Linking Data with Action Part 1: Seven Steps of Using Information for Decision Making.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Violence Against Women and Girls A Compendium of Monitoring and Evaluation Indicators.
Advertisements

February Dakar, Senegal
Rwanda Case Study Additional Slides on Stakeholder Involvement.
GENERATING DEMAND FOR DATA Module 1. Session Objectives  Understand the importance of improving data-informed decision making  Understand the role of.
Begin with the End in Mind
Module 4: Data presentation & interpretation. Module 4: Learning objectives  Understand different ways to best summarize data  Choose the right table/graph.
C OMMUNICATING F INDINGS & L INKING D ATA WITH A CTION Module 5.
LINKING DATA TO ACTION Session 6. Session Objectives By the end of this session, you will be able to:  Identify priority decisions and programmatic questions.
DETERMINANTS OF DATA USE Session 2. Session Objectives  Explain the data-use conceptual framework  Highlight the determinants of data use  List potential.
Module 6: Making data- informed decisions. Module 6: Learning objectives  Review role of M&E in program improvement  Identify priority decisions and.
Communicating and Applying Research Results Session 3.
Module 3: Data presentation & interpretation. Module 3: Learning Objectives  Understand different ways to best summarize data  Choose the right table/graph.
Context of Decision Making
UNDERSTANDING DATA AND INFORMATION FLOW Session 4.
M&E Framework for Programmes for Most-at-Risk Populations
Review of key themes. Module 1: Data demand & use key concepts  Data are needed to improve the delivery of services  Providers play a critical role.
Increasing district level evidence-based decision making in Côte d’Ivoire Tara Nutley MEASURE Evaluation / Futures Group Mini University, Washington DC.
Program Collaboration and Service Integration: An NCHHSTP Green paper Kevin Fenton, M.D., Ph.D., F.F.P.H. Director National Center for HIV/AIDS, Viral.
Technical Approach to and Experiences from Strengthening National Monitoring and Evaluation System for Most Vulnerable Children Program in Tanzania Prisca.
Business as Unusual: Changing the Approach to Monitoring OVC Programs Karen G. Fleischman Foreit, PhD Futures Group/MEASURE Evaluation.
Case management versus M&E in the context of OVC programs: What have we learned? Jenifer Chapman, PhD Futures Group/MEASURE Evaluation.
Historical Mapping of HIV Programmes 1985 – 2012 in Malawi Presented at the 20 TH INTERNATIONAL AIDS CONFERENCE, MELBOURNE, AUSTRALIA 24 th July 2014 By.
Global Monitoring & Evaluation of HIV Prevention Among Most-at-Risk Populations: Update on existing guidance Priscilla Akwara, PhD Senior Advisor, Statistics.
Bridging the Research-to-Practice Gap Session 1. Session Objectives  Understand the importance of improving data- informed decision making  Understand.
Data Triangulation. Objectives:  At the end of the session, participants will be able to:  Describe the role of data triangulation in program evaluation.
PLACE Method Priorities for Local AIDS Control Efforts 1 1 MEASURE Evaluation, A Manual for implementing the PLACE Method.
Consultant Advance Research Team. Outline UNDERSTANDING M&E DATA NEEDS PEOPLE, PARTNERSHIP AND PLANNING 1.Organizational structures with HIV M&E functions.
Linking Data with Action Part 2: Understanding Data Discrepancies.
Day 6: Supervisors’ Training This presentation has been supported by the U.S President’s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR) through the U.S. Agency.
Using Data for Decision Making. Learning Objectives By the end of the session, participants will be able to: 1. Raise awareness of the importance of using.
WHY IS THIS HAPPENING IN THE PROGRAM? Session 5 Options for Further Investigation & Information Flow.
Violence Against Women and Girls A Compendium of Monitoring and Evaluation Indicators By Shelah S. Bloom Presented by: Anupa Deshpande.
Unmet Need Exercise  Review the trends in CPR. What do you conclude about the performance of the FP program in each country?  Review trends in unmet.
Day 4: Field Practicum This presentation has been supported by the U.S President’s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR) through the U.S. Agency for.
Developing Program Indicators Measuring Results MEASURE Evaluation.
MEASURE Evaluation Data Quality Assurance Workshop Session 3 Introduction to Routine Data Quality Assessment.
PLANNING FOR QUALITATIVE DATA COLLECTION Day 2 - Session 4.
Developing a Monitoring & Evaluation Plan MEASURE Evaluation.
MEASURE EVALUATION Session: 7 Developing Action Plans Based on Results Data Quality Assurance Workshop.
MER Essential Survey Indicators Jenifer Chapman, PhD & Lisa Parker, PhD February 2, 2015.
Data Use for Gender-Aware Health Programming Welcome and Introductions.
Data Demand & Use: Information Use Map Webinar Series #2 Tuesday, January 24, 2012 Presenters: Eric Geers and Tara Nutley.
Monitoring & Evaluation Capacity Strengthening Workshop WORKSHOP INTRODUCTION AND OVERVIEW.
Integration of Community Based Services It seems like a good idea, but how to make it work? Molly Cannon Palladium/MEASURE Evaluation September 28, 2015.
Data Quality Assurance Workshop
Introduction MODULE 2: Indicators and Data Collection and Reporting
Introduction ROUTINE HEALTH INFORMATION SYSTEMS MODULE 5:
Data Quality Assurance
Session: 5 Using the RDQA tool for System Assessment
Introduction MODULE 6: RHIS Data Demand and Use
Right-sized Evaluation
Fundamentals of Monitoring and Evaluation
Training of Trainers on the OVC Household Vulnerability Prioritization Tool.
MEASURE Evaluation Using a Primary Health Care Lens Gabriela Escudero
Presenting an Information Needs Framework for PEPFAR OVC Programs
Overview of the RHIS Rapid Assessment Tool
Use of Community Health Data for Shared Accountability
What don’t we know? Often M&E data are reviewed, but questions still remain to truly understand why a program is not meeting it objectives. In this group.
Assessment Training Session 9: Assessment Analysis
Training Content and Orientation
Introduction to Health Informatics:
Introduction to the PRISM Framework
Session: 6 Understanding & Using the RDQA Tool Output
Introduction MODULE 7: RHIS Governance and Management of Resources
Data and Interoperability:
Use of Information for Decision Making
Measuring Data Quality
Introduction to Health Informatics
Process Improvement, System Design, and Usability Evaluation
TRACE INITIATIVE: Data Use
Presentation transcript:

Linking Data with Action Part 1: Seven Steps of Using Information for Decision Making

Session 4: Learning Objectives  Understand the 7 step approach to using data in decision making  Apply management and leadership practices to the 7 steps approach  Practice using the 7 steps  Create a management plan to apply the 7 steps to a program or policy question  Understand how to deal with data discrepancies

Session Overview  7 Steps of using data in decision making  Leadership and the 7 steps  Small group activity 1 – case example  Applying the Framework for Linking Data with Action  Small group activity 2 –Framework  Dealing with data discrepancies in your work

Why Use the 7 Step Approach  Provides concrete steps to data-informed decision making  Encourages more strategic and effective use of data  Ensures involvement of data users & producers

Seven Steps Approach  1 - Identify questions of interest  2 - Prioritize key questions of interest  3 - Identify data needs and potential sources

Seven Steps Approach  4 - Transform data into information  5 - Interpret information and draw conclusions  6 - Craft solutions and take action  7 - Continue to monitor key indicators

Applications of 7 Steps  New data is released that has programmatic relevance  Have an up coming decision that needs to be made or you have a specific question about your programs and/or populations

Step 1 – Identify questions No need to go fishing….instead answer question that respond to true needs and priorities

Example – Starting with the data  DHS 2010 – preliminary report

Knowledge of HIV prevention Percentage of women and men age who, in response to prompted questions, say that people can reduce the risk of getting the AIDS virus by :

Women - Multiple sex partners & use of condoms Among all women age 15-49Among women who had 2+ partners in the past 12 months Percentage who had less than 2 partners in the past 12 months Percentage who reported NOT using a condom during last sexual intercourse

Men - Multiple sex partners & use of condoms Among all men age 15-49Among men who had 2+ partners in the past 12 months Percentage who had less than 2 partners in the past month Percentage who reported NOT using a condom during last sexual intercourse

The findings  About 10% of men & women did not using condoms can reduce the risk of HIV  85% women, 79% men knew that limiting sex to 1 uninfected partner can reduce the risk HIV  79% women, 74% men knew that using condoms and limiting sex to 1 uninfected partner can reduce the risk of HIV  Of the 4.2% of men with >2 partners, 25% didn’t use condoms at last sex  Of the 0.6% of women with >2 partners, 28.9% didn’t use condoms at last sex

Step 1 – Identify questions of interest XXXX XXXx x Is action required?

Step 1 – Identify Questions  What is the size problem?  What populations are affected?  How is it affecting HIV prevalence in those populations?

