Budget Status and FY03 Requests Elton Smith Hall D Collaboration Meeting Sep 12-14, 2002.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Overview of the GlueX Tagger and Photon Beamline..
Advertisements

Preparing for the CD-2 Review Elton Smith Hall D Collaboration Meeting October 12-14, 2006.
Fermilab E906 Schedule Paul E. Reimer 20 June 2008.
Upcoming Review of the Hall D Photon Beam and Tagger Richard Jones, University of Connecticut, for the GlueX collaboration GlueX Collaboration Meeting.
FACET: The Proposal Process with Q & A Carsten Hast SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory.
Elton S. Smith University of Virginia October 25, Overview Bremsstrahlung Tagging Spectrometer and Photon Beam Review Elton S. Smith Jefferson Lab.
Accelerator Systems Division FACET Project Management John Seeman for the FACET Study Group PPA Directorate Stanford Linear Accelerator Center DOE FACET.
An updated Baseline Design for MICE From proposal to technical reference Paul Drumm, Dec 2003.
SHMS Detector Commissioning and Installation Howard Fenker Hall-C Users Meeting Jan-2015.
We are Here! Gluex Collaboration Meeting May Engineering Status - Presented by Tim Whitlatch1.
SBS Program Management John J. LeRose SBS Collaboration Meeting October 18,
23 July, 2003Curtis A. Meyer1 Milestones and Manpower Curtis A. Meyer.
Jefferson Lab Status Hall A collaboration Dec. 16, 2013 R. D. McKeown Deputy Director For Science.
GlueX Collaboration Meeting February 2011 Jefferson Lab Our 30’th Collaboration Meeting.
Experiment HUGS 2011 – Jefferson Laboratory Hussein Al Ghoul Department Of Physics Florida State University ᵠ.
20 October, 2004GlueX Detector Review 1 The GlueX Detector Curtis A. Meyer This talk Next talk.
Hall A 12 GeV DVCS Status report December 16th 2013 Hall A collaboration meeting Alexandre Camsonne.
PAC23_12_GeV_Review_Intro 10/7/2015 9:57 AM10/7/2015 9:57 AM Why are We Here Today and What are We Trying to Accomplish? The entire community has worked.
Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility Page 1 IPR October 18-20, 2011 John J. LeRose Independent Project Review of 12 GeV Upgrade Jefferson Lab.
The GlueX Detector 5/29/091CIPANP The GlueX Detector -- David Lawrence (JLab) David Lawrence (JLab) Electron beam accelerator continuous-wave (1497MHz,
Generic Detector R&D for an Electron Ion Collider RHIC & AGS Annual Users Meeting T. Ludlam, June 2011.
Project Overview How to get here…. Half Way to the Test Run October 18, 2012HPS Project Overview2 …starting from here? John Jaros HPS Collaboration Meeting.
1 BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES NSLS-II Status & Charge to ASAC Steve Dierker Associate Laboratory Director for Light Sources, NSLS-II Project Director.
JLab preparations for upgrade, FY05 budget Elton Smith Hall D Collaboration Meeting May 20-22, 2004.
12 GeV Upgrade Project Status Allison Lung Hall C Users Meeting Jefferson Lab January 18, 2008.
Introduction to FACET & Test Facilities and charge to SAREC committee Vitaly Yakimenko June 25, 2013.
Global Design Effort Beam Delivery System => EDR LCWS07 June 2, 2007 at DESY Andrei Seryi for BDS Area leaders Deepa Angal-Kalinin, A.S., Hitoshi Yamamoto.
LIGO-G M Planning and Implementation Strategy for Advanced LIGO Gary Sanders LSC Meeting Hanford, August 14, 2001.
Global Design Effort - CFS TILC09 and GDE AAP Review Meeting - Tsukuba, Japan 1 GDE ACCELERATOR ADVISORY PANEL REVIEW CONVENTIONAL FACILITIES.
Comments from Physics Division Rolf Ent Associate Director for Experimental Nuclear Physics SOLID collaboration meeting, February 03, 2012 Thomas Jefferson.
Jefferson Lab Update R. D. McKeown Jefferson Lab HPS Meeting June 16, 2014.
End Station A Test Beam (ESTB) Carsten Hast and Mauro Pivi August 23 th 2012 Proposals, Procedures, Schedule.
