observation Goals OIB is meant to provide data to improve our understanding of the mass evolution.
Menglin Jin Department of Atmospheric & Oceanic Science University of Maryland, College park Observed Land Impacts on Clouds, Water Vapor, and Rainfall.
Ventures Proposal Science Objectives and Requirements.
Active Microwave and LIDAR. Three models for remote sensing 1. Passive-Reflective: Sensors that rely on EM energy emitted by the sun to illuminate the.
ICESat dH/dt Thinning Thickening ICESat key findings.
An Introduction to Lidar Mark E. Meade, PE, PLS, CP Photo Science, Inc.
What is RADAR? What is RADAR? Active detecting and ranging sensor operating in the microwave portion of the EM spectrum Active detecting and ranging sensor.
Planning for airborne LIDAR survey Dr.Lamyaa Gamal El-deen.
Merging InSAR and LIDAR to Estimate Surface and Vegetation Heights EECS 826 InSAR and Applications University of Kansas Jeff S. Hall April 2 nd, 2009.
Sea-ice freeboard heights in the Arctic Ocean from ICESat and airborne laser H. Skourup, R. Forsberg, S. M. Hvidegaard, and K. Keller, Department of Geodesy,
ICESat TM 04/21/20031 MIT Activities Two main areas of activity: –Validation of atmospheric delays being computed for ICESat –Assessment of statistics.
Uses of Geospatial Soils & Surface Measurement Data in DWR Delta Levee Program Joel Dudas
Polar Topographic Knowledge Prior to LCROSS Impact David E. Smith 1, Maria T. Zuber 2 1 NASA/Goddard Space Flight Center 2 Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
Quantitative Estimates of Biomass and Forest Structure in Coastal Temperate Rainforests Derived from Multi-return Airborne Lidar Marc G. Kramer 1 and Michael.
Active Microwave and LIDAR. Three models for remote sensing 1. Passive-Reflective: Sensors that rely on EM energy emitted by the sun to illuminate the.
An In-depth Look at ICESat and GLAS By: Vishana Ramdeen.
GISMO Simulation Study Objective Key instrument and geometry parameters Surface and base DEMs Ice mass reflection and refraction modeling Algorithms used.
Biomass Mapping The set of field biomass training data and the MODIS observations were used to develop a regression tree model (Random Forest). Biomass.
Gravity-Lidar Study for 2006: Refined Gravity Field For the North-Central Gulf of Mexico Dan Roman National Geodetic Survey Jarir Saleh National Geodetic.
Applications for Precision GPS: Seismology, Volcanic Eruptions, Ice Sheet Dynamics, and Soil Moisture Kristine M. Larson Dept. of Aerospace Engineering.
William Crosson, Ashutosh Limaye, Charles Laymon National Space Science and Technology Center Huntsville, Alabama, USA Soil Moisture Retrievals Using C-
From TOMS to OMI Reflections on 15 years of NASA/KNMI/FMI Collaboration Pawan K Bhartia Earth Sciences Division- Atmospheres NASA Goddard Space Flight.
Surface Reflectivity from OMI: Effects of Snow on OMI NO 2 Gray O’Byrne 1, Randall Martin 1,2, Aaron van Donkelaar 1, Joanna Joiner 3, Edward A. Celarier.
EMIRAD Data coSMOS2 campaign. coSMOS2 campaign objectives Validation of SMOS SM L2 prototype processor Assimilation of root zone moisture Investigation.
Uses of Geospatial Soils & Surface Measurement Data in DWR Delta Levee Program Joel Dudas
WP 8: Impact on Satellite Retrievals University of l’Aquila (DFUA [12]): Vincenzo Rizi Ecole Polytechnique (EPFL [13]): Bertrand Calpini Observatory of.
Thoughts on OIB Science Team KCJ. Acquisition Strategies OIB developed 3, basic acquisition strategies February 2011 I. Establish once the bedrock topography.
RASTERTIN. What is LiDAR? LiDAR = Light Detection And Ranging Active form of remote sensing measuring distance to target surfaces using narrow beams of.
Spaceborne 3D Imaging Lidar John J. Degnan Geoscience Technology Office, Code Code 900 Instrument and Mission Initiative Review March 13, 2002.
BIOPHYS: A Physically-based Algorithm for Inferring Continuous Fields of Vegetative Biophysical and Structural Parameters Forrest Hall 1, Fred Huemmrich.