Step 2 – Prioritize Questions  Programmatic relevance  Answerable  Actionable  Timeliness

Step 3 – Identify Data Needs & Sources QuestionsData needs & sources What populations are affected (men & partners)? What is the prevalence in these populations? Engage data producers, start with data that already exist, consider the quality of the data

Step 4 – Transform Data Into Information  Isolate required indicators and/or data elements  Analyze the data and calculate the indicator  Depict data as a visual image (graph, chart, table)

Step 5 – Interpret Information and Draw Conclusions  Convene group of data users & producers  Review graphs, tables, and information  Discuss the meaning of these analyses for organizations, programs and facilities

Interpreting data

 Adding meaning to information by making connections and comparisons and exploring causes and consequences Relevance of finding Reasons for finding Consider other data Conduct further research

Interpretation – relevance of finding  Adding meaning to information by making connections and comparisons and exploring causes and consequences Relevance of finding Reasons for finding Consider other data Conduct further research

Interpretation – relevance of finding  Is there anything that surprises you in the data?  Are there any highs and lows in the data?  How does the indicator compare to other time periods, other facilities?  How does the indicator compare to the target/ideal?  How far from the target/ideal is it?

Relevance of finding Reasons for finding Consider other data Conduct further research Interpretation – possible causes? Supplement with expert opinion Others with knowledge of the program or target population

Relevance of finding Reasons for finding Consider other data Conduct further research Interpretation – consider other data Use existing data to clarify questions RHIS, DHS, surveys, census, surveillance, etc. calculate nurse-to-client ratio, review commodities data against client load, etc.

Interpretation – conduct further research  Data gap conduct further research  Methodology depends on questions being asked and resources available Relevance of finding Reasons for finding Consider other data Conduct further research

The findings  About 10% of men & women did not using condoms can reduce the risk of HIV  85% women, 79% men knew that limiting sex to 1 uninfected partner can reduce the risk HIV  79% women, 74% men knew that using condoms and limiting sex to 1 uninfected partner can reduce the risk of HIV  Of the 4.2% of men with >2 partners, 25% didn’t use condoms at last sex  Of the 0.6% of women with >2 partners, 28.9% didn’t use condoms at last sex

Step 6 – Craft Solutions and Take Action  Engage variety of stakeholders to craft solutions  Discuss conclusions from interpretation  Brainstorm potential solutions  Further specify, craft and prioritize these solutions  Develop an action plan

Step 7 – Continue to Monitor Key Indicators  Monitor implementation of action plan  Consider frequency and duration of monitoring  Develop tool for monitoring

Seven Steps Approach  1 - Identify questions of interest  2 - Prioritize key questions of interest  3 - Identify data needs and potential sources  4 - Transform data into information  5 - Interpret information and draw conclusions  6 - Craft solutions and take action  7 - Continue to monitor key indicators

Group Exercise  Which province does your team recommend DANIDA support with additional funds?  Why was this province selected (refer to available data )?  What activities do you recommend to improve services for FCSWs?  What are at least 2 indicators to monitor performance?

Building Data Use into Your Work  PLAN PLAN PLAN !  Engage in dialogue with stakeholders to fully understand the:  decisions they make  information they need  best way to present that information

Building Data Use into Your Work Implement organizational supports:  Regularly scheduled meetings  Appoint a committee or champion  Revise job descriptions  Develop policies or guidance

Building Data Use into Your Work Use & institutionalize DDU tools & approaches  Stakeholder Engagement, Information Use Map, Priority Questions Scoring Worksheet, and the 7 Steps to Use Information to Improve Programs.  Framework for Linking Data with Action

Framework for Linking Data with Action  Creates a time-bound plan for data-informed decision making  Encourages greater use of existing information  Monitors the use of information in decision making  Functions as a management tool

Framework for Linking Data with Action Program/ Policy Question Data Source Indicator/ Data Timeline (Analysis) (Decision) Decision Maker, Other Stakehol ders Decision / Action Commu- nication Channel What pop.’s are affected (men & partners)? What is the prevalence of HIV in these pop.’s?

Framework for Linking Data with Action Program/ Policy Question Data Source Indicator/ Data Timeline (Analysis) (Decision) Decision Maker, Other Stakehol ders Decision / Action Commu- nication Channel What is the size and scope of high risk behaviors (2+ partners & condom use) M&W DHS BSS National HMIS

38 What is the problem? What are the contributing factors? What interventions and resources are needed? What interventions can work (efficacy & effectiveness)? Are we implementing the program as planned? What are we doing? Are we doing it right? Are interventions working/making a difference? Are collective efforts being implemented on a large enough scale to impact the epidemic? Understanding Potential Responses Monitoring & Evaluating National Programs Determining Collective Effectiveness A Public Health Questions Approach (Rugg D, et al. Global advances in HIV /AIDS monitoring and evaluation. New Directions for Evaluation 103, 2004) Are we doing the right things? Are we doing them right? Are we doing them on a large enough scale? Problem Identification

This research has been supported by the President’s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR) through the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) under the terms of MEASURE Evaluation cooperative agreement GHA-A which is implemented by the Carolina Population Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill with Futures Group, ICF International, John Snow, Inc., Management Sciences for Health, and Tulane University. Views expressed are not necessarily those of PEPFAR, USAID, or the United States government.