Hall D Design Status GlueX Collaboration Meeting JLab, Ravi Anumagalla.
Hall D Design Status GlueX Collaboration Meeting JLab, December 11-13, 2003 Ravi Anumagalla.
Hall D Electronics Review (July 23-24) Elton Smith Hall D Collaboration Meeting August 4-6.
Understanding the Origin of the Nucleon Spin Andi Klein, Melynda Brooks, Pat McGaughey and Matt Stettler Research Goals: Use Deeply Virtual Compton Scattering.
Opening Remarks Alex Dzierba GlueX/Hall D Collaboration meeting - Jlab - Dec 11-13, 2003.
Welcome to Jefferson Lab R. D. McKeown Jefferson Lab Hypernuclear Workshop May 27, 2014.
1 Collaboration Meeting JLAB January 2008 Project Status Update E.C. Aschenauer.
Status Report on ILC Project in Japan Seiichi SHIMASAKI Director, Office for Particle and Nuclear Research Promotion June 19, 2015.
GlueX electronics Collaboration Meeting December, 2003 Paul Smith.
Collaboration Meeting Alex Dzierba Indiana U March 16-17, 2001 at JLab 1.Progress since our last meeting 2.NSAC Issues 3.Preparing the Conceptual Design.
10/25/2007GlueX Collaboration Meeting1 October 25-27, 2007 Jefferson Lab This is approximately our 20’th such meeting.
CMS Experiment at the LHC, CERN Date Recorded: :21 CET Run/Event: / Candidate Collision Event Report from Belgium Michael Tytgat.
Vina Punjabi Norfolk State University Hall A Collaboration Meeting June 10-11, 2010 GEp-V Experiment to Measure G Ep /G Mp.
FACET User Support Carsten Hast Accelerator Research Division Test Facilities Department
DoE Review June 6, 2000 Cost Estimate  New Cost Estimate u Manpower Costs (Op. SWF) u Equipment Costs (Eq. M&S) u Contingency  Conclusions Mike Tuts.
The 12 GeV Physics Program at Jefferson Lab R. D. McKeown Jefferson Lab College of William and Mary PTSP 2013 – Charlottesville, VA September 9, 2013.
1 BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES NSLS-II Strategic Planning John Hill Experimental Facilities Division Director NSLS-II EFAC May 5 th 2008.
Early Career Internal Review Upgrade and development for calorimetry for Deeply Virtual Compton Scattering Alexandre Camsonne VI. Nuclear Physics (NP)
1 Integration and Milestones Elton Smith Hall D Detector Review October 20-22, 2004.
Jefferson Lab’s Enabling Technologies: A Call for Strategic Planning W. OREN JLAB Engineering Division 9 February 2012.
Plan to go forward Peter Wilson SBN Program Coordinator 27 September 2014.
Hall D infrastructure and integration Elton Smith Hall D Collaboration Meeting September 9-11, 2004.
Detector for GlueX JLab PAC 23 Jan 20, 2003 Physics Beamline Hall D GlueX Detector Software Trigger Computing Environment PRL.
Charge and Overview: What are we trying to accomplish during this review L. Cardman.
Experiment Readiness Review P. Rossi – Hall C Coll. Meeting Jan 21, 2016.
Early Career Internal Review Measurement of Double DVCS using SuperBigBite Spectrometer Nuclear Physics Alexandre Camsonne.
Budget Status and FY04 Requests Elton Smith Hall D Collaboration Meeting Dec 11-13, 2003.
GlueX Collaboration May05 C. Cuevas 1 Topics: Infrastructure Update New Developments EECAD & Modeling Tools Flash ADC VXS – Crates GlueX Electronics Workshop.
Mike AlbrowSept 8 th 2005Test Beam for FP420 Vacuum Chambers/Detectors 1 Things we need to test (and why) How we could, together with BTeV people, detectors,
1 Jefferson Lab Organization – December 2009 Director Accelerator Science Advisory Comm. Nuclear Physics Program Adv. Comm. Photon Science Program Adv.
Jefferson Lab Overview
GlueX Electronics Review Jefferson Lab July 23-24, 2003
CLAS12 First Experiment Workshop Report
Samples of Hall B Results with Strong Italian Impact
Preparations for a Lehman Review
Status, Misc Elton Smith Feb 21, 2003.
Preparation of the CLAS12 First Experiment Status and Time-Line
X-Ray Endstations Update
Presentation transcript:

Budget Status and FY03 Requests Elton Smith Hall D Collaboration Meeting Sep 12-14, 2002

Topics Schedule for pCDR Budget proposal for FY03 GlueX upgrade budgets

Review of pCDR Sept. 1 - DRAFT1 pCDR Material Submitted  Hall Leaders and selected individuals review draft text and enhance/edit as appropriate, and the process for merging the draft documents from accelerator and the halls begins  The Physics Divisions Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) produces the “experiment/equipment overlap matrix,” a first look at how well we have "orthogonalized" the hall equipment.

Review of pCDR (cont.) Nov. 1 - DRAFT2 pCDR Ready for Distribution  “Nearly final” draft pCDR sent to PAC members and others invited for the January science review.  Updated “experiment/equipment overlap matrix” produced by the TAC, will also be given to PAC members and others invited for the January science review

Review pCDR (cont.) Week of Jan 13: PAC 23 Meets and conducts its normal business relative to ongoing experimental program. January 19 – 22: Special Workshop (tentatively at the Outer Banks) held the augmented PAC to carry out a review of the science plans and equipment “orthogonalization”.

Outline of Presentations on the Physics of the Upgrade to the augmented PAC Introduction by Cardman – why are we here and what do we hope to accomplish Review and Summary of the “White Paper Approved” Major Physics Thrusts developed with the input of PAC18. Speakers will be “appointed.” We solicit your suggestions for names of persons to give each of the following four presentations to the PAC  GlueX  High-x (summarizing experiments in all halls)  GPDs with emphasis on DVCS (summarizing experiments in all halls)  Summary of other initiatives (e.g. pion form factor, color transparency, duality, etc.) “Proposals” for changes in the structure of the executive summary of the pCDR. These presentations must motivate a research PROGRAM, not just an individual experiment. Presentation on the “experiment/equipment overlap matrix”

GlueX Budget Proposal for FY03 Cardman suggests that we develop a budget proposal assuming a timely approval of CD-0 and Alternate strategy if approvals are delayed

GlueX Budget Proposal for FY03 k$ Notes Civil Construction150 Solenoid473 Work at IUCF Detector Tracking CDC40 Tracking FDC30 Start Counter20 Barrel Calorimeter80 Cerenkov Counter40 Forward Calorimeter135 Time-of-Flight Wall20 Computing80 DAQ25 Electronics200 Includes robotics facility Photon Tagger80 Glasgow postdoc hired Jlab designer65 Ravi Anumagalla hired PWA Center224 New Request Total1662

Work Breakdown Structure 1.5Hall D 1.5.1Solenoid Shipping Hardware Assembly Labor Erection, rigging (labor) 1.5.2Detectors Tracking Forward chambers Central chambers Start counter Calorimetry Barrel calorimeter Forward calorimeter Particle ID Time-of-flight Cerenkov counter

Work Breakdown Structure (cont.) 1.5.3Computing DAQ Online computing Offline (CC Budget) Slow Controls 1.5.4Electronics FADC TDC Trigger Crates, racks HV 1.5.5Beamline Tagger Target Beamline components Collimator 1.5.6Infrastructure Assembly Installation

Work Breakdown Structure (cont.) 1.6Civil 1.6.3Hall D Tunnel, Buildings Utilities Crane Access Control Fire Protection Mech, LCW, HVAC Electrical Contracting Overhead

Hall D Technical Year SystemMan-yr Lead Engineer Proj Man7 Lead Designer Tracking6 Lead technician Install6 Designer Tagger5 Mechanical technician PID17 Electrical Designer TDC12 Electrical technician FADC17 Computer Professional (hardware) Online9 Total

Hall D Physicists Year SystemMan-yr Group Leader Proj Man7 Coordinator (Computing/DAQ) Proj Man7 DAQ Online Offline Level 3 Farm 1111Online4 Slow Controls Coordinator (Detector/Electr) Proj Man7 Tracking Calorimetry 1111Calor4 PID Electronics 11111trig5 Beamline/tagger Beamline6 Total351013

Jlab budget requirements FY03 k$ Notes Civil Construction150 CD0 required Solenoid~200 Coordination with IUCF Detector Tracking FDC20 Support to detector group Computing40 DAQ/trigger15Crate communication Electronics15 Support for electronic prototypes Jlab designer65 Ravi Anumagalla hired PWA Center- Lab support for PWA work

Impact of Near-term Constant-effort Budgets Fiscal years Constant-effort budget continues thru FY03 * 10 CD-0 CD-1CD-4CD-2CD-3 Orig. schedule Constant-effort budget in FY02 * & O * Assumes increases beyond constant-effort in subsequent years.

VERY Tentative charge to the augmented PAC workshop Comment on the intellectual framework presented for the 12 GeV pCDR. Is this the best way to present the science case to DOE and the larger nuclear physics community? Are there flaws or omissions in the framework? Review the new research programs that are under consideration for being highlighted in the executive summary of the pCDR. Do they represent compelling science that must be done to advance our understanding of nuclear physics? At what level should they be included in the executive summary? Have we omitted any key science initiatives that could be supported by a 12 GeV electron beam? Is the experimental equipment proposed well matched to the key physics experiments motivating the upgrade? In cases where an experiment or program is proposed for more than one set of equipment, are the differences in capability and physics reach of the equipment essential for getting all the physics, important for getting as much physics as possible, or simply useful in that, for example, an experiment could be done somewhat faster with one hall equipment compared to another? (note the exact wording of this part of the charge will be refined)

Jlab R&D Budgets FY02 JunNovFebNotes Civil Construction0500 Solenoid0300 Dismantling and shipping Detector Tracking CDC120200Spending FY01 Tracking FDC0300Detector group Start Counter41400Spending FY01 Barrel Calorimeter Cerenkov Counter Forward Calorimeter55400 Time-of-Flight Wall2000 Computing160800latest request Electronics Draft MOU Photon Tagger04580Add 35K for Glasgow postdoc Assembly postdoc LQCD000Memo to Cardman, Gross Jlab designer000Request for 65k Total