1. Opening Remarks Alex Dzierba GlueX/Hall D Collaboration meeting - Jlab - Dec 11-13, 2003

2. Welcome Prof. Hara Pertidou U of Thessaloniki - Greece Prof. Jim Pinfold U of Alberta - Canada Prof. Marco Reyes U of Guanajuato - Mexico.. And other visitors and thanks to our JLab hosts

3. Good News

4. 20-yr Plan

5. From Congress

6. Senate

7. Reviews Electronics - July 2003 Calorimetry & Tracking Software Theory? Lehman review (~ 1 yr)

8. Software Issues PWA and phenomenology  NSF PWA center - GlueX/CLEO-c  Other proposals Simulations/Reconstruction  Ed Brash/Richard Jones/Maciej Swat  Lehman review preps GRID  Coordinate with Lab  G. Fox DAQ  Coordinate with Lab/Tim Smith?

9. System Requirements

10. Funding Coordinated NSF/DOE supplementals CDRF and ISTC - US/Russia Joint Canada/Mexico/US Requests for R&D to JLab Theory requests Computer science

11. Collaboration Commitment Nature of MOU’s  Physicists  Technical Staff  Other experiments Adding/Removing Collaborators  Guidelines  Implementation

12. Equipment that Could be Completed Magnet  End-plate holes?  Energize at IUCF? LGD  Evaluate glass/pm’s  Frame, wall, monitor  Electronics

13. Projects that could be completed soon Development of amplitude parameterization  isobar model  Deck effect  unitarity, analyticity,  particular attention to incident photons

14. Equipment Issues Tracking  Design & manpower?  Vertex region Calorimetry  Barrel readout  Prototypes  Upstream Particle I.D.  Re-visit Cerenkov  TOF - OK  Magnetic issue  Forward/Cal - TOF - Cerenkov package

15. Infrastructure Building  Can we go to architect? Beam  Beam line design  Tagger design  Tagger magnet  Coherent multiple scattering? Subsystem Integration  Use BarBar as paradigm

16. Schedule Current schedule is painfully slow Build the Hall and beamline before upgrade Investigate physics at lower energy Stage equipment installation

17. Analysis/Phenomenology Amplitude Analysis  Understand ambiguities  Improve algorithms/throughput  Analysis of extant data Phenomenology  Critique of isobar model  Model for backgrounds  Understand ‘theory’ systematic errors

18. Conclusions There’s a lot to do Let’s get busy