Terra Launched December 18, 1999
Using instrumented aircraft to bridge the observational gap between ICESat and ICESat-2.
Sea ice thickness from CryoSat – A new data set for operational ice services? Christian Haas German CryoSat Office AWI.
A bestiary of lidar errors The following images illustrate some of the defects that may be found in lidar-derived bare-earth models. The images also illustrate.
University of Kansas S. Gogineni, P. Kanagaratnam, R. Parthasarathy, V. Ramasami & D. Braaten The University of Kansas Wideband Radars for Mapping of Near.
Design Features of a Boresighted GPM Core Radiometer Christopher S. Ruf Dept. of Atmospheric, Oceanic & Space Sciences University of Michigan, Ann Arbor,
NASA ESTO ATIP Laser Sounder for Remotely Measuring Atmospheric CO 2 Concentrations 12/12/01 NASA Goddard - Laser Remote Sensing Branch 1 James B. Abshire,
September 07 Airborne Experiment. September 07 Experiment P-3 flights from Thule and Kangerdlussuaq 150 MHz and 450 MHz Radars Maximum altitude allowable.
Center for Satellite Applications and Research (STAR) Review 09 – 11 March Arctic Aircraft Altimeter (AAA) Experiment Envisat and ICESat underflights.
CCAR / University of Colorado 1 Airborne GPS Bistatic Radar in CLPX Dallas Masters University of Colorado, Boulder Valery Zavorotny NOAA ETL Stephen Katzberg.
Greenland ice melt Ben Lee EPS 131 Friday 10/28/2005.
Gravity Lidar Study for 2006: A First Look D.R. Roman, V.A. Childers, D.L. Rabine, S.A. Martinka, Y.M. Wang, J.M. Brozena, S.B. Luthcke, and J.B. Blair.
A Long Term Data Record of the Ozone Vertical Distribution IN43B-1150 by Richard McPeters 1, Stacey Frith 2, and Val Soika 3 1) NASA GSFC
Ocean Surface Current Observations in PWS Carter Ohlmann Institute for Computational Earth System Science, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA.
ICESat Mission By Berhan Amare Period: 5 Date: Nov. 28, 2006.
An Examination of the Relation between Burn Severity and Forest Height Change in the Taylor Complex Fire using LIDAR data from ICESat/GLAS Andrew Maher.
Research and Discover 2003 ICESat Precise Elevation Data Over the Antarctic Megadunes Tom Daigle: NASA/University of New Hampshire Research and Discover.
SGM as an Affordable Alternative to LiDAR
FOR 274: From Photos to Lidar Introduction to LiDAR What is it? How does it work? LiDAR Jargon and Terms Natural Resource Applications Data Acquisition.
Global Ice Coverage Claire L. Parkinson NASA Goddard Space Flight Center Presentation to the Earth Ambassador program, meeting at NASA Goddard Space Flight.
U NIVERSITY OF J OENSUU F ACULTY OF F ORESTRY Introduction to Lidar and Airborne Laser Scanning Petteri Packalén Kärkihankkeen ”Multi-scale Geospatial.
An Accuracy Assessment of a Digital Elevation Model Derived From an Airborne Profiling Laser Joseph M. Piwowar Philip J. Howarth Waterloo Laboratory for.
NASA, CGMS-44, 7 June 2016 Coordination Group for Meteorological Satellites - CGMS SURFACE PRESSURE MEASUREMENTS FROM THE ORBITING CARBON OBSERVATORY-2.
GISMO Flights Plans and Objectives. Technical Objectives for April ’07 Experiment 1) Acquire data over the May 2006 flight line to compare high.
Over 30% of Earth’s land surface has seasonal snow. On average, 60% of Northern Hemisphere has snow cover in midwinter. About 10% of Earth’s land surface.
Integrated spatial data LIDAR Mapping for Coastal Monitoring Dr Alison Matthews Geomatics Manager Environment Agency Geomatics Group.
Integrating LiDAR Intensity and Elevation Data for Terrain Characterization in a Forested Area Cheng Wang and Nancy F. Glenn IEEE GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE.
PADMA ALEKHYA V V L, SURAJ REDDY R, RAJASHEKAR G & JHA C S
AVIRIS By: Evan, Mike, Ana Belen ER-2 Twin Otter.
LiDAR Range (R) recorded as R = c * t/2 Unaffected by clouds above
Woolpert & New Geospatial Technologies
Presentation transcript:

Mapping Greenland Using NASA’s Full- Waveform, Medium/High-Altitude, LVIS Lidar System: Potential 2009 Coverage and Expected Performance Michelle Hofton Department of Geography, University of Maryland, College Park J Bryan Blair NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, Maryland David Rabine SSAI, Lanham, Maryland

NASA’s Laser Vegetation Imaging Sensor n NASA’s Laser Vegetation Imaging Sensor (LVIS) F Medium/high-altitude, waveform-recording lidar. F Utilizes medium-sized footprints to image topography and surface structure. n Operational since 1997: F Numerous missions for vegetation, solid earth studies. F Flown in Greenland in 2007 in NASA’s P3-B. n LVIS capability for Greenland 2009: F 2 km-wide swath. F 25 m-wide footprints. F 3-4cm range precision F 1-2m horizontal geolocation accuracy. F Contiguous footprints along and across track. F Tx&Return waveforms (10 bit, 1Gsamp/s) for each shot F Quicklook data in 1-2 months, final data in <6 months. F Plenty of link margin to penetrate through clouds. 2 km 10 km Nominal operating mode of LVIS Example LVIS Waveform Collected over Jakobshavn Glacier, 2007 Waveform amplitude (counts) Elevation above ITRF05 ellipsoid (m)

Proposed Greenland Mapping, May 2009 n Proposed LVIS Mapping in Greenland: F 11 flights, 60 ~E-W cross-country flight lines 44 km apart, and 4 ~N-S lines. F 3 week mission on DC-8, ~May F Will illuminate and sample ~5% of Greenland’s surface area. n Each line flown once, cloud issues minimized by flexible planning. n If required, additional flights to cover specifically-targeted areas. n Assumptions: F Using NASA’s DC-8 aircraft F 40,000’ altitude, 400 knot ground speed F 12 hr flights with 10 hrs for science F Thule, Sondrestrom, Keflavik base? 300 km LVIS lines, spaced 44km apart

Coverage Comparisons ICESat Repeat 33 day Coverage LVIS flight track from 9/20/ km Proposed LVIS ‘09 Coverage (3 weeks) 300 km

Swath Corridor n Example 2007 LVIS swath (from 25,000’) in vicinity of Jakobshavn with ICESat L3 (cloud free) footprint locations n From 30-40,000’ flying altitude, LVIS achieves a 2 km- wide swath over all of Greenland n Swath is sufficiently wide to capture all ICESat-1 tracks ICESat L3 Footprint Locations 500m 1km

LVIS Performance in Greenland, 2007 n LVIS data collected on 9/20/07 and 9/21/07 from ~27,000’ in P3-B. n Two ~850km long transects over ice sheet plus ~35 km long transect in the Summit area. n Elevations differences between coincident footprints used to evaluate system performance m 0.00 m 0.01 m 0.08 m 0.11 m 0.06 m Mean difference Standard deviation (1  ) From: Hofton et al. (2008), Geophysical Research Letters, DOI: /2008GL Elevation Differences (m) Percentage in bin (%) With system calibration and multiple GPS base stations, similar performance could be expected in Histograms of elevation differences at coincident LVIS footprints:

Along-track Performance of LVIS Data in Greenland n On average, elevation differences between coincident LVIS footprints had means of 0.0m, but along-transect variations of up to 5 cm occurred (likely caused by errors in the atmospheric model applied in the GPS trajectory calculations). From: Hofton et al. (2008), Geophysical Research Letters, DOI: /2008GL n No obvious degradation in data precision over rough terrain (in this example, the feeder zone of Jakobshavn Glacier)

Comparison of 2007 LVIS Data and ICESat Data n Comparing coincident LVIS (20m footprint) and ICESat (nominal 60m footprint) data in the Summit area. Although there are offsets between the ICESat L3b-h observations and LVIS, the standard deviations of the differences are <7cm (except L3C). From: Hofton et al. (2008), Geophysical Research Letters, DOI: /2008GL035774